Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria

Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Security journal 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.1220-1248
1. Verfasser: Nche, George C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1248
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1220
container_title Security journal
container_volume 35
creator Nche, George C.
description Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are key stakeholders and have played significant roles in peace-building in many societies across the globe. The present study, therefore, explored the views of church leaders about the effectiveness of the PAP with respect to the current spate of insecurity and conflict in Rivers State. Information was elicited from sixteen church leaders across different communities in Rivers State. A descriptive narrative approach was employed in the thematic organization and analysis of data. Some of the church leaders, as findings showed, believe that although the PAP has empowered some ex-militants and ended the anti-state rebellion, it has only succeeded in redirecting the attention of the militants to the local residents of Rivers State who are currently the victims of violent crimes such as killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc. Others see the PAP as cash for peace approach that encourages violence in the state. An all-inclusive approach to peace building and a church-led advocacy were suggested by the participants as the possible solutions to the persistence of insecurity and conflicts in Rivers State.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2736077118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2736077118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9947ac10ed44ad72204edd9a2597960a71748db5419a3f7c7e20493b9888ec2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssW3Ar8QxuwpBQaoA8VhbTuwmLk1cbKeof49LkdixGs3onpk7F4BzjC4xyvlVYJiULEMEZwhRQjN0AEaYM5qxguWHYIREnme4KMgxOAlhiRAqBRcjsJk5pyewGiLsXYRN6qDp3dC01_CrVRHW7eDrFq6M0sYHGFvbf0BVuQTE1sBnb4LVpo9WreC0602I2zR0jVddZ6Dt4Yvd7MDXqKKZwEfbGG_VKThaqFUwZ791DN7vbt9u7rP50-zhZjrPaopFzIRgXNUYGc2Y0pwQxIzWQpE8mS-Q4unFUlc5w0LRBa-5SQpBK1GWpamJpmNwsd-79u5zSObk0g2-Tycl4bRAnGNcJhXZq2rvQvBmIdfedspvJUZyl6_c5ytTvvInX4kSRPdQSOI-ffW3-h_qG70SfaM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736077118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Nche, George C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nche, George C.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are key stakeholders and have played significant roles in peace-building in many societies across the globe. The present study, therefore, explored the views of church leaders about the effectiveness of the PAP with respect to the current spate of insecurity and conflict in Rivers State. Information was elicited from sixteen church leaders across different communities in Rivers State. A descriptive narrative approach was employed in the thematic organization and analysis of data. Some of the church leaders, as findings showed, believe that although the PAP has empowered some ex-militants and ended the anti-state rebellion, it has only succeeded in redirecting the attention of the militants to the local residents of Rivers State who are currently the victims of violent crimes such as killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc. Others see the PAP as cash for peace approach that encourages violence in the state. An all-inclusive approach to peace building and a church-led advocacy were suggested by the participants as the possible solutions to the persistence of insecurity and conflicts in Rivers State.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-1662</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-4645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Amnesties ; Crime and Society ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Effectiveness ; Militancy ; Murders &amp; murder attempts ; Original Article ; Peace ; Religious organizations ; Rivers ; Robbery ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Security journal, 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.1220-1248</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9947ac10ed44ad72204edd9a2597960a71748db5419a3f7c7e20493b9888ec2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9947ac10ed44ad72204edd9a2597960a71748db5419a3f7c7e20493b9888ec2d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7325-7374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nche, George C.</creatorcontrib><title>Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria</title><title>Security journal</title><addtitle>Secur J</addtitle><description>Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are key stakeholders and have played significant roles in peace-building in many societies across the globe. The present study, therefore, explored the views of church leaders about the effectiveness of the PAP with respect to the current spate of insecurity and conflict in Rivers State. Information was elicited from sixteen church leaders across different communities in Rivers State. A descriptive narrative approach was employed in the thematic organization and analysis of data. Some of the church leaders, as findings showed, believe that although the PAP has empowered some ex-militants and ended the anti-state rebellion, it has only succeeded in redirecting the attention of the militants to the local residents of Rivers State who are currently the victims of violent crimes such as killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc. Others see the PAP as cash for peace approach that encourages violence in the state. An all-inclusive approach to peace building and a church-led advocacy were suggested by the participants as the possible solutions to the persistence of insecurity and conflicts in Rivers State.</description><subject>Amnesties</subject><subject>Crime and Society</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Militancy</subject><subject>Murders &amp; murder attempts</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Religious organizations</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Robbery</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0955-1662</issn><issn>1743-4645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssW3Ar8QxuwpBQaoA8VhbTuwmLk1cbKeof49LkdixGs3onpk7F4BzjC4xyvlVYJiULEMEZwhRQjN0AEaYM5qxguWHYIREnme4KMgxOAlhiRAqBRcjsJk5pyewGiLsXYRN6qDp3dC01_CrVRHW7eDrFq6M0sYHGFvbf0BVuQTE1sBnb4LVpo9WreC0602I2zR0jVddZ6Dt4Yvd7MDXqKKZwEfbGG_VKThaqFUwZ791DN7vbt9u7rP50-zhZjrPaopFzIRgXNUYGc2Y0pwQxIzWQpE8mS-Q4unFUlc5w0LRBa-5SQpBK1GWpamJpmNwsd-79u5zSObk0g2-Tycl4bRAnGNcJhXZq2rvQvBmIdfedspvJUZyl6_c5ytTvvInX4kSRPdQSOI-ffW3-h_qG70SfaM</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Nche, George C.</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-7374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria</title><author>Nche, George C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9947ac10ed44ad72204edd9a2597960a71748db5419a3f7c7e20493b9888ec2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Amnesties</topic><topic>Crime and Society</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Militancy</topic><topic>Murders &amp; murder attempts</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Religious organizations</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Robbery</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nche, George C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Security journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nche, George C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>Security journal</jtitle><stitle>Secur J</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1220</spage><epage>1248</epage><pages>1220-1248</pages><issn>0955-1662</issn><eissn>1743-4645</eissn><abstract>Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are key stakeholders and have played significant roles in peace-building in many societies across the globe. The present study, therefore, explored the views of church leaders about the effectiveness of the PAP with respect to the current spate of insecurity and conflict in Rivers State. Information was elicited from sixteen church leaders across different communities in Rivers State. A descriptive narrative approach was employed in the thematic organization and analysis of data. Some of the church leaders, as findings showed, believe that although the PAP has empowered some ex-militants and ended the anti-state rebellion, it has only succeeded in redirecting the attention of the militants to the local residents of Rivers State who are currently the victims of violent crimes such as killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc. Others see the PAP as cash for peace approach that encourages violence in the state. An all-inclusive approach to peace building and a church-led advocacy were suggested by the participants as the possible solutions to the persistence of insecurity and conflicts in Rivers State.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-7374</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0955-1662
ispartof Security journal, 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.1220-1248
issn 0955-1662
1743-4645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2736077118
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Amnesties
Crime and Society
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Effectiveness
Militancy
Murders & murder attempts
Original Article
Peace
Religious organizations
Rivers
Robbery
Social Sciences
title Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A13%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Good,%20but%20not%20good%20enough:%20what%20church%20leaders%20think%20about%20the%20Presidential%20Amnesty%20Programme%20in%20Rivers%20State,%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Security%20journal&rft.au=Nche,%20George%20C.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1220&rft.epage=1248&rft.pages=1220-1248&rft.issn=0955-1662&rft.eissn=1743-4645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2736077118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736077118&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true