Thin, muscular, and fit-ideals: Prevalence and correlates in undergraduate women
Objective: The current study aimed to compare endorsement of the muscular- and thin-ideals alone, as well as simultaneous endorsement of both as representative of the fit-ideal and examine potential negative correlates of each type of ideal internalization. Participants: Participants were 300 female...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of American college health 2022-11, Vol.70 (8), p.2476-2482 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2482 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 2476 |
| container_title | Journal of American college health |
| container_volume | 70 |
| creator | Wagner, Allison F. Bennett, Brooke L. Stefano, Emily C. Latner, Janet D. |
| description | Objective: The current study aimed to compare endorsement of the muscular- and thin-ideals alone, as well as simultaneous endorsement of both as representative of the fit-ideal and examine potential negative correlates of each type of ideal internalization. Participants: Participants were 300 female undergraduate students. Methods: Participants completed measures of internalization of the thin- and muscular-ideals, body dissatisfaction, body checking, and body avoidance. Results: Analyses revealed that approximately 24.9% of participants endorsed scores in the upper quartile on thin-ideal internalization, and 27.4% of participants fell in the upper quartile of muscular-ideal internalization, while 10.3% endorsed high internalization of both ideals. Analyses revealed that individuals endorsing only the thin-ideal reported significantly higher levels of body dissatisfaction and body avoidance than those endorsing the fit-ideal. Conclusions: Overall, findings suggested that thin- and muscular-ideal internalization present different patterns of association depending on whether an individual endorses one or both of these body ideals. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07448481.2020.1865981 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2736068572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1370785</ericid><sourcerecordid>2483817383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b4a04390a91724861a3dba74d1911c5a45735b9e0f125f8aa10e00ec9dea33c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPFTEUhRujgQfyEzCTuHHBwL3TdtpxhSGgEhJZ4Lrp69zRkpkW2xkJ_94-34OFC1c3uec7JyeHsWOEUwQNZ6CE0ELjaQNNeelWdhpfsRV2AmregH7NVhum3kD77CDnewDARnd7bJ9ziRwUrNjt3U8fTqppyW4ZbTqpbOirwc-178mO-WN1m-i3HSk4-iu5mBKNdqZc-VAtoaf0I9l-KZ_qMU4U3rI3QzHS0e4esu9Xl3cXX-qbb5-_Xny6qZ3Adq7XwoLgHdgOVSN0i5b3a6tEjx2ik1ZIxeW6IxiwkYO2FoEAyHWlFucO-CH7sM19SPHXQnk2k8-OxtEGiks2JZRrVFzzgr7_B72PSwqlnWkUb6HVUjWFklvKpZhzosE8JD_Z9GQQzGZy8zy52UxudpMX37td-rKeqH9xPW9cgOMtQMm7F_nyGrkCpWXRz7e6D0NMk32MaezNbJ_GmIZkg_PZ8P93-APFApeu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736068572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thin, muscular, and fit-ideals: Prevalence and correlates in undergraduate women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Wagner, Allison F. ; Bennett, Brooke L. ; Stefano, Emily C. ; Latner, Janet D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Allison F. ; Bennett, Brooke L. ; Stefano, Emily C. ; Latner, Janet D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The current study aimed to compare endorsement of the muscular- and thin-ideals alone, as well as simultaneous endorsement of both as representative of the fit-ideal and examine potential negative correlates of each type of ideal internalization. Participants: Participants were 300 female undergraduate students. Methods: Participants completed measures of internalization of the thin- and muscular-ideals, body dissatisfaction, body checking, and body avoidance. Results: Analyses revealed that approximately 24.9% of participants endorsed scores in the upper quartile on thin-ideal internalization, and 27.4% of participants fell in the upper quartile of muscular-ideal internalization, while 10.3% endorsed high internalization of both ideals. Analyses revealed that individuals endorsing only the thin-ideal reported significantly higher levels of body dissatisfaction and body avoidance than those endorsing the fit-ideal. Conclusions: Overall, findings suggested that thin- and muscular-ideal internalization present different patterns of association depending on whether an individual endorses one or both of these body ideals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0744-8481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-3208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2020.1865981</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33513070</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Adjustment (to Environment) ; Aesthetics ; Attitudes ; Body Composition ; Body ideals ; Body Image ; Cultural Influences ; Discontent ; Feeding and Eating Disorders ; Female ; Females ; fit-ideal internalization ; Human Body ; Humans ; Internalization ; muscular-ideal internalization ; Personal Satisfaction ; Prevalence ; Psychological Patterns ; Self Concept ; Social Attitudes ; Students ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; thin-ideal internalization ; Thinness ; Undergraduate Students ; Universities ; Values ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of American college health, 2022-11, Vol.70 (8), p.2476-2482</ispartof><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2021</rights><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b4a04390a91724861a3dba74d1911c5a45735b9e0f125f8aa10e00ec9dea33c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b4a04390a91724861a3dba74d1911c5a45735b9e0f125f8aa10e00ec9dea33c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1370785$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33513070$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Allison F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Brooke L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefano, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latner, Janet D.</creatorcontrib><title>Thin, muscular, and fit-ideals: Prevalence and correlates in undergraduate women</title><title>Journal of American college health</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Health</addtitle><description>Objective: The current study aimed to compare endorsement of the muscular- and thin-ideals alone, as well as simultaneous endorsement of both as representative of the fit-ideal and examine potential negative correlates of each type of ideal internalization. Participants: Participants were 300 female undergraduate students. Methods: Participants completed measures of internalization of the thin- and muscular-ideals, body dissatisfaction, body checking, and body avoidance. Results: Analyses revealed that approximately 24.9% of participants endorsed scores in the upper quartile on thin-ideal internalization, and 27.4% of participants fell in the upper quartile of muscular-ideal internalization, while 10.3% endorsed high internalization of both ideals. Analyses revealed that individuals endorsing only the thin-ideal reported significantly higher levels of body dissatisfaction and body avoidance than those endorsing the fit-ideal. Conclusions: Overall, findings suggested that thin- and muscular-ideal internalization present different patterns of association depending on whether an individual endorses one or both of these body ideals.</description><subject>Adjustment (to Environment)</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Body Composition</subject><subject>Body ideals</subject><subject>Body Image</subject><subject>Cultural Influences</subject><subject>Discontent</subject><subject>Feeding and Eating Disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>fit-ideal internalization</subject><subject>Human Body</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internalization</subject><subject>muscular-ideal internalization</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Self Concept</subject><subject>Social Attitudes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>thin-ideal internalization</subject><subject>Thinness</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0744-8481</issn><issn>1940-3208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFPFTEUhRujgQfyEzCTuHHBwL3TdtpxhSGgEhJZ4Lrp69zRkpkW2xkJ_94-34OFC1c3uec7JyeHsWOEUwQNZ6CE0ELjaQNNeelWdhpfsRV2AmregH7NVhum3kD77CDnewDARnd7bJ9ziRwUrNjt3U8fTqppyW4ZbTqpbOirwc-178mO-WN1m-i3HSk4-iu5mBKNdqZc-VAtoaf0I9l-KZ_qMU4U3rI3QzHS0e4esu9Xl3cXX-qbb5-_Xny6qZ3Adq7XwoLgHdgOVSN0i5b3a6tEjx2ik1ZIxeW6IxiwkYO2FoEAyHWlFucO-CH7sM19SPHXQnk2k8-OxtEGiks2JZRrVFzzgr7_B72PSwqlnWkUb6HVUjWFklvKpZhzosE8JD_Z9GQQzGZy8zy52UxudpMX37td-rKeqH9xPW9cgOMtQMm7F_nyGrkCpWXRz7e6D0NMk32MaezNbJ_GmIZkg_PZ8P93-APFApeu</recordid><startdate>20221117</startdate><enddate>20221117</enddate><creator>Wagner, Allison F.</creator><creator>Bennett, Brooke L.</creator><creator>Stefano, Emily C.</creator><creator>Latner, Janet D.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221117</creationdate><title>Thin, muscular, and fit-ideals: Prevalence and correlates in undergraduate women</title><author>Wagner, Allison F. ; Bennett, Brooke L. ; Stefano, Emily C. ; Latner, Janet D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-b4a04390a91724861a3dba74d1911c5a45735b9e0f125f8aa10e00ec9dea33c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adjustment (to Environment)</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Body Composition</topic><topic>Body ideals</topic><topic>Body Image</topic><topic>Cultural Influences</topic><topic>Discontent</topic><topic>Feeding and Eating Disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>fit-ideal internalization</topic><topic>Human Body</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internalization</topic><topic>muscular-ideal internalization</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Self Concept</topic><topic>Social Attitudes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>thin-ideal internalization</topic><topic>Thinness</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Allison F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Brooke L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefano, Emily C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latner, Janet D.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of American college health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wagner, Allison F.</au><au>Bennett, Brooke L.</au><au>Stefano, Emily C.</au><au>Latner, Janet D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1370785</ericid><atitle>Thin, muscular, and fit-ideals: Prevalence and correlates in undergraduate women</atitle><jtitle>Journal of American college health</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Health</addtitle><date>2022-11-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2476</spage><epage>2482</epage><pages>2476-2482</pages><issn>0744-8481</issn><eissn>1940-3208</eissn><abstract>Objective: The current study aimed to compare endorsement of the muscular- and thin-ideals alone, as well as simultaneous endorsement of both as representative of the fit-ideal and examine potential negative correlates of each type of ideal internalization. Participants: Participants were 300 female undergraduate students. Methods: Participants completed measures of internalization of the thin- and muscular-ideals, body dissatisfaction, body checking, and body avoidance. Results: Analyses revealed that approximately 24.9% of participants endorsed scores in the upper quartile on thin-ideal internalization, and 27.4% of participants fell in the upper quartile of muscular-ideal internalization, while 10.3% endorsed high internalization of both ideals. Analyses revealed that individuals endorsing only the thin-ideal reported significantly higher levels of body dissatisfaction and body avoidance than those endorsing the fit-ideal. Conclusions: Overall, findings suggested that thin- and muscular-ideal internalization present different patterns of association depending on whether an individual endorses one or both of these body ideals.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>33513070</pmid><doi>10.1080/07448481.2020.1865981</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0744-8481 |
| ispartof | Journal of American college health, 2022-11, Vol.70 (8), p.2476-2482 |
| issn | 0744-8481 1940-3208 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2736068572 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source |
| subjects | Adjustment (to Environment) Aesthetics Attitudes Body Composition Body ideals Body Image Cultural Influences Discontent Feeding and Eating Disorders Female Females fit-ideal internalization Human Body Humans Internalization muscular-ideal internalization Personal Satisfaction Prevalence Psychological Patterns Self Concept Social Attitudes Students Surveys and Questionnaires thin-ideal internalization Thinness Undergraduate Students Universities Values Women |
| title | Thin, muscular, and fit-ideals: Prevalence and correlates in undergraduate women |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thin,%20muscular,%20and%20fit-ideals:%20Prevalence%20and%20correlates%20in%20undergraduate%20women&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20American%20college%20health&rft.au=Wagner,%20Allison%20F.&rft.date=2022-11-17&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2476&rft.epage=2482&rft.pages=2476-2482&rft.issn=0744-8481&rft.eissn=1940-3208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07448481.2020.1865981&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2483817383%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736068572&rft_id=info:pmid/33513070&rft_ericid=EJ1370785&rfr_iscdi=true |