Blockchain Platforms in Energy Markets—A Critical Assessment
Compared to other applications of distributed ledger technologies, for example, in decentralized finance, non-fungible tokens, and logistics, Blockchain applications in the energy industry have not found widespread dissemination and fell short of market expectations during the Blockchain hype in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of risk and financial management 2022-11, Vol.15 (11), p.516 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 516 |
container_title | Journal of risk and financial management |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Burger, Christoph Weinmann, Jens |
description | Compared to other applications of distributed ledger technologies, for example, in decentralized finance, non-fungible tokens, and logistics, Blockchain applications in the energy industry have not found widespread dissemination and fell short of market expectations during the Blockchain hype in the late 2010s. In semi-structured qualitative interviews with leading providers in the energy industry, conducted from 2019 to 2021, hurdles in energy applications are compared with a control group of additional interviews with representatives of companies operating in IT and FinTech. The analysis uses a framework covering technical feasibility, desirability, and economic viability, as well as the role of regulatory frameworks. The interviews reveal that the first Blockchain applications suffered from a combination of technological constraints and inter-platform competition. Due to the permissionless configuration of the early energy Blockchains, they were slow in terms of transaction speed compared to existing platforms and prices per transaction were high, in addition to high degrees of complexity related to requirements from both critical-infrastructure systems and financial market regulation. The analysis further points to the slow adoption of Blockchain applications in the energy sector being related to business models rather focusing on products and platforms as well as on transactional rather than procedural use cases, with a high degree of standardization of the offering and low levels of inclusiveness concerning processes. The move from transaction platforms to innovation platforms and the emergence of Blockchain as a service provider—plus technical advances with regards to high-frequency transactions combined with the increasing importance of use cases, such as proof of origin for fuels or e-charging—may induce a shift from pilot applications to commercialization within the larger innovation ecosystem. While the involvement of Blockchain solutions in energy markets increases with pilot projects and with this, the acceptance of players and stakeholders in the energy ecosystem, a big hurdle for innovation remains the regulation of energy markets to allow for peer-to-peer trading, a usage-driven distribution of network costs, and bottom-up pricing markets. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jrfm15110516 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2734630539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2734630539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-d74141ef72c73599abff254437e983ed702a316085ef0043c9b059e956a0d4dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIVKE3PiASVwK7WTuOL0ilKg-pCA5wjlzHhqR5FDs99MZH8IV8CUHl0NPMSDOz2mHsHOGKSMF17V2LAhEEZkdsggoxyUHy4wN-yqYh1ACAMGYon7Cb26Y3a_Ohqy5-afTget-GeBSLzvr3Xfyk_doO4efrexbPfTVURjfxLAQbQmu74YydON0EO_3HiL3dLV7nD8ny-f5xPlsmhgCHpJQcOVonUyNJKKVXzqWCc5JW5WRLCakmzCAX1gFwMmoFQlklMg0lLw1F7GLfu_H959aGoaj7re_Gk0UqiWcEYvwnYpd7l_F9CN66YuOrVvtdgVD8jVQcjkS_KrFZcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734630539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blockchain Platforms in Energy Markets—A Critical Assessment</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Burger, Christoph ; Weinmann, Jens</creator><creatorcontrib>Burger, Christoph ; Weinmann, Jens</creatorcontrib><description>Compared to other applications of distributed ledger technologies, for example, in decentralized finance, non-fungible tokens, and logistics, Blockchain applications in the energy industry have not found widespread dissemination and fell short of market expectations during the Blockchain hype in the late 2010s. In semi-structured qualitative interviews with leading providers in the energy industry, conducted from 2019 to 2021, hurdles in energy applications are compared with a control group of additional interviews with representatives of companies operating in IT and FinTech. The analysis uses a framework covering technical feasibility, desirability, and economic viability, as well as the role of regulatory frameworks. The interviews reveal that the first Blockchain applications suffered from a combination of technological constraints and inter-platform competition. Due to the permissionless configuration of the early energy Blockchains, they were slow in terms of transaction speed compared to existing platforms and prices per transaction were high, in addition to high degrees of complexity related to requirements from both critical-infrastructure systems and financial market regulation. The analysis further points to the slow adoption of Blockchain applications in the energy sector being related to business models rather focusing on products and platforms as well as on transactional rather than procedural use cases, with a high degree of standardization of the offering and low levels of inclusiveness concerning processes. The move from transaction platforms to innovation platforms and the emergence of Blockchain as a service provider—plus technical advances with regards to high-frequency transactions combined with the increasing importance of use cases, such as proof of origin for fuels or e-charging—may induce a shift from pilot applications to commercialization within the larger innovation ecosystem. While the involvement of Blockchain solutions in energy markets increases with pilot projects and with this, the acceptance of players and stakeholders in the energy ecosystem, a big hurdle for innovation remains the regulation of energy markets to allow for peer-to-peer trading, a usage-driven distribution of network costs, and bottom-up pricing markets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jrfm15110516</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Automation ; Bank technology ; Banking industry ; Blockchain ; Business models ; Consortia ; Digital currencies ; Electricity ; Electricity distribution ; Empowerment ; Energy industry ; Institutional investments ; International finance ; Market entry ; Non-fungible tokens ; Pandemics ; Photovoltaic cells ; Renewable resources ; Software</subject><ispartof>Journal of risk and financial management, 2022-11, Vol.15 (11), p.516</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-d74141ef72c73599abff254437e983ed702a316085ef0043c9b059e956a0d4dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-d74141ef72c73599abff254437e983ed702a316085ef0043c9b059e956a0d4dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4172-8068</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burger, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinmann, Jens</creatorcontrib><title>Blockchain Platforms in Energy Markets—A Critical Assessment</title><title>Journal of risk and financial management</title><description>Compared to other applications of distributed ledger technologies, for example, in decentralized finance, non-fungible tokens, and logistics, Blockchain applications in the energy industry have not found widespread dissemination and fell short of market expectations during the Blockchain hype in the late 2010s. In semi-structured qualitative interviews with leading providers in the energy industry, conducted from 2019 to 2021, hurdles in energy applications are compared with a control group of additional interviews with representatives of companies operating in IT and FinTech. The analysis uses a framework covering technical feasibility, desirability, and economic viability, as well as the role of regulatory frameworks. The interviews reveal that the first Blockchain applications suffered from a combination of technological constraints and inter-platform competition. Due to the permissionless configuration of the early energy Blockchains, they were slow in terms of transaction speed compared to existing platforms and prices per transaction were high, in addition to high degrees of complexity related to requirements from both critical-infrastructure systems and financial market regulation. The analysis further points to the slow adoption of Blockchain applications in the energy sector being related to business models rather focusing on products and platforms as well as on transactional rather than procedural use cases, with a high degree of standardization of the offering and low levels of inclusiveness concerning processes. The move from transaction platforms to innovation platforms and the emergence of Blockchain as a service provider—plus technical advances with regards to high-frequency transactions combined with the increasing importance of use cases, such as proof of origin for fuels or e-charging—may induce a shift from pilot applications to commercialization within the larger innovation ecosystem. While the involvement of Blockchain solutions in energy markets increases with pilot projects and with this, the acceptance of players and stakeholders in the energy ecosystem, a big hurdle for innovation remains the regulation of energy markets to allow for peer-to-peer trading, a usage-driven distribution of network costs, and bottom-up pricing markets.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Bank technology</subject><subject>Banking industry</subject><subject>Blockchain</subject><subject>Business models</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Digital currencies</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity distribution</subject><subject>Empowerment</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Institutional investments</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>Market entry</subject><subject>Non-fungible tokens</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><issn>1911-8074</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIVKE3PiASVwK7WTuOL0ilKg-pCA5wjlzHhqR5FDs99MZH8IV8CUHl0NPMSDOz2mHsHOGKSMF17V2LAhEEZkdsggoxyUHy4wN-yqYh1ACAMGYon7Cb26Y3a_Ohqy5-afTget-GeBSLzvr3Xfyk_doO4efrexbPfTVURjfxLAQbQmu74YydON0EO_3HiL3dLV7nD8ny-f5xPlsmhgCHpJQcOVonUyNJKKVXzqWCc5JW5WRLCakmzCAX1gFwMmoFQlklMg0lLw1F7GLfu_H959aGoaj7re_Gk0UqiWcEYvwnYpd7l_F9CN66YuOrVvtdgVD8jVQcjkS_KrFZcA</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Burger, Christoph</creator><creator>Weinmann, Jens</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-8068</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Blockchain Platforms in Energy Markets—A Critical Assessment</title><author>Burger, Christoph ; Weinmann, Jens</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-d74141ef72c73599abff254437e983ed702a316085ef0043c9b059e956a0d4dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Bank technology</topic><topic>Banking industry</topic><topic>Blockchain</topic><topic>Business models</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Digital currencies</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity distribution</topic><topic>Empowerment</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Institutional investments</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>Market entry</topic><topic>Non-fungible tokens</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burger, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinmann, Jens</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burger, Christoph</au><au>Weinmann, Jens</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blockchain Platforms in Energy Markets—A Critical Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>516</spage><pages>516-</pages><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><eissn>1911-8074</eissn><abstract>Compared to other applications of distributed ledger technologies, for example, in decentralized finance, non-fungible tokens, and logistics, Blockchain applications in the energy industry have not found widespread dissemination and fell short of market expectations during the Blockchain hype in the late 2010s. In semi-structured qualitative interviews with leading providers in the energy industry, conducted from 2019 to 2021, hurdles in energy applications are compared with a control group of additional interviews with representatives of companies operating in IT and FinTech. The analysis uses a framework covering technical feasibility, desirability, and economic viability, as well as the role of regulatory frameworks. The interviews reveal that the first Blockchain applications suffered from a combination of technological constraints and inter-platform competition. Due to the permissionless configuration of the early energy Blockchains, they were slow in terms of transaction speed compared to existing platforms and prices per transaction were high, in addition to high degrees of complexity related to requirements from both critical-infrastructure systems and financial market regulation. The analysis further points to the slow adoption of Blockchain applications in the energy sector being related to business models rather focusing on products and platforms as well as on transactional rather than procedural use cases, with a high degree of standardization of the offering and low levels of inclusiveness concerning processes. The move from transaction platforms to innovation platforms and the emergence of Blockchain as a service provider—plus technical advances with regards to high-frequency transactions combined with the increasing importance of use cases, such as proof of origin for fuels or e-charging—may induce a shift from pilot applications to commercialization within the larger innovation ecosystem. While the involvement of Blockchain solutions in energy markets increases with pilot projects and with this, the acceptance of players and stakeholders in the energy ecosystem, a big hurdle for innovation remains the regulation of energy markets to allow for peer-to-peer trading, a usage-driven distribution of network costs, and bottom-up pricing markets.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/jrfm15110516</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-8068</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1911-8074 |
ispartof | Journal of risk and financial management, 2022-11, Vol.15 (11), p.516 |
issn | 1911-8074 1911-8066 1911-8074 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2734630539 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Automation Bank technology Banking industry Blockchain Business models Consortia Digital currencies Electricity Electricity distribution Empowerment Energy industry Institutional investments International finance Market entry Non-fungible tokens Pandemics Photovoltaic cells Renewable resources Software |
title | Blockchain Platforms in Energy Markets—A Critical Assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A13%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blockchain%20Platforms%20in%20Energy%20Markets%E2%80%94A%20Critical%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20risk%20and%20financial%20management&rft.au=Burger,%20Christoph&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=516&rft.pages=516-&rft.issn=1911-8074&rft.eissn=1911-8074&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jrfm15110516&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734630539%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734630539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |