Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria
Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Security journal 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.1220-1248 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1248 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1220 |
container_title | Security journal |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Nche, George C. |
description | Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are key stakeholders and have played significant roles in peace-building in many societies across the globe. The present study, therefore, explored the views of church leaders about the effectiveness of the PAP with respect to the current spate of insecurity and conflict in Rivers State. Information was elicited from sixteen church leaders across different communities in Rivers State. A descriptive narrative approach was employed in the thematic organization and analysis of data. Some of the church leaders, as findings showed, believe that although the PAP has empowered some ex-militants and ended the anti-state rebellion, it has only succeeded in redirecting the attention of the militants to the local residents of Rivers State who are currently the victims of violent crimes such as killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc. Others see the PAP as cash for peace approach that encourages violence in the state. An all-inclusive approach to peace building and a church-led advocacy were suggested by the participants as the possible solutions to the persistence of insecurity and conflicts in Rivers State. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2736077118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2736077118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9947ac10ed44ad72204edd9a2597960a71748db5419a3f7c7e20493b9888ec2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssW3Ar8QxuwpBQaoA8VhbTuwmLk1cbKeof49LkdixGs3onpk7F4BzjC4xyvlVYJiULEMEZwhRQjN0AEaYM5qxguWHYIREnme4KMgxOAlhiRAqBRcjsJk5pyewGiLsXYRN6qDp3dC01_CrVRHW7eDrFq6M0sYHGFvbf0BVuQTE1sBnb4LVpo9WreC0602I2zR0jVddZ6Dt4Yvd7MDXqKKZwEfbGG_VKThaqFUwZ791DN7vbt9u7rP50-zhZjrPaopFzIRgXNUYGc2Y0pwQxIzWQpE8mS-Q4unFUlc5w0LRBa-5SQpBK1GWpamJpmNwsd-79u5zSObk0g2-Tycl4bRAnGNcJhXZq2rvQvBmIdfedspvJUZyl6_c5ytTvvInX4kSRPdQSOI-ffW3-h_qG70SfaM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736077118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Nche, George C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nche, George C.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are key stakeholders and have played significant roles in peace-building in many societies across the globe. The present study, therefore, explored the views of church leaders about the effectiveness of the PAP with respect to the current spate of insecurity and conflict in Rivers State. Information was elicited from sixteen church leaders across different communities in Rivers State. A descriptive narrative approach was employed in the thematic organization and analysis of data. Some of the church leaders, as findings showed, believe that although the PAP has empowered some ex-militants and ended the anti-state rebellion, it has only succeeded in redirecting the attention of the militants to the local residents of Rivers State who are currently the victims of violent crimes such as killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc. Others see the PAP as cash for peace approach that encourages violence in the state. An all-inclusive approach to peace building and a church-led advocacy were suggested by the participants as the possible solutions to the persistence of insecurity and conflicts in Rivers State.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0955-1662</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-4645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Amnesties ; Crime and Society ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Effectiveness ; Militancy ; Murders & murder attempts ; Original Article ; Peace ; Religious organizations ; Rivers ; Robbery ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Security journal, 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.1220-1248</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9947ac10ed44ad72204edd9a2597960a71748db5419a3f7c7e20493b9888ec2d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9947ac10ed44ad72204edd9a2597960a71748db5419a3f7c7e20493b9888ec2d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7325-7374</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nche, George C.</creatorcontrib><title>Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria</title><title>Security journal</title><addtitle>Secur J</addtitle><description>Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are key stakeholders and have played significant roles in peace-building in many societies across the globe. The present study, therefore, explored the views of church leaders about the effectiveness of the PAP with respect to the current spate of insecurity and conflict in Rivers State. Information was elicited from sixteen church leaders across different communities in Rivers State. A descriptive narrative approach was employed in the thematic organization and analysis of data. Some of the church leaders, as findings showed, believe that although the PAP has empowered some ex-militants and ended the anti-state rebellion, it has only succeeded in redirecting the attention of the militants to the local residents of Rivers State who are currently the victims of violent crimes such as killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc. Others see the PAP as cash for peace approach that encourages violence in the state. An all-inclusive approach to peace building and a church-led advocacy were suggested by the participants as the possible solutions to the persistence of insecurity and conflicts in Rivers State.</description><subject>Amnesties</subject><subject>Crime and Society</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Militancy</subject><subject>Murders & murder attempts</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Peace</subject><subject>Religious organizations</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Robbery</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0955-1662</issn><issn>1743-4645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssW3Ar8QxuwpBQaoA8VhbTuwmLk1cbKeof49LkdixGs3onpk7F4BzjC4xyvlVYJiULEMEZwhRQjN0AEaYM5qxguWHYIREnme4KMgxOAlhiRAqBRcjsJk5pyewGiLsXYRN6qDp3dC01_CrVRHW7eDrFq6M0sYHGFvbf0BVuQTE1sBnb4LVpo9WreC0602I2zR0jVddZ6Dt4Yvd7MDXqKKZwEfbGG_VKThaqFUwZ791DN7vbt9u7rP50-zhZjrPaopFzIRgXNUYGc2Y0pwQxIzWQpE8mS-Q4unFUlc5w0LRBa-5SQpBK1GWpamJpmNwsd-79u5zSObk0g2-Tycl4bRAnGNcJhXZq2rvQvBmIdfedspvJUZyl6_c5ytTvvInX4kSRPdQSOI-ffW3-h_qG70SfaM</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Nche, George C.</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-7374</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria</title><author>Nche, George C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-9947ac10ed44ad72204edd9a2597960a71748db5419a3f7c7e20493b9888ec2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Amnesties</topic><topic>Crime and Society</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Militancy</topic><topic>Murders & murder attempts</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Peace</topic><topic>Religious organizations</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Robbery</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nche, George C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Security journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nche, George C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>Security journal</jtitle><stitle>Secur J</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1220</spage><epage>1248</epage><pages>1220-1248</pages><issn>0955-1662</issn><eissn>1743-4645</eissn><abstract>Studies gauging opinions about the effectiveness of the Presidential Amnesty Programme (PAP) as a peace building strategy in the Niger Delta abound. However, none has gauged the opinions of church leaders regarding the PAP especially in Rivers State. This is despite the fact that church leaders are key stakeholders and have played significant roles in peace-building in many societies across the globe. The present study, therefore, explored the views of church leaders about the effectiveness of the PAP with respect to the current spate of insecurity and conflict in Rivers State. Information was elicited from sixteen church leaders across different communities in Rivers State. A descriptive narrative approach was employed in the thematic organization and analysis of data. Some of the church leaders, as findings showed, believe that although the PAP has empowered some ex-militants and ended the anti-state rebellion, it has only succeeded in redirecting the attention of the militants to the local residents of Rivers State who are currently the victims of violent crimes such as killings, kidnapping, armed robbery etc. Others see the PAP as cash for peace approach that encourages violence in the state. An all-inclusive approach to peace building and a church-led advocacy were suggested by the participants as the possible solutions to the persistence of insecurity and conflicts in Rivers State.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7325-7374</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0955-1662 |
ispartof | Security journal, 2022-12, Vol.35 (4), p.1220-1248 |
issn | 0955-1662 1743-4645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2736077118 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Amnesties Crime and Society Criminology and Criminal Justice Effectiveness Militancy Murders & murder attempts Original Article Peace Religious organizations Rivers Robbery Social Sciences |
title | Good, but not good enough: what church leaders think about the Presidential Amnesty Programme in Rivers State, Nigeria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T11%3A13%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Good,%20but%20not%20good%20enough:%20what%20church%20leaders%20think%20about%20the%20Presidential%20Amnesty%20Programme%20in%20Rivers%20State,%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Security%20journal&rft.au=Nche,%20George%20C.&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1220&rft.epage=1248&rft.pages=1220-1248&rft.issn=0955-1662&rft.eissn=1743-4645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41284-021-00323-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2736077118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736077118&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |