Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production

Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual fact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2022-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2239-2252
Hauptverfasser: Queirós, Anabela, Carvalho, Teresa, Rosa, Maria João, Biscaia, Ricardo, Manatos, Maria João, Videira, Pedro, Teixeira, Pedro, Diogo, Sara, Melo, Ana I., Figueiredo, Hugo, Mendes, Rui Amaral
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2252
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2239
container_title Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)
container_volume 47
creator Queirós, Anabela
Carvalho, Teresa
Rosa, Maria João
Biscaia, Ricardo
Manatos, Maria João
Videira, Pedro
Teixeira, Pedro
Diogo, Sara
Melo, Ana I.
Figueiredo, Hugo
Mendes, Rui Amaral
description Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual factors have been identified as determinants of the academic engagement. Hence, using data from a survey delivered to a representative sample of Portuguese academics, this paper analyses the influence of different modes of knowledge production, institutional diversity and individual characteristics on distinct dimensions of academic engagement (Formal Research Collaboration; Informal Dissemination of Knowledge; Commercialization of Knowledge; and Teaching-related Activities and Supervision of Students). We propose as research hypotheses the existence of an influence of individual academics' values, identity and types of knowledge on the engagement with society, addressing them using a linear regression. Results suggest the influence of CUDOS, (i.e. communalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism) and PLACE, (i.e. proprietary, local, authority, commissioned and expert) on academic engagement, although this influence differs according to distinct dimensions. The findings also reveal differences according to the type of institutional affiliation. Moreover, the study confirms the relevance of individual characteristics in explaining different forms of academic engagement, such as gender, discipline and seniority. Since the results do not align entirely with the theory, this paper may be of particular relevance to launch a discussion around the type of engagement higher education institutions intend to promote and how far their own characteristics and those of their academics may influence such engagement.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03075079.2022.2042241
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2730177500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1370547</ericid><sourcerecordid>2730177500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-3dde54b0048fe9b2b9f2dd224fe040b7e175457743df0dbda02da858431c29683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLHTEUDkWhV-1PEALdOvbkMWZuV4rYhwi6sNBdyCQn19iZiU0ylbv1lzfDtV26OeHkexy-j5BjBqcMOvgEAlQLan3KgfM6JOeSvSMrJhU0TMmfe2S1cJqF9J4c5PwIAGeqkyvycmGNwzFYitPGbHDEqdAw0buYyrwxw2daHpCmOCCNvgK5hDKXECczUBf-YMqhbE8qUJfg5vprH0wytmAKlWszNZOjY3SYF4NfU3we0G2QPqXoZrs4HZF9b4aMH17fQ_Ljy9X95bfm5vbr98uLm8ZKIUojnMNW9gCy87jueb_23Lka1SNI6BUy1cpWKSmcB9c7A9yZru2kYJavzzpxSD7ufOvp3zPmoh_jnGqQrLkSwFQtESqr3bFsijkn9PophdGkrWagl7r1v7r1Urd-rbvqjne6Gtz-11xdM6Gglari5zs8TD6m0TzHNDhdzHaIyScz2ZC1ePvEX1Qskok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730177500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Queirós, Anabela ; Carvalho, Teresa ; Rosa, Maria João ; Biscaia, Ricardo ; Manatos, Maria João ; Videira, Pedro ; Teixeira, Pedro ; Diogo, Sara ; Melo, Ana I. ; Figueiredo, Hugo ; Mendes, Rui Amaral</creator><creatorcontrib>Queirós, Anabela ; Carvalho, Teresa ; Rosa, Maria João ; Biscaia, Ricardo ; Manatos, Maria João ; Videira, Pedro ; Teixeira, Pedro ; Diogo, Sara ; Melo, Ana I. ; Figueiredo, Hugo ; Mendes, Rui Amaral</creatorcontrib><description>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual factors have been identified as determinants of the academic engagement. Hence, using data from a survey delivered to a representative sample of Portuguese academics, this paper analyses the influence of different modes of knowledge production, institutional diversity and individual characteristics on distinct dimensions of academic engagement (Formal Research Collaboration; Informal Dissemination of Knowledge; Commercialization of Knowledge; and Teaching-related Activities and Supervision of Students). We propose as research hypotheses the existence of an influence of individual academics' values, identity and types of knowledge on the engagement with society, addressing them using a linear regression. Results suggest the influence of CUDOS, (i.e. communalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism) and PLACE, (i.e. proprietary, local, authority, commissioned and expert) on academic engagement, although this influence differs according to distinct dimensions. The findings also reveal differences according to the type of institutional affiliation. Moreover, the study confirms the relevance of individual characteristics in explaining different forms of academic engagement, such as gender, discipline and seniority. Since the results do not align entirely with the theory, this paper may be of particular relevance to launch a discussion around the type of engagement higher education institutions intend to promote and how far their own characteristics and those of their academics may influence such engagement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2022.2042241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Academic engagement ; Academic staff ; Collaboration ; College Faculty ; commercialisation ; Commercialization ; Communes ; Dissemination ; Diversity (Institutional) ; Educational Research ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Individual Characteristics ; Influence ; Information Dissemination ; Knowledge ; Learner Engagement ; modes of knowledge production ; polytechnic ; Productivity ; Seniority ; Teacher Characteristics ; Teaching ; university</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2022-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2239-2252</ispartof><rights>2022 Society for Research into Higher Education 2022</rights><rights>2022 Society for Research into Higher Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-3dde54b0048fe9b2b9f2dd224fe040b7e175457743df0dbda02da858431c29683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-3dde54b0048fe9b2b9f2dd224fe040b7e175457743df0dbda02da858431c29683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7212-8626 ; 0000-0002-4336-2533 ; 0000-0001-5596-6564 ; 0000-0002-3368-3990 ; 0000-0003-2956-6801 ; 0000-0002-7128-8238 ; 0000-0001-5176-0526</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1370547$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Queirós, Anabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Maria João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biscaia, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manatos, Maria João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Videira, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diogo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Rui Amaral</creatorcontrib><title>Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual factors have been identified as determinants of the academic engagement. Hence, using data from a survey delivered to a representative sample of Portuguese academics, this paper analyses the influence of different modes of knowledge production, institutional diversity and individual characteristics on distinct dimensions of academic engagement (Formal Research Collaboration; Informal Dissemination of Knowledge; Commercialization of Knowledge; and Teaching-related Activities and Supervision of Students). We propose as research hypotheses the existence of an influence of individual academics' values, identity and types of knowledge on the engagement with society, addressing them using a linear regression. Results suggest the influence of CUDOS, (i.e. communalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism) and PLACE, (i.e. proprietary, local, authority, commissioned and expert) on academic engagement, although this influence differs according to distinct dimensions. The findings also reveal differences according to the type of institutional affiliation. Moreover, the study confirms the relevance of individual characteristics in explaining different forms of academic engagement, such as gender, discipline and seniority. Since the results do not align entirely with the theory, this paper may be of particular relevance to launch a discussion around the type of engagement higher education institutions intend to promote and how far their own characteristics and those of their academics may influence such engagement.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Academic engagement</subject><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>commercialisation</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Communes</subject><subject>Dissemination</subject><subject>Diversity (Institutional)</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>modes of knowledge production</subject><subject>polytechnic</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Seniority</subject><subject>Teacher Characteristics</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>university</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEtLHTEUDkWhV-1PEALdOvbkMWZuV4rYhwi6sNBdyCQn19iZiU0ylbv1lzfDtV26OeHkexy-j5BjBqcMOvgEAlQLan3KgfM6JOeSvSMrJhU0TMmfe2S1cJqF9J4c5PwIAGeqkyvycmGNwzFYitPGbHDEqdAw0buYyrwxw2daHpCmOCCNvgK5hDKXECczUBf-YMqhbE8qUJfg5vprH0wytmAKlWszNZOjY3SYF4NfU3we0G2QPqXoZrs4HZF9b4aMH17fQ_Ljy9X95bfm5vbr98uLm8ZKIUojnMNW9gCy87jueb_23Lka1SNI6BUy1cpWKSmcB9c7A9yZru2kYJavzzpxSD7ufOvp3zPmoh_jnGqQrLkSwFQtESqr3bFsijkn9PophdGkrWagl7r1v7r1Urd-rbvqjne6Gtz-11xdM6Gglari5zs8TD6m0TzHNDhdzHaIyScz2ZC1ePvEX1Qskok</recordid><startdate>20221102</startdate><enddate>20221102</enddate><creator>Queirós, Anabela</creator><creator>Carvalho, Teresa</creator><creator>Rosa, Maria João</creator><creator>Biscaia, Ricardo</creator><creator>Manatos, Maria João</creator><creator>Videira, Pedro</creator><creator>Teixeira, Pedro</creator><creator>Diogo, Sara</creator><creator>Melo, Ana I.</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Hugo</creator><creator>Mendes, Rui Amaral</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7212-8626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-2533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-6564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-3990</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-6801</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7128-8238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5176-0526</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221102</creationdate><title>Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production</title><author>Queirós, Anabela ; Carvalho, Teresa ; Rosa, Maria João ; Biscaia, Ricardo ; Manatos, Maria João ; Videira, Pedro ; Teixeira, Pedro ; Diogo, Sara ; Melo, Ana I. ; Figueiredo, Hugo ; Mendes, Rui Amaral</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-3dde54b0048fe9b2b9f2dd224fe040b7e175457743df0dbda02da858431c29683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Academic engagement</topic><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>commercialisation</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Communes</topic><topic>Dissemination</topic><topic>Diversity (Institutional)</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>modes of knowledge production</topic><topic>polytechnic</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Seniority</topic><topic>Teacher Characteristics</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>university</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Queirós, Anabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Maria João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biscaia, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manatos, Maria João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Videira, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diogo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Rui Amaral</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Queirós, Anabela</au><au>Carvalho, Teresa</au><au>Rosa, Maria João</au><au>Biscaia, Ricardo</au><au>Manatos, Maria João</au><au>Videira, Pedro</au><au>Teixeira, Pedro</au><au>Diogo, Sara</au><au>Melo, Ana I.</au><au>Figueiredo, Hugo</au><au>Mendes, Rui Amaral</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1370547</ericid><atitle>Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2022-11-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2239</spage><epage>2252</epage><pages>2239-2252</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual factors have been identified as determinants of the academic engagement. Hence, using data from a survey delivered to a representative sample of Portuguese academics, this paper analyses the influence of different modes of knowledge production, institutional diversity and individual characteristics on distinct dimensions of academic engagement (Formal Research Collaboration; Informal Dissemination of Knowledge; Commercialization of Knowledge; and Teaching-related Activities and Supervision of Students). We propose as research hypotheses the existence of an influence of individual academics' values, identity and types of knowledge on the engagement with society, addressing them using a linear regression. Results suggest the influence of CUDOS, (i.e. communalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism) and PLACE, (i.e. proprietary, local, authority, commissioned and expert) on academic engagement, although this influence differs according to distinct dimensions. The findings also reveal differences according to the type of institutional affiliation. Moreover, the study confirms the relevance of individual characteristics in explaining different forms of academic engagement, such as gender, discipline and seniority. Since the results do not align entirely with the theory, this paper may be of particular relevance to launch a discussion around the type of engagement higher education institutions intend to promote and how far their own characteristics and those of their academics may influence such engagement.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03075079.2022.2042241</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7212-8626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-2533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-6564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-3990</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-6801</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7128-8238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5176-0526</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0307-5079
ispartof Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2022-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2239-2252
issn 0307-5079
1470-174X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2730177500
source Education Source
subjects Academic disciplines
Academic engagement
Academic staff
Collaboration
College Faculty
commercialisation
Commercialization
Communes
Dissemination
Diversity (Institutional)
Educational Research
Foreign Countries
Higher Education
Individual Characteristics
Influence
Information Dissemination
Knowledge
Learner Engagement
modes of knowledge production
polytechnic
Productivity
Seniority
Teacher Characteristics
Teaching
university
title Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T11%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Academic%20engagement%20in%20Portugal:%20the%20role%20of%20institutional%20diversity,%20individual%20characteristics%20and%20modes%20of%20knowledge%20production&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Queir%C3%B3s,%20Anabela&rft.date=2022-11-02&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2239&rft.epage=2252&rft.pages=2239-2252&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03075079.2022.2042241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2730177500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730177500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1370547&rfr_iscdi=true