Are Non-Special Dimensions of Proximity in Local Clusters Related? An Analysis of 99 European Clusters

The destructive effects of industries on the environment are the most crucial reason for the need for firms’ proximity to developing innovative activities such as corporate sustainability. However, most prior efforts have focused on the role of different types of proximity in cluster performances, n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.12976
Hauptverfasser: Royo-Vela, Marcelo, Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 20
container_start_page 12976
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Royo-Vela, Marcelo
Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza
description The destructive effects of industries on the environment are the most crucial reason for the need for firms’ proximity to developing innovative activities such as corporate sustainability. However, most prior efforts have focused on the role of different types of proximity in cluster performances, not the relationship among them. Therefore, this study intends to go one step back, discuss the inter-relationships between different types of proximity, and propose them in a conceptual model as the antecedents of corporate sustainability. These factors are known as the non-specific dimensions of proximity within local clusters: cognitive, organisational, institutional, and social, which received less attention as a theoretical model. To this end, this study invited all members of the European Cluster Cooperation Platform (ECCP) to participate. Among some 1080 European cluster organisations, 113 organisations participated, of which 99 of them were usable for this research. Contrary to existing conceptual theories, the results revealed no strong evidence for significant interrelations among all dimensions of non-specific proximity. Moreover, organisational proximity does not strongly relate to cognitive and social proximities, and there is no meaningful relationship between institutional and social proximities.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su142012976
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2728532056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A747159471</galeid><sourcerecordid>A747159471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-40dd5cc694a0eb70a815beffd6814070b3199edbf814db6143e37155511d99f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkW9LwzAQxosoOOZe-QUCvhLpTJr-WV7JmFMHQ2XT1yVNLiOjTWrSwvbtjU5kuxzJXfg9DwcXRdcEjyll-N73JE0wSViRn0WDBBckJjjD50f1ZTTyfotDUEoYyQeRmjpAr9bE6xaE5jV61A0Yr63xyCr07uxON7rbI23Q0ooAzOred-A8WkHNO5APaGpC8nrv9a-GMTTvnW2Bm3_4KrpQvPYw-nuH0efT_GP2Ei_fnhez6TIWtCBdnGIpMyFylnIMVYH5hGQVKCXzCUlxgaswNQNZqdDKKicphaDLsowQyZhK6TC6Ofi2zn714Ltya3sXhvNlUiSTjCY4ywM1PlAbXkOpjbKd4yIcCY0W1oDS4X9apMGbhSsIbk8Egelg12147325WK9O2bsDK5z13oEqW6cb7vYlweXPosqjRdFviG6C4Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728532056</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Non-Special Dimensions of Proximity in Local Clusters Related? An Analysis of 99 European Clusters</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Royo-Vela, Marcelo ; Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza</creator><creatorcontrib>Royo-Vela, Marcelo ; Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza</creatorcontrib><description>The destructive effects of industries on the environment are the most crucial reason for the need for firms’ proximity to developing innovative activities such as corporate sustainability. However, most prior efforts have focused on the role of different types of proximity in cluster performances, not the relationship among them. Therefore, this study intends to go one step back, discuss the inter-relationships between different types of proximity, and propose them in a conceptual model as the antecedents of corporate sustainability. These factors are known as the non-specific dimensions of proximity within local clusters: cognitive, organisational, institutional, and social, which received less attention as a theoretical model. To this end, this study invited all members of the European Cluster Cooperation Platform (ECCP) to participate. Among some 1080 European cluster organisations, 113 organisations participated, of which 99 of them were usable for this research. Contrary to existing conceptual theories, the results revealed no strong evidence for significant interrelations among all dimensions of non-specific proximity. Moreover, organisational proximity does not strongly relate to cognitive and social proximities, and there is no meaningful relationship between institutional and social proximities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su142012976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Communication ; Cooperation ; Corporate culture ; Corporate sustainability ; Data collection ; Economic aspects ; Economic research ; Geography ; Globalization ; Interactive learning ; Knowledge ; Proximity ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.12976</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-40dd5cc694a0eb70a815beffd6814070b3199edbf814db6143e37155511d99f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-40dd5cc694a0eb70a815beffd6814070b3199edbf814db6143e37155511d99f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9310-5201 ; 0000-0003-0682-6797</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Royo-Vela, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza</creatorcontrib><title>Are Non-Special Dimensions of Proximity in Local Clusters Related? An Analysis of 99 European Clusters</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The destructive effects of industries on the environment are the most crucial reason for the need for firms’ proximity to developing innovative activities such as corporate sustainability. However, most prior efforts have focused on the role of different types of proximity in cluster performances, not the relationship among them. Therefore, this study intends to go one step back, discuss the inter-relationships between different types of proximity, and propose them in a conceptual model as the antecedents of corporate sustainability. These factors are known as the non-specific dimensions of proximity within local clusters: cognitive, organisational, institutional, and social, which received less attention as a theoretical model. To this end, this study invited all members of the European Cluster Cooperation Platform (ECCP) to participate. Among some 1080 European cluster organisations, 113 organisations participated, of which 99 of them were usable for this research. Contrary to existing conceptual theories, the results revealed no strong evidence for significant interrelations among all dimensions of non-specific proximity. Moreover, organisational proximity does not strongly relate to cognitive and social proximities, and there is no meaningful relationship between institutional and social proximities.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Corporate culture</subject><subject>Corporate sustainability</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Interactive learning</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Proximity</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkW9LwzAQxosoOOZe-QUCvhLpTJr-WV7JmFMHQ2XT1yVNLiOjTWrSwvbtjU5kuxzJXfg9DwcXRdcEjyll-N73JE0wSViRn0WDBBckJjjD50f1ZTTyfotDUEoYyQeRmjpAr9bE6xaE5jV61A0Yr63xyCr07uxON7rbI23Q0ooAzOred-A8WkHNO5APaGpC8nrv9a-GMTTvnW2Bm3_4KrpQvPYw-nuH0efT_GP2Ei_fnhez6TIWtCBdnGIpMyFylnIMVYH5hGQVKCXzCUlxgaswNQNZqdDKKicphaDLsowQyZhK6TC6Ofi2zn714Ltya3sXhvNlUiSTjCY4ywM1PlAbXkOpjbKd4yIcCY0W1oDS4X9apMGbhSsIbk8Egelg12147325WK9O2bsDK5z13oEqW6cb7vYlweXPosqjRdFviG6C4Q</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Royo-Vela, Marcelo</creator><creator>Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9310-5201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0682-6797</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Are Non-Special Dimensions of Proximity in Local Clusters Related? An Analysis of 99 European Clusters</title><author>Royo-Vela, Marcelo ; Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-40dd5cc694a0eb70a815beffd6814070b3199edbf814db6143e37155511d99f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Corporate culture</topic><topic>Corporate sustainability</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Interactive learning</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Proximity</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Royo-Vela, Marcelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Royo-Vela, Marcelo</au><au>Mazandarani, Mohammad-Reza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Non-Special Dimensions of Proximity in Local Clusters Related? An Analysis of 99 European Clusters</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>12976</spage><pages>12976-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The destructive effects of industries on the environment are the most crucial reason for the need for firms’ proximity to developing innovative activities such as corporate sustainability. However, most prior efforts have focused on the role of different types of proximity in cluster performances, not the relationship among them. Therefore, this study intends to go one step back, discuss the inter-relationships between different types of proximity, and propose them in a conceptual model as the antecedents of corporate sustainability. These factors are known as the non-specific dimensions of proximity within local clusters: cognitive, organisational, institutional, and social, which received less attention as a theoretical model. To this end, this study invited all members of the European Cluster Cooperation Platform (ECCP) to participate. Among some 1080 European cluster organisations, 113 organisations participated, of which 99 of them were usable for this research. Contrary to existing conceptual theories, the results revealed no strong evidence for significant interrelations among all dimensions of non-specific proximity. Moreover, organisational proximity does not strongly relate to cognitive and social proximities, and there is no meaningful relationship between institutional and social proximities.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su142012976</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9310-5201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0682-6797</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.12976
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2728532056
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Collaboration
Communication
Cooperation
Corporate culture
Corporate sustainability
Data collection
Economic aspects
Economic research
Geography
Globalization
Interactive learning
Knowledge
Proximity
Sustainability
Sustainable development
title Are Non-Special Dimensions of Proximity in Local Clusters Related? An Analysis of 99 European Clusters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A05%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Non-Special%20Dimensions%20of%20Proximity%20in%20Local%20Clusters%20Related?%20An%20Analysis%20of%2099%20European%20Clusters&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Royo-Vela,%20Marcelo&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=12976&rft.pages=12976-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su142012976&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA747159471%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728532056&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A747159471&rfr_iscdi=true