Laparoscopic Proctectomy in Locally Advance Rectal Cancer: Prolapse Delayed Anastomosis Compared to Immediate Anastomosis

Locally advance rectal cancer was treated in 144 patients of stages II and III with positive nodes only between 2014 and 17. Combined laparoscopic and trans-anal-rectal excision were performed in all patients, 54 (37.5%) had delayed, and 90 (62.5%) had immediate coloanal anastomoses. Both groups rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indian journal of surgery 2022-10, Vol.84 (5), p.1014-1019
Hauptverfasser: Zangui, Mahtab, Abdollahi, Abbas, Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari, Jangjoo, Ali, Ravan, Reza Roshan, Navari, Yasaman, Shahabi, Fateme
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1019
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1014
container_title Indian journal of surgery
container_volume 84
creator Zangui, Mahtab
Abdollahi, Abbas
Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari
Jangjoo, Ali
Ravan, Reza Roshan
Navari, Yasaman
Shahabi, Fateme
description Locally advance rectal cancer was treated in 144 patients of stages II and III with positive nodes only between 2014 and 17. Combined laparoscopic and trans-anal-rectal excision were performed in all patients, 54 (37.5%) had delayed, and 90 (62.5%) had immediate coloanal anastomoses. Both groups received diverting stoma. Seven patients (4.9%) had pre-sacral collection and anastomotic leakage of which 5 (9.3%) had delayed and 2 (2.2%) had immediate anastomosis. Postoperative obstructions occurred in 5 (9.3%) patients of group delayed and 2 (2.2%) of immediate group. Sepsis and peritonitis was observed in delayed group only—2 (3.7%). One subject died in postoperative due to bleeding and pelvic sepsis in immediate group. Positive circumferential margins above and below were not different between the two groups ( p  = 0.371, 0.631).Overall survival was 86.8% CI 95% = 74.3–93.5 in the delayed group and 75% CI 95% = 64.6–82.8 in the immediate group. Similarly, 5-year survival was 76% CI 95% = 61.6–85.6 and 69.7% CI 95% = 58.5–78.4 for delayed and immediate anastomoses groups respectively. Overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (related tests p  = 0.429). We conclude from a non-randomized comparative study that combined laparoscopic and trans-anal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer when treated with delayed anastomosis has somewhat higher surgical complications than immediate anastomosis group. However, no difference was observed in the long- and short-term survival between these 2 groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12262-021-03191-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2728164825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A723971009</galeid><sourcerecordid>A723971009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-976f5aa6a348460a0654ec9b2033a506a9dd2b9ad4e5d66c05420bb0566ecc123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhU1poGnSP9CToGeno5Etr3pbNkkTWGgJ6VnMyuOgYFuu5AT876PNBtJACTpIGn1v9JhXFF8lnEmA5nuSiBpLQFmCkkaW9YfiGEyjStMY9fH5jCWCXn0qPqd0D4CVVuq4WLY0UQzJhck78TsGN7Obw7AIP4ptcNT3i1i3jzQ6Fjf5iXqx2V_ijz3d05RYnHNPC7diPVLK2pB8Epsw5Ma5OAdxPQzcepr5X-K0OOqoT_zlZT8p_lxe3G6uyu2vn9eb9bZ0qJs5-9ddTaRJVatKA4GuK3Zmh6AU1aDJtC3uDLUV163WDuoKYbeDWmt2TqI6Kb4d-k4x_H3gNNv78BDH_KXFBldSVyusX6k76tn6sQtzJDf45Oy6QWWaPGaTqbP_UHm1PHgXRu58rr8R4EHg8oxT5M5O0Q8UFyvB7pOzh-RsTs4-J2f3XtRBlDI83nF8dfyO6gmH_psQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728164825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic Proctectomy in Locally Advance Rectal Cancer: Prolapse Delayed Anastomosis Compared to Immediate Anastomosis</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zangui, Mahtab ; Abdollahi, Abbas ; Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari ; Jangjoo, Ali ; Ravan, Reza Roshan ; Navari, Yasaman ; Shahabi, Fateme</creator><creatorcontrib>Zangui, Mahtab ; Abdollahi, Abbas ; Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari ; Jangjoo, Ali ; Ravan, Reza Roshan ; Navari, Yasaman ; Shahabi, Fateme</creatorcontrib><description>Locally advance rectal cancer was treated in 144 patients of stages II and III with positive nodes only between 2014 and 17. Combined laparoscopic and trans-anal-rectal excision were performed in all patients, 54 (37.5%) had delayed, and 90 (62.5%) had immediate coloanal anastomoses. Both groups received diverting stoma. Seven patients (4.9%) had pre-sacral collection and anastomotic leakage of which 5 (9.3%) had delayed and 2 (2.2%) had immediate anastomosis. Postoperative obstructions occurred in 5 (9.3%) patients of group delayed and 2 (2.2%) of immediate group. Sepsis and peritonitis was observed in delayed group only—2 (3.7%). One subject died in postoperative due to bleeding and pelvic sepsis in immediate group. Positive circumferential margins above and below were not different between the two groups ( p  = 0.371, 0.631).Overall survival was 86.8% CI 95% = 74.3–93.5 in the delayed group and 75% CI 95% = 64.6–82.8 in the immediate group. Similarly, 5-year survival was 76% CI 95% = 61.6–85.6 and 69.7% CI 95% = 58.5–78.4 for delayed and immediate anastomoses groups respectively. Overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (related tests p  = 0.429). We conclude from a non-randomized comparative study that combined laparoscopic and trans-anal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer when treated with delayed anastomosis has somewhat higher surgical complications than immediate anastomosis group. However, no difference was observed in the long- and short-term survival between these 2 groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0972-2068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-9793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12262-021-03191-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Springer India</publisher><subject>Cardiac Surgery ; Care and treatment ; Colorectal cancer ; Comparative analysis ; Laparoscopic surgery ; Laparoscopy ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metronidazole ; Neurosurgery ; Original Article ; Pediatric Surgery ; Plastic Surgery ; Sepsis ; Surgery ; Thoracic Surgery</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of surgery, 2022-10, Vol.84 (5), p.1014-1019</ispartof><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>Association of Surgeons of India 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-976f5aa6a348460a0654ec9b2033a506a9dd2b9ad4e5d66c05420bb0566ecc123</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5681-0078</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12262-021-03191-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12262-021-03191-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zangui, Mahtab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdollahi, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jangjoo, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravan, Reza Roshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navari, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Fateme</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic Proctectomy in Locally Advance Rectal Cancer: Prolapse Delayed Anastomosis Compared to Immediate Anastomosis</title><title>Indian journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Indian J Surg</addtitle><description>Locally advance rectal cancer was treated in 144 patients of stages II and III with positive nodes only between 2014 and 17. Combined laparoscopic and trans-anal-rectal excision were performed in all patients, 54 (37.5%) had delayed, and 90 (62.5%) had immediate coloanal anastomoses. Both groups received diverting stoma. Seven patients (4.9%) had pre-sacral collection and anastomotic leakage of which 5 (9.3%) had delayed and 2 (2.2%) had immediate anastomosis. Postoperative obstructions occurred in 5 (9.3%) patients of group delayed and 2 (2.2%) of immediate group. Sepsis and peritonitis was observed in delayed group only—2 (3.7%). One subject died in postoperative due to bleeding and pelvic sepsis in immediate group. Positive circumferential margins above and below were not different between the two groups ( p  = 0.371, 0.631).Overall survival was 86.8% CI 95% = 74.3–93.5 in the delayed group and 75% CI 95% = 64.6–82.8 in the immediate group. Similarly, 5-year survival was 76% CI 95% = 61.6–85.6 and 69.7% CI 95% = 58.5–78.4 for delayed and immediate anastomoses groups respectively. Overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (related tests p  = 0.429). We conclude from a non-randomized comparative study that combined laparoscopic and trans-anal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer when treated with delayed anastomosis has somewhat higher surgical complications than immediate anastomosis group. However, no difference was observed in the long- and short-term survival between these 2 groups.</description><subject>Cardiac Surgery</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Laparoscopic surgery</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metronidazole</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pediatric Surgery</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thoracic Surgery</subject><issn>0972-2068</issn><issn>0973-9793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhU1poGnSP9CToGeno5Etr3pbNkkTWGgJ6VnMyuOgYFuu5AT876PNBtJACTpIGn1v9JhXFF8lnEmA5nuSiBpLQFmCkkaW9YfiGEyjStMY9fH5jCWCXn0qPqd0D4CVVuq4WLY0UQzJhck78TsGN7Obw7AIP4ptcNT3i1i3jzQ6Fjf5iXqx2V_ijz3d05RYnHNPC7diPVLK2pB8Epsw5Ma5OAdxPQzcepr5X-K0OOqoT_zlZT8p_lxe3G6uyu2vn9eb9bZ0qJs5-9ddTaRJVatKA4GuK3Zmh6AU1aDJtC3uDLUV163WDuoKYbeDWmt2TqI6Kb4d-k4x_H3gNNv78BDH_KXFBldSVyusX6k76tn6sQtzJDf45Oy6QWWaPGaTqbP_UHm1PHgXRu58rr8R4EHg8oxT5M5O0Q8UFyvB7pOzh-RsTs4-J2f3XtRBlDI83nF8dfyO6gmH_psQ</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Zangui, Mahtab</creator><creator>Abdollahi, Abbas</creator><creator>Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari</creator><creator>Jangjoo, Ali</creator><creator>Ravan, Reza Roshan</creator><creator>Navari, Yasaman</creator><creator>Shahabi, Fateme</creator><general>Springer India</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-0078</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic Proctectomy in Locally Advance Rectal Cancer: Prolapse Delayed Anastomosis Compared to Immediate Anastomosis</title><author>Zangui, Mahtab ; Abdollahi, Abbas ; Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari ; Jangjoo, Ali ; Ravan, Reza Roshan ; Navari, Yasaman ; Shahabi, Fateme</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c267t-976f5aa6a348460a0654ec9b2033a506a9dd2b9ad4e5d66c05420bb0566ecc123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cardiac Surgery</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Laparoscopic surgery</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metronidazole</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pediatric Surgery</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thoracic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zangui, Mahtab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdollahi, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jangjoo, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravan, Reza Roshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navari, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahabi, Fateme</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zangui, Mahtab</au><au>Abdollahi, Abbas</au><au>Nooghabi, Mehdi Jabbari</au><au>Jangjoo, Ali</au><au>Ravan, Reza Roshan</au><au>Navari, Yasaman</au><au>Shahabi, Fateme</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic Proctectomy in Locally Advance Rectal Cancer: Prolapse Delayed Anastomosis Compared to Immediate Anastomosis</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of surgery</jtitle><stitle>Indian J Surg</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1014</spage><epage>1019</epage><pages>1014-1019</pages><issn>0972-2068</issn><eissn>0973-9793</eissn><abstract>Locally advance rectal cancer was treated in 144 patients of stages II and III with positive nodes only between 2014 and 17. Combined laparoscopic and trans-anal-rectal excision were performed in all patients, 54 (37.5%) had delayed, and 90 (62.5%) had immediate coloanal anastomoses. Both groups received diverting stoma. Seven patients (4.9%) had pre-sacral collection and anastomotic leakage of which 5 (9.3%) had delayed and 2 (2.2%) had immediate anastomosis. Postoperative obstructions occurred in 5 (9.3%) patients of group delayed and 2 (2.2%) of immediate group. Sepsis and peritonitis was observed in delayed group only—2 (3.7%). One subject died in postoperative due to bleeding and pelvic sepsis in immediate group. Positive circumferential margins above and below were not different between the two groups ( p  = 0.371, 0.631).Overall survival was 86.8% CI 95% = 74.3–93.5 in the delayed group and 75% CI 95% = 64.6–82.8 in the immediate group. Similarly, 5-year survival was 76% CI 95% = 61.6–85.6 and 69.7% CI 95% = 58.5–78.4 for delayed and immediate anastomoses groups respectively. Overall survival was not significantly different between the two groups (related tests p  = 0.429). We conclude from a non-randomized comparative study that combined laparoscopic and trans-anal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer when treated with delayed anastomosis has somewhat higher surgical complications than immediate anastomosis group. However, no difference was observed in the long- and short-term survival between these 2 groups.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Springer India</pub><doi>10.1007/s12262-021-03191-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-0078</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0972-2068
ispartof Indian journal of surgery, 2022-10, Vol.84 (5), p.1014-1019
issn 0972-2068
0973-9793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2728164825
source EZB Electronic Journals Library; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Cardiac Surgery
Care and treatment
Colorectal cancer
Comparative analysis
Laparoscopic surgery
Laparoscopy
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metronidazole
Neurosurgery
Original Article
Pediatric Surgery
Plastic Surgery
Sepsis
Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
title Laparoscopic Proctectomy in Locally Advance Rectal Cancer: Prolapse Delayed Anastomosis Compared to Immediate Anastomosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A34%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20Proctectomy%20in%20Locally%20Advance%20Rectal%20Cancer:%20Prolapse%20Delayed%20Anastomosis%20Compared%20to%20Immediate%20Anastomosis&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Zangui,%20Mahtab&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1014&rft.epage=1019&rft.pages=1014-1019&rft.issn=0972-2068&rft.eissn=0973-9793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12262-021-03191-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA723971009%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728164825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A723971009&rfr_iscdi=true