Estimating a target price to regenerate bio‐oils post hydrogen sulfide removal
Bio‐oils such as conventional soybean, high‐oleic soybean, canola, and sunflower are valuable as bio‐solvents for removing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from natural gas. Preceding bench‐scale studies indicate that more than 90% of H2S can be removed from a gas stream; economic analysis of such a process i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining bioproducts and biorefining, 2022-11, Vol.16 (6), p.1781-1793 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1793 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1781 |
container_title | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Brace, Emma C. Engelberth, Abigail S. |
description | Bio‐oils such as conventional soybean, high‐oleic soybean, canola, and sunflower are valuable as bio‐solvents for removing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from natural gas. Preceding bench‐scale studies indicate that more than 90% of H2S can be removed from a gas stream; economic analysis of such a process is necessary to determine the solvent regenerative power required and cost constraints on a to‐be‐determined solvent regeneration scheme. With the goal of processing 1000 kmol·h–1 of sour gas and removing 99.9% of H2S from gas streams with various feed concentrations, the design of an absorption unit to process natural gas using bio‐oils as the absorbing solvent was carried out through equilibrium stage analysis. A graphical method combined with the Kremser method found that a trayed tower with 14 stages, a 2 m diameter, and 8.5 m height could meet these goals successfully with a bio‐solvent flow rate of 120 kmol·h–1. Capital costs were centered on the price of an extraction column designed to meet the desired throughput. Comparison with conventional amine gas treatment was used to set a limit for the cost of treating a unit of gas, and sensitivity analysis explored the relationship between solvent recycle and cost of treating the gas. This study found that the economic viability of using bio‐oils as gas‐sweetening agents depended on developing a solvent regeneration scheme capable of recycling more than 98% of the bio‐oil bio‐solvent. The development of such a scheme is unlikely, and the overall process of using bio‐oils to sweeten sour gas is likely not economically viable. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/bbb.2431 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2730550612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2730550612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2541-42c1c21b3660181ef481c4296644c6fe29215decd52b02e54cc68cba6bf52cae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1KAzEQB_AgCtYq-AgBL162ZrJJbI-21A8o6EHBW0iyszVl29QkVfbmI_iMPolbK948zcD8mGH-hJwCGwBj_MJaO-CihD3Sg1HJC2Al7P_14vmQHKW0YEwqKWSPPExT9kuT_WpODc0mzjHTdfQOaQ404hxXGE1Gan34-vgMvkl0HVKmL20VQzeladPUvsLOLsObaY7JQW2ahCe_tU-erqePk9tidn9zN7maFY5LAYXgDhwHWyrFYAhYiyE4wUdKCeFUjXzEQVboKskt4yiFc2rorFG2ltwZLPvkbLd3HcPrBlPWi7CJq-6k5pclk5Ip4J063ykXQ0oRa939tjSx1cD0Ni_d5aW3eXW02NF332D7r9Pj8fjHfwPSPmxp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730550612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating a target price to regenerate bio‐oils post hydrogen sulfide removal</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Brace, Emma C. ; Engelberth, Abigail S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brace, Emma C. ; Engelberth, Abigail S.</creatorcontrib><description>Bio‐oils such as conventional soybean, high‐oleic soybean, canola, and sunflower are valuable as bio‐solvents for removing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from natural gas. Preceding bench‐scale studies indicate that more than 90% of H2S can be removed from a gas stream; economic analysis of such a process is necessary to determine the solvent regenerative power required and cost constraints on a to‐be‐determined solvent regeneration scheme. With the goal of processing 1000 kmol·h–1 of sour gas and removing 99.9% of H2S from gas streams with various feed concentrations, the design of an absorption unit to process natural gas using bio‐oils as the absorbing solvent was carried out through equilibrium stage analysis. A graphical method combined with the Kremser method found that a trayed tower with 14 stages, a 2 m diameter, and 8.5 m height could meet these goals successfully with a bio‐solvent flow rate of 120 kmol·h–1. Capital costs were centered on the price of an extraction column designed to meet the desired throughput. Comparison with conventional amine gas treatment was used to set a limit for the cost of treating a unit of gas, and sensitivity analysis explored the relationship between solvent recycle and cost of treating the gas. This study found that the economic viability of using bio‐oils as gas‐sweetening agents depended on developing a solvent regeneration scheme capable of recycling more than 98% of the bio‐oil bio‐solvent. The development of such a scheme is unlikely, and the overall process of using bio‐oils to sweeten sour gas is likely not economically viable. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-104X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-1031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2431</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Agricultural economics ; Amines ; biomaterials ; bioreactor design ; bioseparations ; biotechnology ; Capital costs ; Cost analysis ; Economic analysis ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Gas streams ; Graphical methods ; Hydrogen sulfide ; Hydrogen sulphide ; modeling ; Natural gas ; Oils & fats ; Regeneration ; Sensitivity analysis ; Solvents ; Sour gas ; Soybeans ; Sulphides</subject><ispartof>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2022-11, Vol.16 (6), p.1781-1793</ispartof><rights>2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2541-42c1c21b3660181ef481c4296644c6fe29215decd52b02e54cc68cba6bf52cae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7797-2295 ; 0000-0002-8150-0562</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbbb.2431$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbbb.2431$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brace, Emma C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelberth, Abigail S.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating a target price to regenerate bio‐oils post hydrogen sulfide removal</title><title>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</title><description>Bio‐oils such as conventional soybean, high‐oleic soybean, canola, and sunflower are valuable as bio‐solvents for removing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from natural gas. Preceding bench‐scale studies indicate that more than 90% of H2S can be removed from a gas stream; economic analysis of such a process is necessary to determine the solvent regenerative power required and cost constraints on a to‐be‐determined solvent regeneration scheme. With the goal of processing 1000 kmol·h–1 of sour gas and removing 99.9% of H2S from gas streams with various feed concentrations, the design of an absorption unit to process natural gas using bio‐oils as the absorbing solvent was carried out through equilibrium stage analysis. A graphical method combined with the Kremser method found that a trayed tower with 14 stages, a 2 m diameter, and 8.5 m height could meet these goals successfully with a bio‐solvent flow rate of 120 kmol·h–1. Capital costs were centered on the price of an extraction column designed to meet the desired throughput. Comparison with conventional amine gas treatment was used to set a limit for the cost of treating a unit of gas, and sensitivity analysis explored the relationship between solvent recycle and cost of treating the gas. This study found that the economic viability of using bio‐oils as gas‐sweetening agents depended on developing a solvent regeneration scheme capable of recycling more than 98% of the bio‐oil bio‐solvent. The development of such a scheme is unlikely, and the overall process of using bio‐oils to sweeten sour gas is likely not economically viable. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Amines</subject><subject>biomaterials</subject><subject>bioreactor design</subject><subject>bioseparations</subject><subject>biotechnology</subject><subject>Capital costs</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Gas streams</subject><subject>Graphical methods</subject><subject>Hydrogen sulfide</subject><subject>Hydrogen sulphide</subject><subject>modeling</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Oils & fats</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Sour gas</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Sulphides</subject><issn>1932-104X</issn><issn>1932-1031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M1KAzEQB_AgCtYq-AgBL162ZrJJbI-21A8o6EHBW0iyszVl29QkVfbmI_iMPolbK948zcD8mGH-hJwCGwBj_MJaO-CihD3Sg1HJC2Al7P_14vmQHKW0YEwqKWSPPExT9kuT_WpODc0mzjHTdfQOaQ404hxXGE1Gan34-vgMvkl0HVKmL20VQzeladPUvsLOLsObaY7JQW2ahCe_tU-erqePk9tidn9zN7maFY5LAYXgDhwHWyrFYAhYiyE4wUdKCeFUjXzEQVboKskt4yiFc2rorFG2ltwZLPvkbLd3HcPrBlPWi7CJq-6k5pclk5Ip4J063ykXQ0oRa939tjSx1cD0Ni_d5aW3eXW02NF332D7r9Pj8fjHfwPSPmxp</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Brace, Emma C.</creator><creator>Engelberth, Abigail S.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7797-2295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-0562</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Estimating a target price to regenerate bio‐oils post hydrogen sulfide removal</title><author>Brace, Emma C. ; Engelberth, Abigail S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2541-42c1c21b3660181ef481c4296644c6fe29215decd52b02e54cc68cba6bf52cae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Amines</topic><topic>biomaterials</topic><topic>bioreactor design</topic><topic>bioseparations</topic><topic>biotechnology</topic><topic>Capital costs</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Gas streams</topic><topic>Graphical methods</topic><topic>Hydrogen sulfide</topic><topic>Hydrogen sulphide</topic><topic>modeling</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Oils & fats</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Sour gas</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Sulphides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brace, Emma C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engelberth, Abigail S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brace, Emma C.</au><au>Engelberth, Abigail S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating a target price to regenerate bio‐oils post hydrogen sulfide removal</atitle><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1781</spage><epage>1793</epage><pages>1781-1793</pages><issn>1932-104X</issn><eissn>1932-1031</eissn><abstract>Bio‐oils such as conventional soybean, high‐oleic soybean, canola, and sunflower are valuable as bio‐solvents for removing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from natural gas. Preceding bench‐scale studies indicate that more than 90% of H2S can be removed from a gas stream; economic analysis of such a process is necessary to determine the solvent regenerative power required and cost constraints on a to‐be‐determined solvent regeneration scheme. With the goal of processing 1000 kmol·h–1 of sour gas and removing 99.9% of H2S from gas streams with various feed concentrations, the design of an absorption unit to process natural gas using bio‐oils as the absorbing solvent was carried out through equilibrium stage analysis. A graphical method combined with the Kremser method found that a trayed tower with 14 stages, a 2 m diameter, and 8.5 m height could meet these goals successfully with a bio‐solvent flow rate of 120 kmol·h–1. Capital costs were centered on the price of an extraction column designed to meet the desired throughput. Comparison with conventional amine gas treatment was used to set a limit for the cost of treating a unit of gas, and sensitivity analysis explored the relationship between solvent recycle and cost of treating the gas. This study found that the economic viability of using bio‐oils as gas‐sweetening agents depended on developing a solvent regeneration scheme capable of recycling more than 98% of the bio‐oil bio‐solvent. The development of such a scheme is unlikely, and the overall process of using bio‐oils to sweeten sour gas is likely not economically viable. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/bbb.2431</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7797-2295</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8150-0562</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-104X |
ispartof | Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2022-11, Vol.16 (6), p.1781-1793 |
issn | 1932-104X 1932-1031 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2730550612 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Absorption Agricultural economics Amines biomaterials bioreactor design bioseparations biotechnology Capital costs Cost analysis Economic analysis Flow rates Flow velocity Gas streams Graphical methods Hydrogen sulfide Hydrogen sulphide modeling Natural gas Oils & fats Regeneration Sensitivity analysis Solvents Sour gas Soybeans Sulphides |
title | Estimating a target price to regenerate bio‐oils post hydrogen sulfide removal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T16%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20a%20target%20price%20to%20regenerate%20bio%E2%80%90oils%20post%20hydrogen%20sulfide%20removal&rft.jtitle=Biofuels,%20bioproducts%20and%20biorefining&rft.au=Brace,%20Emma%20C.&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1781&rft.epage=1793&rft.pages=1781-1793&rft.issn=1932-104X&rft.eissn=1932-1031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bbb.2431&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2730550612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730550612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |