Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region

Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assembla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biodiversity and conservation 2022-12, Vol.31 (13-14), p.3237-3255
Hauptverfasser: Geldenhuys, Marinus, Gaigher, René, Pryke, James S., Samways, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3255
container_issue 13-14
container_start_page 3237
container_title Biodiversity and conservation
container_volume 31
creator Geldenhuys, Marinus
Gaigher, René
Pryke, James S.
Samways, Michael J.
description Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assemblages across vineyard-fynbos edges in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, where biodiversity-rich fynbos often borders vineyards. Species richness, assemblage composition, and compartmentalised beta-diversity (species turnover and nestedness) were assessed for three vegetation layers (ground level, lower vegetation, and upper vegetation) to determine bidirectional spillover. Species were also categorised according to biotope affiliation (crop-associated, fynbos-associated, or ubiquitous), based on habitat fidelity. We assessed how species richness of each biotope affiliation was influenced by environmental and management variables. Our main interest was biotope-specific variables which may enhance or impede spillover by influencing arthropods affiliated with the opposite biotope. Arthropod species richness did not differ along vineyard-fynbos transects for ground and lower vegetation layers but was lower in the upper vineyard vegetation compared to fynbos. Arthropod assemblages were distinct between biotopes for upper and lower vegetation but were similar on the soil surface and showed lower nestedness differences, indicating greater spillover by ground-level arthropods. In vineyards, no variables influenced fynbos-associated species, although herbaceous vegetation cover promoted ubiquitous arthropod species richness. Spillover between the biotopes was limited, and no drivers could be identified that promote spillover into vineyards, yet both biotopes supported diverse and distinct arthropod assemblages. Therefore, conservation of natural fynbos patches alongside sensitively managed vineyards is feasible for harmonising biodiversity conservation and viticulture.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2736067057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A726647411</galeid><sourcerecordid>A726647411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-dec9d32f2e2b905d8fc1a35453737b4204c4e6051802f9b8b8c31540c380af1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1u3CAQtqpGyjbNC-SE1LPTAYyxj1HUNpUS5dKeEcbgJfKCC-xW-0h9y47jSL1VMEJivp-Br6puKNxSAPk5UxCc1sAYVtO1tXxX7aiQrO4lhffVDvoWak6puKw-5PwCSBIt3VV_nrQPBcuHiSR7CDoUcrKTLbr4GIieIzZ--7Iny7z2Rn-yKXvnzQbwgZx8sGedxkx8JnEp_qBn4mIiJoZs02mV1qnsU1ziCkJV3FPy5jiXY0LwIWbtzWuHDD6-eZRzjZg9jjWh08fqwuk52-u386r6-fXLj_uH-vH52_f7u8fasK4r9WhNP3LmmGVDD2LsnKGai0ZwyeXQMGhMY1sQtAPm-qEbOsOpaMDwDrSjll9VnzbdJcVfR5uLeonHFNBSMclbaCUIiajbDTXp2SofXCxJG1yjPXh8t3Ue7-8ka9tGNpQigW0Ek2LOyTq1JPyodFYU1Jqh2jJUmKF6zVCtLnwjZQSHyaZ_s_yH9RddRqMr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736067057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Geldenhuys, Marinus ; Gaigher, René ; Pryke, James S. ; Samways, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Geldenhuys, Marinus ; Gaigher, René ; Pryke, James S. ; Samways, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assemblages across vineyard-fynbos edges in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, where biodiversity-rich fynbos often borders vineyards. Species richness, assemblage composition, and compartmentalised beta-diversity (species turnover and nestedness) were assessed for three vegetation layers (ground level, lower vegetation, and upper vegetation) to determine bidirectional spillover. Species were also categorised according to biotope affiliation (crop-associated, fynbos-associated, or ubiquitous), based on habitat fidelity. We assessed how species richness of each biotope affiliation was influenced by environmental and management variables. Our main interest was biotope-specific variables which may enhance or impede spillover by influencing arthropods affiliated with the opposite biotope. Arthropod species richness did not differ along vineyard-fynbos transects for ground and lower vegetation layers but was lower in the upper vineyard vegetation compared to fynbos. Arthropod assemblages were distinct between biotopes for upper and lower vegetation but were similar on the soil surface and showed lower nestedness differences, indicating greater spillover by ground-level arthropods. In vineyards, no variables influenced fynbos-associated species, although herbaceous vegetation cover promoted ubiquitous arthropod species richness. Spillover between the biotopes was limited, and no drivers could be identified that promote spillover into vineyards, yet both biotopes supported diverse and distinct arthropod assemblages. Therefore, conservation of natural fynbos patches alongside sensitively managed vineyards is feasible for harmonising biodiversity conservation and viticulture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Associated species ; Biodiversity ; Biological diversity ; Biological diversity conservation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotopes ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Diversification ; Ecology ; Edge effect ; Environmental management ; Fynbos ; Ground level ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Plant cover ; Soil surfaces ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Vegetation ; Vegetation cover ; Vineyards ; Viticulture ; Wildlife conservation ; Wine industry ; Wineries ; Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2022-12, Vol.31 (13-14), p.3237-3255</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-dec9d32f2e2b905d8fc1a35453737b4204c4e6051802f9b8b8c31540c380af1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-dec9d32f2e2b905d8fc1a35453737b4204c4e6051802f9b8b8c31540c380af1e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1319-7490</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geldenhuys, Marinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaigher, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pryke, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samways, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><addtitle>Biodivers Conserv</addtitle><description>Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assemblages across vineyard-fynbos edges in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, where biodiversity-rich fynbos often borders vineyards. Species richness, assemblage composition, and compartmentalised beta-diversity (species turnover and nestedness) were assessed for three vegetation layers (ground level, lower vegetation, and upper vegetation) to determine bidirectional spillover. Species were also categorised according to biotope affiliation (crop-associated, fynbos-associated, or ubiquitous), based on habitat fidelity. We assessed how species richness of each biotope affiliation was influenced by environmental and management variables. Our main interest was biotope-specific variables which may enhance or impede spillover by influencing arthropods affiliated with the opposite biotope. Arthropod species richness did not differ along vineyard-fynbos transects for ground and lower vegetation layers but was lower in the upper vineyard vegetation compared to fynbos. Arthropod assemblages were distinct between biotopes for upper and lower vegetation but were similar on the soil surface and showed lower nestedness differences, indicating greater spillover by ground-level arthropods. In vineyards, no variables influenced fynbos-associated species, although herbaceous vegetation cover promoted ubiquitous arthropod species richness. Spillover between the biotopes was limited, and no drivers could be identified that promote spillover into vineyards, yet both biotopes supported diverse and distinct arthropod assemblages. Therefore, conservation of natural fynbos patches alongside sensitively managed vineyards is feasible for harmonising biodiversity conservation and viticulture.</description><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Associated species</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity conservation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotopes</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Edge effect</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Fynbos</subject><subject>Ground level</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Viticulture</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wine industry</subject><subject>Wineries</subject><subject>Wineries &amp; vineyards</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc1u3CAQtqpGyjbNC-SE1LPTAYyxj1HUNpUS5dKeEcbgJfKCC-xW-0h9y47jSL1VMEJivp-Br6puKNxSAPk5UxCc1sAYVtO1tXxX7aiQrO4lhffVDvoWak6puKw-5PwCSBIt3VV_nrQPBcuHiSR7CDoUcrKTLbr4GIieIzZ--7Iny7z2Rn-yKXvnzQbwgZx8sGedxkx8JnEp_qBn4mIiJoZs02mV1qnsU1ziCkJV3FPy5jiXY0LwIWbtzWuHDD6-eZRzjZg9jjWh08fqwuk52-u386r6-fXLj_uH-vH52_f7u8fasK4r9WhNP3LmmGVDD2LsnKGai0ZwyeXQMGhMY1sQtAPm-qEbOsOpaMDwDrSjll9VnzbdJcVfR5uLeonHFNBSMclbaCUIiajbDTXp2SofXCxJG1yjPXh8t3Ue7-8ka9tGNpQigW0Ek2LOyTq1JPyodFYU1Jqh2jJUmKF6zVCtLnwjZQSHyaZ_s_yH9RddRqMr</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Geldenhuys, Marinus</creator><creator>Gaigher, René</creator><creator>Pryke, James S.</creator><creator>Samways, Michael J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-7490</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region</title><author>Geldenhuys, Marinus ; Gaigher, René ; Pryke, James S. ; Samways, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-dec9d32f2e2b905d8fc1a35453737b4204c4e6051802f9b8b8c31540c380af1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Associated species</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity conservation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotopes</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Edge effect</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Fynbos</topic><topic>Ground level</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Viticulture</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wine industry</topic><topic>Wineries</topic><topic>Wineries &amp; vineyards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geldenhuys, Marinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaigher, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pryke, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samways, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geldenhuys, Marinus</au><au>Gaigher, René</au><au>Pryke, James S.</au><au>Samways, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><stitle>Biodivers Conserv</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>13-14</issue><spage>3237</spage><epage>3255</epage><pages>3237-3255</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assemblages across vineyard-fynbos edges in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, where biodiversity-rich fynbos often borders vineyards. Species richness, assemblage composition, and compartmentalised beta-diversity (species turnover and nestedness) were assessed for three vegetation layers (ground level, lower vegetation, and upper vegetation) to determine bidirectional spillover. Species were also categorised according to biotope affiliation (crop-associated, fynbos-associated, or ubiquitous), based on habitat fidelity. We assessed how species richness of each biotope affiliation was influenced by environmental and management variables. Our main interest was biotope-specific variables which may enhance or impede spillover by influencing arthropods affiliated with the opposite biotope. Arthropod species richness did not differ along vineyard-fynbos transects for ground and lower vegetation layers but was lower in the upper vineyard vegetation compared to fynbos. Arthropod assemblages were distinct between biotopes for upper and lower vegetation but were similar on the soil surface and showed lower nestedness differences, indicating greater spillover by ground-level arthropods. In vineyards, no variables influenced fynbos-associated species, although herbaceous vegetation cover promoted ubiquitous arthropod species richness. Spillover between the biotopes was limited, and no drivers could be identified that promote spillover into vineyards, yet both biotopes supported diverse and distinct arthropod assemblages. Therefore, conservation of natural fynbos patches alongside sensitively managed vineyards is feasible for harmonising biodiversity conservation and viticulture.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-7490</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-3115
ispartof Biodiversity and conservation, 2022-12, Vol.31 (13-14), p.3237-3255
issn 0960-3115
1572-9710
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2736067057
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Arthropoda
Arthropods
Associated species
Biodiversity
Biological diversity
Biological diversity conservation
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biotopes
Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts
Conservation
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Diversification
Ecology
Edge effect
Environmental management
Fynbos
Ground level
Life Sciences
Original Paper
Plant cover
Soil surfaces
Species diversity
Species richness
Vegetation
Vegetation cover
Vineyards
Viticulture
Wildlife conservation
Wine industry
Wineries
Wineries & vineyards
title Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maintaining%20remnant%20vegetation%20along%20with%20plant%20diversification%20in%20vineyards%20is%20optimal%20for%20conserving%20arthropods%20in%20an%20agricultural%20mosaic%20in%20a%20biodiversity-rich%20region&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Geldenhuys,%20Marinus&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=13-14&rft.spage=3237&rft.epage=3255&rft.pages=3237-3255&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA726647411%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736067057&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A726647411&rfr_iscdi=true