Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling
Background Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental mechanics 2022, Vol.62 (8), p.1257-1266 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1266 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1257 |
container_title | Experimental mechanics |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Smit, T.C. Reid, R.G. |
description | Background
Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradients exist. XRD provides excellent near-surface data but insufficient penetration to readily define the stress distribution below the surface. To exploit the best features of each of these complementary residual stress measurement techniques, a means of combining measurements from XRD and IHD was recently demonstrated through the imposition of constraints on a series expansion solution. The regularized integral method is, however, the industry standard. A need therefore exists for a similar approach using the latter method.
Objective
Develop and demonstrate an approach to constrain the solution of the regularized integral method using data from complementary measurement techniques.
Methods
Constraints are enforced using the Lagrange multiplier method. The resulting equations are of closed form and make use of readily available information. The method is demonstrated on an aluminium alloy 7075 specimen of 10 mm thickness subjected to laser shock peening.
Results
Residual stress distributions obtained using the constrained and standard regularized integral methods compare well throughout the hole depth. The effect of incorporating XRD data into the constrained solution is localized to the near-surface region where the uncertainty is reduced.
Conclusions
Incorporation of XRD data into IHD results is readily achieved and allows the advantages of both techniques to be utilised while minimizing their shortcomings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2718669224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2718669224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6a2fa9d3537a40133d3090dc9259a467ed81a9aa03919dd69de14302793400313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcF19GbR5vJUsbHFEYE0YWrEJq006GT1CSz0F9vxgruXF0493zncg9ClwSuCYC4iYQwDhgoxQCLkmB5hGZEcIKpqMpjNAMgHPO8OUVnMW4hQ0zQGXqvd6OPfeq9K3xbLL2LKejepVhkJW1s8WK7_aBD_2VNUbtku6CH4smmjTcHonZNsDvrUlZXfrD4LvTD0LvuHJ20eoj24nfO0dvD_etyhdfPj_Xydo0bymXClaatloaVTGgOhDHDQIJpJC2l5pWwZkG01BqYJNKYShpLOAMqZH4YGGFzdDXljsF_7G1Mauv3weWTigqyqCpJKc8uOrma4GMMtlVj6Hc6fCoC6lChmipUuUL1U6GSGWITFLPZdTb8Rf9DfQP84XLq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718669224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Smit, T.C. ; Reid, R.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smit, T.C. ; Reid, R.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradients exist. XRD provides excellent near-surface data but insufficient penetration to readily define the stress distribution below the surface. To exploit the best features of each of these complementary residual stress measurement techniques, a means of combining measurements from XRD and IHD was recently demonstrated through the imposition of constraints on a series expansion solution. The regularized integral method is, however, the industry standard. A need therefore exists for a similar approach using the latter method.
Objective
Develop and demonstrate an approach to constrain the solution of the regularized integral method using data from complementary measurement techniques.
Methods
Constraints are enforced using the Lagrange multiplier method. The resulting equations are of closed form and make use of readily available information. The method is demonstrated on an aluminium alloy 7075 specimen of 10 mm thickness subjected to laser shock peening.
Results
Residual stress distributions obtained using the constrained and standard regularized integral methods compare well throughout the hole depth. The effect of incorporating XRD data into the constrained solution is localized to the near-surface region where the uncertainty is reduced.
Conclusions
Incorporation of XRD data into IHD results is readily achieved and allows the advantages of both techniques to be utilised while minimizing their shortcomings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aluminum base alloys ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Constraints ; Control ; Drilling ; Dynamical Systems ; Engineering ; Industry standards ; Lagrange multiplier ; Laser shock processing ; Lasers ; Measurement techniques ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Photonics ; Residual stress ; Series expansion ; Solid Mechanics ; Sp Iss: Advances in Residual Stress Technology ; Stress distribution ; Stress measurement ; Thickness measurement ; Uncertainty ; Vibration ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>Experimental mechanics, 2022, Vol.62 (8), p.1257-1266</ispartof><rights>Society for Experimental Mechanics 2022</rights><rights>Society for Experimental Mechanics 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6a2fa9d3537a40133d3090dc9259a467ed81a9aa03919dd69de14302793400313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6a2fa9d3537a40133d3090dc9259a467ed81a9aa03919dd69de14302793400313</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6187-4455</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smit, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, R.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling</title><title>Experimental mechanics</title><addtitle>Exp Mech</addtitle><description>Background
Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradients exist. XRD provides excellent near-surface data but insufficient penetration to readily define the stress distribution below the surface. To exploit the best features of each of these complementary residual stress measurement techniques, a means of combining measurements from XRD and IHD was recently demonstrated through the imposition of constraints on a series expansion solution. The regularized integral method is, however, the industry standard. A need therefore exists for a similar approach using the latter method.
Objective
Develop and demonstrate an approach to constrain the solution of the regularized integral method using data from complementary measurement techniques.
Methods
Constraints are enforced using the Lagrange multiplier method. The resulting equations are of closed form and make use of readily available information. The method is demonstrated on an aluminium alloy 7075 specimen of 10 mm thickness subjected to laser shock peening.
Results
Residual stress distributions obtained using the constrained and standard regularized integral methods compare well throughout the hole depth. The effect of incorporating XRD data into the constrained solution is localized to the near-surface region where the uncertainty is reduced.
Conclusions
Incorporation of XRD data into IHD results is readily achieved and allows the advantages of both techniques to be utilised while minimizing their shortcomings.</description><subject>Aluminum base alloys</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Industry standards</subject><subject>Lagrange multiplier</subject><subject>Laser shock processing</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Residual stress</subject><subject>Series expansion</subject><subject>Solid Mechanics</subject><subject>Sp Iss: Advances in Residual Stress Technology</subject><subject>Stress distribution</subject><subject>Stress measurement</subject><subject>Thickness measurement</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>0014-4851</issn><issn>1741-2765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcF19GbR5vJUsbHFEYE0YWrEJq006GT1CSz0F9vxgruXF0493zncg9ClwSuCYC4iYQwDhgoxQCLkmB5hGZEcIKpqMpjNAMgHPO8OUVnMW4hQ0zQGXqvd6OPfeq9K3xbLL2LKejepVhkJW1s8WK7_aBD_2VNUbtku6CH4smmjTcHonZNsDvrUlZXfrD4LvTD0LvuHJ20eoj24nfO0dvD_etyhdfPj_Xydo0bymXClaatloaVTGgOhDHDQIJpJC2l5pWwZkG01BqYJNKYShpLOAMqZH4YGGFzdDXljsF_7G1Mauv3weWTigqyqCpJKc8uOrma4GMMtlVj6Hc6fCoC6lChmipUuUL1U6GSGWITFLPZdTb8Rf9DfQP84XLq</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Smit, T.C.</creator><creator>Reid, R.G.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-4455</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling</title><author>Smit, T.C. ; Reid, R.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6a2fa9d3537a40133d3090dc9259a467ed81a9aa03919dd69de14302793400313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aluminum base alloys</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Industry standards</topic><topic>Lagrange multiplier</topic><topic>Laser shock processing</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Residual stress</topic><topic>Series expansion</topic><topic>Solid Mechanics</topic><topic>Sp Iss: Advances in Residual Stress Technology</topic><topic>Stress distribution</topic><topic>Stress measurement</topic><topic>Thickness measurement</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smit, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, R.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Experimental mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smit, T.C.</au><au>Reid, R.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling</atitle><jtitle>Experimental mechanics</jtitle><stitle>Exp Mech</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1257</spage><epage>1266</epage><pages>1257-1266</pages><issn>0014-4851</issn><eissn>1741-2765</eissn><abstract>Background
Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradients exist. XRD provides excellent near-surface data but insufficient penetration to readily define the stress distribution below the surface. To exploit the best features of each of these complementary residual stress measurement techniques, a means of combining measurements from XRD and IHD was recently demonstrated through the imposition of constraints on a series expansion solution. The regularized integral method is, however, the industry standard. A need therefore exists for a similar approach using the latter method.
Objective
Develop and demonstrate an approach to constrain the solution of the regularized integral method using data from complementary measurement techniques.
Methods
Constraints are enforced using the Lagrange multiplier method. The resulting equations are of closed form and make use of readily available information. The method is demonstrated on an aluminium alloy 7075 specimen of 10 mm thickness subjected to laser shock peening.
Results
Residual stress distributions obtained using the constrained and standard regularized integral methods compare well throughout the hole depth. The effect of incorporating XRD data into the constrained solution is localized to the near-surface region where the uncertainty is reduced.
Conclusions
Incorporation of XRD data into IHD results is readily achieved and allows the advantages of both techniques to be utilised while minimizing their shortcomings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-4455</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-4851 |
ispartof | Experimental mechanics, 2022, Vol.62 (8), p.1257-1266 |
issn | 0014-4851 1741-2765 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2718669224 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Aluminum base alloys Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Constraints Control Drilling Dynamical Systems Engineering Industry standards Lagrange multiplier Laser shock processing Lasers Measurement techniques Optical Devices Optics Photonics Residual stress Series expansion Solid Mechanics Sp Iss: Advances in Residual Stress Technology Stress distribution Stress measurement Thickness measurement Uncertainty Vibration X-ray diffraction |
title | Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T15%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imposition%20of%20Constraints%20on%20the%20Regularized%20Integral%20Method%20of%20Incremental%20Hole-Drilling&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20mechanics&rft.au=Smit,%20T.C.&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1257&rft.epage=1266&rft.pages=1257-1266&rft.issn=0014-4851&rft.eissn=1741-2765&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718669224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718669224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |