The 14th Amendment in the Supreme Court's Plessy 1 and Brown 2 Decisions and Influences on Editorial Arguments about Segregation in the Southern United States, 1960–1964

A content analysis of the editorial pages of the Birmingham News from 1960 to 1964 shows that, despite its staunch segregationist stance, the paper's editorial pages, nonetheless, produced strong integrationist narratives. This paradox was borne of discordant interpretations of 14th Amendment r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of communication inquiry 2023-01, Vol.47 (1), p.65-83
1. Verfasser: Mohamed, Ali Noor
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 83
container_issue 1
container_start_page 65
container_title The Journal of communication inquiry
container_volume 47
creator Mohamed, Ali Noor
description A content analysis of the editorial pages of the Birmingham News from 1960 to 1964 shows that, despite its staunch segregationist stance, the paper's editorial pages, nonetheless, produced strong integrationist narratives. This paradox was borne of discordant interpretations of 14th Amendment rights featured in the Supreme Court's Plessy (1896) and Brown (1954) decisions. Rise of staunch segregationist groups and officials after the Court's 1954 Brown decision drove News editors to embrace greater democratic pluralism. The evolution in editorial approach corresponded to the paper's gradual adoption of Brown's interpretations of 14th Amendment rights. Change in the valence of the paper's narratives supports Condit’s (1987) thesis that rhetorical “crafting” of public morality about race brought about greater tolerance and acceptance of racial equality in America.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/01968599221085703
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sage_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2737692898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01968599221085703</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2737692898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p673-14b57c6641acf8473c888e6485f8bff56c172d3d114f99ee75b198db92b0a6d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkUtKA0EQhhtRMD4O4K7AhRtHu3qmX8sYnyAoJK7DPGqSkdgTp3sQd97BY3grT2LHiC5cFAV_fVV_UcXYAfITRK1POVplpLVCIDdS83SDDVBKkWQKxSYbrOrJCthmO94_co6pEHLAPiZzAszCHIZP5KoYARoHIarjftnRE8Go7btw5OF-Qd6_AkLuKjjr2hcHAs6pbHzTOv-t3rh60ZMryUPr4KJqQts1-QKG3axfjY5U0fYBxjTraJaH2PjrFvU5dQ4eXBOognHIA_ljiHvzz7f3mLI9tlXnC0_7P3mXjS8vJqPr5Pbu6mY0vE2WSqcJZoXUpVIZ5mVtMp2WxhhSmZG1KepaqhK1qNIKMautJdKyQGuqwoqC56pKd9nheuqya5978mH6GA_gouFU6FQrK4w1kTpZUz6f0R-BfLp6x_TfO9IvysR85Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2737692898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 14th Amendment in the Supreme Court's Plessy 1 and Brown 2 Decisions and Influences on Editorial Arguments about Segregation in the Southern United States, 1960–1964</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Mohamed, Ali Noor</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Ali Noor</creatorcontrib><description>A content analysis of the editorial pages of the Birmingham News from 1960 to 1964 shows that, despite its staunch segregationist stance, the paper's editorial pages, nonetheless, produced strong integrationist narratives. This paradox was borne of discordant interpretations of 14th Amendment rights featured in the Supreme Court's Plessy (1896) and Brown (1954) decisions. Rise of staunch segregationist groups and officials after the Court's 1954 Brown decision drove News editors to embrace greater democratic pluralism. The evolution in editorial approach corresponded to the paper's gradual adoption of Brown's interpretations of 14th Amendment rights. Change in the valence of the paper's narratives supports Condit’s (1987) thesis that rhetorical “crafting” of public morality about race brought about greater tolerance and acceptance of racial equality in America.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8599</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4612</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01968599221085703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Content analysis ; Decisions ; Narratives</subject><ispartof>The Journal of communication inquiry, 2023-01, Vol.47 (1), p.65-83</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-6193-9669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01968599221085703$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01968599221085703$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Ali Noor</creatorcontrib><title>The 14th Amendment in the Supreme Court's Plessy 1 and Brown 2 Decisions and Influences on Editorial Arguments about Segregation in the Southern United States, 1960–1964</title><title>The Journal of communication inquiry</title><addtitle>Journal of Communication Inquiry</addtitle><description>A content analysis of the editorial pages of the Birmingham News from 1960 to 1964 shows that, despite its staunch segregationist stance, the paper's editorial pages, nonetheless, produced strong integrationist narratives. This paradox was borne of discordant interpretations of 14th Amendment rights featured in the Supreme Court's Plessy (1896) and Brown (1954) decisions. Rise of staunch segregationist groups and officials after the Court's 1954 Brown decision drove News editors to embrace greater democratic pluralism. The evolution in editorial approach corresponded to the paper's gradual adoption of Brown's interpretations of 14th Amendment rights. Change in the valence of the paper's narratives supports Condit’s (1987) thesis that rhetorical “crafting” of public morality about race brought about greater tolerance and acceptance of racial equality in America.</description><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Decisions</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><issn>0196-8599</issn><issn>1552-4612</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNplkUtKA0EQhhtRMD4O4K7AhRtHu3qmX8sYnyAoJK7DPGqSkdgTp3sQd97BY3grT2LHiC5cFAV_fVV_UcXYAfITRK1POVplpLVCIDdS83SDDVBKkWQKxSYbrOrJCthmO94_co6pEHLAPiZzAszCHIZP5KoYARoHIarjftnRE8Go7btw5OF-Qd6_AkLuKjjr2hcHAs6pbHzTOv-t3rh60ZMryUPr4KJqQts1-QKG3axfjY5U0fYBxjTraJaH2PjrFvU5dQ4eXBOognHIA_ljiHvzz7f3mLI9tlXnC0_7P3mXjS8vJqPr5Pbu6mY0vE2WSqcJZoXUpVIZ5mVtMp2WxhhSmZG1KepaqhK1qNIKMautJdKyQGuqwoqC56pKd9nheuqya5978mH6GA_gouFU6FQrK4w1kTpZUz6f0R-BfLp6x_TfO9IvysR85Q</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Mohamed, Ali Noor</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope/><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6193-9669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>The 14th Amendment in the Supreme Court's Plessy 1 and Brown 2 Decisions and Influences on Editorial Arguments about Segregation in the Southern United States, 1960–1964</title><author>Mohamed, Ali Noor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p673-14b57c6641acf8473c888e6485f8bff56c172d3d114f99ee75b198db92b0a6d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Decisions</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Ali Noor</creatorcontrib><jtitle>The Journal of communication inquiry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohamed, Ali Noor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 14th Amendment in the Supreme Court's Plessy 1 and Brown 2 Decisions and Influences on Editorial Arguments about Segregation in the Southern United States, 1960–1964</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of communication inquiry</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Communication Inquiry</addtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>65</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>65-83</pages><issn>0196-8599</issn><eissn>1552-4612</eissn><abstract>A content analysis of the editorial pages of the Birmingham News from 1960 to 1964 shows that, despite its staunch segregationist stance, the paper's editorial pages, nonetheless, produced strong integrationist narratives. This paradox was borne of discordant interpretations of 14th Amendment rights featured in the Supreme Court's Plessy (1896) and Brown (1954) decisions. Rise of staunch segregationist groups and officials after the Court's 1954 Brown decision drove News editors to embrace greater democratic pluralism. The evolution in editorial approach corresponded to the paper's gradual adoption of Brown's interpretations of 14th Amendment rights. Change in the valence of the paper's narratives supports Condit’s (1987) thesis that rhetorical “crafting” of public morality about race brought about greater tolerance and acceptance of racial equality in America.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01968599221085703</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6193-9669</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8599
ispartof The Journal of communication inquiry, 2023-01, Vol.47 (1), p.65-83
issn 0196-8599
1552-4612
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2737692898
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Content analysis
Decisions
Narratives
title The 14th Amendment in the Supreme Court's Plessy 1 and Brown 2 Decisions and Influences on Editorial Arguments about Segregation in the Southern United States, 1960–1964
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A27%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sage_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%2014th%20Amendment%20in%20the%20Supreme%20Court's%20Plessy%201%20and%20Brown%202%20Decisions%20and%20Influences%20on%20Editorial%20Arguments%20about%20Segregation%20in%20the%20Southern%20United%20States,%201960%E2%80%931964&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20communication%20inquiry&rft.au=Mohamed,%20Ali%20Noor&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=65&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=65-83&rft.issn=0196-8599&rft.eissn=1552-4612&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01968599221085703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sage_%3E2737692898%3C/proquest_sage_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2737692898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01968599221085703&rfr_iscdi=true