Bioarchaeology in Central Asia: Growing from Legacies to Enhance Future Research

In this article, we review the historical trajectory of bioarchaeology in Central Asia to draw attention to the importance of previous archaeological and biological anthropology research that pioneered large-scale systematic excavation and use of technology such as aerial photography. We also highli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian perspectives (Honolulu) 2022, Vol.61 (2), p.337-367
Hauptverfasser: Bullion, Elissa A, Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz, Ventresca Miller, Alicia R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 367
container_issue 2
container_start_page 337
container_title Asian perspectives (Honolulu)
container_volume 61
creator Bullion, Elissa A
Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz
Ventresca Miller, Alicia R
description In this article, we review the historical trajectory of bioarchaeology in Central Asia to draw attention to the importance of previous archaeological and biological anthropology research that pioneered large-scale systematic excavation and use of technology such as aerial photography. We also highlight the political and social biases of past work and how its legacy continues to shape modern practices. Our goal is to bring these dynamics to the attention of western scholars who are increasingly focusing on Central Asian samples for research. Political ideologies, especially during the Soviet period, shaped the study of populations in Central Asia, including centering ethnogenesis as an enduring focus. Current research requires careful work by scholars to contextualize human remains within social and theoretical models of the past that continue to shape everything from access to collections to the organization ofdepartments. Advances in molecular methods have led to an increase in studies of human remains, often focusing on pan-regional social, dietary, and genetic changes. However, these studies often have small sample sizes and are thinly distributed across the vast expanse of Central Asia. We suggest that researchers conducting bioarchaeological research should concentrate on the documentation of biological and material culture at the micro-regional scale to build up models of broader social processes from the bottom-up. Finally, ethical bioarchaeology in the region requires that the contributions of Central Asian scholars past and present be acknowledged and centered, and that training, research, and publication opportunities be provided for Central Asian scholars and communities. Keywords: bioarchaeology, biological anthropology, ancient DNA, isotope analysis, migration, Central Asia.
doi_str_mv 10.1353/asi.2022.0029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2738610505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2738610505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a516df63627a688285555e716468e00b19618e97c88e15e7a6a7486a382030703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtH7wHPWyfJ5qPeammrUFD8OIe4zrYp7aYmu0j_vVkqOpf3MC_PDA8h1wxGTEhx65IfceB8BMDHJ2TApJCF4UackgGAUoUphTwnFyltAIApwQfk-d4HF6u1w7ANqwP1DZ1i00a3pZPk3R1dxPDtmxWtY9jRJa5c5THRNtBZs3ZNhXTetV1E-oIJe9AlOavdNuHVbw7J-3z2Nn0olk-Lx-lkWVSCQVs4ydRnrYTi2imTn5R5UDNVKoMAH2ysmMGxroxBlhdOOV0a5YThIECDGJKbI3cfw1eHqbWb0MUmn7RcC6MYSJC5VRxbVQwpRaztPvqdiwfLwPbSbJZme2m2l5b75R91g1W76xL-g41mQmv72ovtvXLOs0glxQ9ljm0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2738610505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioarchaeology in Central Asia: Growing from Legacies to Enhance Future Research</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bullion, Elissa A ; Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz ; Ventresca Miller, Alicia R</creator><creatorcontrib>Bullion, Elissa A ; Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz ; Ventresca Miller, Alicia R</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we review the historical trajectory of bioarchaeology in Central Asia to draw attention to the importance of previous archaeological and biological anthropology research that pioneered large-scale systematic excavation and use of technology such as aerial photography. We also highlight the political and social biases of past work and how its legacy continues to shape modern practices. Our goal is to bring these dynamics to the attention of western scholars who are increasingly focusing on Central Asian samples for research. Political ideologies, especially during the Soviet period, shaped the study of populations in Central Asia, including centering ethnogenesis as an enduring focus. Current research requires careful work by scholars to contextualize human remains within social and theoretical models of the past that continue to shape everything from access to collections to the organization ofdepartments. Advances in molecular methods have led to an increase in studies of human remains, often focusing on pan-regional social, dietary, and genetic changes. However, these studies often have small sample sizes and are thinly distributed across the vast expanse of Central Asia. We suggest that researchers conducting bioarchaeological research should concentrate on the documentation of biological and material culture at the micro-regional scale to build up models of broader social processes from the bottom-up. Finally, ethical bioarchaeology in the region requires that the contributions of Central Asian scholars past and present be acknowledged and centered, and that training, research, and publication opportunities be provided for Central Asian scholars and communities. Keywords: bioarchaeology, biological anthropology, ancient DNA, isotope analysis, migration, Central Asia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-8435</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1535-8283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-8283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/asi.2022.0029</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press</publisher><subject>Aerial photography ; Anthropology ; Archaeology ; Attention ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Ethics ; Ethnogenesis ; Excavation ; Human remains ; Material culture ; Photography ; Physical anthropology ; Political ideologies ; Social processes ; Technology</subject><ispartof>Asian perspectives (Honolulu), 2022, Vol.61 (2), p.337-367</ispartof><rights>Copyright © University of Hawai'i Press.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Hawaii Press 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a516df63627a688285555e716468e00b19618e97c88e15e7a6a7486a382030703</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,4025,27927,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bullion, Elissa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ventresca Miller, Alicia R</creatorcontrib><title>Bioarchaeology in Central Asia: Growing from Legacies to Enhance Future Research</title><title>Asian perspectives (Honolulu)</title><description>In this article, we review the historical trajectory of bioarchaeology in Central Asia to draw attention to the importance of previous archaeological and biological anthropology research that pioneered large-scale systematic excavation and use of technology such as aerial photography. We also highlight the political and social biases of past work and how its legacy continues to shape modern practices. Our goal is to bring these dynamics to the attention of western scholars who are increasingly focusing on Central Asian samples for research. Political ideologies, especially during the Soviet period, shaped the study of populations in Central Asia, including centering ethnogenesis as an enduring focus. Current research requires careful work by scholars to contextualize human remains within social and theoretical models of the past that continue to shape everything from access to collections to the organization ofdepartments. Advances in molecular methods have led to an increase in studies of human remains, often focusing on pan-regional social, dietary, and genetic changes. However, these studies often have small sample sizes and are thinly distributed across the vast expanse of Central Asia. We suggest that researchers conducting bioarchaeological research should concentrate on the documentation of biological and material culture at the micro-regional scale to build up models of broader social processes from the bottom-up. Finally, ethical bioarchaeology in the region requires that the contributions of Central Asian scholars past and present be acknowledged and centered, and that training, research, and publication opportunities be provided for Central Asian scholars and communities. Keywords: bioarchaeology, biological anthropology, ancient DNA, isotope analysis, migration, Central Asia.</description><subject>Aerial photography</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethnogenesis</subject><subject>Excavation</subject><subject>Human remains</subject><subject>Material culture</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Physical anthropology</subject><subject>Political ideologies</subject><subject>Social processes</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0066-8435</issn><issn>1535-8283</issn><issn>1535-8283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtH7wHPWyfJ5qPeammrUFD8OIe4zrYp7aYmu0j_vVkqOpf3MC_PDA8h1wxGTEhx65IfceB8BMDHJ2TApJCF4UackgGAUoUphTwnFyltAIApwQfk-d4HF6u1w7ANqwP1DZ1i00a3pZPk3R1dxPDtmxWtY9jRJa5c5THRNtBZs3ZNhXTetV1E-oIJe9AlOavdNuHVbw7J-3z2Nn0olk-Lx-lkWVSCQVs4ydRnrYTi2imTn5R5UDNVKoMAH2ysmMGxroxBlhdOOV0a5YThIECDGJKbI3cfw1eHqbWb0MUmn7RcC6MYSJC5VRxbVQwpRaztPvqdiwfLwPbSbJZme2m2l5b75R91g1W76xL-g41mQmv72ovtvXLOs0glxQ9ljm0A</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Bullion, Elissa A</creator><creator>Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz</creator><creator>Ventresca Miller, Alicia R</creator><general>University of Hawai'i Press</general><general>University of Hawaii Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Bioarchaeology in Central Asia: Growing from Legacies to Enhance Future Research</title><author>Bullion, Elissa A ; Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz ; Ventresca Miller, Alicia R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-a516df63627a688285555e716468e00b19618e97c88e15e7a6a7486a382030703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aerial photography</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethnogenesis</topic><topic>Excavation</topic><topic>Human remains</topic><topic>Material culture</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Physical anthropology</topic><topic>Political ideologies</topic><topic>Social processes</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bullion, Elissa A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ventresca Miller, Alicia R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Asian perspectives (Honolulu)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bullion, Elissa A</au><au>Tashmanbetova, Zhuldyz</au><au>Ventresca Miller, Alicia R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioarchaeology in Central Asia: Growing from Legacies to Enhance Future Research</atitle><jtitle>Asian perspectives (Honolulu)</jtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>337-367</pages><issn>0066-8435</issn><issn>1535-8283</issn><eissn>1535-8283</eissn><abstract>In this article, we review the historical trajectory of bioarchaeology in Central Asia to draw attention to the importance of previous archaeological and biological anthropology research that pioneered large-scale systematic excavation and use of technology such as aerial photography. We also highlight the political and social biases of past work and how its legacy continues to shape modern practices. Our goal is to bring these dynamics to the attention of western scholars who are increasingly focusing on Central Asian samples for research. Political ideologies, especially during the Soviet period, shaped the study of populations in Central Asia, including centering ethnogenesis as an enduring focus. Current research requires careful work by scholars to contextualize human remains within social and theoretical models of the past that continue to shape everything from access to collections to the organization ofdepartments. Advances in molecular methods have led to an increase in studies of human remains, often focusing on pan-regional social, dietary, and genetic changes. However, these studies often have small sample sizes and are thinly distributed across the vast expanse of Central Asia. We suggest that researchers conducting bioarchaeological research should concentrate on the documentation of biological and material culture at the micro-regional scale to build up models of broader social processes from the bottom-up. Finally, ethical bioarchaeology in the region requires that the contributions of Central Asian scholars past and present be acknowledged and centered, and that training, research, and publication opportunities be provided for Central Asian scholars and communities. Keywords: bioarchaeology, biological anthropology, ancient DNA, isotope analysis, migration, Central Asia.</abstract><cop>Honolulu</cop><pub>University of Hawai'i Press</pub><doi>10.1353/asi.2022.0029</doi><tpages>31</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0066-8435
ispartof Asian perspectives (Honolulu), 2022, Vol.61 (2), p.337-367
issn 0066-8435
1535-8283
1535-8283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2738610505
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aerial photography
Anthropology
Archaeology
Attention
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Ethics
Ethnogenesis
Excavation
Human remains
Material culture
Photography
Physical anthropology
Political ideologies
Social processes
Technology
title Bioarchaeology in Central Asia: Growing from Legacies to Enhance Future Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A54%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioarchaeology%20in%20Central%20Asia:%20Growing%20from%20Legacies%20to%20Enhance%20Future%20Research&rft.jtitle=Asian%20perspectives%20(Honolulu)&rft.au=Bullion,%20Elissa%20A&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=337-367&rft.issn=0066-8435&rft.eissn=1535-8283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/asi.2022.0029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2738610505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2738610505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true