Actors, bricolage, and translation in education policy: a case study from Ghana

Due to the centrality of education to economic growth and social development, successive governments in post-colonial Ghana have implemented policies to improve the quality of education in the country. In line with this, Ghana embarked on its first major education reform in 1987 under the Provisiona...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of modern African studies 2022-09, Vol.60 (3), p.323-344
Hauptverfasser: Boakye, Paul Acheampong, Béland, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 344
container_issue 3
container_start_page 323
container_title The Journal of modern African studies
container_volume 60
creator Boakye, Paul Acheampong
Béland, Daniel
description Due to the centrality of education to economic growth and social development, successive governments in post-colonial Ghana have implemented policies to improve the quality of education in the country. In line with this, Ghana embarked on its first major education reform in 1987 under the Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC) government. While several studies have been conducted to explain this reform, these studies have largely been descriptive and theoretically, have over relied on the conditionality thesis. Our study draws on ideational literature and research interviews to offer an alternative explanation of the 1987 reform. Drawing extensively on the ideational concepts of bricolage and translation and focusing on the actors using these two mechanisms, the study argues that, while exogenous forces did impact the 1987 reform, it was mainly driven by endogenous factors featuring both path dependent and departing changes.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0022278X22000192
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2734516480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0022278X22000192</cupid><sourcerecordid>2734516480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ad85296d7ff19ece6b3bfdb81e720ff90ebfb3e375315b089ca4c363acb7757b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLw0AQxxdRMFY_gLcFr43uI8luvJWiVSj0oIK3MPuqKWm27iaHfnsTUvAgzmUY_o-BH0K3lNxTQsXDGyGMMSE_GSOE0JKdoYRmRZmKYc5RMsrpqF-iqxh3g0fmQiZos9CdD3GOVai1b2Br5xhag7sAbWygq32L6xZb0-vpOPim1sdHDFhDtDh2vTliF_wer76ghWt04aCJ9ua0Z-jj-el9-ZKuN6vX5WKdak5Zl4KROSsLI5yjpdW2UFw5oyS1ghHnSmKVU9xykXOaKyJLDZnmBQethMiF4jN0N_Uegv_ubeyqne9DO7ysmOBZTotMksFFJ5cOPsZgXXUI9R7CsaKkGrlVf7gNGX7KwH6AYrb2t_r_1A_SeG-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2734516480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Actors, bricolage, and translation in education policy: a case study from Ghana</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Boakye, Paul Acheampong ; Béland, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Boakye, Paul Acheampong ; Béland, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Due to the centrality of education to economic growth and social development, successive governments in post-colonial Ghana have implemented policies to improve the quality of education in the country. In line with this, Ghana embarked on its first major education reform in 1987 under the Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC) government. While several studies have been conducted to explain this reform, these studies have largely been descriptive and theoretically, have over relied on the conditionality thesis. Our study draws on ideational literature and research interviews to offer an alternative explanation of the 1987 reform. Drawing extensively on the ideational concepts of bricolage and translation and focusing on the actors using these two mechanisms, the study argues that, while exogenous forces did impact the 1987 reform, it was mainly driven by endogenous factors featuring both path dependent and departing changes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-278X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0022278X22000192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>African studies ; Bricolage ; Case studies ; Developing countries ; Economic development ; Economic growth ; Economic recovery ; Education ; Education policy ; Education reform ; Endogenous ; LDCs ; Military policy ; Politics ; Postcolonialism ; Public policy ; Quality of education ; Reforms ; Social development ; Translation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of modern African studies, 2022-09, Vol.60 (3), p.323-344</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022278X22000192/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,315,781,785,12850,27871,27929,27930,55633</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boakye, Paul Acheampong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Béland, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Actors, bricolage, and translation in education policy: a case study from Ghana</title><title>The Journal of modern African studies</title><addtitle>J. Mod. Afr. Stud</addtitle><description>Due to the centrality of education to economic growth and social development, successive governments in post-colonial Ghana have implemented policies to improve the quality of education in the country. In line with this, Ghana embarked on its first major education reform in 1987 under the Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC) government. While several studies have been conducted to explain this reform, these studies have largely been descriptive and theoretically, have over relied on the conditionality thesis. Our study draws on ideational literature and research interviews to offer an alternative explanation of the 1987 reform. Drawing extensively on the ideational concepts of bricolage and translation and focusing on the actors using these two mechanisms, the study argues that, while exogenous forces did impact the 1987 reform, it was mainly driven by endogenous factors featuring both path dependent and departing changes.</description><subject>African studies</subject><subject>Bricolage</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic recovery</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Endogenous</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Military policy</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Postcolonialism</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Quality of education</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>Translation</subject><issn>0022-278X</issn><issn>1469-7777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLw0AQxxdRMFY_gLcFr43uI8luvJWiVSj0oIK3MPuqKWm27iaHfnsTUvAgzmUY_o-BH0K3lNxTQsXDGyGMMSE_GSOE0JKdoYRmRZmKYc5RMsrpqF-iqxh3g0fmQiZos9CdD3GOVai1b2Br5xhag7sAbWygq32L6xZb0-vpOPim1sdHDFhDtDh2vTliF_wer76ghWt04aCJ9ua0Z-jj-el9-ZKuN6vX5WKdak5Zl4KROSsLI5yjpdW2UFw5oyS1ghHnSmKVU9xykXOaKyJLDZnmBQethMiF4jN0N_Uegv_ubeyqne9DO7ysmOBZTotMksFFJ5cOPsZgXXUI9R7CsaKkGrlVf7gNGX7KwH6AYrb2t_r_1A_SeG-A</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Boakye, Paul Acheampong</creator><creator>Béland, Daniel</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Actors, bricolage, and translation in education policy: a case study from Ghana</title><author>Boakye, Paul Acheampong ; Béland, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-ad85296d7ff19ece6b3bfdb81e720ff90ebfb3e375315b089ca4c363acb7757b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>African studies</topic><topic>Bricolage</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic recovery</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Endogenous</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Military policy</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Postcolonialism</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Quality of education</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>Translation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boakye, Paul Acheampong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Béland, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><jtitle>The Journal of modern African studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boakye, Paul Acheampong</au><au>Béland, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Actors, bricolage, and translation in education policy: a case study from Ghana</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of modern African studies</jtitle><addtitle>J. Mod. Afr. Stud</addtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>323-344</pages><issn>0022-278X</issn><eissn>1469-7777</eissn><abstract>Due to the centrality of education to economic growth and social development, successive governments in post-colonial Ghana have implemented policies to improve the quality of education in the country. In line with this, Ghana embarked on its first major education reform in 1987 under the Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC) government. While several studies have been conducted to explain this reform, these studies have largely been descriptive and theoretically, have over relied on the conditionality thesis. Our study draws on ideational literature and research interviews to offer an alternative explanation of the 1987 reform. Drawing extensively on the ideational concepts of bricolage and translation and focusing on the actors using these two mechanisms, the study argues that, while exogenous forces did impact the 1987 reform, it was mainly driven by endogenous factors featuring both path dependent and departing changes.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0022278X22000192</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-278X
ispartof The Journal of modern African studies, 2022-09, Vol.60 (3), p.323-344
issn 0022-278X
1469-7777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2734516480
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals
subjects African studies
Bricolage
Case studies
Developing countries
Economic development
Economic growth
Economic recovery
Education
Education policy
Education reform
Endogenous
LDCs
Military policy
Politics
Postcolonialism
Public policy
Quality of education
Reforms
Social development
Translation
title Actors, bricolage, and translation in education policy: a case study from Ghana
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T07%3A24%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Actors,%20bricolage,%20and%20translation%20in%20education%20policy:%20a%20case%20study%20from%20Ghana&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20modern%20African%20studies&rft.au=Boakye,%20Paul%20Acheampong&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=323-344&rft.issn=0022-278X&rft.eissn=1469-7777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0022278X22000192&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734516480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2734516480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0022278X22000192&rfr_iscdi=true