Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut

Background Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child & youth care forum 2022-12, Vol.51 (6), p.1133-1154
Hauptverfasser: Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy, Kurz, Brenda, Becker, Jessica, Fendrich, Michael, Vanderploeg, Jeffrey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1154
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1133
container_title Child & youth care forum
container_volume 51
creator Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy
Kurz, Brenda
Becker, Jessica
Fendrich, Michael
Vanderploeg, Jeffrey
description Background Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhanced. Implementation science provides an informative analytic framework. Objective This study explores implementation-related factors from the service providers’ perspective using qualitative methods, to ascertain the strengths, challenges, and adaptations made in accord with local factors. Method Between April and November 2017, seven focus groups were conducted with 33 MC services providers. A semi-structured interview elicited descriptions of program strengths and challenges including micro and macro factors affecting MC services delivery. Transcripts were coded thematically and related to the four implementation science concepts–fidelity, acceptability, penetration, and sustainability. Results MC providers prioritize safety and family engagement. They are aware of the many community and personal barriers to practice, including the inadequacy of the continuum of care, and intervene accordingly. Conclusions Implementing a community-based program such as MC requires focused efforts to build relationships with families, agencies, and community organizations. To get families and referring agencies to use MC rather than the ED for youth in behavioral health crisis, practitioners coordinate with EDs, hospitals, and the needed services. By building essential relationships, providers were able to overcome many barriers and challenges, enabling them to successfully implement MC programs throughout the state. Nevertheless, several remaining challenges will need to be addressed to sustain successful program implementation in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2724782336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1351825</ericid><sourcerecordid>2724782336</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-421f839a0dfa914dd87682144bc0c8ebc45e1a73bdbec2f007efeafe305eec283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UM1Kw0AQDqJgrb6AICx4ju5Pkk2OEqpWKhbUg6cl2cy2W9rdupu0ePM1fD2fxK0RvXmaYb4_5ouiU4IvCMb80hOcZlmMKYlxkXEcb_eiAUk5ixkjxX7Yccpikhf4MDryfoExLjhNB5GaOrvRDTj_-f6BpmGuQbZ6Ax5Zg8ar9RJWYFptZuje1noJqHTaa48ewW20DDRlHSrnetk4MKgyDXqxXTtH2qDSGrMzk117HB2oaunh5GcOo-fr0VN5G08ebsbl1SSWlJM2TihROSsq3KiqIEnT5DzLKUmSWmKZQy2TFEjFWd3UIKkKn4OCSgHDKYRDzobRee-7dva1A9-Khe2cCZGCcprwnDKWBRbtWdJZ7x0osXZ6Vbk3QbDY9Sn6PkXoU3z3KbZBdNaLwGn5KxjdEZaSnKYBZz3uA2Zm4P6i_3H9ApYvhU0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724782336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy ; Kurz, Brenda ; Becker, Jessica ; Fendrich, Michael ; Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy ; Kurz, Brenda ; Becker, Jessica ; Fendrich, Michael ; Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><description>Background Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhanced. Implementation science provides an informative analytic framework. Objective This study explores implementation-related factors from the service providers’ perspective using qualitative methods, to ascertain the strengths, challenges, and adaptations made in accord with local factors. Method Between April and November 2017, seven focus groups were conducted with 33 MC services providers. A semi-structured interview elicited descriptions of program strengths and challenges including micro and macro factors affecting MC services delivery. Transcripts were coded thematically and related to the four implementation science concepts–fidelity, acceptability, penetration, and sustainability. Results MC providers prioritize safety and family engagement. They are aware of the many community and personal barriers to practice, including the inadequacy of the continuum of care, and intervene accordingly. Conclusions Implementing a community-based program such as MC requires focused efforts to build relationships with families, agencies, and community organizations. To get families and referring agencies to use MC rather than the ED for youth in behavioral health crisis, practitioners coordinate with EDs, hospitals, and the needed services. By building essential relationships, providers were able to overcome many barriers and challenges, enabling them to successfully implement MC programs throughout the state. Nevertheless, several remaining challenges will need to be addressed to sustain successful program implementation in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Access to Health Care ; Agency Cooperation ; Barriers ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Challenges ; Child and School Psychology ; Children &amp; youth ; Childrens health ; Community organizations ; Community Relations ; Community-based programs ; Crises ; Crisis intervention ; Crisis Management ; Efficacy ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency services ; Families &amp; family life ; Family Involvement ; Fidelity ; Focus Groups ; Health behavior ; Health Services ; Health services utilization ; Hospitals ; Implementation ; Interviews ; Medicaid ; Mental Health ; Original Paper ; Pediatrics ; Penetration ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Implementation ; Psychology ; Qualitative research ; Reimbursement ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Child &amp; youth care forum, 2022-12, Vol.51 (6), p.1133-1154</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-421f839a0dfa914dd87682144bc0c8ebc45e1a73bdbec2f007efeafe305eec283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-421f839a0dfa914dd87682144bc0c8ebc45e1a73bdbec2f007efeafe305eec283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9754-5810 ; 0000-0002-7230-1203 ; 0000-0002-1956-2324 ; 0000-0001-5830-2827 ; 0000-0001-8391-5895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27321,27901,27902,30976,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1351825$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fendrich, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><title>Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut</title><title>Child &amp; youth care forum</title><addtitle>Child Youth Care Forum</addtitle><description>Background Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhanced. Implementation science provides an informative analytic framework. Objective This study explores implementation-related factors from the service providers’ perspective using qualitative methods, to ascertain the strengths, challenges, and adaptations made in accord with local factors. Method Between April and November 2017, seven focus groups were conducted with 33 MC services providers. A semi-structured interview elicited descriptions of program strengths and challenges including micro and macro factors affecting MC services delivery. Transcripts were coded thematically and related to the four implementation science concepts–fidelity, acceptability, penetration, and sustainability. Results MC providers prioritize safety and family engagement. They are aware of the many community and personal barriers to practice, including the inadequacy of the continuum of care, and intervene accordingly. Conclusions Implementing a community-based program such as MC requires focused efforts to build relationships with families, agencies, and community organizations. To get families and referring agencies to use MC rather than the ED for youth in behavioral health crisis, practitioners coordinate with EDs, hospitals, and the needed services. By building essential relationships, providers were able to overcome many barriers and challenges, enabling them to successfully implement MC programs throughout the state. Nevertheless, several remaining challenges will need to be addressed to sustain successful program implementation in the future.</description><subject>Access to Health Care</subject><subject>Agency Cooperation</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Challenges</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Community organizations</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Community-based programs</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Crisis intervention</subject><subject>Crisis Management</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family Involvement</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Health services utilization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1053-1890</issn><issn>1573-3319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UM1Kw0AQDqJgrb6AICx4ju5Pkk2OEqpWKhbUg6cl2cy2W9rdupu0ePM1fD2fxK0RvXmaYb4_5ouiU4IvCMb80hOcZlmMKYlxkXEcb_eiAUk5ixkjxX7Yccpikhf4MDryfoExLjhNB5GaOrvRDTj_-f6BpmGuQbZ6Ax5Zg8ar9RJWYFptZuje1noJqHTaa48ewW20DDRlHSrnetk4MKgyDXqxXTtH2qDSGrMzk117HB2oaunh5GcOo-fr0VN5G08ebsbl1SSWlJM2TihROSsq3KiqIEnT5DzLKUmSWmKZQy2TFEjFWd3UIKkKn4OCSgHDKYRDzobRee-7dva1A9-Khe2cCZGCcprwnDKWBRbtWdJZ7x0osXZ6Vbk3QbDY9Sn6PkXoU3z3KbZBdNaLwGn5KxjdEZaSnKYBZz3uA2Zm4P6i_3H9ApYvhU0</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy</creator><creator>Kurz, Brenda</creator><creator>Becker, Jessica</creator><creator>Fendrich, Michael</creator><creator>Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-1203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-2324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5830-2827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8391-5895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut</title><author>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy ; Kurz, Brenda ; Becker, Jessica ; Fendrich, Michael ; Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-421f839a0dfa914dd87682144bc0c8ebc45e1a73bdbec2f007efeafe305eec283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access to Health Care</topic><topic>Agency Cooperation</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Challenges</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Community organizations</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Community-based programs</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Crisis intervention</topic><topic>Crisis Management</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family Involvement</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Health services utilization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fendrich, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child &amp; youth care forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy</au><au>Kurz, Brenda</au><au>Becker, Jessica</au><au>Fendrich, Michael</au><au>Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1351825</ericid><atitle>Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut</atitle><jtitle>Child &amp; youth care forum</jtitle><stitle>Child Youth Care Forum</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1133</spage><epage>1154</epage><pages>1133-1154</pages><issn>1053-1890</issn><eissn>1573-3319</eissn><abstract>Background Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhanced. Implementation science provides an informative analytic framework. Objective This study explores implementation-related factors from the service providers’ perspective using qualitative methods, to ascertain the strengths, challenges, and adaptations made in accord with local factors. Method Between April and November 2017, seven focus groups were conducted with 33 MC services providers. A semi-structured interview elicited descriptions of program strengths and challenges including micro and macro factors affecting MC services delivery. Transcripts were coded thematically and related to the four implementation science concepts–fidelity, acceptability, penetration, and sustainability. Results MC providers prioritize safety and family engagement. They are aware of the many community and personal barriers to practice, including the inadequacy of the continuum of care, and intervene accordingly. Conclusions Implementing a community-based program such as MC requires focused efforts to build relationships with families, agencies, and community organizations. To get families and referring agencies to use MC rather than the ED for youth in behavioral health crisis, practitioners coordinate with EDs, hospitals, and the needed services. By building essential relationships, providers were able to overcome many barriers and challenges, enabling them to successfully implement MC programs throughout the state. Nevertheless, several remaining challenges will need to be addressed to sustain successful program implementation in the future.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-1203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-2324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5830-2827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8391-5895</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1890
ispartof Child & youth care forum, 2022-12, Vol.51 (6), p.1133-1154
issn 1053-1890
1573-3319
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2724782336
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Access to Health Care
Agency Cooperation
Barriers
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Challenges
Child and School Psychology
Children & youth
Childrens health
Community organizations
Community Relations
Community-based programs
Crises
Crisis intervention
Crisis Management
Efficacy
Emergency medical care
Emergency services
Families & family life
Family Involvement
Fidelity
Focus Groups
Health behavior
Health Services
Health services utilization
Hospitals
Implementation
Interviews
Medicaid
Mental Health
Original Paper
Pediatrics
Penetration
Program Effectiveness
Program Implementation
Psychology
Qualitative research
Reimbursement
Semi Structured Interviews
Youth
title Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T05%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Providers%E2%80%99%20Perspectives%20on%20Implementing%20Mobile%20Crisis%20Services%20for%20Children%20and%20Youth%20in%20Connecticut&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20youth%20care%20forum&rft.au=Dubuque-Gallo,%20Cindy&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1133&rft.epage=1154&rft.pages=1133-1154&rft.issn=1053-1890&rft.eissn=1573-3319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2724782336%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724782336&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1351825&rfr_iscdi=true