The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining
In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of comparative law 2022-10, Vol.70 (1), p.139-161 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 139 |
container_title | The American journal of comparative law |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Langbein, John H |
description | In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. The German practice resembles American plea bargaining in many respects. This Article probes the similarities and the differences between the two systems of negotiated criminal justice. The Article discusses the origins of the German practice, its tensions with historic principles of the procedure system, and the troubled efforts of the courts and the legislature to justify and to regulate the practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ajcl/avac025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2734712356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2734712356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-eff503983e556aca37b411f193ae2749d0dba3aae24907e3758955d7cefb4b393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFZvfoAFr8bun2y2660GrULBHip4C5PNpN2SbOpuqvjtTWkPnmYG3nvD-xFyy9kDZ0ZOYGubCXyDZUKdkZGQIksMN_qcjBhj4rB_XpKrGLeMccYzPiL9aoN0tQ-e9h3NO19jjK7z9AnCGpx3fk2dp3MMLXiaB9c6Dw1dhs5itQ_4SHPYR4wUfDXY2x0EFzsf6Y_rN3TWYnB2MC4bhH-R1-SihibizWmOycfL8yp_TRbv87d8tkisyGSfYF0rJs1UolIZWJC6TDmvuZGAQqemYlUJEoYjNUyj1GpqlKq0xbpMS2nkmNwdc3eh-9pj7IttN1QdXhZCy1RzIVU2qO6PKhu6GAPWxW7oCeG34Kw4cC0OXIsTV_kH2Nht0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734712356</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Langbein, John H</creator><creatorcontrib>Langbein, John H</creatorcontrib><description>In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. The German practice resembles American plea bargaining in many respects. This Article probes the similarities and the differences between the two systems of negotiated criminal justice. The Article discusses the origins of the German practice, its tensions with historic principles of the procedure system, and the troubled efforts of the courts and the legislature to justify and to regulate the practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-919X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-9197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajcl/avac025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: American Society of Comparative Law</publisher><subject>Courts ; Criminal justice ; Criminal pleas ; Criminal procedure ; Legal counsel ; Legislatures ; Plea bargaining</subject><ispartof>The American journal of comparative law, 2022-10, Vol.70 (1), p.139-161</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Comparative Law Mar 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-eff503983e556aca37b411f193ae2749d0dba3aae24907e3758955d7cefb4b393</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langbein, John H</creatorcontrib><title>The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining</title><title>The American journal of comparative law</title><description>In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. The German practice resembles American plea bargaining in many respects. This Article probes the similarities and the differences between the two systems of negotiated criminal justice. The Article discusses the origins of the German practice, its tensions with historic principles of the procedure system, and the troubled efforts of the courts and the legislature to justify and to regulate the practice.</description><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal pleas</subject><subject>Criminal procedure</subject><subject>Legal counsel</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Plea bargaining</subject><issn>0002-919X</issn><issn>2326-9197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFZvfoAFr8bun2y2660GrULBHip4C5PNpN2SbOpuqvjtTWkPnmYG3nvD-xFyy9kDZ0ZOYGubCXyDZUKdkZGQIksMN_qcjBhj4rB_XpKrGLeMccYzPiL9aoN0tQ-e9h3NO19jjK7z9AnCGpx3fk2dp3MMLXiaB9c6Dw1dhs5itQ_4SHPYR4wUfDXY2x0EFzsf6Y_rN3TWYnB2MC4bhH-R1-SihibizWmOycfL8yp_TRbv87d8tkisyGSfYF0rJs1UolIZWJC6TDmvuZGAQqemYlUJEoYjNUyj1GpqlKq0xbpMS2nkmNwdc3eh-9pj7IttN1QdXhZCy1RzIVU2qO6PKhu6GAPWxW7oCeG34Kw4cC0OXIsTV_kH2Nht0A</recordid><startdate>20221025</startdate><enddate>20221025</enddate><creator>Langbein, John H</creator><general>American Society of Comparative Law</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221025</creationdate><title>The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining</title><author>Langbein, John H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-eff503983e556aca37b411f193ae2749d0dba3aae24907e3758955d7cefb4b393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal pleas</topic><topic>Criminal procedure</topic><topic>Legal counsel</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Plea bargaining</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langbein, John H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The American journal of comparative law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langbein, John H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of comparative law</jtitle><date>2022-10-25</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>161</epage><pages>139-161</pages><issn>0002-919X</issn><eissn>2326-9197</eissn><abstract>In recent decades German criminal procedure has developed a practice of confession bargaining, in which defense counsel negotiates with the trial judge for the defendant to confess the charged offense in exchange for a milder sentence than would result if the defendant were to contest the charge. The German practice resembles American plea bargaining in many respects. This Article probes the similarities and the differences between the two systems of negotiated criminal justice. The Article discusses the origins of the German practice, its tensions with historic principles of the procedure system, and the troubled efforts of the courts and the legislature to justify and to regulate the practice.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>American Society of Comparative Law</pub><doi>10.1093/ajcl/avac025</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-919X |
ispartof | The American journal of comparative law, 2022-10, Vol.70 (1), p.139-161 |
issn | 0002-919X 2326-9197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2734712356 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Courts Criminal justice Criminal pleas Criminal procedure Legal counsel Legislatures Plea bargaining |
title | The Turn to Confession Bargaining in German Criminal Procedure: Causes and Comparisons with American Plea Bargaining |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A58%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Turn%20to%20Confession%20Bargaining%20in%20German%20Criminal%20Procedure:%20Causes%20and%20Comparisons%20with%20American%20Plea%20Bargaining&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20comparative%20law&rft.au=Langbein,%20John%20H&rft.date=2022-10-25&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=161&rft.pages=139-161&rft.issn=0002-919X&rft.eissn=2326-9197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajcl/avac025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734712356%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734712356&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |