Cyclo‐olefin copolymer/poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) blends: Structure–property relationships and morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties

In this study, blends of cyclo‐olefin copolymers (COC) that had different monomer compositions and poly(Acrylonitrile‐Butadiene‐Styrene) (ABS) were prepared and variations in their morphological, rheological, and dynamic mechanical properties were investigated. In the morphological analyses, it was...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymer engineering and science 2022-10, Vol.62 (10), p.3254-3268
Hauptverfasser: Kurt, Gökçe, Tüney, İclal, Kasgoz, Alper
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3268
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3254
container_title Polymer engineering and science
container_volume 62
creator Kurt, Gökçe
Tüney, İclal
Kasgoz, Alper
description In this study, blends of cyclo‐olefin copolymers (COC) that had different monomer compositions and poly(Acrylonitrile‐Butadiene‐Styrene) (ABS) were prepared and variations in their morphological, rheological, and dynamic mechanical properties were investigated. In the morphological analyses, it was seen that all blends with 50/50% composition had a co‐continuous morphology, while droplet‐matrix morphology was observed for the other compositions. Melt‐state shear modulus and viscosity increased with the addition of ABS for the blends prepared with COC derivatives containing 40% and ⁓68% norbornene content by weight, while there was no significant change in the modulus values of those prepared with the COC derivative containing ⁓76% norbornene by weight. On the contrary to other blends, it was observed that the modulus values decreased with the addition of ABS in the blends prepared with COC with 82% norbornene content. Evaluation of the SEM images and Cole‐Cole plots indicated that COC‐rich blends were more compatible than the ABS‐rich blends in the case COC with lower norbornene content was used in polymer blends, while ABS‐rich blends became more compatible with increasing norbornene content of COC.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pen.26100
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2720293339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A724071310</galeid><sourcerecordid>A724071310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4390-926e514743e39d9ffb06ddff2c8f2c9f9955a78765e049a8c6e236483247afb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1q3DAQx01poNukh76BoZcG4l1Z8pd6C0v6ASEptD0LWR7ZCrLkSjLBtz5CoQ_R98qTRJsNpIEtQpoZzW_mD8MkydscrXOE8GYCs8ZVdF8kq7wsmgxXpHiZrBAiOCNN07xKXnt_gyJLSrpK_m4Xoe3dr99Wg1QmFXayehnBbXb2PRdu0dao4JSGSLVz4J0Cs_N9WFz0TtNWg-n8h_RbcLMIs4vJP5OzE7iwpA40D8oaP6jJp9x06WjdNFhteyW4PkvdAE_BQx7EwM0uTh-7KPAnyZHk2sObR3uc_Ph48X37Obu8_vRle36ZiYJQlFFcQZkXdUGA0I5K2aKq66TEoomXSkrLktdNXZWACsobUQEmVdEQXNRctg05Tt7t-0bpnzP4wG7s7EyUZLjGCFNCCH2ieq6BKSNtcFyMygt2XuMC1TnJUaSyA1QfZ-Z4HGqcd_x-xq8P8PF0MCpxsODsn4J29sqAj49X_RB8z2fvn-One1w4670DySanRu4WliO22x4Wt4c9bE9kN3v2Nmou_wfZ14urfcU9MFDMyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2720293339</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cyclo‐olefin copolymer/poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) blends: Structure–property relationships and morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Kurt, Gökçe ; Tüney, İclal ; Kasgoz, Alper</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Gökçe ; Tüney, İclal ; Kasgoz, Alper</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, blends of cyclo‐olefin copolymers (COC) that had different monomer compositions and poly(Acrylonitrile‐Butadiene‐Styrene) (ABS) were prepared and variations in their morphological, rheological, and dynamic mechanical properties were investigated. In the morphological analyses, it was seen that all blends with 50/50% composition had a co‐continuous morphology, while droplet‐matrix morphology was observed for the other compositions. Melt‐state shear modulus and viscosity increased with the addition of ABS for the blends prepared with COC derivatives containing 40% and ⁓68% norbornene content by weight, while there was no significant change in the modulus values of those prepared with the COC derivative containing ⁓76% norbornene by weight. On the contrary to other blends, it was observed that the modulus values decreased with the addition of ABS in the blends prepared with COC with 82% norbornene content. Evaluation of the SEM images and Cole‐Cole plots indicated that COC‐rich blends were more compatible than the ABS‐rich blends in the case COC with lower norbornene content was used in polymer blends, while ABS‐rich blends became more compatible with increasing norbornene content of COC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-2634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pen.26100</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Butadiene ; Composition ; Copolymers ; cyclo‐olefin copolymer (COC) ; Dynamic mechanical properties ; Mechanical properties ; Morphology ; poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) (ABS) ; Polymer blends ; Polymeric composites ; Polymers ; polymer blend ; Polyolefins ; Rheological properties ; Rheology ; Shear modulus ; Styrenes</subject><ispartof>Polymer engineering and science, 2022-10, Vol.62 (10), p.3254-3268</ispartof><rights>2022 Society of Plastics Engineers.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc.</rights><rights>2022 Society of Plastics Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4390-926e514743e39d9ffb06ddff2c8f2c9f9955a78765e049a8c6e236483247afb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4390-926e514743e39d9ffb06ddff2c8f2c9f9955a78765e049a8c6e236483247afb83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9869-8555</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpen.26100$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpen.26100$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Gökçe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tüney, İclal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasgoz, Alper</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclo‐olefin copolymer/poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) blends: Structure–property relationships and morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties</title><title>Polymer engineering and science</title><description>In this study, blends of cyclo‐olefin copolymers (COC) that had different monomer compositions and poly(Acrylonitrile‐Butadiene‐Styrene) (ABS) were prepared and variations in their morphological, rheological, and dynamic mechanical properties were investigated. In the morphological analyses, it was seen that all blends with 50/50% composition had a co‐continuous morphology, while droplet‐matrix morphology was observed for the other compositions. Melt‐state shear modulus and viscosity increased with the addition of ABS for the blends prepared with COC derivatives containing 40% and ⁓68% norbornene content by weight, while there was no significant change in the modulus values of those prepared with the COC derivative containing ⁓76% norbornene by weight. On the contrary to other blends, it was observed that the modulus values decreased with the addition of ABS in the blends prepared with COC with 82% norbornene content. Evaluation of the SEM images and Cole‐Cole plots indicated that COC‐rich blends were more compatible than the ABS‐rich blends in the case COC with lower norbornene content was used in polymer blends, while ABS‐rich blends became more compatible with increasing norbornene content of COC.</description><subject>Butadiene</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Copolymers</subject><subject>cyclo‐olefin copolymer (COC)</subject><subject>Dynamic mechanical properties</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) (ABS)</subject><subject>Polymer blends</subject><subject>Polymeric composites</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>polymer blend</subject><subject>Polyolefins</subject><subject>Rheological properties</subject><subject>Rheology</subject><subject>Shear modulus</subject><subject>Styrenes</subject><issn>0032-3888</issn><issn>1548-2634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1q3DAQx01poNukh76BoZcG4l1Z8pd6C0v6ASEptD0LWR7ZCrLkSjLBtz5CoQ_R98qTRJsNpIEtQpoZzW_mD8MkydscrXOE8GYCs8ZVdF8kq7wsmgxXpHiZrBAiOCNN07xKXnt_gyJLSrpK_m4Xoe3dr99Wg1QmFXayehnBbXb2PRdu0dao4JSGSLVz4J0Cs_N9WFz0TtNWg-n8h_RbcLMIs4vJP5OzE7iwpA40D8oaP6jJp9x06WjdNFhteyW4PkvdAE_BQx7EwM0uTh-7KPAnyZHk2sObR3uc_Ph48X37Obu8_vRle36ZiYJQlFFcQZkXdUGA0I5K2aKq66TEoomXSkrLktdNXZWACsobUQEmVdEQXNRctg05Tt7t-0bpnzP4wG7s7EyUZLjGCFNCCH2ieq6BKSNtcFyMygt2XuMC1TnJUaSyA1QfZ-Z4HGqcd_x-xq8P8PF0MCpxsODsn4J29sqAj49X_RB8z2fvn-One1w4670DySanRu4WliO22x4Wt4c9bE9kN3v2Nmou_wfZ14urfcU9MFDMyA</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Kurt, Gökçe</creator><creator>Tüney, İclal</creator><creator>Kasgoz, Alper</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Society of Plastics Engineers, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-8555</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Cyclo‐olefin copolymer/poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) blends: Structure–property relationships and morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties</title><author>Kurt, Gökçe ; Tüney, İclal ; Kasgoz, Alper</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4390-926e514743e39d9ffb06ddff2c8f2c9f9955a78765e049a8c6e236483247afb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Butadiene</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Copolymers</topic><topic>cyclo‐olefin copolymer (COC)</topic><topic>Dynamic mechanical properties</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) (ABS)</topic><topic>Polymer blends</topic><topic>Polymeric composites</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>polymer blend</topic><topic>Polyolefins</topic><topic>Rheological properties</topic><topic>Rheology</topic><topic>Shear modulus</topic><topic>Styrenes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurt, Gökçe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tüney, İclal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasgoz, Alper</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurt, Gökçe</au><au>Tüney, İclal</au><au>Kasgoz, Alper</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cyclo‐olefin copolymer/poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) blends: Structure–property relationships and morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties</atitle><jtitle>Polymer engineering and science</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3254</spage><epage>3268</epage><pages>3254-3268</pages><issn>0032-3888</issn><eissn>1548-2634</eissn><abstract>In this study, blends of cyclo‐olefin copolymers (COC) that had different monomer compositions and poly(Acrylonitrile‐Butadiene‐Styrene) (ABS) were prepared and variations in their morphological, rheological, and dynamic mechanical properties were investigated. In the morphological analyses, it was seen that all blends with 50/50% composition had a co‐continuous morphology, while droplet‐matrix morphology was observed for the other compositions. Melt‐state shear modulus and viscosity increased with the addition of ABS for the blends prepared with COC derivatives containing 40% and ⁓68% norbornene content by weight, while there was no significant change in the modulus values of those prepared with the COC derivative containing ⁓76% norbornene by weight. On the contrary to other blends, it was observed that the modulus values decreased with the addition of ABS in the blends prepared with COC with 82% norbornene content. Evaluation of the SEM images and Cole‐Cole plots indicated that COC‐rich blends were more compatible than the ABS‐rich blends in the case COC with lower norbornene content was used in polymer blends, while ABS‐rich blends became more compatible with increasing norbornene content of COC.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/pen.26100</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-8555</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-3888
ispartof Polymer engineering and science, 2022-10, Vol.62 (10), p.3254-3268
issn 0032-3888
1548-2634
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2720293339
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Butadiene
Composition
Copolymers
cyclo‐olefin copolymer (COC)
Dynamic mechanical properties
Mechanical properties
Morphology
poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) (ABS)
Polymer blends
Polymeric composites
Polymers
polymer blend
Polyolefins
Rheological properties
Rheology
Shear modulus
Styrenes
title Cyclo‐olefin copolymer/poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) blends: Structure–property relationships and morphological, rheological, and mechanical properties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T08%3A24%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cyclo%E2%80%90olefin%20copolymer/poly(acrylonitrile%E2%80%90butadiene%E2%80%90styrene)%20blends:%20Structure%E2%80%93property%20relationships%20and%20morphological,%20rheological,%20and%20mechanical%20properties&rft.jtitle=Polymer%20engineering%20and%20science&rft.au=Kurt,%20G%C3%B6k%C3%A7e&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3254&rft.epage=3268&rft.pages=3254-3268&rft.issn=0032-3888&rft.eissn=1548-2634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pen.26100&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA724071310%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2720293339&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A724071310&rfr_iscdi=true