Psychometric evaluation of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil)
to analyze the validity of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil), 25 and 20-item versions, based on its internal structure (dimensional and correlation), with professors and health workers from a public university in southern Brazil. methodological study, developed in 2018, with 526 part...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem 2022, Vol.75 (3), p.e20210241-7 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | e20210241 |
| container_title | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem |
| container_volume | 75 |
| creator | Greco, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani Ongaro, Juliana Dal Seidel, Enio Júnior Machado, Wagner de Lara McEwen, Kathryn Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza |
| description | to analyze the validity of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil), 25 and 20-item versions, based on its internal structure (dimensional and correlation), with professors and health workers from a public university in southern Brazil.
methodological study, developed in 2018, with 526 participants. For psychometric tests, the following were used: Confirmatory Factor Analysis; composite reliability, and convergent validity against the Engagement at work; Occupational self-efficacy; Overall resilience; General Health Questionnaire; and Social support at work scales.
both versions had factor loadings > 0.30, adequate fit indices and satisfactory composite reliability. In both versions, strong and direct correlations with general Resilience and Self-efficacy were evidenced; moderate and direct with social Engagement and Support; and moderate and inverse with General Health.
the RAW Scale 25 and 20 - Brazil meets the validity requirements with potential for assessing resilience at work within the studied context. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0241 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sciel</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2734720529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><scielo_id>S0034_71672022000400183</scielo_id><sourcerecordid>2636142864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-fab27a9c201978ada17a42fb9de837aa22b29f5d7f141911278f1c5795a46f3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLJDEUhYMoY-P4CwYk4EYX5eTepCqVpTaOCg0jPnAZUqkEo9UdTaoE59dPFd32wtW9i--c-ziE_AJ2BqVivxnjopBQyQIZQsFQwA6ZgapFwYSodslsS-yTw5xDw1hZAseq_kH2eYlc1VjNyOI2f9rnuHR9Cpa6D9MNpg9xRaOn_bOjdy6HLriVddT09CmmV3pvTefoyd3506Yt6EUy_0J3-pPsedNld7ipB-Txz-XD_LpY_L26mZ8vCsv5uKw3DUqjLDJQsjatAWkE-ka1rubSGMQGlS9b6UGAAkBZe7ClVKURlectPyBna99sg-uifolDWo0D9f10tJ6OHr-CjDHBGNR8FJysBW8pvg8u93oZsnVdZ1YuDlljxSsQWFdiRI-_oVt3lFyMxiWqkeJryqaYc3Jev6WwNOlTA9NTQHq7iZ4C0lNAo-po4z00S9duNV9x8P8nhoT9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734720529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Greco, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani ; Ongaro, Juliana Dal ; Seidel, Enio Júnior ; Machado, Wagner de Lara ; McEwen, Kathryn ; Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza</creator><creatorcontrib>Greco, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani ; Ongaro, Juliana Dal ; Seidel, Enio Júnior ; Machado, Wagner de Lara ; McEwen, Kathryn ; Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza</creatorcontrib><description>to analyze the validity of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil), 25 and 20-item versions, based on its internal structure (dimensional and correlation), with professors and health workers from a public university in southern Brazil.
methodological study, developed in 2018, with 526 participants. For psychometric tests, the following were used: Confirmatory Factor Analysis; composite reliability, and convergent validity against the Engagement at work; Occupational self-efficacy; Overall resilience; General Health Questionnaire; and Social support at work scales.
both versions had factor loadings > 0.30, adequate fit indices and satisfactory composite reliability. In both versions, strong and direct correlations with general Resilience and Self-efficacy were evidenced; moderate and direct with social Engagement and Support; and moderate and inverse with General Health.
the RAW Scale 25 and 20 - Brazil meets the validity requirements with potential for assessing resilience at work within the studied context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-7167</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1984-0446</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1984-0446</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35239826</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Brazil ; Clinical medicine ; Data collection ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Humans ; Information technology ; NURSING ; Occupational stress ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Efficacy ; Stress ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Validity ; Workers ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2022, Vol.75 (3), p.e20210241-7</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-fab27a9c201978ada17a42fb9de837aa22b29f5d7f141911278f1c5795a46f3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-fab27a9c201978ada17a42fb9de837aa22b29f5d7f141911278f1c5795a46f3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5308-1604 ; 0000-0003-0058-0132 ; 0000-0002-9656-0699 ; 0000-0001-5555-5116 ; 0000-0001-6797-4174 ; 0000-0001-6999-5470</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35239826$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greco, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongaro, Juliana Dal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidel, Enio Júnior</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Wagner de Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil)</title><title>Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem</title><addtitle>Rev Bras Enferm</addtitle><description>to analyze the validity of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil), 25 and 20-item versions, based on its internal structure (dimensional and correlation), with professors and health workers from a public university in southern Brazil.
methodological study, developed in 2018, with 526 participants. For psychometric tests, the following were used: Confirmatory Factor Analysis; composite reliability, and convergent validity against the Engagement at work; Occupational self-efficacy; Overall resilience; General Health Questionnaire; and Social support at work scales.
both versions had factor loadings > 0.30, adequate fit indices and satisfactory composite reliability. In both versions, strong and direct correlations with general Resilience and Self-efficacy were evidenced; moderate and direct with social Engagement and Support; and moderate and inverse with General Health.
the RAW Scale 25 and 20 - Brazil meets the validity requirements with potential for assessing resilience at work within the studied context.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>NURSING</subject><subject>Occupational stress</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0034-7167</issn><issn>1984-0446</issn><issn>1984-0446</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLJDEUhYMoY-P4CwYk4EYX5eTepCqVpTaOCg0jPnAZUqkEo9UdTaoE59dPFd32wtW9i--c-ziE_AJ2BqVivxnjopBQyQIZQsFQwA6ZgapFwYSodslsS-yTw5xDw1hZAseq_kH2eYlc1VjNyOI2f9rnuHR9Cpa6D9MNpg9xRaOn_bOjdy6HLriVddT09CmmV3pvTefoyd3506Yt6EUy_0J3-pPsedNld7ipB-Txz-XD_LpY_L26mZ8vCsv5uKw3DUqjLDJQsjatAWkE-ka1rubSGMQGlS9b6UGAAkBZe7ClVKURlectPyBna99sg-uifolDWo0D9f10tJ6OHr-CjDHBGNR8FJysBW8pvg8u93oZsnVdZ1YuDlljxSsQWFdiRI-_oVt3lFyMxiWqkeJryqaYc3Jev6WwNOlTA9NTQHq7iZ4C0lNAo-po4z00S9duNV9x8P8nhoT9</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Greco, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani</creator><creator>Ongaro, Juliana Dal</creator><creator>Seidel, Enio Júnior</creator><creator>Machado, Wagner de Lara</creator><creator>McEwen, Kathryn</creator><creator>Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza</creator><general>Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CLZPN</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>GPN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5308-1604</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0058-0132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-0699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-5116</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-4174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-5470</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Psychometric evaluation of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil)</title><author>Greco, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani ; Ongaro, Juliana Dal ; Seidel, Enio Júnior ; Machado, Wagner de Lara ; McEwen, Kathryn ; Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-fab27a9c201978ada17a42fb9de837aa22b29f5d7f141911278f1c5795a46f3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>NURSING</topic><topic>Occupational stress</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greco, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ongaro, Juliana Dal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidel, Enio Júnior</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machado, Wagner de Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEwen, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Latin America & Iberia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SciELO</collection><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greco, Patrícia Bitencourt Toscani</au><au>Ongaro, Juliana Dal</au><au>Seidel, Enio Júnior</au><au>Machado, Wagner de Lara</au><au>McEwen, Kathryn</au><au>Magnago, Tânia Solange Bosi de Souza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric evaluation of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil)</atitle><jtitle>Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Bras Enferm</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e20210241</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>e20210241-7</pages><issn>0034-7167</issn><issn>1984-0446</issn><eissn>1984-0446</eissn><abstract>to analyze the validity of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil), 25 and 20-item versions, based on its internal structure (dimensional and correlation), with professors and health workers from a public university in southern Brazil.
methodological study, developed in 2018, with 526 participants. For psychometric tests, the following were used: Confirmatory Factor Analysis; composite reliability, and convergent validity against the Engagement at work; Occupational self-efficacy; Overall resilience; General Health Questionnaire; and Social support at work scales.
both versions had factor loadings > 0.30, adequate fit indices and satisfactory composite reliability. In both versions, strong and direct correlations with general Resilience and Self-efficacy were evidenced; moderate and direct with social Engagement and Support; and moderate and inverse with General Health.
the RAW Scale 25 and 20 - Brazil meets the validity requirements with potential for assessing resilience at work within the studied context.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem</pub><pmid>35239826</pmid><doi>10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0241</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5308-1604</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0058-0132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9656-0699</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-5116</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6797-4174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-5470</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0034-7167 |
| ispartof | Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 2022, Vol.75 (3), p.e20210241-7 |
| issn | 0034-7167 1984-0446 1984-0446 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2734720529 |
| source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Adaptation Brazil Clinical medicine Data collection Factor Analysis, Statistical Humans Information technology NURSING Occupational stress Psychometrics Quantitative psychology Questionnaires Reproducibility of Results Self Efficacy Stress Surveys and Questionnaires Validity Workers Workloads |
| title | Psychometric evaluation of the Resilience at Work Scale (RAW Scale - Brazil) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T11%3A54%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sciel&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Resilience%20at%20Work%20Scale%20(RAW%20Scale%20-%20Brazil)&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Brasileira%20de%20Enfermagem&rft.au=Greco,%20Patr%C3%ADcia%20Bitencourt%20Toscani&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e20210241&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=e20210241-7&rft.issn=0034-7167&rft.eissn=1984-0446&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sciel%3E2636142864%3C/proquest_sciel%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734720529&rft_id=info:pmid/35239826&rft_scielo_id=S0034_71672022000400183&rfr_iscdi=true |