Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling

Background Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental mechanics 2022, Vol.62 (8), p.1257-1266
Hauptverfasser: Smit, T.C., Reid, R.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1266
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1257
container_title Experimental mechanics
container_volume 62
creator Smit, T.C.
Reid, R.G.
description Background Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradients exist. XRD provides excellent near-surface data but insufficient penetration to readily define the stress distribution below the surface. To exploit the best features of each of these complementary residual stress measurement techniques, a means of combining measurements from XRD and IHD was recently demonstrated through the imposition of constraints on a series expansion solution. The regularized integral method is, however, the industry standard. A need therefore exists for a similar approach using the latter method. Objective Develop and demonstrate an approach to constrain the solution of the regularized integral method using data from complementary measurement techniques. Methods Constraints are enforced using the Lagrange multiplier method. The resulting equations are of closed form and make use of readily available information. The method is demonstrated on an aluminium alloy 7075 specimen of 10 mm thickness subjected to laser shock peening. Results Residual stress distributions obtained using the constrained and standard regularized integral methods compare well throughout the hole depth. The effect of incorporating XRD data into the constrained solution is localized to the near-surface region where the uncertainty is reduced. Conclusions Incorporation of XRD data into IHD results is readily achieved and allows the advantages of both techniques to be utilised while minimizing their shortcomings.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2718669224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2718669224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6a2fa9d3537a40133d3090dc9259a467ed81a9aa03919dd69de14302793400313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcF19GbR5vJUsbHFEYE0YWrEJq006GT1CSz0F9vxgruXF0493zncg9ClwSuCYC4iYQwDhgoxQCLkmB5hGZEcIKpqMpjNAMgHPO8OUVnMW4hQ0zQGXqvd6OPfeq9K3xbLL2LKejepVhkJW1s8WK7_aBD_2VNUbtku6CH4smmjTcHonZNsDvrUlZXfrD4LvTD0LvuHJ20eoj24nfO0dvD_etyhdfPj_Xydo0bymXClaatloaVTGgOhDHDQIJpJC2l5pWwZkG01BqYJNKYShpLOAMqZH4YGGFzdDXljsF_7G1Mauv3weWTigqyqCpJKc8uOrma4GMMtlVj6Hc6fCoC6lChmipUuUL1U6GSGWITFLPZdTb8Rf9DfQP84XLq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718669224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Smit, T.C. ; Reid, R.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smit, T.C. ; Reid, R.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradients exist. XRD provides excellent near-surface data but insufficient penetration to readily define the stress distribution below the surface. To exploit the best features of each of these complementary residual stress measurement techniques, a means of combining measurements from XRD and IHD was recently demonstrated through the imposition of constraints on a series expansion solution. The regularized integral method is, however, the industry standard. A need therefore exists for a similar approach using the latter method. Objective Develop and demonstrate an approach to constrain the solution of the regularized integral method using data from complementary measurement techniques. Methods Constraints are enforced using the Lagrange multiplier method. The resulting equations are of closed form and make use of readily available information. The method is demonstrated on an aluminium alloy 7075 specimen of 10 mm thickness subjected to laser shock peening. Results Residual stress distributions obtained using the constrained and standard regularized integral methods compare well throughout the hole depth. The effect of incorporating XRD data into the constrained solution is localized to the near-surface region where the uncertainty is reduced. Conclusions Incorporation of XRD data into IHD results is readily achieved and allows the advantages of both techniques to be utilised while minimizing their shortcomings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Aluminum base alloys ; Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Constraints ; Control ; Drilling ; Dynamical Systems ; Engineering ; Industry standards ; Lagrange multiplier ; Laser shock processing ; Lasers ; Measurement techniques ; Optical Devices ; Optics ; Photonics ; Residual stress ; Series expansion ; Solid Mechanics ; Sp Iss: Advances in Residual Stress Technology ; Stress distribution ; Stress measurement ; Thickness measurement ; Uncertainty ; Vibration ; X-ray diffraction</subject><ispartof>Experimental mechanics, 2022, Vol.62 (8), p.1257-1266</ispartof><rights>Society for Experimental Mechanics 2022</rights><rights>Society for Experimental Mechanics 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6a2fa9d3537a40133d3090dc9259a467ed81a9aa03919dd69de14302793400313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6a2fa9d3537a40133d3090dc9259a467ed81a9aa03919dd69de14302793400313</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6187-4455</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smit, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, R.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling</title><title>Experimental mechanics</title><addtitle>Exp Mech</addtitle><description>Background Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradients exist. XRD provides excellent near-surface data but insufficient penetration to readily define the stress distribution below the surface. To exploit the best features of each of these complementary residual stress measurement techniques, a means of combining measurements from XRD and IHD was recently demonstrated through the imposition of constraints on a series expansion solution. The regularized integral method is, however, the industry standard. A need therefore exists for a similar approach using the latter method. Objective Develop and demonstrate an approach to constrain the solution of the regularized integral method using data from complementary measurement techniques. Methods Constraints are enforced using the Lagrange multiplier method. The resulting equations are of closed form and make use of readily available information. The method is demonstrated on an aluminium alloy 7075 specimen of 10 mm thickness subjected to laser shock peening. Results Residual stress distributions obtained using the constrained and standard regularized integral methods compare well throughout the hole depth. The effect of incorporating XRD data into the constrained solution is localized to the near-surface region where the uncertainty is reduced. Conclusions Incorporation of XRD data into IHD results is readily achieved and allows the advantages of both techniques to be utilised while minimizing their shortcomings.</description><subject>Aluminum base alloys</subject><subject>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Industry standards</subject><subject>Lagrange multiplier</subject><subject>Laser shock processing</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Optical Devices</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Photonics</subject><subject>Residual stress</subject><subject>Series expansion</subject><subject>Solid Mechanics</subject><subject>Sp Iss: Advances in Residual Stress Technology</subject><subject>Stress distribution</subject><subject>Stress measurement</subject><subject>Thickness measurement</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>X-ray diffraction</subject><issn>0014-4851</issn><issn>1741-2765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AVcF19GbR5vJUsbHFEYE0YWrEJq006GT1CSz0F9vxgruXF0493zncg9ClwSuCYC4iYQwDhgoxQCLkmB5hGZEcIKpqMpjNAMgHPO8OUVnMW4hQ0zQGXqvd6OPfeq9K3xbLL2LKejepVhkJW1s8WK7_aBD_2VNUbtku6CH4smmjTcHonZNsDvrUlZXfrD4LvTD0LvuHJ20eoj24nfO0dvD_etyhdfPj_Xydo0bymXClaatloaVTGgOhDHDQIJpJC2l5pWwZkG01BqYJNKYShpLOAMqZH4YGGFzdDXljsF_7G1Mauv3weWTigqyqCpJKc8uOrma4GMMtlVj6Hc6fCoC6lChmipUuUL1U6GSGWITFLPZdTb8Rf9DfQP84XLq</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Smit, T.C.</creator><creator>Reid, R.G.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-4455</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling</title><author>Smit, T.C. ; Reid, R.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-6a2fa9d3537a40133d3090dc9259a467ed81a9aa03919dd69de14302793400313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aluminum base alloys</topic><topic>Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Industry standards</topic><topic>Lagrange multiplier</topic><topic>Laser shock processing</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Optical Devices</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Photonics</topic><topic>Residual stress</topic><topic>Series expansion</topic><topic>Solid Mechanics</topic><topic>Sp Iss: Advances in Residual Stress Technology</topic><topic>Stress distribution</topic><topic>Stress measurement</topic><topic>Thickness measurement</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>X-ray diffraction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smit, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, R.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Experimental mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smit, T.C.</au><au>Reid, R.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling</atitle><jtitle>Experimental mechanics</jtitle><stitle>Exp Mech</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1257</spage><epage>1266</epage><pages>1257-1266</pages><issn>0014-4851</issn><eissn>1741-2765</eissn><abstract>Background Incremental hole-drilling (IHD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) are two of the most commonly used methods to measure through-thickness residual stress variation. IHD readily provides interior stress data, but the technique is prone to large uncertainty near the surface when steep stress gradients exist. XRD provides excellent near-surface data but insufficient penetration to readily define the stress distribution below the surface. To exploit the best features of each of these complementary residual stress measurement techniques, a means of combining measurements from XRD and IHD was recently demonstrated through the imposition of constraints on a series expansion solution. The regularized integral method is, however, the industry standard. A need therefore exists for a similar approach using the latter method. Objective Develop and demonstrate an approach to constrain the solution of the regularized integral method using data from complementary measurement techniques. Methods Constraints are enforced using the Lagrange multiplier method. The resulting equations are of closed form and make use of readily available information. The method is demonstrated on an aluminium alloy 7075 specimen of 10 mm thickness subjected to laser shock peening. Results Residual stress distributions obtained using the constrained and standard regularized integral methods compare well throughout the hole depth. The effect of incorporating XRD data into the constrained solution is localized to the near-surface region where the uncertainty is reduced. Conclusions Incorporation of XRD data into IHD results is readily achieved and allows the advantages of both techniques to be utilised while minimizing their shortcomings.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6187-4455</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-4851
ispartof Experimental mechanics, 2022, Vol.62 (8), p.1257-1266
issn 0014-4851
1741-2765
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2718669224
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Aluminum base alloys
Biomedical Engineering and Bioengineering
Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
Constraints
Control
Drilling
Dynamical Systems
Engineering
Industry standards
Lagrange multiplier
Laser shock processing
Lasers
Measurement techniques
Optical Devices
Optics
Photonics
Residual stress
Series expansion
Solid Mechanics
Sp Iss: Advances in Residual Stress Technology
Stress distribution
Stress measurement
Thickness measurement
Uncertainty
Vibration
X-ray diffraction
title Imposition of Constraints on the Regularized Integral Method of Incremental Hole-Drilling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T15%3A53%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imposition%20of%20Constraints%20on%20the%20Regularized%20Integral%20Method%20of%20Incremental%20Hole-Drilling&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20mechanics&rft.au=Smit,%20T.C.&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1257&rft.epage=1266&rft.pages=1257-1266&rft.issn=0014-4851&rft.eissn=1741-2765&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11340-022-00851-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718669224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718669224&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true