Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology,20(2), 267-290.ISSN:1696-2095. 2022. no. 57267Promoting pedagogy students's scientific skills through critical thinking program

Introduction.Critical thinking is a highly-valued skill in higher education, even though there are fewstudies that demonstrate its effectiveness on scientific skills of pedagogy stu-dents. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of a critical thinking program (PENCRIT-RC) on inquiry and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista electrónica de investigación psicoeducativa y psicopedagógica 2022-09, Vol.20 (57), p.267
Hauptverfasser: Cornejo, Carlos Ossa, Luengo, Maritza Palma, Mujica, Alejandro Díaz, Rovira, Darío Páez
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction.Critical thinking is a highly-valued skill in higher education, even though there are fewstudies that demonstrate its effectiveness on scientific skills of pedagogy stu-dents. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of a critical thinking program (PENCRIT-RC) on inquiry and probabilistic reasoning skillsin pedagogy students. Method.The method was based on a quasi-experimental design, with a control group and pre-and post-test application. The participants were 95 students of science and mathematics pedagogy from two Chilean universities. The instruments used were an inquiry scale adapted from a critical thinking test, and a scale of probabilistic reasoning adapted from the Lawson classroom test. Descriptive and bivariated analisys (ancova) was applied to calculate data. Results.The results showed a statistically significant difference in both variables for the ex-perimental group, with a large effect in the inquiry variable, and a moderate effect in the probabilistic reasoning variable.Discussion and Conclusion.It is concluded that the program is effective for the develop-ment of inquiry skills in participants, but probabilistic reasoning skills require more work in professional training.
ISSN:1699-5880
1696-2095