Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers
As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, howe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Phi Delta Kappan 2022-11, Vol.104 (3), p.18-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Phi Delta Kappan |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Rice-Boothe, Mary Marshall, Tanji Reed |
description | As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, however, that student achievement is not the only metric for determining the success of equity officers. When holding equity officers accountable, it’s important to be clear about the expectations for the role, establish appropriate measurements to assess their effectiveness, and provide supports that set the leaders up for success. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00317217221136593 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2728975320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1354137</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_00317217221136593</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2728975320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2bc352492e504ed301f96280233998115fcd4345f3a05324c4329148a554c7773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0BHoSAV1Nndna72aPW-kXBi55D3O7WFJuku8mh_74bI3oQYWDeMO8DHmPnCBNEpa4BCBWPwxFpKjUdsBFqAelUZOqQjfp_2hOO2UkIawBABDFit3fWlVVZra6SjS1C579gUS2T0DVN7dt4J-2HjacxNoSkdonddmW7i8iVxvpwyo5c8Rns2fces7f7-evsMV28PDzNbhapIRJtyt8NSS40txKEXRKg01OeASfSOkOUziwFCemoAElcGEFco8gKKYVRStGYXQ6-ja-3nQ1tvq47X8XInCueaRVVEFk4sIyvQ_DW5Y0vN4Xf5Qh5X1X-p6qouRg01pfmhz9_RpICqU-eDP9QrOxv6v-Ge5cgbwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728975320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Rice-Boothe, Mary ; Marshall, Tanji Reed</creator><creatorcontrib>Rice-Boothe, Mary ; Marshall, Tanji Reed</creatorcontrib><description>As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, however, that student achievement is not the only metric for determining the success of equity officers. When holding equity officers accountable, it’s important to be clear about the expectations for the role, establish appropriate measurements to assess their effectiveness, and provide supports that set the leaders up for success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-7217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-6487</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00317217221136593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Accountability ; Educational inequality ; Educational objectives ; Educational tests & measurements ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Equal Education ; Expectation ; Public Schools ; Role ; School administration ; School Districts ; School Personnel ; Success</subject><ispartof>Phi Delta Kappan, 2022-11, Vol.104 (3), p.18-21</ispartof><rights>2022 by Phi Delta Kappa International</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2bc352492e504ed301f96280233998115fcd4345f3a05324c4329148a554c7773</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00317217221136593$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00317217221136593$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1354137$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rice-Boothe, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Tanji Reed</creatorcontrib><title>Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers</title><title>Phi Delta Kappan</title><description>As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, however, that student achievement is not the only metric for determining the success of equity officers. When holding equity officers accountable, it’s important to be clear about the expectations for the role, establish appropriate measurements to assess their effectiveness, and provide supports that set the leaders up for success.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Educational inequality</subject><subject>Educational objectives</subject><subject>Educational tests & measurements</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Expectation</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>School administration</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>School Personnel</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>0031-7217</issn><issn>1940-6487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0BHoSAV1Nndna72aPW-kXBi55D3O7WFJuku8mh_74bI3oQYWDeMO8DHmPnCBNEpa4BCBWPwxFpKjUdsBFqAelUZOqQjfp_2hOO2UkIawBABDFit3fWlVVZra6SjS1C579gUS2T0DVN7dt4J-2HjacxNoSkdonddmW7i8iVxvpwyo5c8Rns2fces7f7-evsMV28PDzNbhapIRJtyt8NSS40txKEXRKg01OeASfSOkOUziwFCemoAElcGEFco8gKKYVRStGYXQ6-ja-3nQ1tvq47X8XInCueaRVVEFk4sIyvQ_DW5Y0vN4Xf5Qh5X1X-p6qouRg01pfmhz9_RpICqU-eDP9QrOxv6v-Ge5cgbwY</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Rice-Boothe, Mary</creator><creator>Marshall, Tanji Reed</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Phi Delta Kappa</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers</title><author>Rice-Boothe, Mary ; Marshall, Tanji Reed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2bc352492e504ed301f96280233998115fcd4345f3a05324c4329148a554c7773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Educational inequality</topic><topic>Educational objectives</topic><topic>Educational tests & measurements</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Expectation</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>School administration</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>School Personnel</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rice-Boothe, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Tanji Reed</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rice-Boothe, Mary</au><au>Marshall, Tanji Reed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1354137</ericid><atitle>Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers</atitle><jtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>18-21</pages><issn>0031-7217</issn><eissn>1940-6487</eissn><abstract>As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, however, that student achievement is not the only metric for determining the success of equity officers. When holding equity officers accountable, it’s important to be clear about the expectations for the role, establish appropriate measurements to assess their effectiveness, and provide supports that set the leaders up for success.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00317217221136593</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-7217 |
ispartof | Phi Delta Kappan, 2022-11, Vol.104 (3), p.18-21 |
issn | 0031-7217 1940-6487 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2728975320 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source |
subjects | Academic Achievement Accountability Educational inequality Educational objectives Educational tests & measurements Elementary Secondary Education Equal Education Expectation Public Schools Role School administration School Districts School Personnel Success |
title | Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A13%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining,%20measuring,%20and%20supporting%20the%20success%20of%20equity%20officers&rft.jtitle=Phi%20Delta%20Kappan&rft.au=Rice-Boothe,%20Mary&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=18-21&rft.issn=0031-7217&rft.eissn=1940-6487&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00317217221136593&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2728975320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728975320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1354137&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00317217221136593&rfr_iscdi=true |