Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut
Background Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Child & youth care forum 2022-12, Vol.51 (6), p.1133-1154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1154 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1133 |
container_title | Child & youth care forum |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy Kurz, Brenda Becker, Jessica Fendrich, Michael Vanderploeg, Jeffrey |
description | Background
Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhanced. Implementation science provides an informative analytic framework.
Objective
This study explores implementation-related factors from the service providers’ perspective using qualitative methods, to ascertain the strengths, challenges, and adaptations made in accord with local factors.
Method
Between April and November 2017, seven focus groups were conducted with 33 MC services providers. A semi-structured interview elicited descriptions of program strengths and challenges including micro and macro factors affecting MC services delivery. Transcripts were coded thematically and related to the four implementation science concepts–fidelity, acceptability, penetration, and sustainability.
Results
MC providers prioritize safety and family engagement. They are aware of the many community and personal barriers to practice, including the inadequacy of the continuum of care, and intervene accordingly.
Conclusions
Implementing a community-based program such as MC requires focused efforts to build relationships with families, agencies, and community organizations. To get families and referring agencies to use MC rather than the ED for youth in behavioral health crisis, practitioners coordinate with EDs, hospitals, and the needed services. By building essential relationships, providers were able to overcome many barriers and challenges, enabling them to successfully implement MC programs throughout the state. Nevertheless, several remaining challenges will need to be addressed to sustain successful program implementation in the future. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2724782336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1351825</ericid><sourcerecordid>2724782336</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-421f839a0dfa914dd87682144bc0c8ebc45e1a73bdbec2f007efeafe305eec283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UM1Kw0AQDqJgrb6AICx4ju5Pkk2OEqpWKhbUg6cl2cy2W9rdupu0ePM1fD2fxK0RvXmaYb4_5ouiU4IvCMb80hOcZlmMKYlxkXEcb_eiAUk5ixkjxX7Yccpikhf4MDryfoExLjhNB5GaOrvRDTj_-f6BpmGuQbZ6Ax5Zg8ar9RJWYFptZuje1noJqHTaa48ewW20DDRlHSrnetk4MKgyDXqxXTtH2qDSGrMzk117HB2oaunh5GcOo-fr0VN5G08ebsbl1SSWlJM2TihROSsq3KiqIEnT5DzLKUmSWmKZQy2TFEjFWd3UIKkKn4OCSgHDKYRDzobRee-7dva1A9-Khe2cCZGCcprwnDKWBRbtWdJZ7x0osXZ6Vbk3QbDY9Sn6PkXoU3z3KbZBdNaLwGn5KxjdEZaSnKYBZz3uA2Zm4P6i_3H9ApYvhU0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724782336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy ; Kurz, Brenda ; Becker, Jessica ; Fendrich, Michael ; Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creator><creatorcontrib>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy ; Kurz, Brenda ; Becker, Jessica ; Fendrich, Michael ; Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhanced. Implementation science provides an informative analytic framework.
Objective
This study explores implementation-related factors from the service providers’ perspective using qualitative methods, to ascertain the strengths, challenges, and adaptations made in accord with local factors.
Method
Between April and November 2017, seven focus groups were conducted with 33 MC services providers. A semi-structured interview elicited descriptions of program strengths and challenges including micro and macro factors affecting MC services delivery. Transcripts were coded thematically and related to the four implementation science concepts–fidelity, acceptability, penetration, and sustainability.
Results
MC providers prioritize safety and family engagement. They are aware of the many community and personal barriers to practice, including the inadequacy of the continuum of care, and intervene accordingly.
Conclusions
Implementing a community-based program such as MC requires focused efforts to build relationships with families, agencies, and community organizations. To get families and referring agencies to use MC rather than the ED for youth in behavioral health crisis, practitioners coordinate with EDs, hospitals, and the needed services. By building essential relationships, providers were able to overcome many barriers and challenges, enabling them to successfully implement MC programs throughout the state. Nevertheless, several remaining challenges will need to be addressed to sustain successful program implementation in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Access to Health Care ; Agency Cooperation ; Barriers ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Challenges ; Child and School Psychology ; Children & youth ; Childrens health ; Community organizations ; Community Relations ; Community-based programs ; Crises ; Crisis intervention ; Crisis Management ; Efficacy ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency services ; Families & family life ; Family Involvement ; Fidelity ; Focus Groups ; Health behavior ; Health Services ; Health services utilization ; Hospitals ; Implementation ; Interviews ; Medicaid ; Mental Health ; Original Paper ; Pediatrics ; Penetration ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Implementation ; Psychology ; Qualitative research ; Reimbursement ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Youth</subject><ispartof>Child & youth care forum, 2022-12, Vol.51 (6), p.1133-1154</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-421f839a0dfa914dd87682144bc0c8ebc45e1a73bdbec2f007efeafe305eec283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-421f839a0dfa914dd87682144bc0c8ebc45e1a73bdbec2f007efeafe305eec283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9754-5810 ; 0000-0002-7230-1203 ; 0000-0002-1956-2324 ; 0000-0001-5830-2827 ; 0000-0001-8391-5895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27321,27901,27902,30976,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1351825$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fendrich, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><title>Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut</title><title>Child & youth care forum</title><addtitle>Child Youth Care Forum</addtitle><description>Background
Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhanced. Implementation science provides an informative analytic framework.
Objective
This study explores implementation-related factors from the service providers’ perspective using qualitative methods, to ascertain the strengths, challenges, and adaptations made in accord with local factors.
Method
Between April and November 2017, seven focus groups were conducted with 33 MC services providers. A semi-structured interview elicited descriptions of program strengths and challenges including micro and macro factors affecting MC services delivery. Transcripts were coded thematically and related to the four implementation science concepts–fidelity, acceptability, penetration, and sustainability.
Results
MC providers prioritize safety and family engagement. They are aware of the many community and personal barriers to practice, including the inadequacy of the continuum of care, and intervene accordingly.
Conclusions
Implementing a community-based program such as MC requires focused efforts to build relationships with families, agencies, and community organizations. To get families and referring agencies to use MC rather than the ED for youth in behavioral health crisis, practitioners coordinate with EDs, hospitals, and the needed services. By building essential relationships, providers were able to overcome many barriers and challenges, enabling them to successfully implement MC programs throughout the state. Nevertheless, several remaining challenges will need to be addressed to sustain successful program implementation in the future.</description><subject>Access to Health Care</subject><subject>Agency Cooperation</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Challenges</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Community organizations</subject><subject>Community Relations</subject><subject>Community-based programs</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Crisis intervention</subject><subject>Crisis Management</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Family Involvement</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Focus Groups</subject><subject>Health behavior</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Health services utilization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Reimbursement</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Youth</subject><issn>1053-1890</issn><issn>1573-3319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UM1Kw0AQDqJgrb6AICx4ju5Pkk2OEqpWKhbUg6cl2cy2W9rdupu0ePM1fD2fxK0RvXmaYb4_5ouiU4IvCMb80hOcZlmMKYlxkXEcb_eiAUk5ixkjxX7Yccpikhf4MDryfoExLjhNB5GaOrvRDTj_-f6BpmGuQbZ6Ax5Zg8ar9RJWYFptZuje1noJqHTaa48ewW20DDRlHSrnetk4MKgyDXqxXTtH2qDSGrMzk117HB2oaunh5GcOo-fr0VN5G08ebsbl1SSWlJM2TihROSsq3KiqIEnT5DzLKUmSWmKZQy2TFEjFWd3UIKkKn4OCSgHDKYRDzobRee-7dva1A9-Khe2cCZGCcprwnDKWBRbtWdJZ7x0osXZ6Vbk3QbDY9Sn6PkXoU3z3KbZBdNaLwGn5KxjdEZaSnKYBZz3uA2Zm4P6i_3H9ApYvhU0</recordid><startdate>20221201</startdate><enddate>20221201</enddate><creator>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy</creator><creator>Kurz, Brenda</creator><creator>Becker, Jessica</creator><creator>Fendrich, Michael</creator><creator>Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-1203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-2324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5830-2827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8391-5895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221201</creationdate><title>Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut</title><author>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy ; Kurz, Brenda ; Becker, Jessica ; Fendrich, Michael ; Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c271t-421f839a0dfa914dd87682144bc0c8ebc45e1a73bdbec2f007efeafe305eec283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access to Health Care</topic><topic>Agency Cooperation</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Challenges</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Community organizations</topic><topic>Community Relations</topic><topic>Community-based programs</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Crisis intervention</topic><topic>Crisis Management</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Family Involvement</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Focus Groups</topic><topic>Health behavior</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Health services utilization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Reimbursement</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Youth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Brenda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fendrich, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Child & youth care forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dubuque-Gallo, Cindy</au><au>Kurz, Brenda</au><au>Becker, Jessica</au><au>Fendrich, Michael</au><au>Vanderploeg, Jeffrey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1351825</ericid><atitle>Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut</atitle><jtitle>Child & youth care forum</jtitle><stitle>Child Youth Care Forum</stitle><date>2022-12-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1133</spage><epage>1154</epage><pages>1133-1154</pages><issn>1053-1890</issn><eissn>1573-3319</eissn><abstract>Background
Mobile crisis (MC) services is a pediatric behavioral health service that diverts those who need a lower level of care away from the Emergency Department (ED), enabling EDs to focus on providing acute behavioral health services. However, despite MC’s efficacy, utilization could be enhanced. Implementation science provides an informative analytic framework.
Objective
This study explores implementation-related factors from the service providers’ perspective using qualitative methods, to ascertain the strengths, challenges, and adaptations made in accord with local factors.
Method
Between April and November 2017, seven focus groups were conducted with 33 MC services providers. A semi-structured interview elicited descriptions of program strengths and challenges including micro and macro factors affecting MC services delivery. Transcripts were coded thematically and related to the four implementation science concepts–fidelity, acceptability, penetration, and sustainability.
Results
MC providers prioritize safety and family engagement. They are aware of the many community and personal barriers to practice, including the inadequacy of the continuum of care, and intervene accordingly.
Conclusions
Implementing a community-based program such as MC requires focused efforts to build relationships with families, agencies, and community organizations. To get families and referring agencies to use MC rather than the ED for youth in behavioral health crisis, practitioners coordinate with EDs, hospitals, and the needed services. By building essential relationships, providers were able to overcome many barriers and challenges, enabling them to successfully implement MC programs throughout the state. Nevertheless, several remaining challenges will need to be addressed to sustain successful program implementation in the future.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9754-5810</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7230-1203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-2324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5830-2827</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8391-5895</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1890 |
ispartof | Child & youth care forum, 2022-12, Vol.51 (6), p.1133-1154 |
issn | 1053-1890 1573-3319 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2724782336 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source; SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Access to Health Care Agency Cooperation Barriers Behavioral Science and Psychology Challenges Child and School Psychology Children & youth Childrens health Community organizations Community Relations Community-based programs Crises Crisis intervention Crisis Management Efficacy Emergency medical care Emergency services Families & family life Family Involvement Fidelity Focus Groups Health behavior Health Services Health services utilization Hospitals Implementation Interviews Medicaid Mental Health Original Paper Pediatrics Penetration Program Effectiveness Program Implementation Psychology Qualitative research Reimbursement Semi Structured Interviews Youth |
title | Providers’ Perspectives on Implementing Mobile Crisis Services for Children and Youth in Connecticut |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T05%3A07%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Providers%E2%80%99%20Perspectives%20on%20Implementing%20Mobile%20Crisis%20Services%20for%20Children%20and%20Youth%20in%20Connecticut&rft.jtitle=Child%20&%20youth%20care%20forum&rft.au=Dubuque-Gallo,%20Cindy&rft.date=2022-12-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1133&rft.epage=1154&rft.pages=1133-1154&rft.issn=1053-1890&rft.eissn=1573-3319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10566-021-09670-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2724782336%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724782336&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1351825&rfr_iscdi=true |