Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration

Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.) Colo.), 2022-09, Vol.106 (3), p.547-563
Hauptverfasser: De Costa, Peter I., Gajasinghe, Kasun, Ojha, Laxmi Prasad, Rabie–Ahmed, Amr
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 563
container_issue 3
container_start_page 547
container_title The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.)
container_volume 106
creator De Costa, Peter I.
Gajasinghe, Kasun
Ojha, Laxmi Prasad
Rabie–Ahmed, Amr
description Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/modl.12796
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2721460313</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1350773</ericid><sourcerecordid>2721460313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-b4ab0e98de71c00d84fdbebbd249e87c86b04e513b7694187d9e8003538255533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVIIZu0l9wLgt4CTkaWbNm9bXa3TcKGlLI5G1matRW81la2k-wtt14LfcM8Se11yTFzGZj_4xv4CTllcM76udg4U52zUKbxAZmwSEAgZMIOyQQgjAOZQnhEjpvmAQAYS8SE_L701hS2LmhbIv2JDSqvS_SvL39_eKVb21pXo6dz-2gN0lXpXVeUdOY2m6627e715c-iLlSBhk71wL45vtJpj1WVyp1XrX1EOu1ah21Zu8KrbWk1XTxvq33o6o_kw1pVDX76v0_I_bfFanYVLO--X8-my0DzkMdBLlQOmCYGJdMAJhFrk2Oem1CkmEidxDkIjBjPZZwKlkjTnwF4xJMwiiLOT8iX0bv17leHTZs9uM7X_csslCETMXA2UGcjpb1rGo_rbOvtRvldxiAbis6GorN90T38eYTRW_0GLm4Yj0DKQcbG_MlWuHvHlN3ezZej8x-RiY3f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2721460313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>De Costa, Peter I. ; Gajasinghe, Kasun ; Ojha, Laxmi Prasad ; Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creator><creatorcontrib>De Costa, Peter I. ; Gajasinghe, Kasun ; Ojha, Laxmi Prasad ; Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creatorcontrib><description>Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-7902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-4781</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/modl.12796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley</publisher><subject>Action Research ; Autobiographies ; Autoethnography ; Collaboration ; collaborative autoethnography ; Cooperation ; Educational Research ; Ethics ; Ethnography ; Language Acquisition ; Language Teachers ; Researchers ; research–practice gap ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Second language teachers ; Teacher Collaboration ; Teacher education ; Teacher Educators ; Teacher Researchers ; teacher–research collaboration ; Theory Practice Relationship</subject><ispartof>The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.), 2022-09, Vol.106 (3), p.547-563</ispartof><rights>National Federation of Modern Language Teachers Associations.</rights><rights>2022 by The Modern Language Journal.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-b4ab0e98de71c00d84fdbebbd249e87c86b04e513b7694187d9e8003538255533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-b4ab0e98de71c00d84fdbebbd249e87c86b04e513b7694187d9e8003538255533</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2088-5921 ; 0000-0003-0389-1163 ; 0000-0003-2241-9331 ; 0000-0001-9861-5625</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmodl.12796$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmodl.12796$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27902,27903,45552,45553</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1350773$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Costa, Peter I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajasinghe, Kasun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Laxmi Prasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creatorcontrib><title>Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration</title><title>The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.)</title><description>Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.</description><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Autobiographies</subject><subject>Autoethnography</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>collaborative autoethnography</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>research–practice gap</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second language teachers</subject><subject>Teacher Collaboration</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teacher Researchers</subject><subject>teacher–research collaboration</subject><subject>Theory Practice Relationship</subject><issn>0026-7902</issn><issn>1540-4781</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFq3DAQhkVIIZu0l9wLgt4CTkaWbNm9bXa3TcKGlLI5G1matRW81la2k-wtt14LfcM8Se11yTFzGZj_4xv4CTllcM76udg4U52zUKbxAZmwSEAgZMIOyQQgjAOZQnhEjpvmAQAYS8SE_L701hS2LmhbIv2JDSqvS_SvL39_eKVb21pXo6dz-2gN0lXpXVeUdOY2m6627e715c-iLlSBhk71wL45vtJpj1WVyp1XrX1EOu1ah21Zu8KrbWk1XTxvq33o6o_kw1pVDX76v0_I_bfFanYVLO--X8-my0DzkMdBLlQOmCYGJdMAJhFrk2Oem1CkmEidxDkIjBjPZZwKlkjTnwF4xJMwiiLOT8iX0bv17leHTZs9uM7X_csslCETMXA2UGcjpb1rGo_rbOvtRvldxiAbis6GorN90T38eYTRW_0GLm4Yj0DKQcbG_MlWuHvHlN3ezZej8x-RiY3f</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>De Costa, Peter I.</creator><creator>Gajasinghe, Kasun</creator><creator>Ojha, Laxmi Prasad</creator><creator>Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-5921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-1163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-9331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-5625</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration</title><author>De Costa, Peter I. ; Gajasinghe, Kasun ; Ojha, Laxmi Prasad ; Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3236-b4ab0e98de71c00d84fdbebbd249e87c86b04e513b7694187d9e8003538255533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Autobiographies</topic><topic>Autoethnography</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>collaborative autoethnography</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>research–practice gap</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second language teachers</topic><topic>Teacher Collaboration</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teacher Researchers</topic><topic>teacher–research collaboration</topic><topic>Theory Practice Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Costa, Peter I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajasinghe, Kasun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Laxmi Prasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Costa, Peter I.</au><au>Gajasinghe, Kasun</au><au>Ojha, Laxmi Prasad</au><au>Rabie–Ahmed, Amr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1350773</ericid><atitle>Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration</atitle><jtitle>The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.)</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>547-563</pages><issn>0026-7902</issn><eissn>1540-4781</eissn><abstract>Consistent with recent calls to bridge the research–practice divide in second language acquisition, this article reports on the findings of a collaborative autoethnographic study that we, authors of this article, conducted as critical second language teacher educators. Conducting a series of constructive dialogues among ourselves for a semester, we focused on how our acts of reciprocal reflexivity were characterized by discussions and subsequent actions with our teacher partners located in different parts of the world and working in diverse contexts. Our data, which included reflective journal entries, phenomenological interviews, artefacts, and audio‐recorded group conversations, illustrate how we fostered constructive researcher–practitioner collaborations. These collaborations were mediated within and outside our classroom settings, as we sought to ultimately improve our own pedagogical practices. In contrast to working from an ivory tower and in keeping with our commitment to promoting equitable educational and research practices, our article also demonstrates and problematizes how we conducted our research in an ethical manner when designing, carrying out, and subsequently disseminating our findings to multiple audiences.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/modl.12796</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-5921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-1163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-9331</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9861-5625</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-7902
ispartof The Modern language journal (Boulder, Colo.), 2022-09, Vol.106 (3), p.547-563
issn 0026-7902
1540-4781
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2721460313
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Action Research
Autobiographies
Autoethnography
Collaboration
collaborative autoethnography
Cooperation
Educational Research
Ethics
Ethnography
Language Acquisition
Language Teachers
Researchers
research–practice gap
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Second language teachers
Teacher Collaboration
Teacher education
Teacher Educators
Teacher Researchers
teacher–research collaboration
Theory Practice Relationship
title Bridging the Researcher–Practitioner Divide Through Community‐Engaged Action Research: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Exploration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A21%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bridging%20the%20Researcher%E2%80%93Practitioner%20Divide%20Through%20Community%E2%80%90Engaged%20Action%20Research:%20A%20Collaborative%20Autoethnographic%20Exploration&rft.jtitle=The%20Modern%20language%20journal%20(Boulder,%20Colo.)&rft.au=De%20Costa,%20Peter%20I.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=547-563&rft.issn=0026-7902&rft.eissn=1540-4781&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/modl.12796&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2721460313%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2721460313&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1350773&rfr_iscdi=true