Families with Black Caregivers Were More Likely to Reunify? Explaining Findings from a RCT for Families who are Housing-unstable and Have Children in Foster Care
This qualitative explanatory study examines findings from an RCT offering intensive case management for families who are housing-unstable and have children in foster care. Service providers offered feedback on why children of Black caregivers in the treatment group were significantly more likely to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child welfare 2022-03, Vol.100 (2), p.27-48 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 48 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | Child welfare |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Collins, Cyleste Bai, Rong Crampton, David Fischer, Robert L |
description | This qualitative explanatory study examines findings from an RCT offering intensive case management for families who are housing-unstable and have children in foster care. Service providers offered feedback on why children of Black caregivers in the treatment group were significantly more likely to reunify. The 20 interviews identified addressing structural racism, reframing expectations, connection and relationship, and advocacy as key explanations. Findings are framed in terms of antiracist practice. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2724914817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A698841077</galeid><sourcerecordid>A698841077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g249t-b23f899479f8796c97715ff10996c6090f4c8e95788de4056af33f86d39583e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj29LwzAQxvtCwTn9DgeC7yrp2rXJK5nFOWEiiOLLkrWXNi5NNEnVfRy_qfEPTGEc3HHH73nubi8aEUJYnJFJchAdOvcU2mlB6Sj6mPNeKokO3qTv4ELxeg0lt9jKV7QOHtEi3JiQlnKNagPewB0OWorNOVy-PysutdQtzKVuQnUgrOmBw115D8JY2Np3BoItLMzgAhgP2nm-UghcN7DgrwhlJ1VjUYPUMDfOo_0-5CjaF1w5PP6t4-hhfnlfLuLl7dV1OVvG7SRjPl5NUkEZywomaMHymhVFMhUiISw0OWFEZDVF9vV1gxmZ5lykQZE3KZvSFPN0HJ38-D5b8zKg89WTGawOK6tJEVYkGU2KLdVyhZXUwnjL6166uprljNIsIcUXFe-gWtRouTIahQzjf_zZDj5Eg72sdwpO_wg65Mp3zqjBS6PdX_AT8x2dFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724914817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Families with Black Caregivers Were More Likely to Reunify? Explaining Findings from a RCT for Families who are Housing-unstable and Have Children in Foster Care</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Collins, Cyleste ; Bai, Rong ; Crampton, David ; Fischer, Robert L</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, Cyleste ; Bai, Rong ; Crampton, David ; Fischer, Robert L</creatorcontrib><description>This qualitative explanatory study examines findings from an RCT offering intensive case management for families who are housing-unstable and have children in foster care. Service providers offered feedback on why children of Black caregivers in the treatment group were significantly more likely to reunify. The 20 interviews identified addressing structural racism, reframing expectations, connection and relationship, and advocacy as key explanations. Findings are framed in terms of antiracist practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-4021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Arlington: Child Welfare League of America, Inc</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; African American Children ; African Americans ; Caregivers ; Case management ; Caseworkers ; Child Abuse ; Child welfare ; Control Groups ; Demographic aspects ; Design ; Discrimination ; Economic aspects ; Families & family life ; Foster care ; Foster children ; Foster home care ; Homeless people ; Housing ; Population ; Qualitative research ; Race ; Racism ; Social aspects ; Systemic racism ; Workers</subject><ispartof>Child welfare, 2022-03, Vol.100 (2), p.27-48</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Child Welfare League of America, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Child Welfare League of America, Inc. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, Cyleste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crampton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Robert L</creatorcontrib><title>Families with Black Caregivers Were More Likely to Reunify? Explaining Findings from a RCT for Families who are Housing-unstable and Have Children in Foster Care</title><title>Child welfare</title><description>This qualitative explanatory study examines findings from an RCT offering intensive case management for families who are housing-unstable and have children in foster care. Service providers offered feedback on why children of Black caregivers in the treatment group were significantly more likely to reunify. The 20 interviews identified addressing structural racism, reframing expectations, connection and relationship, and advocacy as key explanations. Findings are framed in terms of antiracist practice.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>African American Children</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Case management</subject><subject>Caseworkers</subject><subject>Child Abuse</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Demographic aspects</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Foster care</subject><subject>Foster children</subject><subject>Foster home care</subject><subject>Homeless people</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Systemic racism</subject><subject>Workers</subject><issn>0009-4021</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptj29LwzAQxvtCwTn9DgeC7yrp2rXJK5nFOWEiiOLLkrWXNi5NNEnVfRy_qfEPTGEc3HHH73nubi8aEUJYnJFJchAdOvcU2mlB6Sj6mPNeKokO3qTv4ELxeg0lt9jKV7QOHtEi3JiQlnKNagPewB0OWorNOVy-PysutdQtzKVuQnUgrOmBw115D8JY2Np3BoItLMzgAhgP2nm-UghcN7DgrwhlJ1VjUYPUMDfOo_0-5CjaF1w5PP6t4-hhfnlfLuLl7dV1OVvG7SRjPl5NUkEZywomaMHymhVFMhUiISw0OWFEZDVF9vV1gxmZ5lykQZE3KZvSFPN0HJ38-D5b8zKg89WTGawOK6tJEVYkGU2KLdVyhZXUwnjL6166uprljNIsIcUXFe-gWtRouTIahQzjf_zZDj5Eg72sdwpO_wg65Mp3zqjBS6PdX_AT8x2dFA</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Collins, Cyleste</creator><creator>Bai, Rong</creator><creator>Crampton, David</creator><creator>Fischer, Robert L</creator><general>Child Welfare League of America, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Families with Black Caregivers Were More Likely to Reunify? Explaining Findings from a RCT for Families who are Housing-unstable and Have Children in Foster Care</title><author>Collins, Cyleste ; Bai, Rong ; Crampton, David ; Fischer, Robert L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g249t-b23f899479f8796c97715ff10996c6090f4c8e95788de4056af33f86d39583e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>African American Children</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Case management</topic><topic>Caseworkers</topic><topic>Child Abuse</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Demographic aspects</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Foster care</topic><topic>Foster children</topic><topic>Foster home care</topic><topic>Homeless people</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Systemic racism</topic><topic>Workers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, Cyleste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crampton, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Robert L</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Child welfare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, Cyleste</au><au>Bai, Rong</au><au>Crampton, David</au><au>Fischer, Robert L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Families with Black Caregivers Were More Likely to Reunify? Explaining Findings from a RCT for Families who are Housing-unstable and Have Children in Foster Care</atitle><jtitle>Child welfare</jtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>27-48</pages><issn>0009-4021</issn><abstract>This qualitative explanatory study examines findings from an RCT offering intensive case management for families who are housing-unstable and have children in foster care. Service providers offered feedback on why children of Black caregivers in the treatment group were significantly more likely to reunify. The 20 interviews identified addressing structural racism, reframing expectations, connection and relationship, and advocacy as key explanations. Findings are framed in terms of antiracist practice.</abstract><cop>Arlington</cop><pub>Child Welfare League of America, Inc</pub><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-4021 |
ispartof | Child welfare, 2022-03, Vol.100 (2), p.27-48 |
issn | 0009-4021 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2724914817 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Advocacy African American Children African Americans Caregivers Case management Caseworkers Child Abuse Child welfare Control Groups Demographic aspects Design Discrimination Economic aspects Families & family life Foster care Foster children Foster home care Homeless people Housing Population Qualitative research Race Racism Social aspects Systemic racism Workers |
title | Families with Black Caregivers Were More Likely to Reunify? Explaining Findings from a RCT for Families who are Housing-unstable and Have Children in Foster Care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T09%3A53%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Families%20with%20Black%20Caregivers%20Were%20More%20Likely%20to%20Reunify?%20Explaining%20Findings%20from%20a%20RCT%20for%20Families%20who%20are%20Housing-unstable%20and%20Have%20Children%20in%20Foster%20Care&rft.jtitle=Child%20welfare&rft.au=Collins,%20Cyleste&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=27-48&rft.issn=0009-4021&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA698841077%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724914817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A698841077&rfr_iscdi=true |