Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration
Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constru...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.) Colo.), 2022-09, Vol.106 (3), p.547-563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 563 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 547 |
container_title | The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.) |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | De Costa, Peter I. Gajasinghe, Kasun Ojha, Laxmi Prasad Rabie–Ahmed, Amr |
description | Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/modl.12796 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2721460313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1350773</ericid><sourcerecordid>2721460313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-b4ab0e98de71c00d84fdbebbd249e87c86b04e513b7694187d9e8003538255533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVIIZu0l9wLgt4CTkaWbNm9bXa3TcKGlLI5G1matRW81la2k-wtt14LfcM8Se11yTFzGZj_4xv4CTllcM76udg4U52zUKbxAZmwSEAgZMIOyQQgjAOZQnhEjpvmAQAYS8SE_L701hS2LmhbIv2JDSqvS_SvL39_eKVb21pXo6dz-2gN0lXpXVeUdOY2m6627e715c-iLlSBhk71wL45vtJpj1WVyp1XrX1EOu1ah21Zu8KrbWk1XTxvq33o6o_kw1pVDX76v0_I_bfFanYVLO--X8-my0DzkMdBLlQOmCYGJdMAJhFrk2Oem1CkmEidxDkIjBjPZZwKlkjTnwF4xJMwiiLOT8iX0bv17leHTZs9uM7X_csslCETMXA2UGcjpb1rGo_rbOvtRvldxiAbis6GorN90T38eYTRW_0GLm4Yj0DKQcbG_MlWuHvHlN3ezZej8x-RiY3f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2721460313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>De Costa, Peter I. ; Gajasinghe, Kasun ; Ojha, Laxmi Prasad ; Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creator><creatorcontrib>De Costa, Peter I. ; Gajasinghe, Kasun ; Ojha, Laxmi Prasad ; Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creatorcontrib><description>Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-7902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-4781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/modl.12796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley</publisher><subject>Action Research ; Autobiographies ; Autoethnography ; Collaboration ; collaborative autoethnography ; Cooperation ; Educational Research ; Ethics ; Ethnography ; Language Acquisition ; Language Teachers ; Researchers ; research–practice gap ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Second language teachers ; Teacher Collaboration ; Teacher education ; Teacher Educators ; Teacher Researchers ; teacher–research collaboration ; Theory Practice Relationship</subject><ispartof>The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.), 2022-09, Vol.106 (3), p.547-563</ispartof><rights>National Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations.</rights><rights>2022 by The Modern Language Journal.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-b4ab0e98de71c00d84fdbebbd249e87c86b04e513b7694187d9e8003538255533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-b4ab0e98de71c00d84fdbebbd249e87c86b04e513b7694187d9e8003538255533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2088-5921 ; 0000-0003-0389-1163 ; 0000-0003-2241-9331 ; 0000-0001-9861-5625</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmodl.12796$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmodl.12796$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27902,27903,45552,45553</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1350773$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Costa, Peter I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajasinghe, Kasun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Laxmi Prasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creatorcontrib><title>Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration</title><title>The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.)</title><description>Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.</description><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Autobiographies</subject><subject>Autoethnography</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>collaborative autoethnography</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>research–practice gap</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second language teachers</subject><subject>Teacher Collaboration</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teacher Researchers</subject><subject>teacher–research collaboration</subject><subject>Theory Practice Relationship</subject><issn>0026-7902</issn><issn>1540-4781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVIIZu0l9wLgt4CTkaWbNm9bXa3TcKGlLI5G1matRW81la2k-wtt14LfcM8Se11yTFzGZj_4xv4CTllcM76udg4U52zUKbxAZmwSEAgZMIOyQQgjAOZQnhEjpvmAQAYS8SE_L701hS2LmhbIv2JDSqvS_SvL39_eKVb21pXo6dz-2gN0lXpXVeUdOY2m6627e715c-iLlSBhk71wL45vtJpj1WVyp1XrX1EOu1ah21Zu8KrbWk1XTxvq33o6o_kw1pVDX76v0_I_bfFanYVLO--X8-my0DzkMdBLlQOmCYGJdMAJhFrk2Oem1CkmEidxDkIjBjPZZwKlkjTnwF4xJMwiiLOT8iX0bv17leHTZs9uM7X_csslCETMXA2UGcjpb1rGo_rbOvtRvldxiAbis6GorN90T38eYTRW_0GLm4Yj0DKQcbG_MlWuHvHlN3ezZej8x-RiY3f</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>De Costa, Peter I.</creator><creator>Gajasinghe, Kasun</creator><creator>Ojha, Laxmi Prasad</creator><creator>Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-5921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-1163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-9331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-5625</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration</title><author>De Costa, Peter I. ; Gajasinghe, Kasun ; Ojha, Laxmi Prasad ; Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-b4ab0e98de71c00d84fdbebbd249e87c86b04e513b7694187d9e8003538255533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Autobiographies</topic><topic>Autoethnography</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>collaborative autoethnography</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>research–practice gap</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second language teachers</topic><topic>Teacher Collaboration</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teacher Researchers</topic><topic>teacher–research collaboration</topic><topic>Theory Practice Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Costa, Peter I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajasinghe, Kasun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Laxmi Prasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Costa, Peter I.</au><au>Gajasinghe, Kasun</au><au>Ojha, Laxmi Prasad</au><au>Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1350773</ericid><atitle>Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration</atitle><jtitle>The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.)</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>547-563</pages><issn>0026-7902</issn><eissn>1540-4781</eissn><abstract>Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/modl.12796</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-5921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-1163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-9331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-5625</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-7902 |
ispartof | The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.), 2022-09, Vol.106 (3), p.547-563 |
issn | 0026-7902 1540-4781 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2721460313 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Action Research Autobiographies Autoethnography Collaboration collaborative autoethnography Cooperation Educational Research Ethics Ethnography Language Acquisition Language Teachers Researchers research–practice gap Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Second language teachers Teacher Collaboration Teacher education Teacher Educators Teacher Researchers teacher–research collaboration Theory Practice Relationship |
title | Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A21%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging%20the%20Researcher%E2%80%93Practitioner%20Divide%20Through%20Community%E2%80%90Engaged%20Action%20Research:%20A%20Collaborative%20Autoethnographic%20Exploration&rft.jtitle=The%20Modern%20language%20journal%20(Boulder,%20Colo.)&rft.au=De%20Costa,%20Peter%20I.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=547-563&rft.issn=0026-7902&rft.eissn=1540-4781&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/modl.12796&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2721460313%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2721460313&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1350773&rfr_iscdi=true |