Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review

Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are direct influences on human well-being and sustainable development, and they have become increasingly important in the development and progress of society. This paper reviewed 1248 papers on CESs by using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. On this basis, we also...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-09, Vol.14 (19), p.11845
Hauptverfasser: Yang, Liangjian, Cao, Kaijun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 11845
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Yang, Liangjian
Cao, Kaijun
description Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are direct influences on human well-being and sustainable development, and they have become increasingly important in the development and progress of society. This paper reviewed 1248 papers on CESs by using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. On this basis, we also reviewed 179 selected empirical papers related to this field, with regards to geographical locations, study objects, evaluation methods, and categories. The results show that: (1) the number of publications related to cultural services has increased year by year, and Ecosystem Services, Ecological Indicators, and Sustainability are the top three journals with the greatest amount of research published; (2) ecosystem services, benefits, management, and social–ecological systems are perceptions closely related to CES research, which are also popular topics in the field; (3) the results of a keyword detection show that the cultural landscapes, patterns, mental health services, social value, and other keywords were popular keywords used from 2005 to 2021; (4) CESs have mainly attracted the attention of many developed countries, and the cultural services in cities, oceans, and coastal areas have become the focus for researchers; (5) the recreation and ecotourism, and aesthetic values are the common categories of the CES empirical studies, while the knowledge system and the cultural diversity are the two categories with the least amount of research; (6) the evaluation methods of CESs are mostly carried out using a traditional questionnaire and interview, but mapping and modeling methods have been widely used in recent years.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su141911845
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2724321293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A746959955</galeid><sourcerecordid>A746959955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e8c9968916472949359ea39c3ef93135b39693ad71894d038f52deafde3c7a0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd9Lw0AMx4soOOae_AcKPol03jX9Fd_G2HQwUDZ9Ps5rOju2dl7a6f57b0xwA5OHhPD55guJ511L0QdAcc-tjCRKmUXxmdcJRSoDKWJxftRfej3mpXAB4NCk402H7apprV75I1Pzjhta-3Oy29IQ-zNi0tZ8-C-2Xlhi9nWV--PWCWg_4w2Zhh_8gSO3JX1deReFXjH1fmvXexuPXodPwfT5cTIcTAMDITYBZQYxyZx_lIYYIcRIGtAAFQgS4nfABEHnqcwwygVkRRzmpIucwKRaEHS9m8Peja0_W-JGLevWVs5ShWkYQShDhD9qoVekyqqoG6vNumSjBmmUYIwYx47q_0O5zGldmrqionTzE8HticAxDX03C90yq8l8dsreHVjjjsWWCrWx5VrbnZJC7Z-mjp4GP5v0hec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724321293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Yang, Liangjian ; Cao, Kaijun</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Liangjian ; Cao, Kaijun</creatorcontrib><description>Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are direct influences on human well-being and sustainable development, and they have become increasingly important in the development and progress of society. This paper reviewed 1248 papers on CESs by using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. On this basis, we also reviewed 179 selected empirical papers related to this field, with regards to geographical locations, study objects, evaluation methods, and categories. The results show that: (1) the number of publications related to cultural services has increased year by year, and Ecosystem Services, Ecological Indicators, and Sustainability are the top three journals with the greatest amount of research published; (2) ecosystem services, benefits, management, and social–ecological systems are perceptions closely related to CES research, which are also popular topics in the field; (3) the results of a keyword detection show that the cultural landscapes, patterns, mental health services, social value, and other keywords were popular keywords used from 2005 to 2021; (4) CESs have mainly attracted the attention of many developed countries, and the cultural services in cities, oceans, and coastal areas have become the focus for researchers; (5) the recreation and ecotourism, and aesthetic values are the common categories of the CES empirical studies, while the knowledge system and the cultural diversity are the two categories with the least amount of research; (6) the evaluation methods of CESs are mostly carried out using a traditional questionnaire and interview, but mapping and modeling methods have been widely used in recent years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su141911845</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Categories ; Classification ; Coastal zone ; Cultural heritage ; Developed countries ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Ecotourism ; Environment ; Environmental aspects ; Geographical locations ; Keywords ; Mental health ; Methods ; Oceans ; Quality of life ; Research methodology ; Reviews ; Social aspects ; Spirituality ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-09, Vol.14 (19), p.11845</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e8c9968916472949359ea39c3ef93135b39693ad71894d038f52deafde3c7a0e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e8c9968916472949359ea39c3ef93135b39693ad71894d038f52deafde3c7a0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4769-759X ; 0000-0003-0076-7044</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Liangjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Kaijun</creatorcontrib><title>Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are direct influences on human well-being and sustainable development, and they have become increasingly important in the development and progress of society. This paper reviewed 1248 papers on CESs by using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. On this basis, we also reviewed 179 selected empirical papers related to this field, with regards to geographical locations, study objects, evaluation methods, and categories. The results show that: (1) the number of publications related to cultural services has increased year by year, and Ecosystem Services, Ecological Indicators, and Sustainability are the top three journals with the greatest amount of research published; (2) ecosystem services, benefits, management, and social–ecological systems are perceptions closely related to CES research, which are also popular topics in the field; (3) the results of a keyword detection show that the cultural landscapes, patterns, mental health services, social value, and other keywords were popular keywords used from 2005 to 2021; (4) CESs have mainly attracted the attention of many developed countries, and the cultural services in cities, oceans, and coastal areas have become the focus for researchers; (5) the recreation and ecotourism, and aesthetic values are the common categories of the CES empirical studies, while the knowledge system and the cultural diversity are the two categories with the least amount of research; (6) the evaluation methods of CESs are mostly carried out using a traditional questionnaire and interview, but mapping and modeling methods have been widely used in recent years.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Coastal zone</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Ecotourism</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Geographical locations</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkd9Lw0AMx4soOOae_AcKPol03jX9Fd_G2HQwUDZ9Ps5rOju2dl7a6f57b0xwA5OHhPD55guJ511L0QdAcc-tjCRKmUXxmdcJRSoDKWJxftRfej3mpXAB4NCk402H7apprV75I1Pzjhta-3Oy29IQ-zNi0tZ8-C-2Xlhi9nWV--PWCWg_4w2Zhh_8gSO3JX1deReFXjH1fmvXexuPXodPwfT5cTIcTAMDITYBZQYxyZx_lIYYIcRIGtAAFQgS4nfABEHnqcwwygVkRRzmpIucwKRaEHS9m8Peja0_W-JGLevWVs5ShWkYQShDhD9qoVekyqqoG6vNumSjBmmUYIwYx47q_0O5zGldmrqionTzE8HticAxDX03C90yq8l8dsreHVjjjsWWCrWx5VrbnZJC7Z-mjp4GP5v0hec</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Yang, Liangjian</creator><creator>Cao, Kaijun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4769-759X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-7044</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review</title><author>Yang, Liangjian ; Cao, Kaijun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-e8c9968916472949359ea39c3ef93135b39693ad71894d038f52deafde3c7a0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Coastal zone</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Ecotourism</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Geographical locations</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Liangjian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Kaijun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Liangjian</au><au>Cao, Kaijun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>11845</spage><pages>11845-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) are direct influences on human well-being and sustainable development, and they have become increasingly important in the development and progress of society. This paper reviewed 1248 papers on CESs by using VOSviewer and CiteSpace software. On this basis, we also reviewed 179 selected empirical papers related to this field, with regards to geographical locations, study objects, evaluation methods, and categories. The results show that: (1) the number of publications related to cultural services has increased year by year, and Ecosystem Services, Ecological Indicators, and Sustainability are the top three journals with the greatest amount of research published; (2) ecosystem services, benefits, management, and social–ecological systems are perceptions closely related to CES research, which are also popular topics in the field; (3) the results of a keyword detection show that the cultural landscapes, patterns, mental health services, social value, and other keywords were popular keywords used from 2005 to 2021; (4) CESs have mainly attracted the attention of many developed countries, and the cultural services in cities, oceans, and coastal areas have become the focus for researchers; (5) the recreation and ecotourism, and aesthetic values are the common categories of the CES empirical studies, while the knowledge system and the cultural diversity are the two categories with the least amount of research; (6) the evaluation methods of CESs are mostly carried out using a traditional questionnaire and interview, but mapping and modeling methods have been widely used in recent years.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su141911845</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4769-759X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-7044</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-09, Vol.14 (19), p.11845
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2724321293
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Bibliometrics
Categories
Classification
Coastal zone
Cultural heritage
Developed countries
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Ecotourism
Environment
Environmental aspects
Geographical locations
Keywords
Mental health
Methods
Oceans
Quality of life
Research methodology
Reviews
Social aspects
Spirituality
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Systematic review
title Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T12%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultural%20Ecosystem%20Services%20Research%20Progress%20and%20Future%20Prospects:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Yang,%20Liangjian&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=11845&rft.pages=11845-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su141911845&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA746959955%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724321293&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A746959955&rfr_iscdi=true