Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production
Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual fact...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) 2022-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2239-2252 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2252 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2239 |
container_title | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames) |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Queirós, Anabela Carvalho, Teresa Rosa, Maria João Biscaia, Ricardo Manatos, Maria João Videira, Pedro Teixeira, Pedro Diogo, Sara Melo, Ana I. Figueiredo, Hugo Mendes, Rui Amaral |
description | Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual factors have been identified as determinants of the academic engagement. Hence, using data from a survey delivered to a representative sample of Portuguese academics, this paper analyses the influence of different modes of knowledge production, institutional diversity and individual characteristics on distinct dimensions of academic engagement (Formal Research Collaboration; Informal Dissemination of Knowledge; Commercialization of Knowledge; and Teaching-related Activities and Supervision of Students). We propose as research hypotheses the existence of an influence of individual academics' values, identity and types of knowledge on the engagement with society, addressing them using a linear regression. Results suggest the influence of CUDOS, (i.e. communalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism) and PLACE, (i.e. proprietary, local, authority, commissioned and expert) on academic engagement, although this influence differs according to distinct dimensions. The findings also reveal differences according to the type of institutional affiliation. Moreover, the study confirms the relevance of individual characteristics in explaining different forms of academic engagement, such as gender, discipline and seniority. Since the results do not align entirely with the theory, this paper may be of particular relevance to launch a discussion around the type of engagement higher education institutions intend to promote and how far their own characteristics and those of their academics may influence such engagement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03075079.2022.2042241 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2730177500</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1370547</ericid><sourcerecordid>2730177500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-3dde54b0048fe9b2b9f2dd224fe040b7e175457743df0dbda02da858431c29683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLHTEUDkWhV-1PEALdOvbkMWZuV4rYhwi6sNBdyCQn19iZiU0ylbv1lzfDtV26OeHkexy-j5BjBqcMOvgEAlQLan3KgfM6JOeSvSMrJhU0TMmfe2S1cJqF9J4c5PwIAGeqkyvycmGNwzFYitPGbHDEqdAw0buYyrwxw2daHpCmOCCNvgK5hDKXECczUBf-YMqhbE8qUJfg5vprH0wytmAKlWszNZOjY3SYF4NfU3we0G2QPqXoZrs4HZF9b4aMH17fQ_Ljy9X95bfm5vbr98uLm8ZKIUojnMNW9gCy87jueb_23Lka1SNI6BUy1cpWKSmcB9c7A9yZru2kYJavzzpxSD7ufOvp3zPmoh_jnGqQrLkSwFQtESqr3bFsijkn9PophdGkrWagl7r1v7r1Urd-rbvqjne6Gtz-11xdM6Gglari5zs8TD6m0TzHNDhdzHaIyScz2ZC1ePvEX1Qskok</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730177500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Queirós, Anabela ; Carvalho, Teresa ; Rosa, Maria João ; Biscaia, Ricardo ; Manatos, Maria João ; Videira, Pedro ; Teixeira, Pedro ; Diogo, Sara ; Melo, Ana I. ; Figueiredo, Hugo ; Mendes, Rui Amaral</creator><creatorcontrib>Queirós, Anabela ; Carvalho, Teresa ; Rosa, Maria João ; Biscaia, Ricardo ; Manatos, Maria João ; Videira, Pedro ; Teixeira, Pedro ; Diogo, Sara ; Melo, Ana I. ; Figueiredo, Hugo ; Mendes, Rui Amaral</creatorcontrib><description>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual factors have been identified as determinants of the academic engagement. Hence, using data from a survey delivered to a representative sample of Portuguese academics, this paper analyses the influence of different modes of knowledge production, institutional diversity and individual characteristics on distinct dimensions of academic engagement (Formal Research Collaboration; Informal Dissemination of Knowledge; Commercialization of Knowledge; and Teaching-related Activities and Supervision of Students). We propose as research hypotheses the existence of an influence of individual academics' values, identity and types of knowledge on the engagement with society, addressing them using a linear regression. Results suggest the influence of CUDOS, (i.e. communalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism) and PLACE, (i.e. proprietary, local, authority, commissioned and expert) on academic engagement, although this influence differs according to distinct dimensions. The findings also reveal differences according to the type of institutional affiliation. Moreover, the study confirms the relevance of individual characteristics in explaining different forms of academic engagement, such as gender, discipline and seniority. Since the results do not align entirely with the theory, this paper may be of particular relevance to launch a discussion around the type of engagement higher education institutions intend to promote and how far their own characteristics and those of their academics may influence such engagement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0307-5079</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2022.2042241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Academic engagement ; Academic staff ; Collaboration ; College Faculty ; commercialisation ; Commercialization ; Communes ; Dissemination ; Diversity (Institutional) ; Educational Research ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Individual Characteristics ; Influence ; Information Dissemination ; Knowledge ; Learner Engagement ; modes of knowledge production ; polytechnic ; Productivity ; Seniority ; Teacher Characteristics ; Teaching ; university</subject><ispartof>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2022-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2239-2252</ispartof><rights>2022 Society for Research into Higher Education 2022</rights><rights>2022 Society for Research into Higher Education</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-3dde54b0048fe9b2b9f2dd224fe040b7e175457743df0dbda02da858431c29683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-3dde54b0048fe9b2b9f2dd224fe040b7e175457743df0dbda02da858431c29683</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7212-8626 ; 0000-0002-4336-2533 ; 0000-0001-5596-6564 ; 0000-0002-3368-3990 ; 0000-0003-2956-6801 ; 0000-0002-7128-8238 ; 0000-0001-5176-0526</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1370547$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Queirós, Anabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Maria João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biscaia, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manatos, Maria João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Videira, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diogo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Rui Amaral</creatorcontrib><title>Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production</title><title>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</title><description>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual factors have been identified as determinants of the academic engagement. Hence, using data from a survey delivered to a representative sample of Portuguese academics, this paper analyses the influence of different modes of knowledge production, institutional diversity and individual characteristics on distinct dimensions of academic engagement (Formal Research Collaboration; Informal Dissemination of Knowledge; Commercialization of Knowledge; and Teaching-related Activities and Supervision of Students). We propose as research hypotheses the existence of an influence of individual academics' values, identity and types of knowledge on the engagement with society, addressing them using a linear regression. Results suggest the influence of CUDOS, (i.e. communalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism) and PLACE, (i.e. proprietary, local, authority, commissioned and expert) on academic engagement, although this influence differs according to distinct dimensions. The findings also reveal differences according to the type of institutional affiliation. Moreover, the study confirms the relevance of individual characteristics in explaining different forms of academic engagement, such as gender, discipline and seniority. Since the results do not align entirely with the theory, this paper may be of particular relevance to launch a discussion around the type of engagement higher education institutions intend to promote and how far their own characteristics and those of their academics may influence such engagement.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Academic engagement</subject><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>commercialisation</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Communes</subject><subject>Dissemination</subject><subject>Diversity (Institutional)</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>modes of knowledge production</subject><subject>polytechnic</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Seniority</subject><subject>Teacher Characteristics</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>university</subject><issn>0307-5079</issn><issn>1470-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEtLHTEUDkWhV-1PEALdOvbkMWZuV4rYhwi6sNBdyCQn19iZiU0ylbv1lzfDtV26OeHkexy-j5BjBqcMOvgEAlQLan3KgfM6JOeSvSMrJhU0TMmfe2S1cJqF9J4c5PwIAGeqkyvycmGNwzFYitPGbHDEqdAw0buYyrwxw2daHpCmOCCNvgK5hDKXECczUBf-YMqhbE8qUJfg5vprH0wytmAKlWszNZOjY3SYF4NfU3we0G2QPqXoZrs4HZF9b4aMH17fQ_Ljy9X95bfm5vbr98uLm8ZKIUojnMNW9gCy87jueb_23Lka1SNI6BUy1cpWKSmcB9c7A9yZru2kYJavzzpxSD7ufOvp3zPmoh_jnGqQrLkSwFQtESqr3bFsijkn9PophdGkrWagl7r1v7r1Urd-rbvqjne6Gtz-11xdM6Gglari5zs8TD6m0TzHNDhdzHaIyScz2ZC1ePvEX1Qskok</recordid><startdate>20221102</startdate><enddate>20221102</enddate><creator>Queirós, Anabela</creator><creator>Carvalho, Teresa</creator><creator>Rosa, Maria João</creator><creator>Biscaia, Ricardo</creator><creator>Manatos, Maria João</creator><creator>Videira, Pedro</creator><creator>Teixeira, Pedro</creator><creator>Diogo, Sara</creator><creator>Melo, Ana I.</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Hugo</creator><creator>Mendes, Rui Amaral</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7212-8626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-2533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-6564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-3990</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-6801</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7128-8238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5176-0526</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221102</creationdate><title>Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production</title><author>Queirós, Anabela ; Carvalho, Teresa ; Rosa, Maria João ; Biscaia, Ricardo ; Manatos, Maria João ; Videira, Pedro ; Teixeira, Pedro ; Diogo, Sara ; Melo, Ana I. ; Figueiredo, Hugo ; Mendes, Rui Amaral</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-3dde54b0048fe9b2b9f2dd224fe040b7e175457743df0dbda02da858431c29683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Academic engagement</topic><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>commercialisation</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Communes</topic><topic>Dissemination</topic><topic>Diversity (Institutional)</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>modes of knowledge production</topic><topic>polytechnic</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Seniority</topic><topic>Teacher Characteristics</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>university</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Queirós, Anabela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Maria João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biscaia, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manatos, Maria João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Videira, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diogo, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, Ana I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Rui Amaral</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Queirós, Anabela</au><au>Carvalho, Teresa</au><au>Rosa, Maria João</au><au>Biscaia, Ricardo</au><au>Manatos, Maria João</au><au>Videira, Pedro</au><au>Teixeira, Pedro</au><au>Diogo, Sara</au><au>Melo, Ana I.</au><au>Figueiredo, Hugo</au><au>Mendes, Rui Amaral</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1370547</ericid><atitle>Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production</atitle><jtitle>Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames)</jtitle><date>2022-11-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2239</spage><epage>2252</epage><pages>2239-2252</pages><issn>0307-5079</issn><eissn>1470-174X</eissn><abstract>Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) play a crucial role in knowledge society by providing and disseminating knowledge. In this regard, academics have been encouraged to collaborate with society, leading to the emergence of new modes of knowledge production. Several institutional and individual factors have been identified as determinants of the academic engagement. Hence, using data from a survey delivered to a representative sample of Portuguese academics, this paper analyses the influence of different modes of knowledge production, institutional diversity and individual characteristics on distinct dimensions of academic engagement (Formal Research Collaboration; Informal Dissemination of Knowledge; Commercialization of Knowledge; and Teaching-related Activities and Supervision of Students). We propose as research hypotheses the existence of an influence of individual academics' values, identity and types of knowledge on the engagement with society, addressing them using a linear regression. Results suggest the influence of CUDOS, (i.e. communalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism) and PLACE, (i.e. proprietary, local, authority, commissioned and expert) on academic engagement, although this influence differs according to distinct dimensions. The findings also reveal differences according to the type of institutional affiliation. Moreover, the study confirms the relevance of individual characteristics in explaining different forms of academic engagement, such as gender, discipline and seniority. Since the results do not align entirely with the theory, this paper may be of particular relevance to launch a discussion around the type of engagement higher education institutions intend to promote and how far their own characteristics and those of their academics may influence such engagement.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03075079.2022.2042241</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7212-8626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-2533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5596-6564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-3990</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-6801</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7128-8238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5176-0526</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0307-5079 |
ispartof | Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 2022-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2239-2252 |
issn | 0307-5079 1470-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2730177500 |
source | Education Source |
subjects | Academic disciplines Academic engagement Academic staff Collaboration College Faculty commercialisation Commercialization Communes Dissemination Diversity (Institutional) Educational Research Foreign Countries Higher Education Individual Characteristics Influence Information Dissemination Knowledge Learner Engagement modes of knowledge production polytechnic Productivity Seniority Teacher Characteristics Teaching university |
title | Academic engagement in Portugal: the role of institutional diversity, individual characteristics and modes of knowledge production |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T11%3A25%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Academic%20engagement%20in%20Portugal:%20the%20role%20of%20institutional%20diversity,%20individual%20characteristics%20and%20modes%20of%20knowledge%20production&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20higher%20education%20(Dorchester-on-Thames)&rft.au=Queir%C3%B3s,%20Anabela&rft.date=2022-11-02&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2239&rft.epage=2252&rft.pages=2239-2252&rft.issn=0307-5079&rft.eissn=1470-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03075079.2022.2042241&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2730177500%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730177500&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1370547&rfr_iscdi=true |