Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers

As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, howe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phi Delta Kappan 2022-11, Vol.104 (3), p.18-21
Hauptverfasser: Rice-Boothe, Mary, Marshall, Tanji Reed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21
container_issue 3
container_start_page 18
container_title Phi Delta Kappan
container_volume 104
creator Rice-Boothe, Mary
Marshall, Tanji Reed
description As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, however, that student achievement is not the only metric for determining the success of equity officers. When holding equity officers accountable, it’s important to be clear about the expectations for the role, establish appropriate measurements to assess their effectiveness, and provide supports that set the leaders up for success.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00317217221136593
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2728975320</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1354137</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_00317217221136593</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2728975320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2bc352492e504ed301f96280233998115fcd4345f3a05324c4329148a554c7773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0BHoSAV1Nndna72aPW-kXBi55D3O7WFJuku8mh_74bI3oQYWDeMO8DHmPnCBNEpa4BCBWPwxFpKjUdsBFqAelUZOqQjfp_2hOO2UkIawBABDFit3fWlVVZra6SjS1C579gUS2T0DVN7dt4J-2HjacxNoSkdonddmW7i8iVxvpwyo5c8Rns2fces7f7-evsMV28PDzNbhapIRJtyt8NSS40txKEXRKg01OeASfSOkOUziwFCemoAElcGEFco8gKKYVRStGYXQ6-ja-3nQ1tvq47X8XInCueaRVVEFk4sIyvQ_DW5Y0vN4Xf5Qh5X1X-p6qouRg01pfmhz9_RpICqU-eDP9QrOxv6v-Ge5cgbwY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728975320</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Rice-Boothe, Mary ; Marshall, Tanji Reed</creator><creatorcontrib>Rice-Boothe, Mary ; Marshall, Tanji Reed</creatorcontrib><description>As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, however, that student achievement is not the only metric for determining the success of equity officers. When holding equity officers accountable, it’s important to be clear about the expectations for the role, establish appropriate measurements to assess their effectiveness, and provide supports that set the leaders up for success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-7217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-6487</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00317217221136593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Accountability ; Educational inequality ; Educational objectives ; Educational tests &amp; measurements ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Equal Education ; Expectation ; Public Schools ; Role ; School administration ; School Districts ; School Personnel ; Success</subject><ispartof>Phi Delta Kappan, 2022-11, Vol.104 (3), p.18-21</ispartof><rights>2022 by Phi Delta Kappa International</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2bc352492e504ed301f96280233998115fcd4345f3a05324c4329148a554c7773</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00317217221136593$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00317217221136593$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,21806,27911,27912,43608,43609</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1354137$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rice-Boothe, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Tanji Reed</creatorcontrib><title>Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers</title><title>Phi Delta Kappan</title><description>As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, however, that student achievement is not the only metric for determining the success of equity officers. When holding equity officers accountable, it’s important to be clear about the expectations for the role, establish appropriate measurements to assess their effectiveness, and provide supports that set the leaders up for success.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Educational inequality</subject><subject>Educational objectives</subject><subject>Educational tests &amp; measurements</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Expectation</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>School administration</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>School Personnel</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>0031-7217</issn><issn>1940-6487</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1Lw0AQXUTBWv0BHoSAV1Nndna72aPW-kXBi55D3O7WFJuku8mh_74bI3oQYWDeMO8DHmPnCBNEpa4BCBWPwxFpKjUdsBFqAelUZOqQjfp_2hOO2UkIawBABDFit3fWlVVZra6SjS1C579gUS2T0DVN7dt4J-2HjacxNoSkdonddmW7i8iVxvpwyo5c8Rns2fces7f7-evsMV28PDzNbhapIRJtyt8NSS40txKEXRKg01OeASfSOkOUziwFCemoAElcGEFco8gKKYVRStGYXQ6-ja-3nQ1tvq47X8XInCueaRVVEFk4sIyvQ_DW5Y0vN4Xf5Qh5X1X-p6qouRg01pfmhz9_RpICqU-eDP9QrOxv6v-Ge5cgbwY</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Rice-Boothe, Mary</creator><creator>Marshall, Tanji Reed</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Phi Delta Kappa</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers</title><author>Rice-Boothe, Mary ; Marshall, Tanji Reed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-2bc352492e504ed301f96280233998115fcd4345f3a05324c4329148a554c7773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Educational inequality</topic><topic>Educational objectives</topic><topic>Educational tests &amp; measurements</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Expectation</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>School administration</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>School Personnel</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rice-Boothe, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Tanji Reed</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rice-Boothe, Mary</au><au>Marshall, Tanji Reed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1354137</ericid><atitle>Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers</atitle><jtitle>Phi Delta Kappan</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>18-21</pages><issn>0031-7217</issn><eissn>1940-6487</eissn><abstract>As more K-12 school districts have hired equity officers, questions have arisen about their role and effectiveness. A recent Heritage Foundation report, for example, found that schools with equity officers have the lowest achievement outcomes. Mary Rice-Boothe and Tanji Reed Marshall point out, however, that student achievement is not the only metric for determining the success of equity officers. When holding equity officers accountable, it’s important to be clear about the expectations for the role, establish appropriate measurements to assess their effectiveness, and provide supports that set the leaders up for success.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00317217221136593</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-7217
ispartof Phi Delta Kappan, 2022-11, Vol.104 (3), p.18-21
issn 0031-7217
1940-6487
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2728975320
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source
subjects Academic Achievement
Accountability
Educational inequality
Educational objectives
Educational tests & measurements
Elementary Secondary Education
Equal Education
Expectation
Public Schools
Role
School administration
School Districts
School Personnel
Success
title Defining, measuring, and supporting the success of equity officers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A13%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining,%20measuring,%20and%20supporting%20the%20success%20of%20equity%20officers&rft.jtitle=Phi%20Delta%20Kappan&rft.au=Rice-Boothe,%20Mary&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=18-21&rft.issn=0031-7217&rft.eissn=1940-6487&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00317217221136593&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2728975320%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728975320&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1354137&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00317217221136593&rfr_iscdi=true