Validating the LDi and LCi Indices in the Southern Hemisphere

The validation of the Local Disturbance index (LDi) and its first time derivative Local Current index (LCi) is performed in the Southern Hemisphere. Two South African magnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek contributed data for this study, and two South African power stations, Grassridge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Space Weather 2022-10, Vol.20 (10), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Nahayo, E., Guerrero, A., Lotz, S., Cid, C., Tshisaphungo, M., Saiz, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Space Weather
container_volume 20
creator Nahayo, E.
Guerrero, A.
Lotz, S.
Cid, C.
Tshisaphungo, M.
Saiz, E.
description The validation of the Local Disturbance index (LDi) and its first time derivative Local Current index (LCi) is performed in the Southern Hemisphere. Two South African magnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek contributed data for this study, and two South African power stations, Grassridge and Matimba, provided geomagnetically induced current (GIC) data. This validation focused on two major geomagnetic storms, Halloween and Saint Patrick's Day events that occurred in October 2003 and March 2015, respectively. The comparative evaluation of the LDi and LCi indices was executed with the help of the local horizontal component (H) and also comparing them to the global index SYM‐H. A direct comparison to measured GIC shows that LCi performs slightly better than dH/dt as a proxy for GIC. The comparison of the LDi 1‐hr magnetic disturbances values to ones calculated applying a Linear phase Robust Non‐Smoothing method to the H component yields a Pearson correlation coefficient R greater than 0.960 for different groups of magnetic storms based on intensity. The estimated SYM‐H index from LDi data showed a possible difference of about 300 nT from the published SYM‐H index values around 20:00 UT on 29 October 2003, during the Halloween storm. This study has shown that the LDi and LCi indices, developed in the Northern Hemisphere, can be calculated at similar latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere for studying local space weather conditions and now‐casting successfully local geomagnetic events. Plain Language Summary The local indices Local Disturbance index and Local Current index, that were developed in Northern Hemisphere (Spain), have been successfully validated to be used in Southern Hemisphere at similar geomagnetic latitudes. This validation was carried out with the help of geomagnetic data from two South African geomagnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek, and geomagnetically induced current data from two South African power stations, Grassridge and Matimba, recorded during two major geomagnetic storms, Halloween in October 2003 and Saint Patrick's Day in March 2015. The results show that these indices can now‐cast successfully local space weather events better than the global geomagnetic activity indices like SYM‐H. Key Points Geomagnetic indices Local Disturbance index (LDi) and Local Current index (LCi) successfully now‐cast local geomagnetic disturbances and geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) respectively in the Southern Hemisphere C
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022SW003092
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2728485957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A761258078</galeid><sourcerecordid>A761258078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-eb25ce25d0e5fddcc687cee728fbafe54ba66872d07d61040114219079c163473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYjefIBNvAq2s-12e_BAEIVkEw-oHJvSdrEEutguMby9xfXAycxhJv98889kELoleEgwiAfAAPMFxjkWcIZ6hFEY8Fzg85P6El3FuMYYKAPaQ48fauOMap1fZe2nzaonlylvsmrsspk3TtuYOf_bmjf7lILPpnbr4i6V9hpd1GoT7c1f7qP358nbeDqoXl9m41E10DkrxMAugWkLzGDLamO0LkqureVQ1ktVW0aXqkgSGMxNQTDFhFAgAnOhSZFTnvfRXee7C83X3sZWrpt98GmlhORCSybYkRp21EptrHS-btqgdAqTDtaNt7VL-ogXBFiJeZkG7rsBHZoYg63lLritCgdJsDx-VJ5-NOHQ4d_J5_AvK-eLCZC8FPkPyV90Rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728485957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validating the LDi and LCi Indices in the Southern Hemisphere</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Nahayo, E. ; Guerrero, A. ; Lotz, S. ; Cid, C. ; Tshisaphungo, M. ; Saiz, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nahayo, E. ; Guerrero, A. ; Lotz, S. ; Cid, C. ; Tshisaphungo, M. ; Saiz, E.</creatorcontrib><description>The validation of the Local Disturbance index (LDi) and its first time derivative Local Current index (LCi) is performed in the Southern Hemisphere. Two South African magnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek contributed data for this study, and two South African power stations, Grassridge and Matimba, provided geomagnetically induced current (GIC) data. This validation focused on two major geomagnetic storms, Halloween and Saint Patrick's Day events that occurred in October 2003 and March 2015, respectively. The comparative evaluation of the LDi and LCi indices was executed with the help of the local horizontal component (H) and also comparing them to the global index SYM‐H. A direct comparison to measured GIC shows that LCi performs slightly better than dH/dt as a proxy for GIC. The comparison of the LDi 1‐hr magnetic disturbances values to ones calculated applying a Linear phase Robust Non‐Smoothing method to the H component yields a Pearson correlation coefficient R greater than 0.960 for different groups of magnetic storms based on intensity. The estimated SYM‐H index from LDi data showed a possible difference of about 300 nT from the published SYM‐H index values around 20:00 UT on 29 October 2003, during the Halloween storm. This study has shown that the LDi and LCi indices, developed in the Northern Hemisphere, can be calculated at similar latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere for studying local space weather conditions and now‐casting successfully local geomagnetic events. Plain Language Summary The local indices Local Disturbance index and Local Current index, that were developed in Northern Hemisphere (Spain), have been successfully validated to be used in Southern Hemisphere at similar geomagnetic latitudes. This validation was carried out with the help of geomagnetic data from two South African geomagnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek, and geomagnetically induced current data from two South African power stations, Grassridge and Matimba, recorded during two major geomagnetic storms, Halloween in October 2003 and Saint Patrick's Day in March 2015. The results show that these indices can now‐cast successfully local space weather events better than the global geomagnetic activity indices like SYM‐H. Key Points Geomagnetic indices Local Disturbance index (LDi) and Local Current index (LCi) successfully now‐cast local geomagnetic disturbances and geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) respectively in the Southern Hemisphere Comparison to measured GIC shows that LCi seems to perform slightly better than dH/dt as a proxy for GIC We present a method for rederiving SYM‐H indices using the LDi index</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-7390</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1539-4964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022SW003092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Electric currents ; Geomagnetic activity ; Geomagnetic data ; Geomagnetic storms ; Geomagnetism ; Hirsch index ; Ionospheric research ; Linear phase ; Local current ; Magnetic disturbances ; Magnetic storms ; Mathematical analysis ; Northern Hemisphere ; Observatories ; Power plants ; Southern Hemisphere ; Space weather ; Storms ; Weather ; Weather conditions</subject><ispartof>Space Weather, 2022-10, Vol.20 (10), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2022. The Authors.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-eb25ce25d0e5fddcc687cee728fbafe54ba66872d07d61040114219079c163473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-eb25ce25d0e5fddcc687cee728fbafe54ba66872d07d61040114219079c163473</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7878-9476 ; 0000-0002-7056-7753 ; 0000-0003-0651-9025 ; 0000-0002-1037-348X ; 0000-0002-2863-3745 ; 0000-0002-5407-633X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022SW003092$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022SW003092$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nahayo, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cid, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tshisaphungo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiz, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Validating the LDi and LCi Indices in the Southern Hemisphere</title><title>Space Weather</title><description>The validation of the Local Disturbance index (LDi) and its first time derivative Local Current index (LCi) is performed in the Southern Hemisphere. Two South African magnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek contributed data for this study, and two South African power stations, Grassridge and Matimba, provided geomagnetically induced current (GIC) data. This validation focused on two major geomagnetic storms, Halloween and Saint Patrick's Day events that occurred in October 2003 and March 2015, respectively. The comparative evaluation of the LDi and LCi indices was executed with the help of the local horizontal component (H) and also comparing them to the global index SYM‐H. A direct comparison to measured GIC shows that LCi performs slightly better than dH/dt as a proxy for GIC. The comparison of the LDi 1‐hr magnetic disturbances values to ones calculated applying a Linear phase Robust Non‐Smoothing method to the H component yields a Pearson correlation coefficient R greater than 0.960 for different groups of magnetic storms based on intensity. The estimated SYM‐H index from LDi data showed a possible difference of about 300 nT from the published SYM‐H index values around 20:00 UT on 29 October 2003, during the Halloween storm. This study has shown that the LDi and LCi indices, developed in the Northern Hemisphere, can be calculated at similar latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere for studying local space weather conditions and now‐casting successfully local geomagnetic events. Plain Language Summary The local indices Local Disturbance index and Local Current index, that were developed in Northern Hemisphere (Spain), have been successfully validated to be used in Southern Hemisphere at similar geomagnetic latitudes. This validation was carried out with the help of geomagnetic data from two South African geomagnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek, and geomagnetically induced current data from two South African power stations, Grassridge and Matimba, recorded during two major geomagnetic storms, Halloween in October 2003 and Saint Patrick's Day in March 2015. The results show that these indices can now‐cast successfully local space weather events better than the global geomagnetic activity indices like SYM‐H. Key Points Geomagnetic indices Local Disturbance index (LDi) and Local Current index (LCi) successfully now‐cast local geomagnetic disturbances and geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) respectively in the Southern Hemisphere Comparison to measured GIC shows that LCi seems to perform slightly better than dH/dt as a proxy for GIC We present a method for rederiving SYM‐H indices using the LDi index</description><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Electric currents</subject><subject>Geomagnetic activity</subject><subject>Geomagnetic data</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Hirsch index</subject><subject>Ionospheric research</subject><subject>Linear phase</subject><subject>Local current</subject><subject>Magnetic disturbances</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Northern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Observatories</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Southern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Space weather</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather conditions</subject><issn>1542-7390</issn><issn>1539-4964</issn><issn>1542-7390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQhhujiYjefIBNvAq2s-12e_BAEIVkEw-oHJvSdrEEutguMby9xfXAycxhJv98889kELoleEgwiAfAAPMFxjkWcIZ6hFEY8Fzg85P6El3FuMYYKAPaQ48fauOMap1fZe2nzaonlylvsmrsspk3TtuYOf_bmjf7lILPpnbr4i6V9hpd1GoT7c1f7qP358nbeDqoXl9m41E10DkrxMAugWkLzGDLamO0LkqureVQ1ktVW0aXqkgSGMxNQTDFhFAgAnOhSZFTnvfRXee7C83X3sZWrpt98GmlhORCSybYkRp21EptrHS-btqgdAqTDtaNt7VL-ogXBFiJeZkG7rsBHZoYg63lLritCgdJsDx-VJ5-NOHQ4d_J5_AvK-eLCZC8FPkPyV90Rg</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Nahayo, E.</creator><creator>Guerrero, A.</creator><creator>Lotz, S.</creator><creator>Cid, C.</creator><creator>Tshisaphungo, M.</creator><creator>Saiz, E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7878-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-7753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0651-9025</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1037-348X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-3745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5407-633X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Validating the LDi and LCi Indices in the Southern Hemisphere</title><author>Nahayo, E. ; Guerrero, A. ; Lotz, S. ; Cid, C. ; Tshisaphungo, M. ; Saiz, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3569-eb25ce25d0e5fddcc687cee728fbafe54ba66872d07d61040114219079c163473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Electric currents</topic><topic>Geomagnetic activity</topic><topic>Geomagnetic data</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Hirsch index</topic><topic>Ionospheric research</topic><topic>Linear phase</topic><topic>Local current</topic><topic>Magnetic disturbances</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Northern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Observatories</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Southern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Space weather</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nahayo, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotz, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cid, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tshisaphungo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiz, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Space Weather</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nahayo, E.</au><au>Guerrero, A.</au><au>Lotz, S.</au><au>Cid, C.</au><au>Tshisaphungo, M.</au><au>Saiz, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validating the LDi and LCi Indices in the Southern Hemisphere</atitle><jtitle>Space Weather</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>10</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1542-7390</issn><issn>1539-4964</issn><eissn>1542-7390</eissn><abstract>The validation of the Local Disturbance index (LDi) and its first time derivative Local Current index (LCi) is performed in the Southern Hemisphere. Two South African magnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek contributed data for this study, and two South African power stations, Grassridge and Matimba, provided geomagnetically induced current (GIC) data. This validation focused on two major geomagnetic storms, Halloween and Saint Patrick's Day events that occurred in October 2003 and March 2015, respectively. The comparative evaluation of the LDi and LCi indices was executed with the help of the local horizontal component (H) and also comparing them to the global index SYM‐H. A direct comparison to measured GIC shows that LCi performs slightly better than dH/dt as a proxy for GIC. The comparison of the LDi 1‐hr magnetic disturbances values to ones calculated applying a Linear phase Robust Non‐Smoothing method to the H component yields a Pearson correlation coefficient R greater than 0.960 for different groups of magnetic storms based on intensity. The estimated SYM‐H index from LDi data showed a possible difference of about 300 nT from the published SYM‐H index values around 20:00 UT on 29 October 2003, during the Halloween storm. This study has shown that the LDi and LCi indices, developed in the Northern Hemisphere, can be calculated at similar latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere for studying local space weather conditions and now‐casting successfully local geomagnetic events. Plain Language Summary The local indices Local Disturbance index and Local Current index, that were developed in Northern Hemisphere (Spain), have been successfully validated to be used in Southern Hemisphere at similar geomagnetic latitudes. This validation was carried out with the help of geomagnetic data from two South African geomagnetic observatories, Hermanus and Hartebeesthoek, and geomagnetically induced current data from two South African power stations, Grassridge and Matimba, recorded during two major geomagnetic storms, Halloween in October 2003 and Saint Patrick's Day in March 2015. The results show that these indices can now‐cast successfully local space weather events better than the global geomagnetic activity indices like SYM‐H. Key Points Geomagnetic indices Local Disturbance index (LDi) and Local Current index (LCi) successfully now‐cast local geomagnetic disturbances and geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) respectively in the Southern Hemisphere Comparison to measured GIC shows that LCi seems to perform slightly better than dH/dt as a proxy for GIC We present a method for rederiving SYM‐H indices using the LDi index</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2022SW003092</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7878-9476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-7753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0651-9025</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1037-348X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2863-3745</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5407-633X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1542-7390
ispartof Space Weather, 2022-10, Vol.20 (10), p.n/a
issn 1542-7390
1539-4964
1542-7390
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2728485957
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; EZB Free E-Journals; Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Electric currents
Geomagnetic activity
Geomagnetic data
Geomagnetic storms
Geomagnetism
Hirsch index
Ionospheric research
Linear phase
Local current
Magnetic disturbances
Magnetic storms
Mathematical analysis
Northern Hemisphere
Observatories
Power plants
Southern Hemisphere
Space weather
Storms
Weather
Weather conditions
title Validating the LDi and LCi Indices in the Southern Hemisphere
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T14%3A08%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validating%20the%20LDi%20and%20LCi%20Indices%20in%20the%20Southern%20Hemisphere&rft.jtitle=Space%20Weather&rft.au=Nahayo,%20E.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=10&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1542-7390&rft.eissn=1542-7390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022SW003092&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA761258078%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728485957&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A761258078&rfr_iscdi=true