Despite Being Distinguished as the 2020 European Green Capital, Lisbon Has Lost Public Green Areas over the Previous Decade
With the objective of assessing Lisbon’s environmental improvement and sustainable development, we measured the changes in Lisbon’s vegetation cover over the 2010–2020 timeframe considering three categories: public green areas (PGA), street trees (ST), and urban green infrastructure (UGI). We calcul...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-09, Vol.14 (19), p.12112 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 12112 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | de Almeida, Juscidalva Rodrigues Alves, Gustavo Benedito Medeiros Nunes, Reginaldo de Oliveira Dias, Teresa |
description | With the objective of assessing Lisbon’s environmental improvement and sustainable development, we measured the changes in Lisbon’s vegetation cover over the 2010–2020 timeframe considering three categories: public green areas (PGA), street trees (ST), and urban green infrastructure (UGI). We calculated the vegetation cover (m2), vegetation cover per resident (m2 person−1), and % of vegetation cover. PGA and ST covers were made available by the municipality, while UGI cover was estimated from the NDVI calculated from multispectral satellite images (Landsat 7–8). Since only the PGA cover decreased 2% (the ST and UGI covers increased 38% and 5%, respectively), Lisbon has lost PGA over the previous decade. The values of PGA per resident were below the minimum value of 12 m2 person−1 at the city scale and in most parishes (19 parishes out of 24 in 2020). While the values of % of UGI were above the desired value of 30% at the city scale, in 2020 there were three parishes with values below the minimum of 5%. This information is important to prioritize measures that promote sustainable urbanization in those parishes. Our study raised many questions, suggesting the need to standardize the methods for measuring the urban vegetation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su141912112 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2724319250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A746960357</galeid><sourcerecordid>A746960357</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f53608ecf5ed9f9f50ed367449956ebe95be183cce10bd5a8e6a2d4e46a5d6483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkdtKAzEQhhdRUKpXvkDAK9FqDpts97K2nqCgeLgO2exsG2k3NZMVxZc3WsEWnJsZfr5_hpnJskNGz4Qo6Tl2LGcl44zxrWyP04L1GZV0e63ezQ4QX2gKIRKq9rLPMeDSRSAX4NopGTuMKXcOZ1ATgyTOgHDKKbnsgl-Cacl1AGjJyCSXmZ-SicPKt-QmsROPkdx31dzZX2oYIOn-DcJPo_sAb853SMZgTQ372U5j5ggHv7mXPV9dPo1u-pO769vRcNK3QsrYb6RQdAC2kVCXTdlICrVQRZ6XpVRQQSkrYANhLTBa1dIMQBle55ArI2uVD0QvO1r1XQb_2gFG_eK70KaRmhc8T5fgkv5RUzMH7drGx2DswqHVwyJXpaJCFok6-4cy3-ssnPUtNC7pG4bjDUNiIrzHqekQ9e3jwyZ7smJt8IgBGr0MbmHCh2ZUf_9Yr_1YfAGx95XJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2724319250</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Despite Being Distinguished as the 2020 European Green Capital, Lisbon Has Lost Public Green Areas over the Previous Decade</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>de Almeida, Juscidalva Rodrigues ; Alves, Gustavo Benedito Medeiros ; Nunes, Reginaldo de Oliveira ; Dias, Teresa</creator><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Juscidalva Rodrigues ; Alves, Gustavo Benedito Medeiros ; Nunes, Reginaldo de Oliveira ; Dias, Teresa</creatorcontrib><description>With the objective of assessing Lisbon’s environmental improvement and sustainable development, we measured the changes in Lisbon’s vegetation cover over the 2010–2020 timeframe considering three categories: public green areas (PGA), street trees (ST), and urban green infrastructure (UGI). We calculated the vegetation cover (m2), vegetation cover per resident (m2 person−1), and % of vegetation cover. PGA and ST covers were made available by the municipality, while UGI cover was estimated from the NDVI calculated from multispectral satellite images (Landsat 7–8). Since only the PGA cover decreased 2% (the ST and UGI covers increased 38% and 5%, respectively), Lisbon has lost PGA over the previous decade. The values of PGA per resident were below the minimum value of 12 m2 person−1 at the city scale and in most parishes (19 parishes out of 24 in 2020). While the values of % of UGI were above the desired value of 30% at the city scale, in 2020 there were three parishes with values below the minimum of 5%. This information is important to prioritize measures that promote sustainable urbanization in those parishes. Our study raised many questions, suggesting the need to standardize the methods for measuring the urban vegetation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su141912112</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Biodiversity ; Cities ; Climate change ; Environmental quality ; Gardens & gardening ; Heat ; International organizations ; Landsat ; Measurement methods ; Precipitation ; Satellite imagery ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Urbanization ; Vegetation ; Vegetation cover</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-09, Vol.14 (19), p.12112</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f53608ecf5ed9f9f50ed367449956ebe95be183cce10bd5a8e6a2d4e46a5d6483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f53608ecf5ed9f9f50ed367449956ebe95be183cce10bd5a8e6a2d4e46a5d6483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5421-4763 ; 0000-0003-1048-6094</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Juscidalva Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Gustavo Benedito Medeiros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Reginaldo de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Teresa</creatorcontrib><title>Despite Being Distinguished as the 2020 European Green Capital, Lisbon Has Lost Public Green Areas over the Previous Decade</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>With the objective of assessing Lisbon’s environmental improvement and sustainable development, we measured the changes in Lisbon’s vegetation cover over the 2010–2020 timeframe considering three categories: public green areas (PGA), street trees (ST), and urban green infrastructure (UGI). We calculated the vegetation cover (m2), vegetation cover per resident (m2 person−1), and % of vegetation cover. PGA and ST covers were made available by the municipality, while UGI cover was estimated from the NDVI calculated from multispectral satellite images (Landsat 7–8). Since only the PGA cover decreased 2% (the ST and UGI covers increased 38% and 5%, respectively), Lisbon has lost PGA over the previous decade. The values of PGA per resident were below the minimum value of 12 m2 person−1 at the city scale and in most parishes (19 parishes out of 24 in 2020). While the values of % of UGI were above the desired value of 30% at the city scale, in 2020 there were three parishes with values below the minimum of 5%. This information is important to prioritize measures that promote sustainable urbanization in those parishes. Our study raised many questions, suggesting the need to standardize the methods for measuring the urban vegetation.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Gardens & gardening</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkdtKAzEQhhdRUKpXvkDAK9FqDpts97K2nqCgeLgO2exsG2k3NZMVxZc3WsEWnJsZfr5_hpnJskNGz4Qo6Tl2LGcl44zxrWyP04L1GZV0e63ezQ4QX2gKIRKq9rLPMeDSRSAX4NopGTuMKXcOZ1ATgyTOgHDKKbnsgl-Cacl1AGjJyCSXmZ-SicPKt-QmsROPkdx31dzZX2oYIOn-DcJPo_sAb853SMZgTQ372U5j5ggHv7mXPV9dPo1u-pO769vRcNK3QsrYb6RQdAC2kVCXTdlICrVQRZ6XpVRQQSkrYANhLTBa1dIMQBle55ArI2uVD0QvO1r1XQb_2gFG_eK70KaRmhc8T5fgkv5RUzMH7drGx2DswqHVwyJXpaJCFok6-4cy3-ssnPUtNC7pG4bjDUNiIrzHqekQ9e3jwyZ7smJt8IgBGr0MbmHCh2ZUf_9Yr_1YfAGx95XJ</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>de Almeida, Juscidalva Rodrigues</creator><creator>Alves, Gustavo Benedito Medeiros</creator><creator>Nunes, Reginaldo de Oliveira</creator><creator>Dias, Teresa</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5421-4763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-6094</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Despite Being Distinguished as the 2020 European Green Capital, Lisbon Has Lost Public Green Areas over the Previous Decade</title><author>de Almeida, Juscidalva Rodrigues ; Alves, Gustavo Benedito Medeiros ; Nunes, Reginaldo de Oliveira ; Dias, Teresa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-f53608ecf5ed9f9f50ed367449956ebe95be183cce10bd5a8e6a2d4e46a5d6483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Gardens & gardening</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Almeida, Juscidalva Rodrigues</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Gustavo Benedito Medeiros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, Reginaldo de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias, Teresa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Almeida, Juscidalva Rodrigues</au><au>Alves, Gustavo Benedito Medeiros</au><au>Nunes, Reginaldo de Oliveira</au><au>Dias, Teresa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Despite Being Distinguished as the 2020 European Green Capital, Lisbon Has Lost Public Green Areas over the Previous Decade</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>12112</spage><pages>12112-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>With the objective of assessing Lisbon’s environmental improvement and sustainable development, we measured the changes in Lisbon’s vegetation cover over the 2010–2020 timeframe considering three categories: public green areas (PGA), street trees (ST), and urban green infrastructure (UGI). We calculated the vegetation cover (m2), vegetation cover per resident (m2 person−1), and % of vegetation cover. PGA and ST covers were made available by the municipality, while UGI cover was estimated from the NDVI calculated from multispectral satellite images (Landsat 7–8). Since only the PGA cover decreased 2% (the ST and UGI covers increased 38% and 5%, respectively), Lisbon has lost PGA over the previous decade. The values of PGA per resident were below the minimum value of 12 m2 person−1 at the city scale and in most parishes (19 parishes out of 24 in 2020). While the values of % of UGI were above the desired value of 30% at the city scale, in 2020 there were three parishes with values below the minimum of 5%. This information is important to prioritize measures that promote sustainable urbanization in those parishes. Our study raised many questions, suggesting the need to standardize the methods for measuring the urban vegetation.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su141912112</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5421-4763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1048-6094</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-09, Vol.14 (19), p.12112 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2724319250 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Adaptation Biodiversity Cities Climate change Environmental quality Gardens & gardening Heat International organizations Landsat Measurement methods Precipitation Satellite imagery Sustainability Sustainable development Urbanization Vegetation Vegetation cover |
title | Despite Being Distinguished as the 2020 European Green Capital, Lisbon Has Lost Public Green Areas over the Previous Decade |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A52%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Despite%20Being%20Distinguished%20as%20the%202020%20European%20Green%20Capital,%20Lisbon%20Has%20Lost%20Public%20Green%20Areas%20over%20the%20Previous%20Decade&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=de%20Almeida,%20Juscidalva%20Rodrigues&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=12112&rft.pages=12112-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su141912112&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA746960357%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2724319250&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A746960357&rfr_iscdi=true |