Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is superior than placebo and control for postoperative pain relief
To determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is more efficient than placebo TENS and control groups for pain relief. Randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. A total of 78 adults with postoperative pain, after cholecystectomy, at the University Hospital. The...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pain management 2020-07, Vol.10 (4), p.235-246 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 246 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 235 |
| container_title | Pain management |
| container_volume | 10 |
| creator | Borges, Maraísa Rodrigues de Oliveira, Nuno Miguel Lopes Antonelli, Izabella Barberato Silva Silva, Maristella Borges Crema, Eduardo Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho |
| description | To determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is more efficient than placebo TENS and control groups for pain relief.
Randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
A total of 78 adults with postoperative pain, after cholecystectomy, at the University Hospital. They were randomized into active TENS, placebo TENS and control.
A total of 30-min interventions applied in the first 24 h after the surgery.
Pain intensity.
Pain significantly decreased for both TENS; however, the active TENS was better. A decrease of 2 points or more on the visual analog scale for 53.8% active TENS and 11.5% placebo.
There was a greater reduction in pain of important clinical relevance in the active TENS group.
Clinical Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trial (REBEC): RBR-6cgx2k. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2217/pmt-2019-0063 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2736320038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2736320038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-7e48e62a134b779a2dc37c16534c42815521d97817e1aeae9368c3acd7b6a66c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LwzAYh4MobswdvUrAc7VJ2qQ9yvALBl7mOaTpW8xok5oPwf_ejOlu5pK8vM_vF3gQuiblHaVE3M9TLGhJ2qIsOTtDSyLqpiCNEOenN28XaB3Cvsyn5qQl_BItGK15xTlZIrvzygadorLgUsAwgo7eaDViC_4LcIhmSqOKxllsAg5pBm-cx_FDWTyPSkPnsLI91s5G70Y85OXsQnQZzLFcMStjsYfRwHCFLgY1Blj_3iv0_vS427wU27fn183DttBVRWIhoGqAU0VY1QnRKtprJjThNat0RRtS15T0rWiIAKJAQct4o5nSvei44lyzFbo99s7efSYIUe5d8jZ_KalgnNGyZE2miiOlvQvBwyBnbyblvyUp5UGwzILlQbA8CM78zW9r6iboT_Sfzgy0R2BIMXkI2oDVII9TThhtLPxT_gNI8Ivc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736320038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is superior than placebo and control for postoperative pain relief</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Borges, Maraísa Rodrigues ; de Oliveira, Nuno Miguel Lopes ; Antonelli, Izabella Barberato Silva ; Silva, Maristella Borges ; Crema, Eduardo ; Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho</creator><creatorcontrib>Borges, Maraísa Rodrigues ; de Oliveira, Nuno Miguel Lopes ; Antonelli, Izabella Barberato Silva ; Silva, Maristella Borges ; Crema, Eduardo ; Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is more efficient than placebo TENS and control groups for pain relief.
Randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
A total of 78 adults with postoperative pain, after cholecystectomy, at the University Hospital. They were randomized into active TENS, placebo TENS and control.
A total of 30-min interventions applied in the first 24 h after the surgery.
Pain intensity.
Pain significantly decreased for both TENS; however, the active TENS was better. A decrease of 2 points or more on the visual analog scale for 53.8% active TENS and 11.5% placebo.
There was a greater reduction in pain of important clinical relevance in the active TENS group.
Clinical Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trial (REBEC): RBR-6cgx2k.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-1869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2019-0063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32564661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Future Medicine Ltd</publisher><subject>acute pain ; Adult ; Aged ; analgesia ; Brazil ; Cholecystectomy ; Cholecystectomy - adverse effects ; Clinical trials ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Pain ; Pain management ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Pain, Postoperative - therapy ; Physical therapy ; Placebos ; postoperative ; Postoperative period ; Single-Blind Method ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods ; Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - standards ; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS ; transcutaneous electrical stimulation ; treatment outcome</subject><ispartof>Pain management, 2020-07, Vol.10 (4), p.235-246</ispartof><rights>2020 Future Medicine Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Future Medicine Ltd Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-7e48e62a134b779a2dc37c16534c42815521d97817e1aeae9368c3acd7b6a66c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-7e48e62a134b779a2dc37c16534c42815521d97817e1aeae9368c3acd7b6a66c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9627-0870</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32564661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borges, Maraísa Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Nuno Miguel Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonelli, Izabella Barberato Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Maristella Borges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crema, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho</creatorcontrib><title>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is superior than placebo and control for postoperative pain relief</title><title>Pain management</title><addtitle>Pain Manag</addtitle><description>To determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is more efficient than placebo TENS and control groups for pain relief.
Randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
A total of 78 adults with postoperative pain, after cholecystectomy, at the University Hospital. They were randomized into active TENS, placebo TENS and control.
A total of 30-min interventions applied in the first 24 h after the surgery.
Pain intensity.
Pain significantly decreased for both TENS; however, the active TENS was better. A decrease of 2 points or more on the visual analog scale for 53.8% active TENS and 11.5% placebo.
There was a greater reduction in pain of important clinical relevance in the active TENS group.
Clinical Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trial (REBEC): RBR-6cgx2k.</description><subject>acute pain</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>analgesia</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - therapy</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>postoperative</subject><subject>Postoperative period</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - standards</subject><subject>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS</subject><subject>transcutaneous electrical stimulation</subject><subject>treatment outcome</subject><issn>1758-1869</issn><issn>1758-1877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LwzAYh4MobswdvUrAc7VJ2qQ9yvALBl7mOaTpW8xok5oPwf_ejOlu5pK8vM_vF3gQuiblHaVE3M9TLGhJ2qIsOTtDSyLqpiCNEOenN28XaB3Cvsyn5qQl_BItGK15xTlZIrvzygadorLgUsAwgo7eaDViC_4LcIhmSqOKxllsAg5pBm-cx_FDWTyPSkPnsLI91s5G70Y85OXsQnQZzLFcMStjsYfRwHCFLgY1Blj_3iv0_vS427wU27fn183DttBVRWIhoGqAU0VY1QnRKtprJjThNat0RRtS15T0rWiIAKJAQct4o5nSvei44lyzFbo99s7efSYIUe5d8jZ_KalgnNGyZE2miiOlvQvBwyBnbyblvyUp5UGwzILlQbA8CM78zW9r6iboT_Sfzgy0R2BIMXkI2oDVII9TThhtLPxT_gNI8Ivc</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Borges, Maraísa Rodrigues</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Nuno Miguel Lopes</creator><creator>Antonelli, Izabella Barberato Silva</creator><creator>Silva, Maristella Borges</creator><creator>Crema, Eduardo</creator><creator>Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho</creator><general>Future Medicine Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>EHMNL</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-0870</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is superior than placebo and control for postoperative pain relief</title><author>Borges, Maraísa Rodrigues ; de Oliveira, Nuno Miguel Lopes ; Antonelli, Izabella Barberato Silva ; Silva, Maristella Borges ; Crema, Eduardo ; Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-7e48e62a134b779a2dc37c16534c42815521d97817e1aeae9368c3acd7b6a66c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>acute pain</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>analgesia</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - therapy</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>postoperative</topic><topic>Postoperative period</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - standards</topic><topic>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS</topic><topic>transcutaneous electrical stimulation</topic><topic>treatment outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borges, Maraísa Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Nuno Miguel Lopes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonelli, Izabella Barberato Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Maristella Borges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crema, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>UK & Ireland Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Pain management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borges, Maraísa Rodrigues</au><au>de Oliveira, Nuno Miguel Lopes</au><au>Antonelli, Izabella Barberato Silva</au><au>Silva, Maristella Borges</au><au>Crema, Eduardo</au><au>Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is superior than placebo and control for postoperative pain relief</atitle><jtitle>Pain management</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Manag</addtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>235</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>235-246</pages><issn>1758-1869</issn><eissn>1758-1877</eissn><abstract>To determine whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is more efficient than placebo TENS and control groups for pain relief.
Randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.
A total of 78 adults with postoperative pain, after cholecystectomy, at the University Hospital. They were randomized into active TENS, placebo TENS and control.
A total of 30-min interventions applied in the first 24 h after the surgery.
Pain intensity.
Pain significantly decreased for both TENS; however, the active TENS was better. A decrease of 2 points or more on the visual analog scale for 53.8% active TENS and 11.5% placebo.
There was a greater reduction in pain of important clinical relevance in the active TENS group.
Clinical Trial registration: Brazilian Clinical Trial (REBEC): RBR-6cgx2k.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Future Medicine Ltd</pub><pmid>32564661</pmid><doi>10.2217/pmt-2019-0063</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-0870</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1758-1869 |
| ispartof | Pain management, 2020-07, Vol.10 (4), p.235-246 |
| issn | 1758-1869 1758-1877 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2736320038 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central |
| subjects | acute pain Adult Aged analgesia Brazil Cholecystectomy Cholecystectomy - adverse effects Clinical trials Female Humans Male Middle Aged Outcome Assessment, Health Care Pain Pain management Pain Measurement Pain, Postoperative - etiology Pain, Postoperative - therapy Physical therapy Placebos postoperative Postoperative period Single-Blind Method Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - methods Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation - standards Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS transcutaneous electrical stimulation treatment outcome |
| title | Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation is superior than placebo and control for postoperative pain relief |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T00%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcutaneous%20electrical%20nerve%20stimulation%20is%20superior%20than%20placebo%20and%20control%20for%20postoperative%20pain%20relief&rft.jtitle=Pain%20management&rft.au=Borges,%20Mara%C3%ADsa%20Rodrigues&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=235&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=235-246&rft.issn=1758-1869&rft.eissn=1758-1877&rft_id=info:doi/10.2217/pmt-2019-0063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2736320038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736320038&rft_id=info:pmid/32564661&rfr_iscdi=true |