Do You Really Know if It’s True? How Asking Users to Rate Stories Affects Belief in Fake News on Social Media
Research shows that consuming ratings influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. We find that the act of producing ratings reduces belief in news articles on social media and induces social media users to think more critically....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Information systems research 2022-09, Vol.33 (3), p.887-907 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 907 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 887 |
container_title | Information systems research |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Moravec, Patricia L |
description | Research shows that
consuming ratings
influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. We find that the act of
producing ratings
reduces belief in news articles on social media and induces social media users to think more critically. We propose this intervention as a method to encourage users to realize that, unlike in the product rating setting, social media users who submit their ratings for news articles typically lack firsthand knowledge of the events reported in the news, making it difficult for most users to rate news articles accurately. We asked 68 social media users to assess the believability of 42 social media articles and measured their cognitive activity using electroencephalography. We found that asking users to rate articles using a self-referential question induced them to think more critically—as indicated by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—and made them less likely to believe the articles. The effect extended to subsequent articles; after being asked to rate an article, users were less likely to believe other articles that followed it whether they were asked to rate them or not.
Research has shown that
consuming ratings
influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. However, we do not know if the act of
creating a rating
influences belief in online news stories. Unlike e-commerce settings in which ratings typically come from those who have personally used the product or service, social media users who submit their ratings for news articles typically lack firsthand knowledge of the events reported in the news, making it difficult for most users to rate news articles accurately. We propose that one key benefit of user ratings in the context of news on social media lies in triggering users who create the ratings (as opposed to
consume
the ratings) to realize that they lack this firsthand knowledge, thus inducing them to become more skeptical of articles they see. We asked 68 social media users to assess the believability of 42 social media articles and measured their cognitive activity using electroencephalography. We found that asking users to rate articles using a self-referential question induced them to think more critically—as indicated by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—and made them less lik |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/isre.2021.1090 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2718384421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2718384421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-56454431a26d9fadcd3d5c7faebd6a9251f83f45006cbf2f02e68eec8fbf289e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWKtb1wdcT81lLpmV1GpVrAqtLlwNMXMi0elEkxmKO1_D1_NJTKng0s258f__gY-QQ0ZHjMvi2AaPI045GzFa0i0yYBnPkywT-XacaVokRSy7ZC-EF0qpEKUYEHfm4NH1MEfVNB9w3boVWANX3ffnV4B73-MJXMbbOLza9hkeAvoAnYO56hAWnfMWA4yNQd0FOMXGogHbwlS9ItziKoBrYeG0VQ3cYG3VPtkxqgl48NuH5GF6fj-5TGZ3F1eT8SzRQtAuyfI0S1PBFM_r0qha16LOdGEUPtW5KnnGjBQmzSjN9ZPhhnLMJaKWJm6yRDEkR5vcN-_eewxd9eJ638aXFS-YFDJNOYuq0UalvQsRn6nevF0q_1ExWq2hVmuo1RpqtYYaDbAxoHatDX9yyQrJUxZpD0mykdjWOL8M_0X-ALj_g-U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718384421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do You Really Know if It’s True? How Asking Users to Rate Stories Affects Belief in Fake News on Social Media</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><creator>Moravec, Patricia L</creator><creatorcontrib>Moravec, Patricia L</creatorcontrib><description>Research shows that
consuming ratings
influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. We find that the act of
producing ratings
reduces belief in news articles on social media and induces social media users to think more critically. We propose this intervention as a method to encourage users to realize that, unlike in the product rating setting, social media users who submit their ratings for news articles typically lack firsthand knowledge of the events reported in the news, making it difficult for most users to rate news articles accurately. We asked 68 social media users to assess the believability of 42 social media articles and measured their cognitive activity using electroencephalography. We found that asking users to rate articles using a self-referential question induced them to think more critically—as indicated by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—and made them less likely to believe the articles. The effect extended to subsequent articles; after being asked to rate an article, users were less likely to believe other articles that followed it whether they were asked to rate them or not.
Research has shown that
consuming ratings
influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. However, we do not know if the act of
creating a rating
influences belief in online news stories. Unlike e-commerce settings in which ratings typically come from those who have personally used the product or service, social media users who submit their ratings for news articles typically lack firsthand knowledge of the events reported in the news, making it difficult for most users to rate news articles accurately. We propose that one key benefit of user ratings in the context of news on social media lies in triggering users who create the ratings (as opposed to
consume
the ratings) to realize that they lack this firsthand knowledge, thus inducing them to become more skeptical of articles they see. We asked 68 social media users to assess the believability of 42 social media articles and measured their cognitive activity using electroencephalography. We found that asking users to rate articles using a self-referential question induced them to think more critically—as indicated by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—and made them less likely to believe the articles. The effect extended to subsequent articles; after being asked to rate an article, users were less likely to believe other articles that followed it whether they were asked to rate them or not. Overall, our findings suggest that asking users to evaluate the truthfulness of articles using self-referential rating questions may not only produce rating information that could be used by others later in time, but also has an immediate benefit of inducing users to think more critically about all articles they see.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-7047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.1090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Blogs ; Consumer behavior ; Digital media ; disinformation ; Electroencephalography ; Electronic commerce ; fake news ; misinformation ; News ; Product choice ; Questions ; Ratings ; Ratings & rankings ; reviews ; social media ; Social networks ; system cognition</subject><ispartof>Information systems research, 2022-09, Vol.33 (3), p.887-907</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Sep 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-56454431a26d9fadcd3d5c7faebd6a9251f83f45006cbf2f02e68eec8fbf289e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-56454431a26d9fadcd3d5c7faebd6a9251f83f45006cbf2f02e68eec8fbf289e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5896-5444 ; 0000-0002-2886-0892 ; 0000-0002-6439-6134</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/isre.2021.1090$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3679,27901,27902,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moravec, Patricia L</creatorcontrib><title>Do You Really Know if It’s True? How Asking Users to Rate Stories Affects Belief in Fake News on Social Media</title><title>Information systems research</title><description>Research shows that
consuming ratings
influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. We find that the act of
producing ratings
reduces belief in news articles on social media and induces social media users to think more critically. We propose this intervention as a method to encourage users to realize that, unlike in the product rating setting, social media users who submit their ratings for news articles typically lack firsthand knowledge of the events reported in the news, making it difficult for most users to rate news articles accurately. We asked 68 social media users to assess the believability of 42 social media articles and measured their cognitive activity using electroencephalography. We found that asking users to rate articles using a self-referential question induced them to think more critically—as indicated by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—and made them less likely to believe the articles. The effect extended to subsequent articles; after being asked to rate an article, users were less likely to believe other articles that followed it whether they were asked to rate them or not.
Research has shown that
consuming ratings
influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. However, we do not know if the act of
creating a rating
influences belief in online news stories. Unlike e-commerce settings in which ratings typically come from those who have personally used the product or service, social media users who submit their ratings for news articles typically lack firsthand knowledge of the events reported in the news, making it difficult for most users to rate news articles accurately. We propose that one key benefit of user ratings in the context of news on social media lies in triggering users who create the ratings (as opposed to
consume
the ratings) to realize that they lack this firsthand knowledge, thus inducing them to become more skeptical of articles they see. We asked 68 social media users to assess the believability of 42 social media articles and measured their cognitive activity using electroencephalography. We found that asking users to rate articles using a self-referential question induced them to think more critically—as indicated by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—and made them less likely to believe the articles. The effect extended to subsequent articles; after being asked to rate an article, users were less likely to believe other articles that followed it whether they were asked to rate them or not. Overall, our findings suggest that asking users to evaluate the truthfulness of articles using self-referential rating questions may not only produce rating information that could be used by others later in time, but also has an immediate benefit of inducing users to think more critically about all articles they see.</description><subject>Blogs</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>disinformation</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Electronic commerce</subject><subject>fake news</subject><subject>misinformation</subject><subject>News</subject><subject>Product choice</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Ratings & rankings</subject><subject>reviews</subject><subject>social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>system cognition</subject><issn>1047-7047</issn><issn>1526-5536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWKtb1wdcT81lLpmV1GpVrAqtLlwNMXMi0elEkxmKO1_D1_NJTKng0s258f__gY-QQ0ZHjMvi2AaPI045GzFa0i0yYBnPkywT-XacaVokRSy7ZC-EF0qpEKUYEHfm4NH1MEfVNB9w3boVWANX3ffnV4B73-MJXMbbOLza9hkeAvoAnYO56hAWnfMWA4yNQd0FOMXGogHbwlS9ItziKoBrYeG0VQ3cYG3VPtkxqgl48NuH5GF6fj-5TGZ3F1eT8SzRQtAuyfI0S1PBFM_r0qha16LOdGEUPtW5KnnGjBQmzSjN9ZPhhnLMJaKWJm6yRDEkR5vcN-_eewxd9eJ638aXFS-YFDJNOYuq0UalvQsRn6nevF0q_1ExWq2hVmuo1RpqtYYaDbAxoHatDX9yyQrJUxZpD0mykdjWOL8M_0X-ALj_g-U</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Moravec, Patricia L</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-5444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-0892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-6134</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Do You Really Know if It’s True? How Asking Users to Rate Stories Affects Belief in Fake News on Social Media</title><author>Moravec, Patricia L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-56454431a26d9fadcd3d5c7faebd6a9251f83f45006cbf2f02e68eec8fbf289e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Blogs</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>disinformation</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Electronic commerce</topic><topic>fake news</topic><topic>misinformation</topic><topic>News</topic><topic>Product choice</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Ratings & rankings</topic><topic>reviews</topic><topic>social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>system cognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moravec, Patricia L</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Information systems research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moravec, Patricia L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do You Really Know if It’s True? How Asking Users to Rate Stories Affects Belief in Fake News on Social Media</atitle><jtitle>Information systems research</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>887</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>887-907</pages><issn>1047-7047</issn><eissn>1526-5536</eissn><abstract>Research shows that
consuming ratings
influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. We find that the act of
producing ratings
reduces belief in news articles on social media and induces social media users to think more critically. We propose this intervention as a method to encourage users to realize that, unlike in the product rating setting, social media users who submit their ratings for news articles typically lack firsthand knowledge of the events reported in the news, making it difficult for most users to rate news articles accurately. We asked 68 social media users to assess the believability of 42 social media articles and measured their cognitive activity using electroencephalography. We found that asking users to rate articles using a self-referential question induced them to think more critically—as indicated by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—and made them less likely to believe the articles. The effect extended to subsequent articles; after being asked to rate an article, users were less likely to believe other articles that followed it whether they were asked to rate them or not.
Research has shown that
consuming ratings
influences purchase decisions in e-commerce and also has modest effects on belief in news articles on social media. However, we do not know if the act of
creating a rating
influences belief in online news stories. Unlike e-commerce settings in which ratings typically come from those who have personally used the product or service, social media users who submit their ratings for news articles typically lack firsthand knowledge of the events reported in the news, making it difficult for most users to rate news articles accurately. We propose that one key benefit of user ratings in the context of news on social media lies in triggering users who create the ratings (as opposed to
consume
the ratings) to realize that they lack this firsthand knowledge, thus inducing them to become more skeptical of articles they see. We asked 68 social media users to assess the believability of 42 social media articles and measured their cognitive activity using electroencephalography. We found that asking users to rate articles using a self-referential question induced them to think more critically—as indicated by increased activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex—and made them less likely to believe the articles. The effect extended to subsequent articles; after being asked to rate an article, users were less likely to believe other articles that followed it whether they were asked to rate them or not. Overall, our findings suggest that asking users to evaluate the truthfulness of articles using self-referential rating questions may not only produce rating information that could be used by others later in time, but also has an immediate benefit of inducing users to think more critically about all articles they see.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/isre.2021.1090</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-5444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-0892</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-6134</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1047-7047 |
ispartof | Information systems research, 2022-09, Vol.33 (3), p.887-907 |
issn | 1047-7047 1526-5536 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2718384421 |
source | INFORMS PubsOnLine |
subjects | Blogs Consumer behavior Digital media disinformation Electroencephalography Electronic commerce fake news misinformation News Product choice Questions Ratings Ratings & rankings reviews social media Social networks system cognition |
title | Do You Really Know if It’s True? How Asking Users to Rate Stories Affects Belief in Fake News on Social Media |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T01%3A12%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20You%20Really%20Know%20if%20It%E2%80%99s%20True?%20How%20Asking%20Users%20to%20Rate%20Stories%20Affects%20Belief%20in%20Fake%20News%20on%20Social%20Media&rft.jtitle=Information%20systems%20research&rft.au=Moravec,%20Patricia%20L&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=887&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=887-907&rft.issn=1047-7047&rft.eissn=1526-5536&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/isre.2021.1090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718384421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718384421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |