Automation and the Workforce: A Firm-Level View from the 2019 Annual Business Survey

This paper describes the adoption of automation technologies by US firms across all economic sectors by leveraging a new module introduced in the 2019 Annual Business Survey, conducted by the US Census Bureau in partnership with the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NBER Working Paper Series 2022-11
Hauptverfasser: Dinlersoz, Emin, Restrepo, Pascual, Anderson, Gary W, Goldschlag, Nathan, Beede, David N, Zolas, Nikolas, Foster, Lucia S, Kroff, Zachary, Childress, Eric E, Haltiwanger, John C, Acemoglu, Daron, Buffington, Cathy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title NBER Working Paper Series
container_volume
creator Dinlersoz, Emin
Restrepo, Pascual
Anderson, Gary W
Goldschlag, Nathan
Beede, David N
Zolas, Nikolas
Foster, Lucia S
Kroff, Zachary
Childress, Eric E
Haltiwanger, John C
Acemoglu, Daron
Buffington, Cathy
description This paper describes the adoption of automation technologies by US firms across all economic sectors by leveraging a new module introduced in the 2019 Annual Business Survey, conducted by the US Census Bureau in partnership with the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). The module collects data from over 300,000 firms on the use of five advanced technologies: AI, robotics, dedicated equipment, specialized software, and cloud computing. The adoption of these technologies remains low (especially for AI and robotics), varies substantially across industries, and concentrates on large and young firms. However, because larger firms are much more likely to adopt them, 12-64% of US workers and 22-72% of manufacturing workers are exposed to these technologies. Firms report a variety of motivations for adoption, including automating tasks previously performed by labor. Consistent with the use of these technologies for automation, adopters have higher labor productivity and lower labor shares. In particular, the use of these technologies is associated with a 11.4% higher labor productivity, which accounts for 20-30% of the difference in labor productivity between large firms and the median firm in an industry. Adopters report that these technologies raised skill requirements and led to greater demand for skilled labor but brought limited or ambiguous effects to their employment levels.
doi_str_mv 10.3386/w30659
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_nber_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2738196614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><nber_id>w30659</nber_id><sourcerecordid>2738196614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c844-e53a26a7180d28c8b8b1af51bd601ec15fa628ec2948325618374ea9ecc6de553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0L1OwzAUBWAPIFEKPACTJeaAf2Lnmi1UtCBVYqCCMXKcG5HS2MVOWvXtqSjTWT6dIx1Cbji7lxL0w14yrcwZmTAwkAkjiwtymdKaMQHA-ISsynEIvR264Kn1DR2-kH6G-N2G6PCRlnTexT5b4g439KPDPW1j6P-UYNzQ0vvRbujTmDqPKdH3Me7wcEXOW7tJeP2fU7KaP69mL9nybfE6K5eZgzzPUEkrtC04sEaAgxpqblvF60Yzjo6r1moB6ITJQQqlOcgiR2vQOd2gUnJK7k612xh-RkxDtQ5j9MfFShQSuNGa50d1e1K-xlhtY9fbeKhOx8hfmW5Vfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2738196614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automation and the Workforce: A Firm-Level View from the 2019 Annual Business Survey</title><source>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dinlersoz, Emin ; Restrepo, Pascual ; Anderson, Gary W ; Goldschlag, Nathan ; Beede, David N ; Zolas, Nikolas ; Foster, Lucia S ; Kroff, Zachary ; Childress, Eric E ; Haltiwanger, John C ; Acemoglu, Daron ; Buffington, Cathy</creator><creatorcontrib>Dinlersoz, Emin ; Restrepo, Pascual ; Anderson, Gary W ; Goldschlag, Nathan ; Beede, David N ; Zolas, Nikolas ; Foster, Lucia S ; Kroff, Zachary ; Childress, Eric E ; Haltiwanger, John C ; Acemoglu, Daron ; Buffington, Cathy</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes the adoption of automation technologies by US firms across all economic sectors by leveraging a new module introduced in the 2019 Annual Business Survey, conducted by the US Census Bureau in partnership with the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). The module collects data from over 300,000 firms on the use of five advanced technologies: AI, robotics, dedicated equipment, specialized software, and cloud computing. The adoption of these technologies remains low (especially for AI and robotics), varies substantially across industries, and concentrates on large and young firms. However, because larger firms are much more likely to adopt them, 12-64% of US workers and 22-72% of manufacturing workers are exposed to these technologies. Firms report a variety of motivations for adoption, including automating tasks previously performed by labor. Consistent with the use of these technologies for automation, adopters have higher labor productivity and lower labor shares. In particular, the use of these technologies is associated with a 11.4% higher labor productivity, which accounts for 20-30% of the difference in labor productivity between large firms and the median firm in an industry. Adopters report that these technologies raised skill requirements and led to greater demand for skilled labor but brought limited or ambiguous effects to their employment levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2937</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3386/w30659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research</publisher><subject>Automation ; Economic Fluctuations and Growth ; Economic theory ; Labor productivity ; Labor Studies ; Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship ; Robotics</subject><ispartof>NBER Working Paper Series, 2022-11</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Nov 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c844-e53a26a7180d28c8b8b1af51bd601ec15fa628ec2948325618374ea9ecc6de553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dinlersoz, Emin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restrepo, Pascual</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Gary W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldschlag, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beede, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zolas, Nikolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Lucia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroff, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Childress, Eric E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haltiwanger, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acemoglu, Daron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffington, Cathy</creatorcontrib><title>Automation and the Workforce: A Firm-Level View from the 2019 Annual Business Survey</title><title>NBER Working Paper Series</title><description>This paper describes the adoption of automation technologies by US firms across all economic sectors by leveraging a new module introduced in the 2019 Annual Business Survey, conducted by the US Census Bureau in partnership with the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). The module collects data from over 300,000 firms on the use of five advanced technologies: AI, robotics, dedicated equipment, specialized software, and cloud computing. The adoption of these technologies remains low (especially for AI and robotics), varies substantially across industries, and concentrates on large and young firms. However, because larger firms are much more likely to adopt them, 12-64% of US workers and 22-72% of manufacturing workers are exposed to these technologies. Firms report a variety of motivations for adoption, including automating tasks previously performed by labor. Consistent with the use of these technologies for automation, adopters have higher labor productivity and lower labor shares. In particular, the use of these technologies is associated with a 11.4% higher labor productivity, which accounts for 20-30% of the difference in labor productivity between large firms and the median firm in an industry. Adopters report that these technologies raised skill requirements and led to greater demand for skilled labor but brought limited or ambiguous effects to their employment levels.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Economic Fluctuations and Growth</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Labor productivity</subject><subject>Labor Studies</subject><subject>Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><issn>0898-2937</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>NBR</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNot0L1OwzAUBWAPIFEKPACTJeaAf2Lnmi1UtCBVYqCCMXKcG5HS2MVOWvXtqSjTWT6dIx1Cbji7lxL0w14yrcwZmTAwkAkjiwtymdKaMQHA-ISsynEIvR264Kn1DR2-kH6G-N2G6PCRlnTexT5b4g439KPDPW1j6P-UYNzQ0vvRbujTmDqPKdH3Me7wcEXOW7tJeP2fU7KaP69mL9nybfE6K5eZgzzPUEkrtC04sEaAgxpqblvF60Yzjo6r1moB6ITJQQqlOcgiR2vQOd2gUnJK7k612xh-RkxDtQ5j9MfFShQSuNGa50d1e1K-xlhtY9fbeKhOx8hfmW5Vfg</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Dinlersoz, Emin</creator><creator>Restrepo, Pascual</creator><creator>Anderson, Gary W</creator><creator>Goldschlag, Nathan</creator><creator>Beede, David N</creator><creator>Zolas, Nikolas</creator><creator>Foster, Lucia S</creator><creator>Kroff, Zachary</creator><creator>Childress, Eric E</creator><creator>Haltiwanger, John C</creator><creator>Acemoglu, Daron</creator><creator>Buffington, Cathy</creator><general>National Bureau of Economic Research</general><general>National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc</general><scope>CZO</scope><scope>MPB</scope><scope>NBR</scope><scope>XD6</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Automation and the Workforce: A Firm-Level View from the 2019 Annual Business Survey</title><author>Dinlersoz, Emin ; Restrepo, Pascual ; Anderson, Gary W ; Goldschlag, Nathan ; Beede, David N ; Zolas, Nikolas ; Foster, Lucia S ; Kroff, Zachary ; Childress, Eric E ; Haltiwanger, John C ; Acemoglu, Daron ; Buffington, Cathy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c844-e53a26a7180d28c8b8b1af51bd601ec15fa628ec2948325618374ea9ecc6de553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Economic Fluctuations and Growth</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Labor productivity</topic><topic>Labor Studies</topic><topic>Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dinlersoz, Emin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Restrepo, Pascual</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Gary W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldschlag, Nathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beede, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zolas, Nikolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Lucia S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroff, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Childress, Eric E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haltiwanger, John C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acemoglu, Daron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buffington, Cathy</creatorcontrib><collection>NBER Working Papers</collection><collection>NBER</collection><collection>National Bureau of Economic Research Publications</collection><collection>NBER Technical Working Papers Archive</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dinlersoz, Emin</au><au>Restrepo, Pascual</au><au>Anderson, Gary W</au><au>Goldschlag, Nathan</au><au>Beede, David N</au><au>Zolas, Nikolas</au><au>Foster, Lucia S</au><au>Kroff, Zachary</au><au>Childress, Eric E</au><au>Haltiwanger, John C</au><au>Acemoglu, Daron</au><au>Buffington, Cathy</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Automation and the Workforce: A Firm-Level View from the 2019 Annual Business Survey</atitle><jtitle>NBER Working Paper Series</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><issn>0898-2937</issn><abstract>This paper describes the adoption of automation technologies by US firms across all economic sectors by leveraging a new module introduced in the 2019 Annual Business Survey, conducted by the US Census Bureau in partnership with the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES). The module collects data from over 300,000 firms on the use of five advanced technologies: AI, robotics, dedicated equipment, specialized software, and cloud computing. The adoption of these technologies remains low (especially for AI and robotics), varies substantially across industries, and concentrates on large and young firms. However, because larger firms are much more likely to adopt them, 12-64% of US workers and 22-72% of manufacturing workers are exposed to these technologies. Firms report a variety of motivations for adoption, including automating tasks previously performed by labor. Consistent with the use of these technologies for automation, adopters have higher labor productivity and lower labor shares. In particular, the use of these technologies is associated with a 11.4% higher labor productivity, which accounts for 20-30% of the difference in labor productivity between large firms and the median firm in an industry. Adopters report that these technologies raised skill requirements and led to greater demand for skilled labor but brought limited or ambiguous effects to their employment levels.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>National Bureau of Economic Research</pub><doi>10.3386/w30659</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-2937
ispartof NBER Working Paper Series, 2022-11
issn 0898-2937
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2738196614
source National Bureau of Economic Research Publications; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Automation
Economic Fluctuations and Growth
Economic theory
Labor productivity
Labor Studies
Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship
Robotics
title Automation and the Workforce: A Firm-Level View from the 2019 Annual Business Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A03%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_nber_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Automation%20and%20the%20Workforce:%20A%20Firm-Level%20View%20from%20the%202019%20Annual%20Business%20Survey&rft.jtitle=NBER%20Working%20Paper%20Series&rft.au=Dinlersoz,%20Emin&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.issn=0898-2937&rft_id=info:doi/10.3386/w30659&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_nber_%3E2738196614%3C/proquest_nber_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2738196614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_nber_id=w30659&rfr_iscdi=true