LAI estimation across California vineyards using sUAS multi-seasonal multi-spectral, thermal, and elevation information and machine learning
In agriculture, leaf area index (LAI) is an important variable that describes occurring biomass and relates to the distribution of energy fluxes and evapotranspiration components. Current LAI estimation methods at subfield scale are limited not only by the characteristics of the spatial data (pixel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Irrigation science 2022-09, Vol.40 (4-5), p.731-759 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 759 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4-5 |
container_start_page | 731 |
container_title | Irrigation science |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Gao, Rui Torres-Rua, Alfonso F. Aboutalebi, Mahyar White, William A. Anderson, Martha Kustas, William P. Agam, Nurit Alsina, Maria Mar Alfieri, Joseph Hipps, Lawrence Dokoozlian, Nick Nieto, Hector Gao, Feng McKee, Lynn G. Prueger, John H. Sanchez, Luis Mcelrone, Andrew J. Bambach-Ortiz, Nicolas Coopmans, Calvin Gowing, Ian |
description | In agriculture, leaf area index (LAI) is an important variable that describes occurring biomass and relates to the distribution of energy fluxes and evapotranspiration components. Current LAI estimation methods at subfield scale are limited not only by the characteristics of the spatial data (pixel size and spectral information) but also by the empiricity of developed models, mostly based on vegetation indices, which do not necessarily scale spatiality (among different varieties or planting characteristics) or temporally (need for different LAI models for different phenological stages). Widely used machine learning (ML) algorithms and high-resolution small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) information provide an opportunity for spatial and temporal LAI estimation addressing the spatial and temporal limitations. In this study, considering both accuracy and efficiency, a point-cloud-based feature-extraction approach (Full Approach) and a raster-based feature-extraction approach (Fast Approach) using sUAS information were developed based on multiple growing seasons (2014–2019) to extract and generate vine-scale information for LAI estimation in commercial vineyards across California. Three known ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), were considered, along with hybrid ML schemes based on those three algorithms, coupled with different feature-extraction approaches. Results showed that the hybrid ML technique using RF and RVM and the Fast Approach with 9 input variables, called RVM-RF
Fast
model, performs better than others in a visual and statistical assessments of the generated LAI being also computationally efficient. Furthermore, using the generated LAI products in the quantification of energy balance using the two-source energy balance Priestley-Taylor version (TSEB-PT) model and EC tower data, the results indicated excellent estimation of net radiation (Rn) and latent heat flux (LE), good estimation of surface heat flux (G), and poor estimation of sensible heat flux (H). Additionally, TSEB-PT sensitivity analysis performed by regenerating LAI maps based on the generated LAI map (from − 15% of the original LAI map to + 15% with a 5% gap) showed that LAI uncertainty had a major impact on G, followed by evapotranspiration partitioning (T/ET), H, LE, and Rn. When considering the annual growth cycle of grapevines, the impact of LAI uncertainty on the T/ET in the veraison stage was larger than in the |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00271-022-00776-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2717355847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2717355847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e11500bac78999782974057adea9c040d2092826cd97f07322ad78559829ef7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwsccWwdpLaPlYVP5UqcYCerW3itKkSp9hJJd6Bh8ZtqLhxslc7M6v5CLnl8MAB5GMAEJIzEILFUU4YnJERTxPBeML1ORlBkgomuVKX5CqELQCXE5WOyPdiOqc2dFWDXdU6irlvQ6AzrKuy9a5Cuq-c_UJfBNqHyq1pWE7fadPXXcWCxdA6rE_jzuadx_qedhvrm8MHXUFtbfdDeOVi5ulQ3DSYb2I6rS3GU259TS5KrIO9-X3HZPn89DF7ZYu3l_lsumB5LNMxy3kGsMJcKq21VELLFDKJhUWdQwqFAC2UmOSFliXIRAgspMoyHZW2lKtkTO6G3J1vP_vY3mzb3sciwUSKMskylcqoEoPqiMTb0ux8xOS_DAdzoG4G6iZSN0fqBqIpGUwhit3a-r_of1w_8GWGfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2717355847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>LAI estimation across California vineyards using sUAS multi-seasonal multi-spectral, thermal, and elevation information and machine learning</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gao, Rui ; Torres-Rua, Alfonso F. ; Aboutalebi, Mahyar ; White, William A. ; Anderson, Martha ; Kustas, William P. ; Agam, Nurit ; Alsina, Maria Mar ; Alfieri, Joseph ; Hipps, Lawrence ; Dokoozlian, Nick ; Nieto, Hector ; Gao, Feng ; McKee, Lynn G. ; Prueger, John H. ; Sanchez, Luis ; Mcelrone, Andrew J. ; Bambach-Ortiz, Nicolas ; Coopmans, Calvin ; Gowing, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Rui ; Torres-Rua, Alfonso F. ; Aboutalebi, Mahyar ; White, William A. ; Anderson, Martha ; Kustas, William P. ; Agam, Nurit ; Alsina, Maria Mar ; Alfieri, Joseph ; Hipps, Lawrence ; Dokoozlian, Nick ; Nieto, Hector ; Gao, Feng ; McKee, Lynn G. ; Prueger, John H. ; Sanchez, Luis ; Mcelrone, Andrew J. ; Bambach-Ortiz, Nicolas ; Coopmans, Calvin ; Gowing, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>In agriculture, leaf area index (LAI) is an important variable that describes occurring biomass and relates to the distribution of energy fluxes and evapotranspiration components. Current LAI estimation methods at subfield scale are limited not only by the characteristics of the spatial data (pixel size and spectral information) but also by the empiricity of developed models, mostly based on vegetation indices, which do not necessarily scale spatiality (among different varieties or planting characteristics) or temporally (need for different LAI models for different phenological stages). Widely used machine learning (ML) algorithms and high-resolution small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) information provide an opportunity for spatial and temporal LAI estimation addressing the spatial and temporal limitations. In this study, considering both accuracy and efficiency, a point-cloud-based feature-extraction approach (Full Approach) and a raster-based feature-extraction approach (Fast Approach) using sUAS information were developed based on multiple growing seasons (2014–2019) to extract and generate vine-scale information for LAI estimation in commercial vineyards across California. Three known ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), were considered, along with hybrid ML schemes based on those three algorithms, coupled with different feature-extraction approaches. Results showed that the hybrid ML technique using RF and RVM and the Fast Approach with 9 input variables, called RVM-RF
Fast
model, performs better than others in a visual and statistical assessments of the generated LAI being also computationally efficient. Furthermore, using the generated LAI products in the quantification of energy balance using the two-source energy balance Priestley-Taylor version (TSEB-PT) model and EC tower data, the results indicated excellent estimation of net radiation (Rn) and latent heat flux (LE), good estimation of surface heat flux (G), and poor estimation of sensible heat flux (H). Additionally, TSEB-PT sensitivity analysis performed by regenerating LAI maps based on the generated LAI map (from − 15% of the original LAI map to + 15% with a 5% gap) showed that LAI uncertainty had a major impact on G, followed by evapotranspiration partitioning (T/ET), H, LE, and Rn. When considering the annual growth cycle of grapevines, the impact of LAI uncertainty on the T/ET in the veraison stage was larger than in the fruit set stage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1319</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00271-022-00776-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Algorithms ; Aquatic Pollution ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climate Change ; Energy balance ; Energy distribution ; Enthalpy ; Environment ; Evapotranspiration ; Feature extraction ; Fluctuations ; Fruit set ; Grapevines ; Growing season ; Heat ; Heat flux ; Heat transfer ; Information processing ; Latent heat ; Leaf area ; Leaf area index ; Learning algorithms ; Life Sciences ; Machine learning ; Net radiation ; Original Paper ; Radiation balance ; Sensible heat ; Sensible heat transfer ; Sensitivity analysis ; Spatial data ; Sustainable Development ; Uncertainty ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Vegetation index ; Vineyards ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Industry/Water Technologies ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Wineries & vineyards</subject><ispartof>Irrigation science, 2022-09, Vol.40 (4-5), p.731-759</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e11500bac78999782974057adea9c040d2092826cd97f07322ad78559829ef7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e11500bac78999782974057adea9c040d2092826cd97f07322ad78559829ef7b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6127-0843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00271-022-00776-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00271-022-00776-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Rua, Alfonso F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboutalebi, Mahyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kustas, William P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agam, Nurit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsina, Maria Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfieri, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hipps, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokoozlian, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto, Hector</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKee, Lynn G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prueger, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mcelrone, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bambach-Ortiz, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coopmans, Calvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gowing, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>LAI estimation across California vineyards using sUAS multi-seasonal multi-spectral, thermal, and elevation information and machine learning</title><title>Irrigation science</title><addtitle>Irrig Sci</addtitle><description>In agriculture, leaf area index (LAI) is an important variable that describes occurring biomass and relates to the distribution of energy fluxes and evapotranspiration components. Current LAI estimation methods at subfield scale are limited not only by the characteristics of the spatial data (pixel size and spectral information) but also by the empiricity of developed models, mostly based on vegetation indices, which do not necessarily scale spatiality (among different varieties or planting characteristics) or temporally (need for different LAI models for different phenological stages). Widely used machine learning (ML) algorithms and high-resolution small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) information provide an opportunity for spatial and temporal LAI estimation addressing the spatial and temporal limitations. In this study, considering both accuracy and efficiency, a point-cloud-based feature-extraction approach (Full Approach) and a raster-based feature-extraction approach (Fast Approach) using sUAS information were developed based on multiple growing seasons (2014–2019) to extract and generate vine-scale information for LAI estimation in commercial vineyards across California. Three known ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), were considered, along with hybrid ML schemes based on those three algorithms, coupled with different feature-extraction approaches. Results showed that the hybrid ML technique using RF and RVM and the Fast Approach with 9 input variables, called RVM-RF
Fast
model, performs better than others in a visual and statistical assessments of the generated LAI being also computationally efficient. Furthermore, using the generated LAI products in the quantification of energy balance using the two-source energy balance Priestley-Taylor version (TSEB-PT) model and EC tower data, the results indicated excellent estimation of net radiation (Rn) and latent heat flux (LE), good estimation of surface heat flux (G), and poor estimation of sensible heat flux (H). Additionally, TSEB-PT sensitivity analysis performed by regenerating LAI maps based on the generated LAI map (from − 15% of the original LAI map to + 15% with a 5% gap) showed that LAI uncertainty had a major impact on G, followed by evapotranspiration partitioning (T/ET), H, LE, and Rn. When considering the annual growth cycle of grapevines, the impact of LAI uncertainty on the T/ET in the veraison stage was larger than in the fruit set stage.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Energy balance</subject><subject>Energy distribution</subject><subject>Enthalpy</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Fluctuations</subject><subject>Fruit set</subject><subject>Grapevines</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Heat flux</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Latent heat</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaf area index</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Net radiation</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Radiation balance</subject><subject>Sensible heat</subject><subject>Sensible heat transfer</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Spatial data</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Vegetation index</subject><subject>Vineyards</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Industry/Water Technologies</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Wineries & vineyards</subject><issn>0342-7188</issn><issn>1432-1319</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwApwsccWwdpLaPlYVP5UqcYCerW3itKkSp9hJJd6Bh8ZtqLhxslc7M6v5CLnl8MAB5GMAEJIzEILFUU4YnJERTxPBeML1ORlBkgomuVKX5CqELQCXE5WOyPdiOqc2dFWDXdU6irlvQ6AzrKuy9a5Cuq-c_UJfBNqHyq1pWE7fadPXXcWCxdA6rE_jzuadx_qedhvrm8MHXUFtbfdDeOVi5ulQ3DSYb2I6rS3GU259TS5KrIO9-X3HZPn89DF7ZYu3l_lsumB5LNMxy3kGsMJcKq21VELLFDKJhUWdQwqFAC2UmOSFliXIRAgspMoyHZW2lKtkTO6G3J1vP_vY3mzb3sciwUSKMskylcqoEoPqiMTb0ux8xOS_DAdzoG4G6iZSN0fqBqIpGUwhit3a-r_of1w_8GWGfQ</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Gao, Rui</creator><creator>Torres-Rua, Alfonso F.</creator><creator>Aboutalebi, Mahyar</creator><creator>White, William A.</creator><creator>Anderson, Martha</creator><creator>Kustas, William P.</creator><creator>Agam, Nurit</creator><creator>Alsina, Maria Mar</creator><creator>Alfieri, Joseph</creator><creator>Hipps, Lawrence</creator><creator>Dokoozlian, Nick</creator><creator>Nieto, Hector</creator><creator>Gao, Feng</creator><creator>McKee, Lynn G.</creator><creator>Prueger, John H.</creator><creator>Sanchez, Luis</creator><creator>Mcelrone, Andrew J.</creator><creator>Bambach-Ortiz, Nicolas</creator><creator>Coopmans, Calvin</creator><creator>Gowing, Ian</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-0843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>LAI estimation across California vineyards using sUAS multi-seasonal multi-spectral, thermal, and elevation information and machine learning</title><author>Gao, Rui ; Torres-Rua, Alfonso F. ; Aboutalebi, Mahyar ; White, William A. ; Anderson, Martha ; Kustas, William P. ; Agam, Nurit ; Alsina, Maria Mar ; Alfieri, Joseph ; Hipps, Lawrence ; Dokoozlian, Nick ; Nieto, Hector ; Gao, Feng ; McKee, Lynn G. ; Prueger, John H. ; Sanchez, Luis ; Mcelrone, Andrew J. ; Bambach-Ortiz, Nicolas ; Coopmans, Calvin ; Gowing, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e11500bac78999782974057adea9c040d2092826cd97f07322ad78559829ef7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Energy balance</topic><topic>Energy distribution</topic><topic>Enthalpy</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Fluctuations</topic><topic>Fruit set</topic><topic>Grapevines</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Heat flux</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Latent heat</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaf area index</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Net radiation</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Radiation balance</topic><topic>Sensible heat</topic><topic>Sensible heat transfer</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Spatial data</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Vegetation index</topic><topic>Vineyards</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Industry/Water Technologies</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Wineries & vineyards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres-Rua, Alfonso F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aboutalebi, Mahyar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Martha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kustas, William P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agam, Nurit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsina, Maria Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alfieri, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hipps, Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokoozlian, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieto, Hector</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKee, Lynn G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prueger, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mcelrone, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bambach-Ortiz, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coopmans, Calvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gowing, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Irrigation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Rui</au><au>Torres-Rua, Alfonso F.</au><au>Aboutalebi, Mahyar</au><au>White, William A.</au><au>Anderson, Martha</au><au>Kustas, William P.</au><au>Agam, Nurit</au><au>Alsina, Maria Mar</au><au>Alfieri, Joseph</au><au>Hipps, Lawrence</au><au>Dokoozlian, Nick</au><au>Nieto, Hector</au><au>Gao, Feng</au><au>McKee, Lynn G.</au><au>Prueger, John H.</au><au>Sanchez, Luis</au><au>Mcelrone, Andrew J.</au><au>Bambach-Ortiz, Nicolas</au><au>Coopmans, Calvin</au><au>Gowing, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>LAI estimation across California vineyards using sUAS multi-seasonal multi-spectral, thermal, and elevation information and machine learning</atitle><jtitle>Irrigation science</jtitle><stitle>Irrig Sci</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4-5</issue><spage>731</spage><epage>759</epage><pages>731-759</pages><issn>0342-7188</issn><eissn>1432-1319</eissn><abstract>In agriculture, leaf area index (LAI) is an important variable that describes occurring biomass and relates to the distribution of energy fluxes and evapotranspiration components. Current LAI estimation methods at subfield scale are limited not only by the characteristics of the spatial data (pixel size and spectral information) but also by the empiricity of developed models, mostly based on vegetation indices, which do not necessarily scale spatiality (among different varieties or planting characteristics) or temporally (need for different LAI models for different phenological stages). Widely used machine learning (ML) algorithms and high-resolution small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) information provide an opportunity for spatial and temporal LAI estimation addressing the spatial and temporal limitations. In this study, considering both accuracy and efficiency, a point-cloud-based feature-extraction approach (Full Approach) and a raster-based feature-extraction approach (Fast Approach) using sUAS information were developed based on multiple growing seasons (2014–2019) to extract and generate vine-scale information for LAI estimation in commercial vineyards across California. Three known ML algorithms, Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Relevance Vector Machine (RVM), were considered, along with hybrid ML schemes based on those three algorithms, coupled with different feature-extraction approaches. Results showed that the hybrid ML technique using RF and RVM and the Fast Approach with 9 input variables, called RVM-RF
Fast
model, performs better than others in a visual and statistical assessments of the generated LAI being also computationally efficient. Furthermore, using the generated LAI products in the quantification of energy balance using the two-source energy balance Priestley-Taylor version (TSEB-PT) model and EC tower data, the results indicated excellent estimation of net radiation (Rn) and latent heat flux (LE), good estimation of surface heat flux (G), and poor estimation of sensible heat flux (H). Additionally, TSEB-PT sensitivity analysis performed by regenerating LAI maps based on the generated LAI map (from − 15% of the original LAI map to + 15% with a 5% gap) showed that LAI uncertainty had a major impact on G, followed by evapotranspiration partitioning (T/ET), H, LE, and Rn. When considering the annual growth cycle of grapevines, the impact of LAI uncertainty on the T/ET in the veraison stage was larger than in the fruit set stage.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00271-022-00776-0</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-0843</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0342-7188 |
ispartof | Irrigation science, 2022-09, Vol.40 (4-5), p.731-759 |
issn | 0342-7188 1432-1319 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2717355847 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agriculture Algorithms Aquatic Pollution Biomedical and Life Sciences Climate Change Energy balance Energy distribution Enthalpy Environment Evapotranspiration Feature extraction Fluctuations Fruit set Grapevines Growing season Heat Heat flux Heat transfer Information processing Latent heat Leaf area Leaf area index Learning algorithms Life Sciences Machine learning Net radiation Original Paper Radiation balance Sensible heat Sensible heat transfer Sensitivity analysis Spatial data Sustainable Development Uncertainty Unmanned aerial vehicles Vegetation index Vineyards Waste Water Technology Water Industry/Water Technologies Water Management Water Pollution Control Wineries & vineyards |
title | LAI estimation across California vineyards using sUAS multi-seasonal multi-spectral, thermal, and elevation information and machine learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A15%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=LAI%20estimation%20across%20California%20vineyards%20using%20sUAS%20multi-seasonal%20multi-spectral,%20thermal,%20and%20elevation%20information%20and%20machine%20learning&rft.jtitle=Irrigation%20science&rft.au=Gao,%20Rui&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4-5&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=759&rft.pages=731-759&rft.issn=0342-7188&rft.eissn=1432-1319&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00271-022-00776-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2717355847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2717355847&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |