Assessing the level of compliance with alien plant regulations in a large African protected area
Regulations provide the legal basis for managing biological invasions, but assessments of their effectiveness are rare. To assess the influence of national and local regulations on alien plant species richness and composition in a large protected area (Kruger National Park [KNP], South Africa) we su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biological invasions 2022-12, Vol.24 (12), p.3831-3844 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3844 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3831 |
container_title | Biological invasions |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Keet, Jan-Hendrik Datta, Arunava Foxcroft, Llewellyn C. Kumschick, Sabrina Nichols, Geoff R. Richardson, David M. Wilson, John R. U. |
description | Regulations provide the legal basis for managing biological invasions, but assessments of their effectiveness are rare. To assess the influence of national and local regulations on alien plant species richness and composition in a large protected area (Kruger National Park [KNP], South Africa) we surveyed tourist camps and staff villages for alien ornamental plants. We compared our survey results in 2020 with a previous survey carried out between 1999 and 2003, in the context of national regulations on alien plants promulgated in 2001 and 2014. The number of alien plant species recorded in KNP has almost doubled since the first survey (from 231 to 438), although there has been significant species turnover (93% average replacement across all camps). Importantly, however, both the number of listed and regulated alien plant species found in KNP, and their species richness per camp, have declined (by 38% overall and by 56% per camp). This suggests that regulations are effective. In contrast, the number of unregulated ornamental alien species recorded has increased (by 157% overall). This is likely partly due to an increase in survey effort. Alien species regulations provide clear guidance for conservation managers, and there are promising signs of their effectiveness in directing management in KNP. However, converting alien species lists into priorities for control or regulation will continue to require risk analyses sensitive to park user needs. We advocate for better monitoring of the effectiveness of the regulations, and for the results of such monitoring to be interpreted based on local management needs and concerns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10530-022-02883-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2728756376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2728756376</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6462083e07e7eaec8549c273d87175ec8c569a6e03f0ce9e2339adcfaf2c02673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA8-psskl2j6X4DwQveo4hnd2mpNmapIrf3tQVvHkYZgZ-7z14hFzWcF0DqJtUg-BQAWNl2pZX6ojMaqF4VTeyOS43b1XFRaNOyVlKGwDoFIgZeVukhCm5MNC8RurxAz0de2rH7c47EyzST5fX1HiHge68CZlGHPbeZDeGRF2ghnoTB6SLPjprChTHjDbjipqI5pyc9MYnvPjdc_J6d_uyfKienu8fl4unyrKmy5VsJIOWIyhUaNC2ouksU3zVqlqJ8lshOyMReA8WO2Scd2Zle9MzC0wqPidXk2-Jf99jynoz7mMokZop1iohuZKFYhNl45hSxF7votua-KVr0Icm9dSkLk3qnyb1wZpPolTgMGD8s_5H9Q15bna_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728756376</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the level of compliance with alien plant regulations in a large African protected area</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Keet, Jan-Hendrik ; Datta, Arunava ; Foxcroft, Llewellyn C. ; Kumschick, Sabrina ; Nichols, Geoff R. ; Richardson, David M. ; Wilson, John R. U.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keet, Jan-Hendrik ; Datta, Arunava ; Foxcroft, Llewellyn C. ; Kumschick, Sabrina ; Nichols, Geoff R. ; Richardson, David M. ; Wilson, John R. U.</creatorcontrib><description>Regulations provide the legal basis for managing biological invasions, but assessments of their effectiveness are rare. To assess the influence of national and local regulations on alien plant species richness and composition in a large protected area (Kruger National Park [KNP], South Africa) we surveyed tourist camps and staff villages for alien ornamental plants. We compared our survey results in 2020 with a previous survey carried out between 1999 and 2003, in the context of national regulations on alien plants promulgated in 2001 and 2014. The number of alien plant species recorded in KNP has almost doubled since the first survey (from 231 to 438), although there has been significant species turnover (93% average replacement across all camps). Importantly, however, both the number of listed and regulated alien plant species found in KNP, and their species richness per camp, have declined (by 38% overall and by 56% per camp). This suggests that regulations are effective. In contrast, the number of unregulated ornamental alien species recorded has increased (by 157% overall). This is likely partly due to an increase in survey effort. Alien species regulations provide clear guidance for conservation managers, and there are promising signs of their effectiveness in directing management in KNP. However, converting alien species lists into priorities for control or regulation will continue to require risk analyses sensitive to park user needs. We advocate for better monitoring of the effectiveness of the regulations, and for the results of such monitoring to be interpreted based on local management needs and concerns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-022-02883-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Camps ; Developmental Biology ; Ecology ; Effectiveness ; Flowers & plants ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Introduced species ; Life Sciences ; Monitoring ; National parks ; Original Paper ; Ornamental plants ; Plant Sciences ; Plant species ; Polls & surveys ; Population decline ; Protected areas ; Regulations ; Risk analysis ; Species richness ; Surveys ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2022-12, Vol.24 (12), p.3831-3844</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6462083e07e7eaec8549c273d87175ec8c569a6e03f0ce9e2339adcfaf2c02673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6462083e07e7eaec8549c273d87175ec8c569a6e03f0ce9e2339adcfaf2c02673</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3134-491X ; 0000-0003-2610-9410 ; 0000-0001-8034-5831 ; 0000-0001-9574-8297 ; 0000-0002-7071-6739 ; 0000-0003-0174-3239</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-022-02883-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-022-02883-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keet, Jan-Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datta, Arunava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foxcroft, Llewellyn C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumschick, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Geoff R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, John R. U.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the level of compliance with alien plant regulations in a large African protected area</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>Regulations provide the legal basis for managing biological invasions, but assessments of their effectiveness are rare. To assess the influence of national and local regulations on alien plant species richness and composition in a large protected area (Kruger National Park [KNP], South Africa) we surveyed tourist camps and staff villages for alien ornamental plants. We compared our survey results in 2020 with a previous survey carried out between 1999 and 2003, in the context of national regulations on alien plants promulgated in 2001 and 2014. The number of alien plant species recorded in KNP has almost doubled since the first survey (from 231 to 438), although there has been significant species turnover (93% average replacement across all camps). Importantly, however, both the number of listed and regulated alien plant species found in KNP, and their species richness per camp, have declined (by 38% overall and by 56% per camp). This suggests that regulations are effective. In contrast, the number of unregulated ornamental alien species recorded has increased (by 157% overall). This is likely partly due to an increase in survey effort. Alien species regulations provide clear guidance for conservation managers, and there are promising signs of their effectiveness in directing management in KNP. However, converting alien species lists into priorities for control or regulation will continue to require risk analyses sensitive to park user needs. We advocate for better monitoring of the effectiveness of the regulations, and for the results of such monitoring to be interpreted based on local management needs and concerns.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Camps</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Ornamental plants</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA8-psskl2j6X4DwQveo4hnd2mpNmapIrf3tQVvHkYZgZ-7z14hFzWcF0DqJtUg-BQAWNl2pZX6ojMaqF4VTeyOS43b1XFRaNOyVlKGwDoFIgZeVukhCm5MNC8RurxAz0de2rH7c47EyzST5fX1HiHge68CZlGHPbeZDeGRF2ghnoTB6SLPjprChTHjDbjipqI5pyc9MYnvPjdc_J6d_uyfKienu8fl4unyrKmy5VsJIOWIyhUaNC2ouksU3zVqlqJ8lshOyMReA8WO2Scd2Zle9MzC0wqPidXk2-Jf99jynoz7mMokZop1iohuZKFYhNl45hSxF7votua-KVr0Icm9dSkLk3qnyb1wZpPolTgMGD8s_5H9Q15bna_</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Keet, Jan-Hendrik</creator><creator>Datta, Arunava</creator><creator>Foxcroft, Llewellyn C.</creator><creator>Kumschick, Sabrina</creator><creator>Nichols, Geoff R.</creator><creator>Richardson, David M.</creator><creator>Wilson, John R. U.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3134-491X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-9410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-5831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-8297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-6739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0174-3239</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Assessing the level of compliance with alien plant regulations in a large African protected area</title><author>Keet, Jan-Hendrik ; Datta, Arunava ; Foxcroft, Llewellyn C. ; Kumschick, Sabrina ; Nichols, Geoff R. ; Richardson, David M. ; Wilson, John R. U.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6462083e07e7eaec8549c273d87175ec8c569a6e03f0ce9e2339adcfaf2c02673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Camps</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Ornamental plants</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keet, Jan-Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Datta, Arunava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foxcroft, Llewellyn C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumschick, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nichols, Geoff R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, John R. U.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keet, Jan-Hendrik</au><au>Datta, Arunava</au><au>Foxcroft, Llewellyn C.</au><au>Kumschick, Sabrina</au><au>Nichols, Geoff R.</au><au>Richardson, David M.</au><au>Wilson, John R. U.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the level of compliance with alien plant regulations in a large African protected area</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3831</spage><epage>3844</epage><pages>3831-3844</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>Regulations provide the legal basis for managing biological invasions, but assessments of their effectiveness are rare. To assess the influence of national and local regulations on alien plant species richness and composition in a large protected area (Kruger National Park [KNP], South Africa) we surveyed tourist camps and staff villages for alien ornamental plants. We compared our survey results in 2020 with a previous survey carried out between 1999 and 2003, in the context of national regulations on alien plants promulgated in 2001 and 2014. The number of alien plant species recorded in KNP has almost doubled since the first survey (from 231 to 438), although there has been significant species turnover (93% average replacement across all camps). Importantly, however, both the number of listed and regulated alien plant species found in KNP, and their species richness per camp, have declined (by 38% overall and by 56% per camp). This suggests that regulations are effective. In contrast, the number of unregulated ornamental alien species recorded has increased (by 157% overall). This is likely partly due to an increase in survey effort. Alien species regulations provide clear guidance for conservation managers, and there are promising signs of their effectiveness in directing management in KNP. However, converting alien species lists into priorities for control or regulation will continue to require risk analyses sensitive to park user needs. We advocate for better monitoring of the effectiveness of the regulations, and for the results of such monitoring to be interpreted based on local management needs and concerns.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-022-02883-7</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3134-491X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2610-9410</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-5831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-8297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-6739</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0174-3239</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-3547 |
ispartof | Biological invasions, 2022-12, Vol.24 (12), p.3831-3844 |
issn | 1387-3547 1573-1464 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2728756376 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Biomedical and Life Sciences Camps Developmental Biology Ecology Effectiveness Flowers & plants Freshwater & Marine Ecology Introduced species Life Sciences Monitoring National parks Original Paper Ornamental plants Plant Sciences Plant species Polls & surveys Population decline Protected areas Regulations Risk analysis Species richness Surveys Wildlife conservation |
title | Assessing the level of compliance with alien plant regulations in a large African protected area |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A44%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20level%20of%20compliance%20with%20alien%20plant%20regulations%20in%20a%20large%20African%20protected%20area&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Keet,%20Jan-Hendrik&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3831&rft.epage=3844&rft.pages=3831-3844&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-022-02883-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2728756376%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728756376&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |