Autoencoder based Anomaly Detection and Explained Fault Localization in Industrial Cooling Systems

Anomaly detection in large industrial cooling systems is very challenging due to the high data dimensionality, inconsistent sensor recordings, and lack of labels. The state of the art for automated anomaly detection in these systems typically relies on expert knowledge and thresholds. However, data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2022-10
Hauptverfasser: Holly, Stephanie, Heel, Robin, Katic, Denis, Schoeffl, Leopold, Stiftinger, Andreas, Holzner, Peter, Kaufmann, Thomas, Haslhofer, Bernhard, Schall, Daniel, Heitzinger, Clemens, Kemnitz, Jana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Holly, Stephanie
Heel, Robin
Katic, Denis
Schoeffl, Leopold
Stiftinger, Andreas
Holzner, Peter
Kaufmann, Thomas
Haslhofer, Bernhard
Schall, Daniel
Heitzinger, Clemens
Kemnitz, Jana
description Anomaly detection in large industrial cooling systems is very challenging due to the high data dimensionality, inconsistent sensor recordings, and lack of labels. The state of the art for automated anomaly detection in these systems typically relies on expert knowledge and thresholds. However, data is viewed isolated and complex, multivariate relationships are neglected. In this work, we present an autoencoder based end-to-end workflow for anomaly detection suitable for multivariate time series data in large industrial cooling systems, including explained fault localization and root cause analysis based on expert knowledge. We identify system failures using a threshold on the total reconstruction error (autoencoder reconstruction error including all sensor signals). For fault localization, we compute the individual reconstruction error (autoencoder reconstruction error for each sensor signal) allowing us to identify the signals that contribute most to the total reconstruction error. Expert knowledge is provided via look-up table enabling root-cause analysis and assignment to the affected subsystem. We demonstrated our findings in a cooling system unit including 34 sensors over a 8-months time period using 4-fold cross validation approaches and automatically created labels based on thresholds provided by domain experts. Using 4-fold cross validation, we reached a F1-score of 0.56, whereas the autoencoder results showed a higher consistency score (CS of 0.92) compared to the automatically created labels (CS of 0.62) -- indicating that the anomaly is recognized in a very stable manner. The main anomaly was found by the autoencoder and automatically created labels and was also recorded in the log files. Further, the explained fault localization highlighted the most affected component for the main anomaly in a very consistent manner.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2725747938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2725747938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27257479383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjkEKwjAQAIMgKNo_LHgWalJtPYpaFLzpvaxtlJR0V5sErK-3iA_wNIeZwwzEWCq1mGeJlCMROVfHcSxXqVwu1VhcN8GzppIr3cIVna5gQ9yg7WCnvS69YQKkCvavh0VDvc8xWA8nLtGaN34DQ3CkKjjfGrSwZbaG7nDunNeNm4rhDa3T0Y8TMcv3l-1h_mj5GbTzRc2hpV4Vsr9Kk3StMvVf9QGoYEYG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2725747938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autoencoder based Anomaly Detection and Explained Fault Localization in Industrial Cooling Systems</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Holly, Stephanie ; Heel, Robin ; Katic, Denis ; Schoeffl, Leopold ; Stiftinger, Andreas ; Holzner, Peter ; Kaufmann, Thomas ; Haslhofer, Bernhard ; Schall, Daniel ; Heitzinger, Clemens ; Kemnitz, Jana</creator><creatorcontrib>Holly, Stephanie ; Heel, Robin ; Katic, Denis ; Schoeffl, Leopold ; Stiftinger, Andreas ; Holzner, Peter ; Kaufmann, Thomas ; Haslhofer, Bernhard ; Schall, Daniel ; Heitzinger, Clemens ; Kemnitz, Jana</creatorcontrib><description>Anomaly detection in large industrial cooling systems is very challenging due to the high data dimensionality, inconsistent sensor recordings, and lack of labels. The state of the art for automated anomaly detection in these systems typically relies on expert knowledge and thresholds. However, data is viewed isolated and complex, multivariate relationships are neglected. In this work, we present an autoencoder based end-to-end workflow for anomaly detection suitable for multivariate time series data in large industrial cooling systems, including explained fault localization and root cause analysis based on expert knowledge. We identify system failures using a threshold on the total reconstruction error (autoencoder reconstruction error including all sensor signals). For fault localization, we compute the individual reconstruction error (autoencoder reconstruction error for each sensor signal) allowing us to identify the signals that contribute most to the total reconstruction error. Expert knowledge is provided via look-up table enabling root-cause analysis and assignment to the affected subsystem. We demonstrated our findings in a cooling system unit including 34 sensors over a 8-months time period using 4-fold cross validation approaches and automatically created labels based on thresholds provided by domain experts. Using 4-fold cross validation, we reached a F1-score of 0.56, whereas the autoencoder results showed a higher consistency score (CS of 0.92) compared to the automatically created labels (CS of 0.62) -- indicating that the anomaly is recognized in a very stable manner. The main anomaly was found by the autoencoder and automatically created labels and was also recorded in the log files. Further, the explained fault localization highlighted the most affected component for the main anomaly in a very consistent manner.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Cooling ; Cooling systems ; Fault location ; Labels ; Localization ; Lookup tables ; Multivariate analysis ; Reconstruction ; Root cause analysis ; Sensors ; Subsystems ; System failures ; Thresholds ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-10</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holly, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heel, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katic, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoeffl, Leopold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiftinger, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslhofer, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schall, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitzinger, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemnitz, Jana</creatorcontrib><title>Autoencoder based Anomaly Detection and Explained Fault Localization in Industrial Cooling Systems</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Anomaly detection in large industrial cooling systems is very challenging due to the high data dimensionality, inconsistent sensor recordings, and lack of labels. The state of the art for automated anomaly detection in these systems typically relies on expert knowledge and thresholds. However, data is viewed isolated and complex, multivariate relationships are neglected. In this work, we present an autoencoder based end-to-end workflow for anomaly detection suitable for multivariate time series data in large industrial cooling systems, including explained fault localization and root cause analysis based on expert knowledge. We identify system failures using a threshold on the total reconstruction error (autoencoder reconstruction error including all sensor signals). For fault localization, we compute the individual reconstruction error (autoencoder reconstruction error for each sensor signal) allowing us to identify the signals that contribute most to the total reconstruction error. Expert knowledge is provided via look-up table enabling root-cause analysis and assignment to the affected subsystem. We demonstrated our findings in a cooling system unit including 34 sensors over a 8-months time period using 4-fold cross validation approaches and automatically created labels based on thresholds provided by domain experts. Using 4-fold cross validation, we reached a F1-score of 0.56, whereas the autoencoder results showed a higher consistency score (CS of 0.92) compared to the automatically created labels (CS of 0.62) -- indicating that the anomaly is recognized in a very stable manner. The main anomaly was found by the autoencoder and automatically created labels and was also recorded in the log files. Further, the explained fault localization highlighted the most affected component for the main anomaly in a very consistent manner.</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Cooling systems</subject><subject>Fault location</subject><subject>Labels</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Lookup tables</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Root cause analysis</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Subsystems</subject><subject>System failures</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjkEKwjAQAIMgKNo_LHgWalJtPYpaFLzpvaxtlJR0V5sErK-3iA_wNIeZwwzEWCq1mGeJlCMROVfHcSxXqVwu1VhcN8GzppIr3cIVna5gQ9yg7WCnvS69YQKkCvavh0VDvc8xWA8nLtGaN34DQ3CkKjjfGrSwZbaG7nDunNeNm4rhDa3T0Y8TMcv3l-1h_mj5GbTzRc2hpV4Vsr9Kk3StMvVf9QGoYEYG</recordid><startdate>20221014</startdate><enddate>20221014</enddate><creator>Holly, Stephanie</creator><creator>Heel, Robin</creator><creator>Katic, Denis</creator><creator>Schoeffl, Leopold</creator><creator>Stiftinger, Andreas</creator><creator>Holzner, Peter</creator><creator>Kaufmann, Thomas</creator><creator>Haslhofer, Bernhard</creator><creator>Schall, Daniel</creator><creator>Heitzinger, Clemens</creator><creator>Kemnitz, Jana</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221014</creationdate><title>Autoencoder based Anomaly Detection and Explained Fault Localization in Industrial Cooling Systems</title><author>Holly, Stephanie ; Heel, Robin ; Katic, Denis ; Schoeffl, Leopold ; Stiftinger, Andreas ; Holzner, Peter ; Kaufmann, Thomas ; Haslhofer, Bernhard ; Schall, Daniel ; Heitzinger, Clemens ; Kemnitz, Jana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27257479383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Cooling systems</topic><topic>Fault location</topic><topic>Labels</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Lookup tables</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Root cause analysis</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Subsystems</topic><topic>System failures</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holly, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heel, Robin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katic, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoeffl, Leopold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stiftinger, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzner, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslhofer, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schall, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitzinger, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemnitz, Jana</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holly, Stephanie</au><au>Heel, Robin</au><au>Katic, Denis</au><au>Schoeffl, Leopold</au><au>Stiftinger, Andreas</au><au>Holzner, Peter</au><au>Kaufmann, Thomas</au><au>Haslhofer, Bernhard</au><au>Schall, Daniel</au><au>Heitzinger, Clemens</au><au>Kemnitz, Jana</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Autoencoder based Anomaly Detection and Explained Fault Localization in Industrial Cooling Systems</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-10-14</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Anomaly detection in large industrial cooling systems is very challenging due to the high data dimensionality, inconsistent sensor recordings, and lack of labels. The state of the art for automated anomaly detection in these systems typically relies on expert knowledge and thresholds. However, data is viewed isolated and complex, multivariate relationships are neglected. In this work, we present an autoencoder based end-to-end workflow for anomaly detection suitable for multivariate time series data in large industrial cooling systems, including explained fault localization and root cause analysis based on expert knowledge. We identify system failures using a threshold on the total reconstruction error (autoencoder reconstruction error including all sensor signals). For fault localization, we compute the individual reconstruction error (autoencoder reconstruction error for each sensor signal) allowing us to identify the signals that contribute most to the total reconstruction error. Expert knowledge is provided via look-up table enabling root-cause analysis and assignment to the affected subsystem. We demonstrated our findings in a cooling system unit including 34 sensors over a 8-months time period using 4-fold cross validation approaches and automatically created labels based on thresholds provided by domain experts. Using 4-fold cross validation, we reached a F1-score of 0.56, whereas the autoencoder results showed a higher consistency score (CS of 0.92) compared to the automatically created labels (CS of 0.62) -- indicating that the anomaly is recognized in a very stable manner. The main anomaly was found by the autoencoder and automatically created labels and was also recorded in the log files. Further, the explained fault localization highlighted the most affected component for the main anomaly in a very consistent manner.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2022-10
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2725747938
source Free E- Journals
subjects Anomalies
Cooling
Cooling systems
Fault location
Labels
Localization
Lookup tables
Multivariate analysis
Reconstruction
Root cause analysis
Sensors
Subsystems
System failures
Thresholds
Workflow
title Autoencoder based Anomaly Detection and Explained Fault Localization in Industrial Cooling Systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A14%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Autoencoder%20based%20Anomaly%20Detection%20and%20Explained%20Fault%20Localization%20in%20Industrial%20Cooling%20Systems&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Holly,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2022-10-14&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2725747938%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2725747938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true