Why do sukuks (Islamic bonds) need a different pricing model?

The global interest in sukuk, an Islamic alternative to bond financing, has grown rapidly, particularly after the 2008 global financial crisis, due to its distinctive features and investment quality. Sukuk were first launched in Malaysia and are presently available in 29 countries, including the Uni...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of finance and economics 2022-04, Vol.27 (2), p.2210-2234
Hauptverfasser: Uddin, Md Hamid, Kabir, Sarkar H., Kabir Hassan, Mohammad, Hossain, Mohammed S., Liu, Jia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2234
container_issue 2
container_start_page 2210
container_title International journal of finance and economics
container_volume 27
creator Uddin, Md Hamid
Kabir, Sarkar H.
Kabir Hassan, Mohammad
Hossain, Mohammed S.
Liu, Jia
description The global interest in sukuk, an Islamic alternative to bond financing, has grown rapidly, particularly after the 2008 global financial crisis, due to its distinctive features and investment quality. Sukuk were first launched in Malaysia and are presently available in 29 countries, including the United Kingdom, United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Luxembourg. Despite the global market prevalence of sukuk, asset pricing literature has not yet addressed the pricing mechanism of sukuk, which is inherently different from bonds and equity due to the contractual differences. However, analysts use LIBOR, or the Islamic interbank benchmark rate, as the ad‐hoc benchmark to evaluate sukuk performance. In this study, we develop a basic pricing model that captures the common risks in sukuk returns. We identify two risk factors for sukuk that require risk premiums: (a) sukuk market risk and (b) information asymmetry risk. Using these two common sukuk risks factors, investment analysts can estimate the fair value of sukuk more precisely than other ad hoc measures available.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijfe.2269
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2726021060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2726021060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-e62023b687b5bc28dce85ec0525fdad1a7340a97656b722944bc562fcb78897d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgCs7pwW8Q8OIO3d6kTdIeRGRsOhl4UfQW2vzRbm0zkxXZt7e1gidPeQ-_93nDg9AlgSkBoLNyY82UUp4doRGBLIsIYelxPwseZTGIU3QWwgYAOBMwQjevHwesHQ7ttt0GfL0KVV6XCheu0WGCG2M0zrEurTXeNHu886Uqm3dcO22q23N0YvMqmIvfd4xelovn-UO0frpfze_WkUoozSLDKdC44KkoWKFoqpVJmVHAKLM61yQXcQJ5JjjjhegWkqRQjFOrCpGmmdDxGF0NuTvvPlsT9nLjWt90JyUVlAMlwKFTk0Ep70Lwxsrut3XuD5KA7NuRfTuyb6ezeLBGuaYMfzIFiAVN4K0js4F8lZU5_J8lV4_LxU_oN3tNbu8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726021060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why do sukuks (Islamic bonds) need a different pricing model?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Uddin, Md Hamid ; Kabir, Sarkar H. ; Kabir Hassan, Mohammad ; Hossain, Mohammed S. ; Liu, Jia</creator><creatorcontrib>Uddin, Md Hamid ; Kabir, Sarkar H. ; Kabir Hassan, Mohammad ; Hossain, Mohammed S. ; Liu, Jia</creatorcontrib><description>The global interest in sukuk, an Islamic alternative to bond financing, has grown rapidly, particularly after the 2008 global financial crisis, due to its distinctive features and investment quality. Sukuk were first launched in Malaysia and are presently available in 29 countries, including the United Kingdom, United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Luxembourg. Despite the global market prevalence of sukuk, asset pricing literature has not yet addressed the pricing mechanism of sukuk, which is inherently different from bonds and equity due to the contractual differences. However, analysts use LIBOR, or the Islamic interbank benchmark rate, as the ad‐hoc benchmark to evaluate sukuk performance. In this study, we develop a basic pricing model that captures the common risks in sukuk returns. We identify two risk factors for sukuk that require risk premiums: (a) sukuk market risk and (b) information asymmetry risk. Using these two common sukuk risks factors, investment analysts can estimate the fair value of sukuk more precisely than other ad hoc measures available.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-9307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1158</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijfe.2269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Islamic financing ; reference rate ; Risk premiums ; sukuk pricing ; systematic risk factors ; two factor model</subject><ispartof>International journal of finance and economics, 2022-04, Vol.27 (2), p.2210-2234</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-e62023b687b5bc28dce85ec0525fdad1a7340a97656b722944bc562fcb78897d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-e62023b687b5bc28dce85ec0525fdad1a7340a97656b722944bc562fcb78897d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2978-6022 ; 0000-0003-1571-9731 ; 0000-0001-6274-3545 ; 0000-0003-3025-0206</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijfe.2269$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijfe.2269$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uddin, Md Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, Sarkar H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir Hassan, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Mohammed S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jia</creatorcontrib><title>Why do sukuks (Islamic bonds) need a different pricing model?</title><title>International journal of finance and economics</title><description>The global interest in sukuk, an Islamic alternative to bond financing, has grown rapidly, particularly after the 2008 global financial crisis, due to its distinctive features and investment quality. Sukuk were first launched in Malaysia and are presently available in 29 countries, including the United Kingdom, United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Luxembourg. Despite the global market prevalence of sukuk, asset pricing literature has not yet addressed the pricing mechanism of sukuk, which is inherently different from bonds and equity due to the contractual differences. However, analysts use LIBOR, or the Islamic interbank benchmark rate, as the ad‐hoc benchmark to evaluate sukuk performance. In this study, we develop a basic pricing model that captures the common risks in sukuk returns. We identify two risk factors for sukuk that require risk premiums: (a) sukuk market risk and (b) information asymmetry risk. Using these two common sukuk risks factors, investment analysts can estimate the fair value of sukuk more precisely than other ad hoc measures available.</description><subject>Islamic financing</subject><subject>reference rate</subject><subject>Risk premiums</subject><subject>sukuk pricing</subject><subject>systematic risk factors</subject><subject>two factor model</subject><issn>1076-9307</issn><issn>1099-1158</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAYBvAgCs7pwW8Q8OIO3d6kTdIeRGRsOhl4UfQW2vzRbm0zkxXZt7e1gidPeQ-_93nDg9AlgSkBoLNyY82UUp4doRGBLIsIYelxPwseZTGIU3QWwgYAOBMwQjevHwesHQ7ttt0GfL0KVV6XCheu0WGCG2M0zrEurTXeNHu886Uqm3dcO22q23N0YvMqmIvfd4xelovn-UO0frpfze_WkUoozSLDKdC44KkoWKFoqpVJmVHAKLM61yQXcQJ5JjjjhegWkqRQjFOrCpGmmdDxGF0NuTvvPlsT9nLjWt90JyUVlAMlwKFTk0Ep70Lwxsrut3XuD5KA7NuRfTuyb6ezeLBGuaYMfzIFiAVN4K0js4F8lZU5_J8lV4_LxU_oN3tNbu8</recordid><startdate>202204</startdate><enddate>202204</enddate><creator>Uddin, Md Hamid</creator><creator>Kabir, Sarkar H.</creator><creator>Kabir Hassan, Mohammad</creator><creator>Hossain, Mohammed S.</creator><creator>Liu, Jia</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2978-6022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1571-9731</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-3545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-0206</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202204</creationdate><title>Why do sukuks (Islamic bonds) need a different pricing model?</title><author>Uddin, Md Hamid ; Kabir, Sarkar H. ; Kabir Hassan, Mohammad ; Hossain, Mohammed S. ; Liu, Jia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-e62023b687b5bc28dce85ec0525fdad1a7340a97656b722944bc562fcb78897d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Islamic financing</topic><topic>reference rate</topic><topic>Risk premiums</topic><topic>sukuk pricing</topic><topic>systematic risk factors</topic><topic>two factor model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uddin, Md Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir, Sarkar H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabir Hassan, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossain, Mohammed S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jia</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of finance and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uddin, Md Hamid</au><au>Kabir, Sarkar H.</au><au>Kabir Hassan, Mohammad</au><au>Hossain, Mohammed S.</au><au>Liu, Jia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why do sukuks (Islamic bonds) need a different pricing model?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of finance and economics</jtitle><date>2022-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>2210</spage><epage>2234</epage><pages>2210-2234</pages><issn>1076-9307</issn><eissn>1099-1158</eissn><abstract>The global interest in sukuk, an Islamic alternative to bond financing, has grown rapidly, particularly after the 2008 global financial crisis, due to its distinctive features and investment quality. Sukuk were first launched in Malaysia and are presently available in 29 countries, including the United Kingdom, United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Luxembourg. Despite the global market prevalence of sukuk, asset pricing literature has not yet addressed the pricing mechanism of sukuk, which is inherently different from bonds and equity due to the contractual differences. However, analysts use LIBOR, or the Islamic interbank benchmark rate, as the ad‐hoc benchmark to evaluate sukuk performance. In this study, we develop a basic pricing model that captures the common risks in sukuk returns. We identify two risk factors for sukuk that require risk premiums: (a) sukuk market risk and (b) information asymmetry risk. Using these two common sukuk risks factors, investment analysts can estimate the fair value of sukuk more precisely than other ad hoc measures available.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ijfe.2269</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2978-6022</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1571-9731</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-3545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-0206</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-9307
ispartof International journal of finance and economics, 2022-04, Vol.27 (2), p.2210-2234
issn 1076-9307
1099-1158
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2726021060
source EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Islamic financing
reference rate
Risk premiums
sukuk pricing
systematic risk factors
two factor model
title Why do sukuks (Islamic bonds) need a different pricing model?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T09%3A04%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20do%20sukuks%20(Islamic%20bonds)%20need%20a%20different%20pricing%20model?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20finance%20and%20economics&rft.au=Uddin,%20Md%20Hamid&rft.date=2022-04&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=2210&rft.epage=2234&rft.pages=2210-2234&rft.issn=1076-9307&rft.eissn=1099-1158&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijfe.2269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2726021060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726021060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true