The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining

In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of comparative law 2022-10, Vol.70 (1), p.139-161
1. Verfasser: Langbein, John H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 161
container_issue 1
container_start_page 139
container_title The American journal of comparative law
container_volume 70
creator Langbein, John H
description In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. The German practice resembles American plea bargaining in many respects. This Article probes the similarities and the differences between the two systems of negotiated criminal justice. The Article discusses the origins of the German practice, its tensions with historic principles of the procedure system, and the troubled efforts of the courts and the legislature to justify and to regulate the practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajcl/avac025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2734712356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2734712356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-eff503983e556aca37b411f193ae2749d0dba3aae24907e3758955d7cefb4b393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFZvfoAFr8bun2y2660GrULBHip4C5PNpN2SbOpuqvjtTWkPnmYG3nvD-xFyy9kDZ0ZOYGubCXyDZUKdkZGQIksMN_qcjBhj4rB_XpKrGLeMccYzPiL9aoN0tQ-e9h3NO19jjK7z9AnCGpx3fk2dp3MMLXiaB9c6Dw1dhs5itQ_4SHPYR4wUfDXY2x0EFzsf6Y_rN3TWYnB2MC4bhH-R1-SihibizWmOycfL8yp_TRbv87d8tkisyGSfYF0rJs1UolIZWJC6TDmvuZGAQqemYlUJEoYjNUyj1GpqlKq0xbpMS2nkmNwdc3eh-9pj7IttN1QdXhZCy1RzIVU2qO6PKhu6GAPWxW7oCeG34Kw4cC0OXIsTV_kH2Nht0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734712356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Langbein, John H</creator><creatorcontrib>Langbein, John H</creatorcontrib><description>In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. The German practice resembles American plea bargaining in many respects. This Article probes the similarities and the differences between the two systems of negotiated criminal justice. The Article discusses the origins of the German practice, its tensions with historic principles of the procedure system, and the troubled efforts of the courts and the legislature to justify and to regulate the practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-919X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-9197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajcl/avac025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: American Society of Comparative Law</publisher><subject>Courts ; Criminal justice ; Criminal pleas ; Criminal procedure ; Legal counsel ; Legislatures ; Plea bargaining</subject><ispartof>The American journal of comparative law, 2022-10, Vol.70 (1), p.139-161</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Comparative Law Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-eff503983e556aca37b411f193ae2749d0dba3aae24907e3758955d7cefb4b393</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langbein, John H</creatorcontrib><title>The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining</title><title>The American journal of comparative law</title><description>In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. The German practice resembles American plea bargaining in many respects. This Article probes the similarities and the differences between the two systems of negotiated criminal justice. The Article discusses the origins of the German practice, its tensions with historic principles of the procedure system, and the troubled efforts of the courts and the legislature to justify and to regulate the practice.</description><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal pleas</subject><subject>Criminal procedure</subject><subject>Legal counsel</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Plea bargaining</subject><issn>0002-919X</issn><issn>2326-9197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFZvfoAFr8bun2y2660GrULBHip4C5PNpN2SbOpuqvjtTWkPnmYG3nvD-xFyy9kDZ0ZOYGubCXyDZUKdkZGQIksMN_qcjBhj4rB_XpKrGLeMccYzPiL9aoN0tQ-e9h3NO19jjK7z9AnCGpx3fk2dp3MMLXiaB9c6Dw1dhs5itQ_4SHPYR4wUfDXY2x0EFzsf6Y_rN3TWYnB2MC4bhH-R1-SihibizWmOycfL8yp_TRbv87d8tkisyGSfYF0rJs1UolIZWJC6TDmvuZGAQqemYlUJEoYjNUyj1GpqlKq0xbpMS2nkmNwdc3eh-9pj7IttN1QdXhZCy1RzIVU2qO6PKhu6GAPWxW7oCeG34Kw4cC0OXIsTV_kH2Nht0A</recordid><startdate>20221025</startdate><enddate>20221025</enddate><creator>Langbein, John H</creator><general>American Society of Comparative Law</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221025</creationdate><title>The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining</title><author>Langbein, John H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-eff503983e556aca37b411f193ae2749d0dba3aae24907e3758955d7cefb4b393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal pleas</topic><topic>Criminal procedure</topic><topic>Legal counsel</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Plea bargaining</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langbein, John H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The American journal of comparative law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langbein, John H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of comparative law</jtitle><date>2022-10-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>139-161</pages><issn>0002-919X</issn><eissn>2326-9197</eissn><abstract>In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. The German practice resembles American plea bargaining in many respects. This Article probes the similarities and the differences between the two systems of negotiated criminal justice. The Article discusses the origins of the German practice, its tensions with historic principles of the procedure system, and the troubled efforts of the courts and the legislature to justify and to regulate the practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>American Society of Comparative Law</pub><doi>10.1093/ajcl/avac025</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-919X
ispartof The American journal of comparative law, 2022-10, Vol.70 (1), p.139-161
issn 0002-919X
2326-9197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2734712356
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Courts
Criminal justice
Criminal pleas
Criminal procedure
Legal counsel
Legislatures
Plea bargaining
title The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A58%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Turn%20to%20Confession%20Bargaining%20in%20German%20Criminal%20Procedure:%20Causes%20and%20Comparisons%20with%20American%20Plea%20Bargaining&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20comparative%20law&rft.au=Langbein,%20John%20H&rft.date=2022-10-25&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=139-161&rft.issn=0002-919X&rft.eissn=2326-9197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajcl/avac025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734712356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734712356&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true