Functional trajectory for the assessment of ecological restoration success
Ecological restoration aims to recover an ecosystem to a state before degradation. Comparison to reference ecosystems (old‐growth forests) is a key component to define if restoration goals have been achieved (“success”). Nevertheless, it is still unknown how the functional composition of the initial...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Restoration ecology 2022-11, Vol.30 (8), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Restoration ecology |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Manhães, Adriana P. Pantaleão, Laura C. Moraes, Luiz F. D. Amazonas, Nino T. Saavedra, Mariana M. Mantuano, Dulce Sansevero, Jerônimo B. B. |
description | Ecological restoration aims to recover an ecosystem to a state before degradation. Comparison to reference ecosystems (old‐growth forests) is a key component to define if restoration goals have been achieved (“success”). Nevertheless, it is still unknown how the functional composition of the initial community influences the trajectory of the ecosystem through time. Here, we evaluated restoration success based on the functional trajectory of six 20‐year‐old forest communities planted in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest with distinct combinations of ecological groups (pioneers, secondary, and climax). These six communities ranged their species predominance regarding resource‐use strategies, potential size, and functional diversity. To evaluate restoration success, we compared the functional trajectory between the six planted communities after 20 years of secondary succession and calculated their trajectories toward or away from the reference ecosystem. We found that the initial composition influenced the functional trajectory of the communities undergoing restoration and it was a key element to their success. Only the community planted using the highest functional diversity (i.e. pioneer + early and late secondary + climax species) became functionally similar to the reference ecosystem 20 years after planting. The functional trajectories were mostly driven by the mortality of planted individuals than by the colonization of new species. The regeneration is still functionally similar independently of the treatment evidencing little influence of priority effects in this stage of succession. Our study indicated that the initial functional composition of planted forest communities influences the magnitude and direction of their functional trajectory and may influence restoration success. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rec.13665 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2731955835</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2731955835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-9ef51c4eeeba8250d3111d21c13df023e1a6a5908233c8f689f4867874d82e5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv0HAk4dtM0mTzR6ltP6hIIiCt5BmJ7pl29RkF-m3N3W9OpeZw-_NvHmEXAObQK5pRDcBoZQ8ISOQXBXA2PtpnpmCglclnJOLlDaMgdRajMjTst-5rgk729Iu2g26LsQD9SHS7hOpTQlT2uKuo8FTdKENH43LbMSUQXtU0tQ7l6lLcuZtm_Dqr4_J23LxOn8oVs_3j_O7VeHyfVlU6CW4GSKureaS1SL7rjk4ELVnXCBYZWXFNBfCaa905Wdalbqc1ZqjXIsxuRn27mP46rMPswl9zA8kw0sBlZRayEzdDpSLIaWI3uxjs7XxYICZY1QmR2V-o8rsdGC_mxYP_4PmZTEfFD9DFmrO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731955835</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional trajectory for the assessment of ecological restoration success</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Manhães, Adriana P. ; Pantaleão, Laura C. ; Moraes, Luiz F. D. ; Amazonas, Nino T. ; Saavedra, Mariana M. ; Mantuano, Dulce ; Sansevero, Jerônimo B. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Manhães, Adriana P. ; Pantaleão, Laura C. ; Moraes, Luiz F. D. ; Amazonas, Nino T. ; Saavedra, Mariana M. ; Mantuano, Dulce ; Sansevero, Jerônimo B. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological restoration aims to recover an ecosystem to a state before degradation. Comparison to reference ecosystems (old‐growth forests) is a key component to define if restoration goals have been achieved (“success”). Nevertheless, it is still unknown how the functional composition of the initial community influences the trajectory of the ecosystem through time. Here, we evaluated restoration success based on the functional trajectory of six 20‐year‐old forest communities planted in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest with distinct combinations of ecological groups (pioneers, secondary, and climax). These six communities ranged their species predominance regarding resource‐use strategies, potential size, and functional diversity. To evaluate restoration success, we compared the functional trajectory between the six planted communities after 20 years of secondary succession and calculated their trajectories toward or away from the reference ecosystem. We found that the initial composition influenced the functional trajectory of the communities undergoing restoration and it was a key element to their success. Only the community planted using the highest functional diversity (i.e. pioneer + early and late secondary + climax species) became functionally similar to the reference ecosystem 20 years after planting. The functional trajectories were mostly driven by the mortality of planted individuals than by the colonization of new species. The regeneration is still functionally similar independently of the treatment evidencing little influence of priority effects in this stage of succession. Our study indicated that the initial functional composition of planted forest communities influences the magnitude and direction of their functional trajectory and may influence restoration success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rec.13665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Atlantic Forest ; Colonization ; Composition ; Ecological succession ; Ecosystems ; Environmental restoration ; Evaluation ; Forest communities ; Forests ; functional management ; New species ; Regeneration (biological) ; Restoration ; restoration monitoring ; Success ; successional patterns ; Trajectory analysis</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2022-11, Vol.30 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022 Society for Ecological Restoration.</rights><rights>2022 Society for Ecological Restoration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-9ef51c4eeeba8250d3111d21c13df023e1a6a5908233c8f689f4867874d82e5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-9ef51c4eeeba8250d3111d21c13df023e1a6a5908233c8f689f4867874d82e5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9953-267X ; 0000-0003-4098-7789 ; 0000-0002-8049-6936 ; 0000-0001-6289-8520 ; 0000-0002-0492-4636 ; 0000-0002-3389-2581 ; 0000-0001-9063-1858</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frec.13665$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frec.13665$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manhães, Adriana P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantaleão, Laura C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Luiz F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amazonas, Nino T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Mariana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantuano, Dulce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sansevero, Jerônimo B. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Functional trajectory for the assessment of ecological restoration success</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Ecological restoration aims to recover an ecosystem to a state before degradation. Comparison to reference ecosystems (old‐growth forests) is a key component to define if restoration goals have been achieved (“success”). Nevertheless, it is still unknown how the functional composition of the initial community influences the trajectory of the ecosystem through time. Here, we evaluated restoration success based on the functional trajectory of six 20‐year‐old forest communities planted in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest with distinct combinations of ecological groups (pioneers, secondary, and climax). These six communities ranged their species predominance regarding resource‐use strategies, potential size, and functional diversity. To evaluate restoration success, we compared the functional trajectory between the six planted communities after 20 years of secondary succession and calculated their trajectories toward or away from the reference ecosystem. We found that the initial composition influenced the functional trajectory of the communities undergoing restoration and it was a key element to their success. Only the community planted using the highest functional diversity (i.e. pioneer + early and late secondary + climax species) became functionally similar to the reference ecosystem 20 years after planting. The functional trajectories were mostly driven by the mortality of planted individuals than by the colonization of new species. The regeneration is still functionally similar independently of the treatment evidencing little influence of priority effects in this stage of succession. Our study indicated that the initial functional composition of planted forest communities influences the magnitude and direction of their functional trajectory and may influence restoration success.</description><subject>Atlantic Forest</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Forest communities</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>functional management</subject><subject>New species</subject><subject>Regeneration (biological)</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>restoration monitoring</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>successional patterns</subject><subject>Trajectory analysis</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsHv0HAk4dtM0mTzR6ltP6hIIiCt5BmJ7pl29RkF-m3N3W9OpeZw-_NvHmEXAObQK5pRDcBoZQ8ISOQXBXA2PtpnpmCglclnJOLlDaMgdRajMjTst-5rgk729Iu2g26LsQD9SHS7hOpTQlT2uKuo8FTdKENH43LbMSUQXtU0tQ7l6lLcuZtm_Dqr4_J23LxOn8oVs_3j_O7VeHyfVlU6CW4GSKureaS1SL7rjk4ELVnXCBYZWXFNBfCaa905Wdalbqc1ZqjXIsxuRn27mP46rMPswl9zA8kw0sBlZRayEzdDpSLIaWI3uxjs7XxYICZY1QmR2V-o8rsdGC_mxYP_4PmZTEfFD9DFmrO</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Manhães, Adriana P.</creator><creator>Pantaleão, Laura C.</creator><creator>Moraes, Luiz F. D.</creator><creator>Amazonas, Nino T.</creator><creator>Saavedra, Mariana M.</creator><creator>Mantuano, Dulce</creator><creator>Sansevero, Jerônimo B. B.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-267X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8049-6936</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6289-8520</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-4636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-2581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9063-1858</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Functional trajectory for the assessment of ecological restoration success</title><author>Manhães, Adriana P. ; Pantaleão, Laura C. ; Moraes, Luiz F. D. ; Amazonas, Nino T. ; Saavedra, Mariana M. ; Mantuano, Dulce ; Sansevero, Jerônimo B. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-9ef51c4eeeba8250d3111d21c13df023e1a6a5908233c8f689f4867874d82e5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Atlantic Forest</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Forest communities</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>functional management</topic><topic>New species</topic><topic>Regeneration (biological)</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>restoration monitoring</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>successional patterns</topic><topic>Trajectory analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manhães, Adriana P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pantaleão, Laura C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraes, Luiz F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amazonas, Nino T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saavedra, Mariana M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mantuano, Dulce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sansevero, Jerônimo B. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manhães, Adriana P.</au><au>Pantaleão, Laura C.</au><au>Moraes, Luiz F. D.</au><au>Amazonas, Nino T.</au><au>Saavedra, Mariana M.</au><au>Mantuano, Dulce</au><au>Sansevero, Jerônimo B. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional trajectory for the assessment of ecological restoration success</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>Ecological restoration aims to recover an ecosystem to a state before degradation. Comparison to reference ecosystems (old‐growth forests) is a key component to define if restoration goals have been achieved (“success”). Nevertheless, it is still unknown how the functional composition of the initial community influences the trajectory of the ecosystem through time. Here, we evaluated restoration success based on the functional trajectory of six 20‐year‐old forest communities planted in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest with distinct combinations of ecological groups (pioneers, secondary, and climax). These six communities ranged their species predominance regarding resource‐use strategies, potential size, and functional diversity. To evaluate restoration success, we compared the functional trajectory between the six planted communities after 20 years of secondary succession and calculated their trajectories toward or away from the reference ecosystem. We found that the initial composition influenced the functional trajectory of the communities undergoing restoration and it was a key element to their success. Only the community planted using the highest functional diversity (i.e. pioneer + early and late secondary + climax species) became functionally similar to the reference ecosystem 20 years after planting. The functional trajectories were mostly driven by the mortality of planted individuals than by the colonization of new species. The regeneration is still functionally similar independently of the treatment evidencing little influence of priority effects in this stage of succession. Our study indicated that the initial functional composition of planted forest communities influences the magnitude and direction of their functional trajectory and may influence restoration success.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/rec.13665</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9953-267X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8049-6936</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6289-8520</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-4636</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-2581</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9063-1858</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-2971 |
ispartof | Restoration ecology, 2022-11, Vol.30 (8), p.n/a |
issn | 1061-2971 1526-100X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2731955835 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Atlantic Forest Colonization Composition Ecological succession Ecosystems Environmental restoration Evaluation Forest communities Forests functional management New species Regeneration (biological) Restoration restoration monitoring Success successional patterns Trajectory analysis |
title | Functional trajectory for the assessment of ecological restoration success |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20trajectory%20for%20the%20assessment%20of%20ecological%20restoration%20success&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Manh%C3%A3es,%20Adriana%20P.&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rec.13665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2731955835%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731955835&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |