Family screening in patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valve
AimTo determine the prevalence of undiagnosed bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and isolated aortic dilatation in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with isolated BAV and to explore the recurrence risk of BAV in different subgroups of probands with BAV. Recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Netherlands heart journal 2022-04, Vol.30 (4), p.207-211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 211 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Netherlands heart journal |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Cozijnsen, L Braam, R. L Bakker-de Boo, M Otten, A. M Post, J. G Schermer, T Bouma, B. J Mulder, B. J. M |
description | AimTo determine the prevalence of undiagnosed bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and isolated aortic dilatation in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with isolated BAV and to explore the recurrence risk of BAV in different subgroups of probands with BAV. Recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines recommend family screening in patients with associated aortopathy only.MethodsDuring follow-up visits, patients with isolated BAV received a printed invitation for their FDRs advising cardiac screening.ResultsFrom 2012–2019, 257 FDRs of 118 adult BAV patients were screened, among whom 63 (53%) index patients had undergone aortic valve surgery (AVS), including concomitant aortic replacement in 25 (21%). Of the non-operated index patients, 31 (26%) had aortic dilatation (> 40 mm). Mean age of the FDRs was 48 years (range 4–83) and 42% were male. The FDR group comprised 20 parents, 103 siblings and 134 offspring. Among these FDRs, 12 (4.7%) had a previously undiagnosed BAV and 23 (8.9%) had an isolated aortic dilatation. FDRs of the probands with previous AVS (n = 147) had a risk ratio for BAV of 2.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–8.10). FDRs of the probands with BAV and repaired or unrepaired aortic dilatation (n = 127) had a risk ratio for BAV of 0.51 (95% CI 0.16–1.66).ConclusionScreening FDRs of patients with isolated BAV resulted in a reasonable yield of 14% new cases of BAV or isolated aortic dilatation. A trend towards an increased risk of BAV in FDRs was observed in the probands with previous AVS, whereas this risk seemed to be diminished in the probands with associated aortic dilatation. This latter finding does not support the restrictive ACC/AHA recommendation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12471-021-01621-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2729535845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2729535845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p723-5c7aac099a9e0848bcaae46a471b366606092d93c8721f4e9e4970a0f90248393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjktLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAdfTmneyUYqtQcNN9uZPJaMo4M07Siv_egC7OY3XOR8gth3sOYB8yF8pyBqKKm-ryjCy4s4YZoeG8dm0c0865S3KV8wFAW8Htgjyu8TP1PzSHOcYhDe80DXTCkuJQMv1O5YOmPPZYYkubFI55Si3FcS4p0BP2p3hNLjrsc7z5zyXZrZ93qxe2fdu8rp62bLJCMh0sYgDv0UdwyjUBMSqDFbqRxhgw4EXrZXAVq1PRR-UtIHQehHLSyyW5-5ud5vHrGHPZH8bjPNTHvbDCa6md0vIXMc1K5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2729535845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Family screening in patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valve</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cozijnsen, L ; Braam, R. L ; Bakker-de Boo, M ; Otten, A. M ; Post, J. G ; Schermer, T ; Bouma, B. J ; Mulder, B. J. M</creator><creatorcontrib>Cozijnsen, L ; Braam, R. L ; Bakker-de Boo, M ; Otten, A. M ; Post, J. G ; Schermer, T ; Bouma, B. J ; Mulder, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><description>AimTo determine the prevalence of undiagnosed bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and isolated aortic dilatation in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with isolated BAV and to explore the recurrence risk of BAV in different subgroups of probands with BAV. Recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines recommend family screening in patients with associated aortopathy only.MethodsDuring follow-up visits, patients with isolated BAV received a printed invitation for their FDRs advising cardiac screening.ResultsFrom 2012–2019, 257 FDRs of 118 adult BAV patients were screened, among whom 63 (53%) index patients had undergone aortic valve surgery (AVS), including concomitant aortic replacement in 25 (21%). Of the non-operated index patients, 31 (26%) had aortic dilatation (> 40 mm). Mean age of the FDRs was 48 years (range 4–83) and 42% were male. The FDR group comprised 20 parents, 103 siblings and 134 offspring. Among these FDRs, 12 (4.7%) had a previously undiagnosed BAV and 23 (8.9%) had an isolated aortic dilatation. FDRs of the probands with previous AVS (n = 147) had a risk ratio for BAV of 2.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–8.10). FDRs of the probands with BAV and repaired or unrepaired aortic dilatation (n = 127) had a risk ratio for BAV of 0.51 (95% CI 0.16–1.66).ConclusionScreening FDRs of patients with isolated BAV resulted in a reasonable yield of 14% new cases of BAV or isolated aortic dilatation. A trend towards an increased risk of BAV in FDRs was observed in the probands with previous AVS, whereas this risk seemed to be diminished in the probands with associated aortic dilatation. This latter finding does not support the restrictive ACC/AHA recommendation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-5888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-6250</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12471-021-01621-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aortic dissection ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular disease ; Confidence intervals ; Congenital diseases ; Coronary vessels ; Heart surgery ; Patients ; Sinuses ; Teaching hospitals</subject><ispartof>Netherlands heart journal, 2022-04, Vol.30 (4), p.207-211</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cozijnsen, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braam, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakker-de Boo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otten, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Post, J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schermer, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouma, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><title>Family screening in patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valve</title><title>Netherlands heart journal</title><description>AimTo determine the prevalence of undiagnosed bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and isolated aortic dilatation in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with isolated BAV and to explore the recurrence risk of BAV in different subgroups of probands with BAV. Recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines recommend family screening in patients with associated aortopathy only.MethodsDuring follow-up visits, patients with isolated BAV received a printed invitation for their FDRs advising cardiac screening.ResultsFrom 2012–2019, 257 FDRs of 118 adult BAV patients were screened, among whom 63 (53%) index patients had undergone aortic valve surgery (AVS), including concomitant aortic replacement in 25 (21%). Of the non-operated index patients, 31 (26%) had aortic dilatation (> 40 mm). Mean age of the FDRs was 48 years (range 4–83) and 42% were male. The FDR group comprised 20 parents, 103 siblings and 134 offspring. Among these FDRs, 12 (4.7%) had a previously undiagnosed BAV and 23 (8.9%) had an isolated aortic dilatation. FDRs of the probands with previous AVS (n = 147) had a risk ratio for BAV of 2.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–8.10). FDRs of the probands with BAV and repaired or unrepaired aortic dilatation (n = 127) had a risk ratio for BAV of 0.51 (95% CI 0.16–1.66).ConclusionScreening FDRs of patients with isolated BAV resulted in a reasonable yield of 14% new cases of BAV or isolated aortic dilatation. A trend towards an increased risk of BAV in FDRs was observed in the probands with previous AVS, whereas this risk seemed to be diminished in the probands with associated aortic dilatation. This latter finding does not support the restrictive ACC/AHA recommendation.</description><subject>Aortic dissection</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Congenital diseases</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Teaching hospitals</subject><issn>1568-5888</issn><issn>1876-6250</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotjktLAzEUhYMoWKt_wFXAdfTmneyUYqtQcNN9uZPJaMo4M07Siv_egC7OY3XOR8gth3sOYB8yF8pyBqKKm-ryjCy4s4YZoeG8dm0c0865S3KV8wFAW8Htgjyu8TP1PzSHOcYhDe80DXTCkuJQMv1O5YOmPPZYYkubFI55Si3FcS4p0BP2p3hNLjrsc7z5zyXZrZ93qxe2fdu8rp62bLJCMh0sYgDv0UdwyjUBMSqDFbqRxhgw4EXrZXAVq1PRR-UtIHQehHLSyyW5-5ud5vHrGHPZH8bjPNTHvbDCa6md0vIXMc1K5A</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Cozijnsen, L</creator><creator>Braam, R. L</creator><creator>Bakker-de Boo, M</creator><creator>Otten, A. M</creator><creator>Post, J. G</creator><creator>Schermer, T</creator><creator>Bouma, B. J</creator><creator>Mulder, B. J. M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Family screening in patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valve</title><author>Cozijnsen, L ; Braam, R. L ; Bakker-de Boo, M ; Otten, A. M ; Post, J. G ; Schermer, T ; Bouma, B. J ; Mulder, B. J. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p723-5c7aac099a9e0848bcaae46a471b366606092d93c8721f4e9e4970a0f90248393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aortic dissection</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Congenital diseases</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Teaching hospitals</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cozijnsen, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braam, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakker-de Boo, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otten, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Post, J. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schermer, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouma, B. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, B. J. M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Netherlands heart journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cozijnsen, L</au><au>Braam, R. L</au><au>Bakker-de Boo, M</au><au>Otten, A. M</au><au>Post, J. G</au><au>Schermer, T</au><au>Bouma, B. J</au><au>Mulder, B. J. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Family screening in patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valve</atitle><jtitle>Netherlands heart journal</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>207-211</pages><issn>1568-5888</issn><eissn>1876-6250</eissn><abstract>AimTo determine the prevalence of undiagnosed bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and isolated aortic dilatation in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with isolated BAV and to explore the recurrence risk of BAV in different subgroups of probands with BAV. Recent American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines recommend family screening in patients with associated aortopathy only.MethodsDuring follow-up visits, patients with isolated BAV received a printed invitation for their FDRs advising cardiac screening.ResultsFrom 2012–2019, 257 FDRs of 118 adult BAV patients were screened, among whom 63 (53%) index patients had undergone aortic valve surgery (AVS), including concomitant aortic replacement in 25 (21%). Of the non-operated index patients, 31 (26%) had aortic dilatation (> 40 mm). Mean age of the FDRs was 48 years (range 4–83) and 42% were male. The FDR group comprised 20 parents, 103 siblings and 134 offspring. Among these FDRs, 12 (4.7%) had a previously undiagnosed BAV and 23 (8.9%) had an isolated aortic dilatation. FDRs of the probands with previous AVS (n = 147) had a risk ratio for BAV of 2.25 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62–8.10). FDRs of the probands with BAV and repaired or unrepaired aortic dilatation (n = 127) had a risk ratio for BAV of 0.51 (95% CI 0.16–1.66).ConclusionScreening FDRs of patients with isolated BAV resulted in a reasonable yield of 14% new cases of BAV or isolated aortic dilatation. A trend towards an increased risk of BAV in FDRs was observed in the probands with previous AVS, whereas this risk seemed to be diminished in the probands with associated aortic dilatation. This latter finding does not support the restrictive ACC/AHA recommendation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s12471-021-01621-3</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1568-5888 |
ispartof | Netherlands heart journal, 2022-04, Vol.30 (4), p.207-211 |
issn | 1568-5888 1876-6250 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2729535845 |
source | Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aortic dissection Cardiology Cardiovascular disease Confidence intervals Congenital diseases Coronary vessels Heart surgery Patients Sinuses Teaching hospitals |
title | Family screening in patients with isolated bicuspid aortic valve |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A42%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Family%20screening%20in%20patients%20with%20isolated%20bicuspid%20aortic%20valve&rft.jtitle=Netherlands%20heart%20journal&rft.au=Cozijnsen,%20L&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=207-211&rft.issn=1568-5888&rft.eissn=1876-6250&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12471-021-01621-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2729535845%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2729535845&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |