Seasonal Variability of Phytoplankton Biomass Revealed by Satellite and BGC‐Argo Data in the Central Tropical Indian Ocean

The variability of phytoplankton biomass related to ocean's biological carbon pump in the central tropical Indian Ocean is not fully understood. Using satellite and biogeochemical Argo data, we found that phytoplankton biomass exhibits significantly different and even opposite changes at the ne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2022-10, Vol.127 (10), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Qiwei, Chen, Xiaoyan, He, Xianqiang, Bai, Yan, Zhong, Qingwen, Gong, Fang, Zhu, Qiankun, Pan, Delu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Oceans
container_volume 127
creator Hu, Qiwei
Chen, Xiaoyan
He, Xianqiang
Bai, Yan
Zhong, Qingwen
Gong, Fang
Zhu, Qiankun
Pan, Delu
description The variability of phytoplankton biomass related to ocean's biological carbon pump in the central tropical Indian Ocean is not fully understood. Using satellite and biogeochemical Argo data, we found that phytoplankton biomass exhibits significantly different and even opposite changes at the near‐surface (0–10 m) and subsurface layer (50–100 m). Results showed that the shoaling/deepening of the mixed layer and thermocline dominated the phytoplankton biomass change in different layers. In February–May, the shallow mixed‐layer depth (MLD) exacerbated the oligotrophic environment in the mixed layer, thus resulting in low near‐surface phytoplankton biomass (Chl a  50 m), hence increasing the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton from the subsurface to maintain the near‐surface phytoplankton blooms (Chl a > 0.2 mg m−3) in June–October. Below the mixed layer, wind‐induced upwelling/downwelling modulated the thermocline, which significantly affects the supply of nutrients for phytoplankton growth in the subsurface layer. The shallower thermocline during February and March provided favorable conditions for the subsurface blooms (Chl a > 0.5 mg m−3) with a prominent subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer (SCML). Conversely, the deeper thermocline in June and July was related to the lowest phytoplankton biomass with the disappearance of the SCML. These results may help explain the response of vertical phytoplankton to changes driven by multiple atmospheric and physical forcing factors in future climate‐change scenarios. Plain Language Summary Satellite and biogeochemical float are essential platforms for quantifying phytoplankton biomass in the upper ocean, which is critical for understanding ocean's biological carbon pump that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Phytoplankton variation in the upper‐water column, however, is not fully understood. We showed that the seasonal variation of phytoplankton in the near‐surface layer differs from that in the subsurface layer in the central tropical Indian Ocean (CIO) using satellite and float data. We demonstrated that various responses of phytoplankton in the upper water column are triggered by seasonal wind bursts, including the deepening of the mixed layer and shoaling of the thermocline. In February–May, weak wind and enhanced stratification resulted in low near‐surface phytoplankton biomass. However, the s
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021JC018227
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2729009906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2729009906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3738-d804597d8fa7ce9fca82664062543e115f162ea7b3b262b6d1396dd289ac75a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFKxDAQBuAiCsrqzQcIeHU1mbRpctSq6y4LK7vqtUzbVKM1WZOuUvDgI_iMPomVFfHkXGYOHz_MH0X7jB4xCuoYKLBJRpkESDeiHWBCDRUotvl7p8l2tBfCA-1HMhnHaid6W2gMzmJDbtEbLExj2o64mlzdd61bNmgfW2fJqXFPGAKZ6xeNja5I0ZEFtrrpuSZoK3I6yj7fP078nSNn2CIxlrT3mmTatr5Pv_Zuacr-GNvKoCWzUqPdjbZqbILe-9mD6Obi_Dq7HE5no3F2Mh0iT7kcVpLGiUorWWNaalWXKEGImApIYq4ZS2omQGNa8AIEFKJiXImqAqmwTBPkfBAdrHOX3j2vdGjzB7fy_dMhhxQUpUpR0avDtSq9C8HrOl9684S-yxnNvyvO_1bcc77mr6bR3b82n4zmGSTAJP8C1PN89A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2729009906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal Variability of Phytoplankton Biomass Revealed by Satellite and BGC‐Argo Data in the Central Tropical Indian Ocean</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hu, Qiwei ; Chen, Xiaoyan ; He, Xianqiang ; Bai, Yan ; Zhong, Qingwen ; Gong, Fang ; Zhu, Qiankun ; Pan, Delu</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qiwei ; Chen, Xiaoyan ; He, Xianqiang ; Bai, Yan ; Zhong, Qingwen ; Gong, Fang ; Zhu, Qiankun ; Pan, Delu</creatorcontrib><description>The variability of phytoplankton biomass related to ocean's biological carbon pump in the central tropical Indian Ocean is not fully understood. Using satellite and biogeochemical Argo data, we found that phytoplankton biomass exhibits significantly different and even opposite changes at the near‐surface (0–10 m) and subsurface layer (50–100 m). Results showed that the shoaling/deepening of the mixed layer and thermocline dominated the phytoplankton biomass change in different layers. In February–May, the shallow mixed‐layer depth (MLD) exacerbated the oligotrophic environment in the mixed layer, thus resulting in low near‐surface phytoplankton biomass (Chl a &lt; 0.1 mg m−3). However, strengthened wind stress and surface cooling induced deep vertical mixing (MLD &gt; 50 m), hence increasing the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton from the subsurface to maintain the near‐surface phytoplankton blooms (Chl a &gt; 0.2 mg m−3) in June–October. Below the mixed layer, wind‐induced upwelling/downwelling modulated the thermocline, which significantly affects the supply of nutrients for phytoplankton growth in the subsurface layer. The shallower thermocline during February and March provided favorable conditions for the subsurface blooms (Chl a &gt; 0.5 mg m−3) with a prominent subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer (SCML). Conversely, the deeper thermocline in June and July was related to the lowest phytoplankton biomass with the disappearance of the SCML. These results may help explain the response of vertical phytoplankton to changes driven by multiple atmospheric and physical forcing factors in future climate‐change scenarios. Plain Language Summary Satellite and biogeochemical float are essential platforms for quantifying phytoplankton biomass in the upper ocean, which is critical for understanding ocean's biological carbon pump that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Phytoplankton variation in the upper‐water column, however, is not fully understood. We showed that the seasonal variation of phytoplankton in the near‐surface layer differs from that in the subsurface layer in the central tropical Indian Ocean (CIO) using satellite and float data. We demonstrated that various responses of phytoplankton in the upper water column are triggered by seasonal wind bursts, including the deepening of the mixed layer and shoaling of the thermocline. In February–May, weak wind and enhanced stratification resulted in low near‐surface phytoplankton biomass. However, the strong wind and sea surface cooling induced deep vertical mixing, thus increasing the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton to support the near‐surface phytoplankton blooms in June–October of the CIO. For the subsurface layer (50–100 m), the wind‐induced upwelling uplifted the nutrients and provided favorable conditions for the strong subsurface phytoplankton blooms in February and March. Conversely, the wind‐induced downwelling led to the lowest phytoplankton biomass in June and July. These results provide new information on the vertical variability of phytoplankton biomass in the tropical marine. Key Points The phytoplankton biomass in 0–10 m decreased (increased), while that in 50–100 m increased (decreased) during February–May (June and July) The deep vertical mixing drove the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton from the subsurface to support near‐surface blooms The intensity of subsurface blooms depended on the modulation of the thermocline depth by wind‐induced upwelling</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JC018227</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biogeochemistry ; Biomass ; Blooms ; Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide removal ; Chlorophyll ; Chlorophylls ; Climate change ; Cooling ; Downwelling ; Future climates ; Geophysics ; Indian spacecraft ; Mixed layer ; Nutrient cycles ; Nutrients ; Ocean circulation ; Oceans ; Phytoplankton ; Plankton ; Satellites ; Sea surface ; Sea surface cooling ; Seasonal variability ; Seasonal variation ; Seasonal variations ; Seasonal winds ; Shoaling ; Stratification ; Strong winds ; Surface boundary layer ; Surface cooling ; Surface layers ; Thermocline ; Upper ocean ; Upwelling ; Vertical mixing ; Water circulation ; Water column ; Wind ; Wind stress ; Work platforms</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2022-10, Vol.127 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3738-d804597d8fa7ce9fca82664062543e115f162ea7b3b262b6d1396dd289ac75a33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3738-d804597d8fa7ce9fca82664062543e115f162ea7b3b262b6d1396dd289ac75a33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7474-6778 ; 0000-0002-8438-2848 ; 0000-0002-5212-510X ; 0000-0001-5882-1176 ; 0000-0002-3345-1495</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JC018227$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JC018227$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xianqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Qingwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qiankun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Delu</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal Variability of Phytoplankton Biomass Revealed by Satellite and BGC‐Argo Data in the Central Tropical Indian Ocean</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><description>The variability of phytoplankton biomass related to ocean's biological carbon pump in the central tropical Indian Ocean is not fully understood. Using satellite and biogeochemical Argo data, we found that phytoplankton biomass exhibits significantly different and even opposite changes at the near‐surface (0–10 m) and subsurface layer (50–100 m). Results showed that the shoaling/deepening of the mixed layer and thermocline dominated the phytoplankton biomass change in different layers. In February–May, the shallow mixed‐layer depth (MLD) exacerbated the oligotrophic environment in the mixed layer, thus resulting in low near‐surface phytoplankton biomass (Chl a &lt; 0.1 mg m−3). However, strengthened wind stress and surface cooling induced deep vertical mixing (MLD &gt; 50 m), hence increasing the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton from the subsurface to maintain the near‐surface phytoplankton blooms (Chl a &gt; 0.2 mg m−3) in June–October. Below the mixed layer, wind‐induced upwelling/downwelling modulated the thermocline, which significantly affects the supply of nutrients for phytoplankton growth in the subsurface layer. The shallower thermocline during February and March provided favorable conditions for the subsurface blooms (Chl a &gt; 0.5 mg m−3) with a prominent subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer (SCML). Conversely, the deeper thermocline in June and July was related to the lowest phytoplankton biomass with the disappearance of the SCML. These results may help explain the response of vertical phytoplankton to changes driven by multiple atmospheric and physical forcing factors in future climate‐change scenarios. Plain Language Summary Satellite and biogeochemical float are essential platforms for quantifying phytoplankton biomass in the upper ocean, which is critical for understanding ocean's biological carbon pump that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Phytoplankton variation in the upper‐water column, however, is not fully understood. We showed that the seasonal variation of phytoplankton in the near‐surface layer differs from that in the subsurface layer in the central tropical Indian Ocean (CIO) using satellite and float data. We demonstrated that various responses of phytoplankton in the upper water column are triggered by seasonal wind bursts, including the deepening of the mixed layer and shoaling of the thermocline. In February–May, weak wind and enhanced stratification resulted in low near‐surface phytoplankton biomass. However, the strong wind and sea surface cooling induced deep vertical mixing, thus increasing the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton to support the near‐surface phytoplankton blooms in June–October of the CIO. For the subsurface layer (50–100 m), the wind‐induced upwelling uplifted the nutrients and provided favorable conditions for the strong subsurface phytoplankton blooms in February and March. Conversely, the wind‐induced downwelling led to the lowest phytoplankton biomass in June and July. These results provide new information on the vertical variability of phytoplankton biomass in the tropical marine. Key Points The phytoplankton biomass in 0–10 m decreased (increased), while that in 50–100 m increased (decreased) during February–May (June and July) The deep vertical mixing drove the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton from the subsurface to support near‐surface blooms The intensity of subsurface blooms depended on the modulation of the thermocline depth by wind‐induced upwelling</description><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Blooms</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide removal</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Chlorophylls</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Downwelling</subject><subject>Future climates</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Indian spacecraft</subject><subject>Mixed layer</subject><subject>Nutrient cycles</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Ocean circulation</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Sea surface</subject><subject>Sea surface cooling</subject><subject>Seasonal variability</subject><subject>Seasonal variation</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Seasonal winds</subject><subject>Shoaling</subject><subject>Stratification</subject><subject>Strong winds</subject><subject>Surface boundary layer</subject><subject>Surface cooling</subject><subject>Surface layers</subject><subject>Thermocline</subject><subject>Upper ocean</subject><subject>Upwelling</subject><subject>Vertical mixing</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Wind</subject><subject>Wind stress</subject><subject>Work platforms</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MFKxDAQBuAiCsrqzQcIeHU1mbRpctSq6y4LK7vqtUzbVKM1WZOuUvDgI_iMPomVFfHkXGYOHz_MH0X7jB4xCuoYKLBJRpkESDeiHWBCDRUotvl7p8l2tBfCA-1HMhnHaid6W2gMzmJDbtEbLExj2o64mlzdd61bNmgfW2fJqXFPGAKZ6xeNja5I0ZEFtrrpuSZoK3I6yj7fP078nSNn2CIxlrT3mmTatr5Pv_Zuacr-GNvKoCWzUqPdjbZqbILe-9mD6Obi_Dq7HE5no3F2Mh0iT7kcVpLGiUorWWNaalWXKEGImApIYq4ZS2omQGNa8AIEFKJiXImqAqmwTBPkfBAdrHOX3j2vdGjzB7fy_dMhhxQUpUpR0avDtSq9C8HrOl9684S-yxnNvyvO_1bcc77mr6bR3b82n4zmGSTAJP8C1PN89A</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Hu, Qiwei</creator><creator>Chen, Xiaoyan</creator><creator>He, Xianqiang</creator><creator>Bai, Yan</creator><creator>Zhong, Qingwen</creator><creator>Gong, Fang</creator><creator>Zhu, Qiankun</creator><creator>Pan, Delu</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-6778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-2848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-510X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5882-1176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-1495</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Seasonal Variability of Phytoplankton Biomass Revealed by Satellite and BGC‐Argo Data in the Central Tropical Indian Ocean</title><author>Hu, Qiwei ; Chen, Xiaoyan ; He, Xianqiang ; Bai, Yan ; Zhong, Qingwen ; Gong, Fang ; Zhu, Qiankun ; Pan, Delu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3738-d804597d8fa7ce9fca82664062543e115f162ea7b3b262b6d1396dd289ac75a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Blooms</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide removal</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Chlorophylls</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Downwelling</topic><topic>Future climates</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Indian spacecraft</topic><topic>Mixed layer</topic><topic>Nutrient cycles</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Ocean circulation</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Sea surface</topic><topic>Sea surface cooling</topic><topic>Seasonal variability</topic><topic>Seasonal variation</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Seasonal winds</topic><topic>Shoaling</topic><topic>Stratification</topic><topic>Strong winds</topic><topic>Surface boundary layer</topic><topic>Surface cooling</topic><topic>Surface layers</topic><topic>Thermocline</topic><topic>Upper ocean</topic><topic>Upwelling</topic><topic>Vertical mixing</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Wind</topic><topic>Wind stress</topic><topic>Work platforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Qiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xianqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Qingwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Qiankun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Delu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Qiwei</au><au>Chen, Xiaoyan</au><au>He, Xianqiang</au><au>Bai, Yan</au><au>Zhong, Qingwen</au><au>Gong, Fang</au><au>Zhu, Qiankun</au><au>Pan, Delu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal Variability of Phytoplankton Biomass Revealed by Satellite and BGC‐Argo Data in the Central Tropical Indian Ocean</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>The variability of phytoplankton biomass related to ocean's biological carbon pump in the central tropical Indian Ocean is not fully understood. Using satellite and biogeochemical Argo data, we found that phytoplankton biomass exhibits significantly different and even opposite changes at the near‐surface (0–10 m) and subsurface layer (50–100 m). Results showed that the shoaling/deepening of the mixed layer and thermocline dominated the phytoplankton biomass change in different layers. In February–May, the shallow mixed‐layer depth (MLD) exacerbated the oligotrophic environment in the mixed layer, thus resulting in low near‐surface phytoplankton biomass (Chl a &lt; 0.1 mg m−3). However, strengthened wind stress and surface cooling induced deep vertical mixing (MLD &gt; 50 m), hence increasing the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton from the subsurface to maintain the near‐surface phytoplankton blooms (Chl a &gt; 0.2 mg m−3) in June–October. Below the mixed layer, wind‐induced upwelling/downwelling modulated the thermocline, which significantly affects the supply of nutrients for phytoplankton growth in the subsurface layer. The shallower thermocline during February and March provided favorable conditions for the subsurface blooms (Chl a &gt; 0.5 mg m−3) with a prominent subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer (SCML). Conversely, the deeper thermocline in June and July was related to the lowest phytoplankton biomass with the disappearance of the SCML. These results may help explain the response of vertical phytoplankton to changes driven by multiple atmospheric and physical forcing factors in future climate‐change scenarios. Plain Language Summary Satellite and biogeochemical float are essential platforms for quantifying phytoplankton biomass in the upper ocean, which is critical for understanding ocean's biological carbon pump that removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Phytoplankton variation in the upper‐water column, however, is not fully understood. We showed that the seasonal variation of phytoplankton in the near‐surface layer differs from that in the subsurface layer in the central tropical Indian Ocean (CIO) using satellite and float data. We demonstrated that various responses of phytoplankton in the upper water column are triggered by seasonal wind bursts, including the deepening of the mixed layer and shoaling of the thermocline. In February–May, weak wind and enhanced stratification resulted in low near‐surface phytoplankton biomass. However, the strong wind and sea surface cooling induced deep vertical mixing, thus increasing the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton to support the near‐surface phytoplankton blooms in June–October of the CIO. For the subsurface layer (50–100 m), the wind‐induced upwelling uplifted the nutrients and provided favorable conditions for the strong subsurface phytoplankton blooms in February and March. Conversely, the wind‐induced downwelling led to the lowest phytoplankton biomass in June and July. These results provide new information on the vertical variability of phytoplankton biomass in the tropical marine. Key Points The phytoplankton biomass in 0–10 m decreased (increased), while that in 50–100 m increased (decreased) during February–May (June and July) The deep vertical mixing drove the supply of both nutrients and phytoplankton from the subsurface to support near‐surface blooms The intensity of subsurface blooms depended on the modulation of the thermocline depth by wind‐induced upwelling</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JC018227</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-6778</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-2848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-510X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5882-1176</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-1495</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9275
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2022-10, Vol.127 (10), p.n/a
issn 2169-9275
2169-9291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2729009906
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biogeochemistry
Biomass
Blooms
Carbon
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide removal
Chlorophyll
Chlorophylls
Climate change
Cooling
Downwelling
Future climates
Geophysics
Indian spacecraft
Mixed layer
Nutrient cycles
Nutrients
Ocean circulation
Oceans
Phytoplankton
Plankton
Satellites
Sea surface
Sea surface cooling
Seasonal variability
Seasonal variation
Seasonal variations
Seasonal winds
Shoaling
Stratification
Strong winds
Surface boundary layer
Surface cooling
Surface layers
Thermocline
Upper ocean
Upwelling
Vertical mixing
Water circulation
Water column
Wind
Wind stress
Work platforms
title Seasonal Variability of Phytoplankton Biomass Revealed by Satellite and BGC‐Argo Data in the Central Tropical Indian Ocean
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A03%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20Variability%20of%20Phytoplankton%20Biomass%20Revealed%20by%20Satellite%20and%20BGC%E2%80%90Argo%20Data%20in%20the%20Central%20Tropical%20Indian%20Ocean&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Hu,%20Qiwei&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JC018227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2729009906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2729009906&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true