Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking
Studies indicate an increase in the abandonment rates of the use of Assistive Technology devices for several reasons: the non-participation of the user in the development of the technology, the lack of training and the non-adaptation of the device to the needs of users are the most reported complain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Universal access in the information society 2022-11, Vol.21 (4), p.1013-1022 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1022 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1013 |
container_title | Universal access in the information society |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Borges, Ludymila R. Naves, Eduardo L. M. Sa, Angela A. R. |
description | Studies indicate an increase in the abandonment rates of the use of Assistive Technology devices for several reasons: the non-participation of the user in the development of the technology, the lack of training and the non-adaptation of the device to the needs of users are the most reported complaints. In this context, this research aims to understand how users and developers (engineers and programmers) deal with Assistive Technology devices and whether the usability of a device can influence abandonment rates. We developed an electric-powered wheelchair system driven by eye tracking, and we performed usability tests (empirical and analytical evaluation methods) of this Assistive Technology device. The developed device was evaluated by two groups of volunteers: seven (7) developers with experience in Assistive Technology and five (5) users with severe motor disabilities. The participants found many usability issues in the developed system. We also realized that developers and users think differently about the development requirements of the device. Thus, it is possible to suggest that there is a need for discussion between developers and users before the development of an assisted device. Prior to the development of an Assistive Technology device, it is important to consider the opinion and point of view of users and developers. Following this path increases the chances that an assisted device will have a satisfactory usability evaluation and, consequently, user acceptance. In addition, there may be a decrease in abandonment rates on Assistive Technology devices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10209-021-00809-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2727081982</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2727081982</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c90d292e11644cfd721063f13f8063eb2293109530944b04d4f8c0d1702006cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscQ7sOmkSH1HFn1TEhZ4tx1m3LiEpdtqqfXoMQXDjNHOYb1Y7jF0iXCNAcRMQBMgEBCYAZXSHIzbCHCfJRMji-NeX8pSdhbCCmCwRR-x5HnTlGtfvOW11s9G961reWa5bTg2Z3juTrLsdear5bknUmKV2ntfebanlVcT2xHuvzZtrF-fsxOom0MWPjtn8_u51-pjMXh6eprezxKQo-8RIqIUUhJhnmbF1IRDy1GJqy6hUCSFTBDlJQWZZBVmd2dJAjUV8EnJj0zG7GnrXvvvYUOjVqtv4Np5UohAFlChLEVNiSBnfheDJqrV379rvFYL6mk0Ns6k4hvqeTR0ilA5QiOF2Qf6v-h_qE09qb3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727081982</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Borges, Ludymila R. ; Naves, Eduardo L. M. ; Sa, Angela A. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Borges, Ludymila R. ; Naves, Eduardo L. M. ; Sa, Angela A. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies indicate an increase in the abandonment rates of the use of Assistive Technology devices for several reasons: the non-participation of the user in the development of the technology, the lack of training and the non-adaptation of the device to the needs of users are the most reported complaints. In this context, this research aims to understand how users and developers (engineers and programmers) deal with Assistive Technology devices and whether the usability of a device can influence abandonment rates. We developed an electric-powered wheelchair system driven by eye tracking, and we performed usability tests (empirical and analytical evaluation methods) of this Assistive Technology device. The developed device was evaluated by two groups of volunteers: seven (7) developers with experience in Assistive Technology and five (5) users with severe motor disabilities. The participants found many usability issues in the developed system. We also realized that developers and users think differently about the development requirements of the device. Thus, it is possible to suggest that there is a need for discussion between developers and users before the development of an assisted device. Prior to the development of an Assistive Technology device, it is important to consider the opinion and point of view of users and developers. Following this path increases the chances that an assisted device will have a satisfactory usability evaluation and, consequently, user acceptance. In addition, there may be a decrease in abandonment rates on Assistive Technology devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10209-021-00809-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Abandonment ; Adaptive technology ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Computers and Society ; Disabilities ; Empirical analysis ; Eye movements ; Handicapped assistance devices ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; IT in Business ; Long Paper ; Tracking ; Usability ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction ; User satisfaction ; Wheelchairs</subject><ispartof>Universal access in the information society, 2022-11, Vol.21 (4), p.1013-1022</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c90d292e11644cfd721063f13f8063eb2293109530944b04d4f8c0d1702006cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c90d292e11644cfd721063f13f8063eb2293109530944b04d4f8c0d1702006cf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1818-8270 ; 0000-0003-4175-723X ; 0000-0003-0986-1918</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10209-021-00809-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10209-021-00809-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borges, Ludymila R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naves, Eduardo L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sa, Angela A. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking</title><title>Universal access in the information society</title><addtitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</addtitle><description>Studies indicate an increase in the abandonment rates of the use of Assistive Technology devices for several reasons: the non-participation of the user in the development of the technology, the lack of training and the non-adaptation of the device to the needs of users are the most reported complaints. In this context, this research aims to understand how users and developers (engineers and programmers) deal with Assistive Technology devices and whether the usability of a device can influence abandonment rates. We developed an electric-powered wheelchair system driven by eye tracking, and we performed usability tests (empirical and analytical evaluation methods) of this Assistive Technology device. The developed device was evaluated by two groups of volunteers: seven (7) developers with experience in Assistive Technology and five (5) users with severe motor disabilities. The participants found many usability issues in the developed system. We also realized that developers and users think differently about the development requirements of the device. Thus, it is possible to suggest that there is a need for discussion between developers and users before the development of an assisted device. Prior to the development of an Assistive Technology device, it is important to consider the opinion and point of view of users and developers. Following this path increases the chances that an assisted device will have a satisfactory usability evaluation and, consequently, user acceptance. In addition, there may be a decrease in abandonment rates on Assistive Technology devices.</description><subject>Abandonment</subject><subject>Adaptive technology</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers and Society</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Handicapped assistance devices</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Long Paper</subject><subject>Tracking</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><subject>User satisfaction</subject><subject>Wheelchairs</subject><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwscQ7sOmkSH1HFn1TEhZ4tx1m3LiEpdtqqfXoMQXDjNHOYb1Y7jF0iXCNAcRMQBMgEBCYAZXSHIzbCHCfJRMji-NeX8pSdhbCCmCwRR-x5HnTlGtfvOW11s9G961reWa5bTg2Z3juTrLsdear5bknUmKV2ntfebanlVcT2xHuvzZtrF-fsxOom0MWPjtn8_u51-pjMXh6eprezxKQo-8RIqIUUhJhnmbF1IRDy1GJqy6hUCSFTBDlJQWZZBVmd2dJAjUV8EnJj0zG7GnrXvvvYUOjVqtv4Np5UohAFlChLEVNiSBnfheDJqrV379rvFYL6mk0Ns6k4hvqeTR0ilA5QiOF2Qf6v-h_qE09qb3Q</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Borges, Ludymila R.</creator><creator>Naves, Eduardo L. M.</creator><creator>Sa, Angela A. R.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1818-8270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4175-723X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0986-1918</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking</title><author>Borges, Ludymila R. ; Naves, Eduardo L. M. ; Sa, Angela A. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c90d292e11644cfd721063f13f8063eb2293109530944b04d4f8c0d1702006cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abandonment</topic><topic>Adaptive technology</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers and Society</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Handicapped assistance devices</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Long Paper</topic><topic>Tracking</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><topic>User satisfaction</topic><topic>Wheelchairs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borges, Ludymila R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naves, Eduardo L. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sa, Angela A. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borges, Ludymila R.</au><au>Naves, Eduardo L. M.</au><au>Sa, Angela A. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking</atitle><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle><stitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1013</spage><epage>1022</epage><pages>1013-1022</pages><issn>1615-5289</issn><eissn>1615-5297</eissn><abstract>Studies indicate an increase in the abandonment rates of the use of Assistive Technology devices for several reasons: the non-participation of the user in the development of the technology, the lack of training and the non-adaptation of the device to the needs of users are the most reported complaints. In this context, this research aims to understand how users and developers (engineers and programmers) deal with Assistive Technology devices and whether the usability of a device can influence abandonment rates. We developed an electric-powered wheelchair system driven by eye tracking, and we performed usability tests (empirical and analytical evaluation methods) of this Assistive Technology device. The developed device was evaluated by two groups of volunteers: seven (7) developers with experience in Assistive Technology and five (5) users with severe motor disabilities. The participants found many usability issues in the developed system. We also realized that developers and users think differently about the development requirements of the device. Thus, it is possible to suggest that there is a need for discussion between developers and users before the development of an assisted device. Prior to the development of an Assistive Technology device, it is important to consider the opinion and point of view of users and developers. Following this path increases the chances that an assisted device will have a satisfactory usability evaluation and, consequently, user acceptance. In addition, there may be a decrease in abandonment rates on Assistive Technology devices.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10209-021-00809-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1818-8270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4175-723X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0986-1918</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1615-5289 |
ispartof | Universal access in the information society, 2022-11, Vol.21 (4), p.1013-1022 |
issn | 1615-5289 1615-5297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2727081982 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Abandonment Adaptive technology Computer Communication Networks Computer Science Computers and Society Disabilities Empirical analysis Eye movements Handicapped assistance devices Information Storage and Retrieval Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) IT in Business Long Paper Tracking Usability User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction User satisfaction Wheelchairs |
title | Usability evaluation of an electric-powered wheelchair driven by eye tracking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T09%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Usability%20evaluation%20of%20an%20electric-powered%20wheelchair%20driven%20by%20eye%20tracking&rft.jtitle=Universal%20access%20in%20the%20information%20society&rft.au=Borges,%20Ludymila%20R.&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1013&rft.epage=1022&rft.pages=1013-1022&rft.issn=1615-5289&rft.eissn=1615-5297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10209-021-00809-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727081982%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727081982&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |