The Effect of Medical Device Regulations on Deploying a Lean Six Sigma Project
This paper investigates the differences in timelines involved in Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project deployment in a regulated industry versus in an unregulated one. Two case studies utilising Lean Six Sigma methods—in order to compare the transfer of manual manufacturing lines within a medical device and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Processes 2022-11, Vol.10 (11), p.2303 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2303 |
container_title | Processes |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | McGrane, Vincent McDermott, Olivia Trubetskaya, Anna Rosa, Angelo Sony, Michael |
description | This paper investigates the differences in timelines involved in Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project deployment in a regulated industry versus in an unregulated one. Two case studies utilising Lean Six Sigma methods—in order to compare the transfer of manual manufacturing lines within a medical device and electronics manufacturing site—are discussed and utilised. This research aims to show the effects of regulatory procedures on LSS project implementation and timelines. This study particularly highlights how a regulatory environment can be a barrier, or bottleneck, to project management, continuous improvement, and engineering changes in the MedTech or medical device manufacturing industry. The results of this study represent an important first step towards a full understanding of the influence of regulations on operations in medical devices and, by extension, on pharmaceutical manufacturing industries on a global scale. The research limitations are that the data collected were from two specific case study comparisons alone. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr10112303 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2734709959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A744993108</galeid><sourcerecordid>A744993108</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-d60810fa54056b2c44b72ce8872310c4536251ec30fdbeb9fc199162b43204db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUUtLAzEQDqJgqb34CwLehNa8drM5llofUB9oPYdsNllTdjdrshX7741UUMEZhhk-vsdhADjFaEapQBd9wAhjQhE9ACNCCJ8Kjvnhr_sYTGLcoFQC0yLLR-B-_Wrg0lqjB-gtvDOV06qBl-bdaQOfTL1t1OB8F6HvEto3fue6Giq4MqqDz-4jTd0q-Bj8JnmcgCOrmmgm33sMXq6W68XNdPVwfbuYr6aa5mSYVjkqMLIqYyjLS6IZKznRpig4oRhpliVWho2myFalKYXVWAick5JRglhV0jE42_v2wb9tTRzkxm9DlyIl4ZRxJEQmfli1aox0nfVDULp1Ucs5Z0yIFFYk1uwfVurKtE77zliX8D-C871ABx9jMFb2wbUq7CRG8usT8ucT9BMuuHbF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734709959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Medical Device Regulations on Deploying a Lean Six Sigma Project</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>McGrane, Vincent ; McDermott, Olivia ; Trubetskaya, Anna ; Rosa, Angelo ; Sony, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>McGrane, Vincent ; McDermott, Olivia ; Trubetskaya, Anna ; Rosa, Angelo ; Sony, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the differences in timelines involved in Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project deployment in a regulated industry versus in an unregulated one. Two case studies utilising Lean Six Sigma methods—in order to compare the transfer of manual manufacturing lines within a medical device and electronics manufacturing site—are discussed and utilised. This research aims to show the effects of regulatory procedures on LSS project implementation and timelines. This study particularly highlights how a regulatory environment can be a barrier, or bottleneck, to project management, continuous improvement, and engineering changes in the MedTech or medical device manufacturing industry. The results of this study represent an important first step towards a full understanding of the influence of regulations on operations in medical devices and, by extension, on pharmaceutical manufacturing industries on a global scale. The research limitations are that the data collected were from two specific case study comparisons alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr10112303</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Compliance ; Continuous improvement ; Federal regulation ; Industrial project management ; ISO standards ; Lean manufacturing ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Medical device industry ; Medical equipment ; Medical research ; Medical technology ; Pacemakers ; Physiological apparatus ; Project management ; Quality management ; Regulated industries ; Regulations ; Six Sigma</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2022-11, Vol.10 (11), p.2303</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-d60810fa54056b2c44b72ce8872310c4536251ec30fdbeb9fc199162b43204db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-d60810fa54056b2c44b72ce8872310c4536251ec30fdbeb9fc199162b43204db3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2151-6156 ; 0000-0002-8003-5216 ; 0000-0001-5714-4601 ; 0000-0001-8524-9312</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGrane, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trubetskaya, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sony, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Medical Device Regulations on Deploying a Lean Six Sigma Project</title><title>Processes</title><description>This paper investigates the differences in timelines involved in Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project deployment in a regulated industry versus in an unregulated one. Two case studies utilising Lean Six Sigma methods—in order to compare the transfer of manual manufacturing lines within a medical device and electronics manufacturing site—are discussed and utilised. This research aims to show the effects of regulatory procedures on LSS project implementation and timelines. This study particularly highlights how a regulatory environment can be a barrier, or bottleneck, to project management, continuous improvement, and engineering changes in the MedTech or medical device manufacturing industry. The results of this study represent an important first step towards a full understanding of the influence of regulations on operations in medical devices and, by extension, on pharmaceutical manufacturing industries on a global scale. The research limitations are that the data collected were from two specific case study comparisons alone.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Continuous improvement</subject><subject>Federal regulation</subject><subject>Industrial project management</subject><subject>ISO standards</subject><subject>Lean manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Medical device industry</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical technology</subject><subject>Pacemakers</subject><subject>Physiological apparatus</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Regulated industries</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Six Sigma</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptUUtLAzEQDqJgqb34CwLehNa8drM5llofUB9oPYdsNllTdjdrshX7741UUMEZhhk-vsdhADjFaEapQBd9wAhjQhE9ACNCCJ8Kjvnhr_sYTGLcoFQC0yLLR-B-_Wrg0lqjB-gtvDOV06qBl-bdaQOfTL1t1OB8F6HvEto3fue6Giq4MqqDz-4jTd0q-Bj8JnmcgCOrmmgm33sMXq6W68XNdPVwfbuYr6aa5mSYVjkqMLIqYyjLS6IZKznRpig4oRhpliVWho2myFalKYXVWAick5JRglhV0jE42_v2wb9tTRzkxm9DlyIl4ZRxJEQmfli1aox0nfVDULp1Ucs5Z0yIFFYk1uwfVurKtE77zliX8D-C871ABx9jMFb2wbUq7CRG8usT8ucT9BMuuHbF</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>McGrane, Vincent</creator><creator>McDermott, Olivia</creator><creator>Trubetskaya, Anna</creator><creator>Rosa, Angelo</creator><creator>Sony, Michael</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2151-6156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8003-5216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5714-4601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-9312</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>The Effect of Medical Device Regulations on Deploying a Lean Six Sigma Project</title><author>McGrane, Vincent ; McDermott, Olivia ; Trubetskaya, Anna ; Rosa, Angelo ; Sony, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-d60810fa54056b2c44b72ce8872310c4536251ec30fdbeb9fc199162b43204db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Continuous improvement</topic><topic>Federal regulation</topic><topic>Industrial project management</topic><topic>ISO standards</topic><topic>Lean manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Medical device industry</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical technology</topic><topic>Pacemakers</topic><topic>Physiological apparatus</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Regulated industries</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Six Sigma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGrane, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Olivia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trubetskaya, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sony, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGrane, Vincent</au><au>McDermott, Olivia</au><au>Trubetskaya, Anna</au><au>Rosa, Angelo</au><au>Sony, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Medical Device Regulations on Deploying a Lean Six Sigma Project</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2303</spage><pages>2303-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates the differences in timelines involved in Lean Six Sigma (LSS) project deployment in a regulated industry versus in an unregulated one. Two case studies utilising Lean Six Sigma methods—in order to compare the transfer of manual manufacturing lines within a medical device and electronics manufacturing site—are discussed and utilised. This research aims to show the effects of regulatory procedures on LSS project implementation and timelines. This study particularly highlights how a regulatory environment can be a barrier, or bottleneck, to project management, continuous improvement, and engineering changes in the MedTech or medical device manufacturing industry. The results of this study represent an important first step towards a full understanding of the influence of regulations on operations in medical devices and, by extension, on pharmaceutical manufacturing industries on a global scale. The research limitations are that the data collected were from two specific case study comparisons alone.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr10112303</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2151-6156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8003-5216</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5714-4601</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-9312</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
ispartof | Processes, 2022-11, Vol.10 (11), p.2303 |
issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2734709959 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Case studies Compliance Continuous improvement Federal regulation Industrial project management ISO standards Lean manufacturing Manufacturers Manufacturing Medical device industry Medical equipment Medical research Medical technology Pacemakers Physiological apparatus Project management Quality management Regulated industries Regulations Six Sigma |
title | The Effect of Medical Device Regulations on Deploying a Lean Six Sigma Project |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A07%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Medical%20Device%20Regulations%20on%20Deploying%20a%20Lean%20Six%20Sigma%20Project&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=McGrane,%20Vincent&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2303&rft.pages=2303-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr10112303&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA744993108%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734709959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A744993108&rfr_iscdi=true |