Transportation Sustainability and Relevant Ranking of European Countries
The role of transportation in the economic process is central. Transportation’s benefits, however, can be dampened because of its environmental and social cost. A central question then arises as to the degre of sustainability of a national transportation system. In the present paper we develop a mat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intelligent & robotic systems 2022-10, Vol.106 (2), Article 49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of intelligent & robotic systems |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Grigoroudis, Evangelos Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. Phillis, Yannis A. |
description | The role of transportation in the economic process is central. Transportation’s benefits, however, can be dampened because of its environmental and social cost. A central question then arises as to the degre of sustainability of a national transportation system. In the present paper we develop a mathematical model to define and assess national transportation sustainability. The model relies on a number of indicators encompassing environmental impact, efficiency, safety, and economic contributions. Statistical data manipulations and fuzzy multistage reasoning result in an overall sustainability index over [0, 1]. A sensitivity analysis uncovers those indicators with the highest potential for improving transportation sustainability. Thirty European countries are ranked and the most important indicators for each country are pinpointed. It is demonstrated that greatest improvement will be achieved with the reduction of passenger car use, road freight transportation, and fatal accidents. Counterintuitively, Norway, Austria, Denmark, and Luxembourg rank at the bottom of the list together with Bulgaria, Greece, and Malta. This is due to their poor environmental performance and their small sustainability progress over 2010–2020. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10846-022-01736-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2724423878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A737210840</galeid><sourcerecordid>A737210840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-72dce5ef2e16dd9db60b57ea044d8d82c4a4735317b3332752ad81cc22495b0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC562TP7vJHkupVigItZ5DdpMtqdukJlmh396tK3iTOQzMvDdv-CF0j2GGAfhjxCBYmQMhOWBOy1xcoAkuOM2BQXWJJlARPKyr8hrdxLgHgEoU1QSttkG5ePQhqWS9y976mJR1qradTadMOZ1tTGe-lEvZRrkP63aZb7NlH_zRKJctfO9SsCbeoqtWddHc_fYpen9abherfP36_LKYr_OGCJpyTnRjCtMSg0utK12XUBfcKGBMCy1IwxTjtKCY15RSwguitMBNQwirihoMnaKH8e4x-M_exCT3vg9uiJSEE8YIFVwMqtmo2qnOSOtan4JqhtLmYBvvTGuH-ZxTTs7kYDCQ0dAEH2MwrTwGe1DhJDHIM2I5IpYDYvmDWJ5T6GiKg9jtTPj75R_XNxR5fmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724423878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transportation Sustainability and Relevant Ranking of European Countries</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Grigoroudis, Evangelos ; Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. ; Phillis, Yannis A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grigoroudis, Evangelos ; Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. ; Phillis, Yannis A.</creatorcontrib><description>The role of transportation in the economic process is central. Transportation’s benefits, however, can be dampened because of its environmental and social cost. A central question then arises as to the degre of sustainability of a national transportation system. In the present paper we develop a mathematical model to define and assess national transportation sustainability. The model relies on a number of indicators encompassing environmental impact, efficiency, safety, and economic contributions. Statistical data manipulations and fuzzy multistage reasoning result in an overall sustainability index over [0, 1]. A sensitivity analysis uncovers those indicators with the highest potential for improving transportation sustainability. Thirty European countries are ranked and the most important indicators for each country are pinpointed. It is demonstrated that greatest improvement will be achieved with the reduction of passenger car use, road freight transportation, and fatal accidents. Counterintuitively, Norway, Austria, Denmark, and Luxembourg rank at the bottom of the list together with Bulgaria, Greece, and Malta. This is due to their poor environmental performance and their small sustainability progress over 2010–2020.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-0296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10846-022-01736-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Control ; Economic impact ; Electrical Engineering ; Engineering ; Environmental auditing ; Environmental impact ; Freight transportation ; Fuzzy logic ; Impact analysis ; Indicators ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical Engineering ; Mechatronics ; Regular Paper ; Robotics ; Sensitivity analysis ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Transportation industry ; Transportation systems</subject><ispartof>Journal of intelligent & robotic systems, 2022-10, Vol.106 (2), Article 49</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022. corrected publication 2023</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-72dce5ef2e16dd9db60b57ea044d8d82c4a4735317b3332752ad81cc22495b0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8613-9350 ; 0000-0002-4092-8917 ; 0000-0001-8131-2708</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10846-022-01736-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10846-022-01736-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grigoroudis, Evangelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouikoglou, Vassilis S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillis, Yannis A.</creatorcontrib><title>Transportation Sustainability and Relevant Ranking of European Countries</title><title>Journal of intelligent & robotic systems</title><addtitle>J Intell Robot Syst</addtitle><description>The role of transportation in the economic process is central. Transportation’s benefits, however, can be dampened because of its environmental and social cost. A central question then arises as to the degre of sustainability of a national transportation system. In the present paper we develop a mathematical model to define and assess national transportation sustainability. The model relies on a number of indicators encompassing environmental impact, efficiency, safety, and economic contributions. Statistical data manipulations and fuzzy multistage reasoning result in an overall sustainability index over [0, 1]. A sensitivity analysis uncovers those indicators with the highest potential for improving transportation sustainability. Thirty European countries are ranked and the most important indicators for each country are pinpointed. It is demonstrated that greatest improvement will be achieved with the reduction of passenger car use, road freight transportation, and fatal accidents. Counterintuitively, Norway, Austria, Denmark, and Luxembourg rank at the bottom of the list together with Bulgaria, Greece, and Malta. This is due to their poor environmental performance and their small sustainability progress over 2010–2020.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Electrical Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental auditing</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Freight transportation</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Regular Paper</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Transportation industry</subject><subject>Transportation systems</subject><issn>0921-0296</issn><issn>1573-0409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC562TP7vJHkupVigItZ5DdpMtqdukJlmh396tK3iTOQzMvDdv-CF0j2GGAfhjxCBYmQMhOWBOy1xcoAkuOM2BQXWJJlARPKyr8hrdxLgHgEoU1QSttkG5ePQhqWS9y976mJR1qradTadMOZ1tTGe-lEvZRrkP63aZb7NlH_zRKJctfO9SsCbeoqtWddHc_fYpen9abherfP36_LKYr_OGCJpyTnRjCtMSg0utK12XUBfcKGBMCy1IwxTjtKCY15RSwguitMBNQwirihoMnaKH8e4x-M_exCT3vg9uiJSEE8YIFVwMqtmo2qnOSOtan4JqhtLmYBvvTGuH-ZxTTs7kYDCQ0dAEH2MwrTwGe1DhJDHIM2I5IpYDYvmDWJ5T6GiKg9jtTPj75R_XNxR5fmQ</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Grigoroudis, Evangelos</creator><creator>Kouikoglou, Vassilis S.</creator><creator>Phillis, Yannis A.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-9350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-8917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-2708</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Transportation Sustainability and Relevant Ranking of European Countries</title><author>Grigoroudis, Evangelos ; Kouikoglou, Vassilis S. ; Phillis, Yannis A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-72dce5ef2e16dd9db60b57ea044d8d82c4a4735317b3332752ad81cc22495b0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Electrical Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental auditing</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Freight transportation</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Regular Paper</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Transportation industry</topic><topic>Transportation systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grigoroudis, Evangelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kouikoglou, Vassilis S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillis, Yannis A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intelligent & robotic systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grigoroudis, Evangelos</au><au>Kouikoglou, Vassilis S.</au><au>Phillis, Yannis A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transportation Sustainability and Relevant Ranking of European Countries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intelligent & robotic systems</jtitle><stitle>J Intell Robot Syst</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>49</artnum><issn>0921-0296</issn><eissn>1573-0409</eissn><abstract>The role of transportation in the economic process is central. Transportation’s benefits, however, can be dampened because of its environmental and social cost. A central question then arises as to the degre of sustainability of a national transportation system. In the present paper we develop a mathematical model to define and assess national transportation sustainability. The model relies on a number of indicators encompassing environmental impact, efficiency, safety, and economic contributions. Statistical data manipulations and fuzzy multistage reasoning result in an overall sustainability index over [0, 1]. A sensitivity analysis uncovers those indicators with the highest potential for improving transportation sustainability. Thirty European countries are ranked and the most important indicators for each country are pinpointed. It is demonstrated that greatest improvement will be achieved with the reduction of passenger car use, road freight transportation, and fatal accidents. Counterintuitively, Norway, Austria, Denmark, and Luxembourg rank at the bottom of the list together with Bulgaria, Greece, and Malta. This is due to their poor environmental performance and their small sustainability progress over 2010–2020.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10846-022-01736-8</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-9350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-8917</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8131-2708</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-0296 |
ispartof | Journal of intelligent & robotic systems, 2022-10, Vol.106 (2), Article 49 |
issn | 0921-0296 1573-0409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2724423878 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Control Economic impact Electrical Engineering Engineering Environmental auditing Environmental impact Freight transportation Fuzzy logic Impact analysis Indicators Mathematical models Mechanical Engineering Mechatronics Regular Paper Robotics Sensitivity analysis Sustainability Sustainable development Transportation industry Transportation systems |
title | Transportation Sustainability and Relevant Ranking of European Countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T02%3A53%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transportation%20Sustainability%20and%20Relevant%20Ranking%20of%20European%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intelligent%20&%20robotic%20systems&rft.au=Grigoroudis,%20Evangelos&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=49&rft.issn=0921-0296&rft.eissn=1573-0409&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10846-022-01736-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA737210840%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724423878&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A737210840&rfr_iscdi=true |