Research as praxis: challenging inequalities in systems of care

Bringing to fruition the transformative power of knowledge, and embracing the journal's commitment to interdisciplinarity, the authors in this issue advance social justice-oriented research agendas and bring powerful insights on urgent problems of our time. Hunt inspires us to take a careful lo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Outlines. Critical practice studies 2022-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-4
Hauptverfasser: Vianna, Eduardo, Garcia, João Otavio, Leite, Andre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Outlines. Critical practice studies
container_volume 23
creator Vianna, Eduardo
Garcia, João Otavio
Leite, Andre
description Bringing to fruition the transformative power of knowledge, and embracing the journal's commitment to interdisciplinarity, the authors in this issue advance social justice-oriented research agendas and bring powerful insights on urgent problems of our time. Hunt inspires us to take a careful look into these discourses and calls for a more reflexive and critical view of the biopsychosocial model" as well pointed out by the reviewers. [...]the article critically unpacks the notion of 'gains of suffering', demonstrating how it disempowers patients by serving as "further evidence of dysfunctional illness behavior." The thrust of this discussion is to understand the potential of practices between peers, which, according to the authors, consist of practices that are not mediated by hierarchical relationships, knowledge or power.
doi_str_mv 10.7146/ocps.v23i1.134236
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2728520578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2728520578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c708-1f0191b4819bababd0ddea3fcd23cd87aa670f21ee9f988fcc7f29ac9092ce663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LAzEQhoMoWGov3rwVPO86M9l8HaWoFQqC9B7SfOAWddfEiv57U9d3Du8cHmZ4GLtCaBV28mbwY2m_iPfYIu-IyxM2QwNdA4RwWnduTCMEwjlblLKHGglCgpyxy-dYosv-ZenKcszuuy8X7Cy51xIX_z1n2_u77WrdbJ4eHle3m8Yr0A0mQIO7TqPZuToBQoiOJx-I-6CVc1JBIozRJKN18l4lMs4bMOSjlHzOrqezYx4-DrF82v1wyO_1oyVFWhAIpSuFE-XzUEqOyY65f3P5xyLYo7w9yts_eTvJ818ohUzY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728520578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research as praxis: challenging inequalities in systems of care</title><source>tidsskrift.dk</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Vianna, Eduardo ; Garcia, João Otavio ; Leite, Andre</creator><creatorcontrib>Vianna, Eduardo ; Garcia, João Otavio ; Leite, Andre</creatorcontrib><description>Bringing to fruition the transformative power of knowledge, and embracing the journal's commitment to interdisciplinarity, the authors in this issue advance social justice-oriented research agendas and bring powerful insights on urgent problems of our time. Hunt inspires us to take a careful look into these discourses and calls for a more reflexive and critical view of the biopsychosocial model" as well pointed out by the reviewers. [...]the article critically unpacks the notion of 'gains of suffering', demonstrating how it disempowers patients by serving as "further evidence of dysfunctional illness behavior." The thrust of this discussion is to understand the potential of practices between peers, which, according to the authors, consist of practices that are not mediated by hierarchical relationships, knowledge or power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1399-5510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1904-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7146/ocps.v23i1.134236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Copenhagen, Denmark: Outlines, Critical Practice Studies</publisher><subject>Herbal medicine ; Legitimacy ; Medicine ; Patients ; Peers ; Power ; Reflexivity</subject><ispartof>Outlines. Critical practice studies, 2022-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-4</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/about (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vianna, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, João Otavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Research as praxis: challenging inequalities in systems of care</title><title>Outlines. Critical practice studies</title><description>Bringing to fruition the transformative power of knowledge, and embracing the journal's commitment to interdisciplinarity, the authors in this issue advance social justice-oriented research agendas and bring powerful insights on urgent problems of our time. Hunt inspires us to take a careful look into these discourses and calls for a more reflexive and critical view of the biopsychosocial model" as well pointed out by the reviewers. [...]the article critically unpacks the notion of 'gains of suffering', demonstrating how it disempowers patients by serving as "further evidence of dysfunctional illness behavior." The thrust of this discussion is to understand the potential of practices between peers, which, according to the authors, consist of practices that are not mediated by hierarchical relationships, knowledge or power.</description><subject>Herbal medicine</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><issn>1399-5510</issn><issn>1904-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LAzEQhoMoWGov3rwVPO86M9l8HaWoFQqC9B7SfOAWddfEiv57U9d3Du8cHmZ4GLtCaBV28mbwY2m_iPfYIu-IyxM2QwNdA4RwWnduTCMEwjlblLKHGglCgpyxy-dYosv-ZenKcszuuy8X7Cy51xIX_z1n2_u77WrdbJ4eHle3m8Yr0A0mQIO7TqPZuToBQoiOJx-I-6CVc1JBIozRJKN18l4lMs4bMOSjlHzOrqezYx4-DrF82v1wyO_1oyVFWhAIpSuFE-XzUEqOyY65f3P5xyLYo7w9yts_eTvJ818ohUzY</recordid><startdate>20221018</startdate><enddate>20221018</enddate><creator>Vianna, Eduardo</creator><creator>Garcia, João Otavio</creator><creator>Leite, Andre</creator><general>Outlines, Critical Practice Studies</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221018</creationdate><title>Research as praxis</title><author>Vianna, Eduardo ; Garcia, João Otavio ; Leite, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c708-1f0191b4819bababd0ddea3fcd23cd87aa670f21ee9f988fcc7f29ac9092ce663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Herbal medicine</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vianna, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, João Otavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Outlines. Critical practice studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vianna, Eduardo</au><au>Garcia, João Otavio</au><au>Leite, Andre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research as praxis: challenging inequalities in systems of care</atitle><jtitle>Outlines. Critical practice studies</jtitle><date>2022-10-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><issn>1399-5510</issn><eissn>1904-0210</eissn><abstract>Bringing to fruition the transformative power of knowledge, and embracing the journal's commitment to interdisciplinarity, the authors in this issue advance social justice-oriented research agendas and bring powerful insights on urgent problems of our time. Hunt inspires us to take a careful look into these discourses and calls for a more reflexive and critical view of the biopsychosocial model" as well pointed out by the reviewers. [...]the article critically unpacks the notion of 'gains of suffering', demonstrating how it disempowers patients by serving as "further evidence of dysfunctional illness behavior." The thrust of this discussion is to understand the potential of practices between peers, which, according to the authors, consist of practices that are not mediated by hierarchical relationships, knowledge or power.</abstract><cop>Copenhagen, Denmark</cop><pub>Outlines, Critical Practice Studies</pub><doi>10.7146/ocps.v23i1.134236</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1399-5510
ispartof Outlines. Critical practice studies, 2022-10, Vol.23 (1), p.1-4
issn 1399-5510
1904-0210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2728520578
source tidsskrift.dk; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Herbal medicine
Legitimacy
Medicine
Patients
Peers
Power
Reflexivity
title Research as praxis: challenging inequalities in systems of care
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T12%3A30%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20as%20praxis:%20challenging%20inequalities%20in%20systems%20of%20care&rft.jtitle=Outlines.%20Critical%20practice%20studies&rft.au=Vianna,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2022-10-18&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.issn=1399-5510&rft.eissn=1904-0210&rft_id=info:doi/10.7146/ocps.v23i1.134236&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2728520578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728520578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true