Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region
Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assembla...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2022-12, Vol.31 (13-14), p.3237-3255 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3255 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13-14 |
container_start_page | 3237 |
container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Geldenhuys, Marinus Gaigher, René Pryke, James S. Samways, Michael J. |
description | Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assemblages across vineyard-fynbos edges in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, where biodiversity-rich fynbos often borders vineyards. Species richness, assemblage composition, and compartmentalised beta-diversity (species turnover and nestedness) were assessed for three vegetation layers (ground level, lower vegetation, and upper vegetation) to determine bidirectional spillover. Species were also categorised according to biotope affiliation (crop-associated, fynbos-associated, or ubiquitous), based on habitat fidelity. We assessed how species richness of each biotope affiliation was influenced by environmental and management variables. Our main interest was biotope-specific variables which may enhance or impede spillover by influencing arthropods affiliated with the opposite biotope. Arthropod species richness did not differ along vineyard-fynbos transects for ground and lower vegetation layers but was lower in the upper vineyard vegetation compared to fynbos. Arthropod assemblages were distinct between biotopes for upper and lower vegetation but were similar on the soil surface and showed lower nestedness differences, indicating greater spillover by ground-level arthropods. In vineyards, no variables influenced fynbos-associated species, although herbaceous vegetation cover promoted ubiquitous arthropod species richness. Spillover between the biotopes was limited, and no drivers could be identified that promote spillover into vineyards, yet both biotopes supported diverse and distinct arthropod assemblages. Therefore, conservation of natural fynbos patches alongside sensitively managed vineyards is feasible for harmonising biodiversity conservation and viticulture. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2736067057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A726647411</galeid><sourcerecordid>A726647411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-dec9d32f2e2b905d8fc1a35453737b4204c4e6051802f9b8b8c31540c380af1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1u3CAQtqpGyjbNC-SE1LPTAYyxj1HUNpUS5dKeEcbgJfKCC-xW-0h9y47jSL1VMEJivp-Br6puKNxSAPk5UxCc1sAYVtO1tXxX7aiQrO4lhffVDvoWak6puKw-5PwCSBIt3VV_nrQPBcuHiSR7CDoUcrKTLbr4GIieIzZ--7Iny7z2Rn-yKXvnzQbwgZx8sGedxkx8JnEp_qBn4mIiJoZs02mV1qnsU1ziCkJV3FPy5jiXY0LwIWbtzWuHDD6-eZRzjZg9jjWh08fqwuk52-u386r6-fXLj_uH-vH52_f7u8fasK4r9WhNP3LmmGVDD2LsnKGai0ZwyeXQMGhMY1sQtAPm-qEbOsOpaMDwDrSjll9VnzbdJcVfR5uLeonHFNBSMclbaCUIiajbDTXp2SofXCxJG1yjPXh8t3Ue7-8ka9tGNpQigW0Ek2LOyTq1JPyodFYU1Jqh2jJUmKF6zVCtLnwjZQSHyaZ_s_yH9RddRqMr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2736067057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Geldenhuys, Marinus ; Gaigher, René ; Pryke, James S. ; Samways, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Geldenhuys, Marinus ; Gaigher, René ; Pryke, James S. ; Samways, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assemblages across vineyard-fynbos edges in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, where biodiversity-rich fynbos often borders vineyards. Species richness, assemblage composition, and compartmentalised beta-diversity (species turnover and nestedness) were assessed for three vegetation layers (ground level, lower vegetation, and upper vegetation) to determine bidirectional spillover. Species were also categorised according to biotope affiliation (crop-associated, fynbos-associated, or ubiquitous), based on habitat fidelity. We assessed how species richness of each biotope affiliation was influenced by environmental and management variables. Our main interest was biotope-specific variables which may enhance or impede spillover by influencing arthropods affiliated with the opposite biotope. Arthropod species richness did not differ along vineyard-fynbos transects for ground and lower vegetation layers but was lower in the upper vineyard vegetation compared to fynbos. Arthropod assemblages were distinct between biotopes for upper and lower vegetation but were similar on the soil surface and showed lower nestedness differences, indicating greater spillover by ground-level arthropods. In vineyards, no variables influenced fynbos-associated species, although herbaceous vegetation cover promoted ubiquitous arthropod species richness. Spillover between the biotopes was limited, and no drivers could be identified that promote spillover into vineyards, yet both biotopes supported diverse and distinct arthropod assemblages. Therefore, conservation of natural fynbos patches alongside sensitively managed vineyards is feasible for harmonising biodiversity conservation and viticulture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Associated species ; Biodiversity ; Biological diversity ; Biological diversity conservation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotopes ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Diversification ; Ecology ; Edge effect ; Environmental management ; Fynbos ; Ground level ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Plant cover ; Soil surfaces ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Vegetation ; Vegetation cover ; Vineyards ; Viticulture ; Wildlife conservation ; Wine industry ; Wineries ; Wineries & vineyards</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2022-12, Vol.31 (13-14), p.3237-3255</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-dec9d32f2e2b905d8fc1a35453737b4204c4e6051802f9b8b8c31540c380af1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-dec9d32f2e2b905d8fc1a35453737b4204c4e6051802f9b8b8c31540c380af1e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1319-7490</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geldenhuys, Marinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaigher, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pryke, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samways, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><addtitle>Biodivers Conserv</addtitle><description>Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assemblages across vineyard-fynbos edges in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, where biodiversity-rich fynbos often borders vineyards. Species richness, assemblage composition, and compartmentalised beta-diversity (species turnover and nestedness) were assessed for three vegetation layers (ground level, lower vegetation, and upper vegetation) to determine bidirectional spillover. Species were also categorised according to biotope affiliation (crop-associated, fynbos-associated, or ubiquitous), based on habitat fidelity. We assessed how species richness of each biotope affiliation was influenced by environmental and management variables. Our main interest was biotope-specific variables which may enhance or impede spillover by influencing arthropods affiliated with the opposite biotope. Arthropod species richness did not differ along vineyard-fynbos transects for ground and lower vegetation layers but was lower in the upper vineyard vegetation compared to fynbos. Arthropod assemblages were distinct between biotopes for upper and lower vegetation but were similar on the soil surface and showed lower nestedness differences, indicating greater spillover by ground-level arthropods. In vineyards, no variables influenced fynbos-associated species, although herbaceous vegetation cover promoted ubiquitous arthropod species richness. Spillover between the biotopes was limited, and no drivers could be identified that promote spillover into vineyards, yet both biotopes supported diverse and distinct arthropod assemblages. Therefore, conservation of natural fynbos patches alongside sensitively managed vineyards is feasible for harmonising biodiversity conservation and viticulture.</description><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Associated species</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity conservation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotopes</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Edge effect</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Fynbos</subject><subject>Ground level</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Soil surfaces</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Viticulture</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wine industry</subject><subject>Wineries</subject><subject>Wineries & vineyards</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc1u3CAQtqpGyjbNC-SE1LPTAYyxj1HUNpUS5dKeEcbgJfKCC-xW-0h9y47jSL1VMEJivp-Br6puKNxSAPk5UxCc1sAYVtO1tXxX7aiQrO4lhffVDvoWak6puKw-5PwCSBIt3VV_nrQPBcuHiSR7CDoUcrKTLbr4GIieIzZ--7Iny7z2Rn-yKXvnzQbwgZx8sGedxkx8JnEp_qBn4mIiJoZs02mV1qnsU1ziCkJV3FPy5jiXY0LwIWbtzWuHDD6-eZRzjZg9jjWh08fqwuk52-u386r6-fXLj_uH-vH52_f7u8fasK4r9WhNP3LmmGVDD2LsnKGai0ZwyeXQMGhMY1sQtAPm-qEbOsOpaMDwDrSjll9VnzbdJcVfR5uLeonHFNBSMclbaCUIiajbDTXp2SofXCxJG1yjPXh8t3Ue7-8ka9tGNpQigW0Ek2LOyTq1JPyodFYU1Jqh2jJUmKF6zVCtLnwjZQSHyaZ_s_yH9RddRqMr</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Geldenhuys, Marinus</creator><creator>Gaigher, René</creator><creator>Pryke, James S.</creator><creator>Samways, Michael J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-7490</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region</title><author>Geldenhuys, Marinus ; Gaigher, René ; Pryke, James S. ; Samways, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-dec9d32f2e2b905d8fc1a35453737b4204c4e6051802f9b8b8c31540c380af1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Associated species</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity conservation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotopes</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Edge effect</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Fynbos</topic><topic>Ground level</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Soil surfaces</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Viticulture</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wine industry</topic><topic>Wineries</topic><topic>Wineries & vineyards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geldenhuys, Marinus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaigher, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pryke, James S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samways, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geldenhuys, Marinus</au><au>Gaigher, René</au><au>Pryke, James S.</au><au>Samways, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><stitle>Biodivers Conserv</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>13-14</issue><spage>3237</spage><epage>3255</epage><pages>3237-3255</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>Edges between adjacent biotopes may hinder or promote spillover of arthropods, influencing their distribution across landscapes. An understanding of spillover between natural and production areas enables management of edge effects for optimal biodiversity conservation. We assessed arthropod assemblages across vineyard-fynbos edges in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa, where biodiversity-rich fynbos often borders vineyards. Species richness, assemblage composition, and compartmentalised beta-diversity (species turnover and nestedness) were assessed for three vegetation layers (ground level, lower vegetation, and upper vegetation) to determine bidirectional spillover. Species were also categorised according to biotope affiliation (crop-associated, fynbos-associated, or ubiquitous), based on habitat fidelity. We assessed how species richness of each biotope affiliation was influenced by environmental and management variables. Our main interest was biotope-specific variables which may enhance or impede spillover by influencing arthropods affiliated with the opposite biotope. Arthropod species richness did not differ along vineyard-fynbos transects for ground and lower vegetation layers but was lower in the upper vineyard vegetation compared to fynbos. Arthropod assemblages were distinct between biotopes for upper and lower vegetation but were similar on the soil surface and showed lower nestedness differences, indicating greater spillover by ground-level arthropods. In vineyards, no variables influenced fynbos-associated species, although herbaceous vegetation cover promoted ubiquitous arthropod species richness. Spillover between the biotopes was limited, and no drivers could be identified that promote spillover into vineyards, yet both biotopes supported diverse and distinct arthropod assemblages. Therefore, conservation of natural fynbos patches alongside sensitively managed vineyards is feasible for harmonising biodiversity conservation and viticulture.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-7490</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2022-12, Vol.31 (13-14), p.3237-3255 |
issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2736067057 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Arthropoda Arthropods Associated species Biodiversity Biological diversity Biological diversity conservation Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotopes Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Conservation Conservation Biology/Ecology Diversification Ecology Edge effect Environmental management Fynbos Ground level Life Sciences Original Paper Plant cover Soil surfaces Species diversity Species richness Vegetation Vegetation cover Vineyards Viticulture Wildlife conservation Wine industry Wineries Wineries & vineyards |
title | Maintaining remnant vegetation along with plant diversification in vineyards is optimal for conserving arthropods in an agricultural mosaic in a biodiversity-rich region |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maintaining%20remnant%20vegetation%20along%20with%20plant%20diversification%20in%20vineyards%20is%20optimal%20for%20conserving%20arthropods%20in%20an%20agricultural%20mosaic%20in%20a%20biodiversity-rich%20region&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Geldenhuys,%20Marinus&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=13-14&rft.spage=3237&rft.epage=3255&rft.pages=3237-3255&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-022-02486-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA726647411%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2736067057&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A726647411&rfr_iscdi=true |