Fatigue Behavior of a Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy Welding Joint With and Without Natural Defect

In order to investigate the influence of natural defect on the fatigue behavior of 5A06/7A05 dissimilar aluminum alloys welding joint, fatigue tests of two types of specimens with and without defects were carried out systematically under stress amplitude control conditions (stress ratio R =0.1) at n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials science edition 2022-10, Vol.37 (5), p.1000-1008
Hauptverfasser: Shi, Liang, Wang, Chiquan, Liu, Zhiyi, Wang, Juntao, Wang, Wukun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1008
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1000
container_title Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials science edition
container_volume 37
creator Shi, Liang
Wang, Chiquan
Liu, Zhiyi
Wang, Juntao
Wang, Wukun
description In order to investigate the influence of natural defect on the fatigue behavior of 5A06/7A05 dissimilar aluminum alloys welding joint, fatigue tests of two types of specimens with and without defects were carried out systematically under stress amplitude control conditions (stress ratio R =0.1) at normal temperature in laboratory air condition. Furthermore, a new parameter, i e , fatigue defect effect factor (FDEF) was introduced to assess the effect of defect on fatigue strength. The fatigue failure analysis was conducted as well to compare the fatigue and fracture behavior of the two types of specimens. The results show that: (1) natural defects have a strong effect on the fatigue lives of welding joint, and the differences between the specimens with and without defects can reach 80 times under a same theoretical net sectional stress; (2) the FDEF parameter introduced is effective to deal with the defect effect, and the FDEF decreases along with the increase of fatigue life. The mean relative error between the experimental data and predicted fatigue strength based on the FDEF is 10.2%; (3) the macro fracture of both types of specimens have three typical zones, i e , fatigue source zone, crack propagation zone and final fracture zone, while there are more than one fatigue sources for specimens with natural defects. The overall pattern of crack propagation zone and fracture zone are quite similar, but the morphologies are different in details.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11595-022-2623-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2720947060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2720947060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-6665d5a7817941b64776be4c4f80f1c7f64d827e6c09ef4b8f636236f46742173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwAGyWmAPHjmMnYymUiypYQJ2Q5SZ26yqXYjtIeXtcgsTEdP7hv-h8CF0SuCYA4sYTkhVZApQmlNM0GY7QhBRFmgBLxXHUAJBQRtJTdOb9DoBByvkEfSxUsJte41u9VV-2c7gzWOE7671tbK0cntV9Y9u-iaLuBrzSdWXbDX7ubBvwyoYtVm31I7o-4BcVeqdqfKeNLsM5OjGq9vri907R--L-bf6YLF8fnuazZVKSIg8J5zyrMiVyIgpG1pwJwdealczkYEgpDGdVToXmJRTasHVueBqf5IZxwSgR6RRdjb1713322ge563rXxklJBYWCCeAQXWR0la7z3mkj9842yg2SgDxQlCNFGSnKA0U5xAwdMz562412f83_h74BegF0Aw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720947060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fatigue Behavior of a Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy Welding Joint With and Without Natural Defect</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shi, Liang ; Wang, Chiquan ; Liu, Zhiyi ; Wang, Juntao ; Wang, Wukun</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Liang ; Wang, Chiquan ; Liu, Zhiyi ; Wang, Juntao ; Wang, Wukun</creatorcontrib><description>In order to investigate the influence of natural defect on the fatigue behavior of 5A06/7A05 dissimilar aluminum alloys welding joint, fatigue tests of two types of specimens with and without defects were carried out systematically under stress amplitude control conditions (stress ratio R =0.1) at normal temperature in laboratory air condition. Furthermore, a new parameter, i e , fatigue defect effect factor (FDEF) was introduced to assess the effect of defect on fatigue strength. The fatigue failure analysis was conducted as well to compare the fatigue and fracture behavior of the two types of specimens. The results show that: (1) natural defects have a strong effect on the fatigue lives of welding joint, and the differences between the specimens with and without defects can reach 80 times under a same theoretical net sectional stress; (2) the FDEF parameter introduced is effective to deal with the defect effect, and the FDEF decreases along with the increase of fatigue life. The mean relative error between the experimental data and predicted fatigue strength based on the FDEF is 10.2%; (3) the macro fracture of both types of specimens have three typical zones, i e , fatigue source zone, crack propagation zone and final fracture zone, while there are more than one fatigue sources for specimens with natural defects. The overall pattern of crack propagation zone and fracture zone are quite similar, but the morphologies are different in details.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1000-2413</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-0437</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11595-022-2623-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Aluminum base alloys ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Crack propagation ; Defects ; Dissimilar material joining ; Failure analysis ; Fatigue failure ; Fatigue life ; Fatigue strength ; Fatigue tests ; Materials Science ; Metal fatigue ; Metallic Materials ; Parameters ; Stress ratio ; Welded joints ; Welding</subject><ispartof>Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials science edition, 2022-10, Vol.37 (5), p.1000-1008</ispartof><rights>Wuhan University of Technology and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>Wuhan University of Technology and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, Part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-6665d5a7817941b64776be4c4f80f1c7f64d827e6c09ef4b8f636236f46742173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11595-022-2623-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11595-022-2623-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chiquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Juntao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wukun</creatorcontrib><title>Fatigue Behavior of a Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy Welding Joint With and Without Natural Defect</title><title>Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials science edition</title><addtitle>J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit</addtitle><description>In order to investigate the influence of natural defect on the fatigue behavior of 5A06/7A05 dissimilar aluminum alloys welding joint, fatigue tests of two types of specimens with and without defects were carried out systematically under stress amplitude control conditions (stress ratio R =0.1) at normal temperature in laboratory air condition. Furthermore, a new parameter, i e , fatigue defect effect factor (FDEF) was introduced to assess the effect of defect on fatigue strength. The fatigue failure analysis was conducted as well to compare the fatigue and fracture behavior of the two types of specimens. The results show that: (1) natural defects have a strong effect on the fatigue lives of welding joint, and the differences between the specimens with and without defects can reach 80 times under a same theoretical net sectional stress; (2) the FDEF parameter introduced is effective to deal with the defect effect, and the FDEF decreases along with the increase of fatigue life. The mean relative error between the experimental data and predicted fatigue strength based on the FDEF is 10.2%; (3) the macro fracture of both types of specimens have three typical zones, i e , fatigue source zone, crack propagation zone and final fracture zone, while there are more than one fatigue sources for specimens with natural defects. The overall pattern of crack propagation zone and fracture zone are quite similar, but the morphologies are different in details.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum base alloys</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Dissimilar material joining</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Fatigue failure</subject><subject>Fatigue life</subject><subject>Fatigue strength</subject><subject>Fatigue tests</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Metal fatigue</subject><subject>Metallic Materials</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Stress ratio</subject><subject>Welded joints</subject><subject>Welding</subject><issn>1000-2413</issn><issn>1993-0437</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqXwAGyWmAPHjmMnYymUiypYQJ2Q5SZ26yqXYjtIeXtcgsTEdP7hv-h8CF0SuCYA4sYTkhVZApQmlNM0GY7QhBRFmgBLxXHUAJBQRtJTdOb9DoBByvkEfSxUsJte41u9VV-2c7gzWOE7671tbK0cntV9Y9u-iaLuBrzSdWXbDX7ubBvwyoYtVm31I7o-4BcVeqdqfKeNLsM5OjGq9vri907R--L-bf6YLF8fnuazZVKSIg8J5zyrMiVyIgpG1pwJwdealczkYEgpDGdVToXmJRTasHVueBqf5IZxwSgR6RRdjb1713322ge563rXxklJBYWCCeAQXWR0la7z3mkj9842yg2SgDxQlCNFGSnKA0U5xAwdMz562412f83_h74BegF0Aw</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Shi, Liang</creator><creator>Wang, Chiquan</creator><creator>Liu, Zhiyi</creator><creator>Wang, Juntao</creator><creator>Wang, Wukun</creator><general>Wuhan University of Technology</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Fatigue Behavior of a Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy Welding Joint With and Without Natural Defect</title><author>Shi, Liang ; Wang, Chiquan ; Liu, Zhiyi ; Wang, Juntao ; Wang, Wukun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c198t-6665d5a7817941b64776be4c4f80f1c7f64d827e6c09ef4b8f636236f46742173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum base alloys</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Dissimilar material joining</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Fatigue failure</topic><topic>Fatigue life</topic><topic>Fatigue strength</topic><topic>Fatigue tests</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Metal fatigue</topic><topic>Metallic Materials</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Stress ratio</topic><topic>Welded joints</topic><topic>Welding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chiquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Juntao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Wukun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials science edition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Liang</au><au>Wang, Chiquan</au><au>Liu, Zhiyi</au><au>Wang, Juntao</au><au>Wang, Wukun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fatigue Behavior of a Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy Welding Joint With and Without Natural Defect</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials science edition</jtitle><stitle>J. Wuhan Univ. Technol.-Mat. Sci. Edit</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1000</spage><epage>1008</epage><pages>1000-1008</pages><issn>1000-2413</issn><eissn>1993-0437</eissn><abstract>In order to investigate the influence of natural defect on the fatigue behavior of 5A06/7A05 dissimilar aluminum alloys welding joint, fatigue tests of two types of specimens with and without defects were carried out systematically under stress amplitude control conditions (stress ratio R =0.1) at normal temperature in laboratory air condition. Furthermore, a new parameter, i e , fatigue defect effect factor (FDEF) was introduced to assess the effect of defect on fatigue strength. The fatigue failure analysis was conducted as well to compare the fatigue and fracture behavior of the two types of specimens. The results show that: (1) natural defects have a strong effect on the fatigue lives of welding joint, and the differences between the specimens with and without defects can reach 80 times under a same theoretical net sectional stress; (2) the FDEF parameter introduced is effective to deal with the defect effect, and the FDEF decreases along with the increase of fatigue life. The mean relative error between the experimental data and predicted fatigue strength based on the FDEF is 10.2%; (3) the macro fracture of both types of specimens have three typical zones, i e , fatigue source zone, crack propagation zone and final fracture zone, while there are more than one fatigue sources for specimens with natural defects. The overall pattern of crack propagation zone and fracture zone are quite similar, but the morphologies are different in details.</abstract><cop>Wuhan</cop><pub>Wuhan University of Technology</pub><doi>10.1007/s11595-022-2623-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1000-2413
ispartof Journal of Wuhan University of Technology. Materials science edition, 2022-10, Vol.37 (5), p.1000-1008
issn 1000-2413
1993-0437
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2720947060
source SpringerNature Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aluminum
Aluminum base alloys
Chemistry and Materials Science
Crack propagation
Defects
Dissimilar material joining
Failure analysis
Fatigue failure
Fatigue life
Fatigue strength
Fatigue tests
Materials Science
Metal fatigue
Metallic Materials
Parameters
Stress ratio
Welded joints
Welding
title Fatigue Behavior of a Dissimilar Aluminum Alloy Welding Joint With and Without Natural Defect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A54%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fatigue%20Behavior%20of%20a%20Dissimilar%20Aluminum%20Alloy%20Welding%20Joint%20With%20and%20Without%20Natural%20Defect&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Wuhan%20University%20of%20Technology.%20Materials%20science%20edition&rft.au=Shi,%20Liang&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1000&rft.epage=1008&rft.pages=1000-1008&rft.issn=1000-2413&rft.eissn=1993-0437&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11595-022-2623-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2720947060%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720947060&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true