Archimedes revisited: a faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects

A little-known method of measuring the volume of small objects based on Archimedes' principle is described, which involves suspending an object in a water-filled container placed on electronic scales. The suspension technique is a variation on the hydrostatic weighing technique used for measuri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics education 2005-09, Vol.40 (5), p.468-474
1. Verfasser: Hughes, Stephen W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 474
container_issue 5
container_start_page 468
container_title Physics education
container_volume 40
creator Hughes, Stephen W
description A little-known method of measuring the volume of small objects based on Archimedes' principle is described, which involves suspending an object in a water-filled container placed on electronic scales. The suspension technique is a variation on the hydrostatic weighing technique used for measuring volume. The suspension method was compared with two other traditional water displacement methods of measuring volume, i.e. placing an object in a measuring cylinder and recording the rise in the water level and immersing the object in a water-filled container with an overflow spout to record the volume of overflow. The accuracy and precision of the three methods was compared using ten accurately machined PVC cylinders ranging in volume from 1.5 to 15.7 ml. The mean difference between the actual and measured volumes was 3.3 plus or minus 7.3%, -1.6 plus or minus 7.2% and 0.03 plus or minus 0.45%, for the level, overflow and suspension methods respectively. Each measurement was repeated twice to obtain the reproducibility of the three displacement techniques. The reproducibility was -1.7 plus or minus 8.5%, 0.09 plus or minus 3% and -0.04 plus or minus 0.43% or the level, overflow and suspension techniques respectively. The results show that the suspension technique is more accurate and precise than the traditional water displacement methods and is more accurate than measuring volume using Vernier calliper measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0031-9120/40/5/008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2733225369</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ723755</ericid><sourcerecordid>2733225369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-cdaa3d4f7e50e274080bb6ec3d3f5c4690b6002ec578a1b69f6531929d7c64ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gHhY8CQYO7ub3U28lVL_UfCi52WzmdiUpIm7SaHf3tRKL714eszM772BR8g1gwcGSTIBECxKGYdJDBM5jMkJGTGhWKSk5KdkdADOyUUIKwCIdQIjspp6tyxrzDFQj5sylB3mj9TSwoYO_T3NsPtVt0Tboqc1dssmp01BrXO9tx1W22FpQ-_L9Rftlkg3TdXXuENCbauKNtkKXRcuyVlhq4BXfzomn0_zj9lLtHh_fp1NF5ETXCeRy60VeVxolIBcx5BAlil0IheFdLFKIVMAHJ3UiWWZSgslBUt5mmun4syKMbnd57a--e4xdGbV9H49vDRcC8G5FCodKL6nnG9C8FiY1pe19VvDwOw6NbvKzK4yE4ORw5gMppu9CX3pDob5m-ZCSzmco_25bNr_xd0d88ecafNC_AC51406</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2733225369</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Archimedes revisited: a faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Hughes, Stephen W</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><description>A little-known method of measuring the volume of small objects based on Archimedes' principle is described, which involves suspending an object in a water-filled container placed on electronic scales. The suspension technique is a variation on the hydrostatic weighing technique used for measuring volume. The suspension method was compared with two other traditional water displacement methods of measuring volume, i.e. placing an object in a measuring cylinder and recording the rise in the water level and immersing the object in a water-filled container with an overflow spout to record the volume of overflow. The accuracy and precision of the three methods was compared using ten accurately machined PVC cylinders ranging in volume from 1.5 to 15.7 ml. The mean difference between the actual and measured volumes was 3.3 plus or minus 7.3%, -1.6 plus or minus 7.2% and 0.03 plus or minus 0.45%, for the level, overflow and suspension methods respectively. Each measurement was repeated twice to obtain the reproducibility of the three displacement techniques. The reproducibility was -1.7 plus or minus 8.5%, 0.09 plus or minus 3% and -0.04 plus or minus 0.43% or the level, overflow and suspension techniques respectively. The results show that the suspension technique is more accurate and precise than the traditional water displacement methods and is more accurate than measuring volume using Vernier calliper measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6552</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0031-9120/40/5/008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brecon: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Callipers ; Containers ; Displacement ; Measurement methods ; Measurement Techniques ; Overflow ; Physics ; Reproducibility ; Science Activities ; Science Instruction ; Suspension ; Teaching Methods ; Water ; Water levels</subject><ispartof>Physics education, 2005-09, Vol.40 (5), p.468-474</ispartof><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing Sep 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-cdaa3d4f7e50e274080bb6ec3d3f5c4690b6002ec578a1b69f6531929d7c64ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-cdaa3d4f7e50e274080bb6ec3d3f5c4690b6002ec578a1b69f6531929d7c64ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9120/40/5/008/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,53813,53893</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ723755$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><title>Archimedes revisited: a faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects</title><title>Physics education</title><description>A little-known method of measuring the volume of small objects based on Archimedes' principle is described, which involves suspending an object in a water-filled container placed on electronic scales. The suspension technique is a variation on the hydrostatic weighing technique used for measuring volume. The suspension method was compared with two other traditional water displacement methods of measuring volume, i.e. placing an object in a measuring cylinder and recording the rise in the water level and immersing the object in a water-filled container with an overflow spout to record the volume of overflow. The accuracy and precision of the three methods was compared using ten accurately machined PVC cylinders ranging in volume from 1.5 to 15.7 ml. The mean difference between the actual and measured volumes was 3.3 plus or minus 7.3%, -1.6 plus or minus 7.2% and 0.03 plus or minus 0.45%, for the level, overflow and suspension methods respectively. Each measurement was repeated twice to obtain the reproducibility of the three displacement techniques. The reproducibility was -1.7 plus or minus 8.5%, 0.09 plus or minus 3% and -0.04 plus or minus 0.43% or the level, overflow and suspension techniques respectively. The results show that the suspension technique is more accurate and precise than the traditional water displacement methods and is more accurate than measuring volume using Vernier calliper measurements.</description><subject>Callipers</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Overflow</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Science Activities</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Suspension</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><issn>0031-9120</issn><issn>1361-6552</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9Lw0AQxRdRsFa_gHhY8CQYO7ub3U28lVL_UfCi52WzmdiUpIm7SaHf3tRKL714eszM772BR8g1gwcGSTIBECxKGYdJDBM5jMkJGTGhWKSk5KdkdADOyUUIKwCIdQIjspp6tyxrzDFQj5sylB3mj9TSwoYO_T3NsPtVt0Tboqc1dssmp01BrXO9tx1W22FpQ-_L9Rftlkg3TdXXuENCbauKNtkKXRcuyVlhq4BXfzomn0_zj9lLtHh_fp1NF5ETXCeRy60VeVxolIBcx5BAlil0IheFdLFKIVMAHJ3UiWWZSgslBUt5mmun4syKMbnd57a--e4xdGbV9H49vDRcC8G5FCodKL6nnG9C8FiY1pe19VvDwOw6NbvKzK4yE4ORw5gMppu9CX3pDob5m-ZCSzmco_25bNr_xd0d88ecafNC_AC51406</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Hughes, Stephen W</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>Institute of Physics Publishing, Dirac House, Temple Back, Bristol, BS1 6BE, United Kingdom</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Archimedes revisited: a faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects</title><author>Hughes, Stephen W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-cdaa3d4f7e50e274080bb6ec3d3f5c4690b6002ec578a1b69f6531929d7c64ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Callipers</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Overflow</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Science Activities</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Suspension</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Physics education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, Stephen W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ723755</ericid><atitle>Archimedes revisited: a faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects</atitle><jtitle>Physics education</jtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>468</spage><epage>474</epage><pages>468-474</pages><issn>0031-9120</issn><eissn>1361-6552</eissn><abstract>A little-known method of measuring the volume of small objects based on Archimedes' principle is described, which involves suspending an object in a water-filled container placed on electronic scales. The suspension technique is a variation on the hydrostatic weighing technique used for measuring volume. The suspension method was compared with two other traditional water displacement methods of measuring volume, i.e. placing an object in a measuring cylinder and recording the rise in the water level and immersing the object in a water-filled container with an overflow spout to record the volume of overflow. The accuracy and precision of the three methods was compared using ten accurately machined PVC cylinders ranging in volume from 1.5 to 15.7 ml. The mean difference between the actual and measured volumes was 3.3 plus or minus 7.3%, -1.6 plus or minus 7.2% and 0.03 plus or minus 0.45%, for the level, overflow and suspension methods respectively. Each measurement was repeated twice to obtain the reproducibility of the three displacement techniques. The reproducibility was -1.7 plus or minus 8.5%, 0.09 plus or minus 3% and -0.04 plus or minus 0.43% or the level, overflow and suspension techniques respectively. The results show that the suspension technique is more accurate and precise than the traditional water displacement methods and is more accurate than measuring volume using Vernier calliper measurements.</abstract><cop>Brecon</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/0031-9120/40/5/008</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9120
ispartof Physics education, 2005-09, Vol.40 (5), p.468-474
issn 0031-9120
1361-6552
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2733225369
source IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Callipers
Containers
Displacement
Measurement methods
Measurement Techniques
Overflow
Physics
Reproducibility
Science Activities
Science Instruction
Suspension
Teaching Methods
Water
Water levels
title Archimedes revisited: a faster, better, cheaper method of accurately measuring the volume of small objects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T22%3A45%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Archimedes%20revisited:%20a%20faster,%20better,%20cheaper%20method%20of%20accurately%20measuring%20the%20volume%20of%20small%20objects&rft.jtitle=Physics%20education&rft.au=Hughes,%20Stephen%20W&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=468&rft.epage=474&rft.pages=468-474&rft.issn=0031-9120&rft.eissn=1361-6552&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0031-9120/40/5/008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_p%3E2733225369%3C/proquest_iop_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2733225369&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ723755&rfr_iscdi=true