Improving Efficiency of Large RFID Networks Using a Clustered Method: A Comparative Analysis
Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is primarily used to resolve the problems of taking care of the majority of nodes perceived and tracking tags related to the items. Utilizing contactless radio frequency identification data can be communicated distantly using electromagnetic fields. In this pape...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Electronics (Basel) 2022-09, Vol.11 (18), p.2968 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 2968 |
container_title | Electronics (Basel) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Pandian, M. Thurai Chouhan, Kuldeep Kumar, B. Muthu Dash, Jatindra Kumar Jhanjhi, N. Z. Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman Abulfaraj, Anas W. |
description | Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is primarily used to resolve the problems of taking care of the majority of nodes perceived and tracking tags related to the items. Utilizing contactless radio frequency identification data can be communicated distantly using electromagnetic fields. In this paper, the comparison and analysis made between the Clustered RFID with existing protocols Ad hoc On-demand Multicast Distance Vector Secure Adjacent Position Trust Verification (AOMDV_SAPTV) and Optimal Distance-Based Clustering (ODBC) protocols based on the network attributes of accuracy, vulnerability and success rate, delay and throughput while handling the huge nodes of communication. In the RFID Network, the clustering mechanism was implemented to enhance the performance of the network when scaling nodes. Multicast routing was used to handle the large number of nodes involved in the transmission of particular network communication. While scaling up the network, existing methods may be compromised with their efficiency. However, the Clustered RFID method will give better performance without compromising efficiency. Here, Clustered RFID gives 93% performance, AOMDV_SAPTV can achieve 79%, and ODBC can reach 85% of performance. Clustered RFID gives 14% better performance than AOMDV_SAPTV and 8% better performance than ODBC for handling a huge range of nodes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/electronics11182968 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2716521022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A745603503</galeid><sourcerecordid>A745603503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-11257ff2c4ab7951be6504efb4c4886fc0b1b9b5562072b5cc62dfb7500f8f7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUE1Lw0AQDaJgqf0FXhY8p-5HNsl6C7HVQlUQexPCZjNbtybZurut9N-bUg8enDnMMLz3mPei6JrgKWMC30ILKjjbG-UJITkVaX4WjSjORCyooOd_9sto4v0GDyUIyxkeRe-Lbuvs3vRrNNPaKAO9OiCr0VK6NaDX-eIePUP4tu7To5U_4iQq250P4KBBTxA-bHOHClTabiudDGYPqOhle_DGX0UXWrYeJr9zHK3ms7fyMV6-PCzKYhkrlpIQE0J5pjVViawzwUkNKccJ6DpRSZ6nWuGa1KLmPB2M0JorldJG1xnHWOc6U2wc3Zx0BytfO_Ch2tidG57wFc1IyinBlA6o6Qm1li1Uptc2OKmGbqAzyvagzXAvsoSnmHHMBgI7EZSz3jvQ1daZTrpDRXB1jL76J3r2A55seTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2716521022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Efficiency of Large RFID Networks Using a Clustered Method: A Comparative Analysis</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Pandian, M. Thurai ; Chouhan, Kuldeep ; Kumar, B. Muthu ; Dash, Jatindra Kumar ; Jhanjhi, N. Z. ; Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman ; Abulfaraj, Anas W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pandian, M. Thurai ; Chouhan, Kuldeep ; Kumar, B. Muthu ; Dash, Jatindra Kumar ; Jhanjhi, N. Z. ; Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman ; Abulfaraj, Anas W.</creatorcontrib><description>Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is primarily used to resolve the problems of taking care of the majority of nodes perceived and tracking tags related to the items. Utilizing contactless radio frequency identification data can be communicated distantly using electromagnetic fields. In this paper, the comparison and analysis made between the Clustered RFID with existing protocols Ad hoc On-demand Multicast Distance Vector Secure Adjacent Position Trust Verification (AOMDV_SAPTV) and Optimal Distance-Based Clustering (ODBC) protocols based on the network attributes of accuracy, vulnerability and success rate, delay and throughput while handling the huge nodes of communication. In the RFID Network, the clustering mechanism was implemented to enhance the performance of the network when scaling nodes. Multicast routing was used to handle the large number of nodes involved in the transmission of particular network communication. While scaling up the network, existing methods may be compromised with their efficiency. However, the Clustered RFID method will give better performance without compromising efficiency. Here, Clustered RFID gives 93% performance, AOMDV_SAPTV can achieve 79%, and ODBC can reach 85% of performance. Clustered RFID gives 14% better performance than AOMDV_SAPTV and 8% better performance than ODBC for handling a huge range of nodes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-9292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-9292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/electronics11182968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Clustering ; Communication ; Comparative analysis ; Efficiency ; Electromagnetic fields ; Frequency analysis ; Fuzzy logic ; Infringement ; Internet of Things ; Licenses ; Literature reviews ; Multicasting ; Nodes ; Radio frequency identification ; Radio frequency identification (RFID) ; Success</subject><ispartof>Electronics (Basel), 2022-09, Vol.11 (18), p.2968</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-11257ff2c4ab7951be6504efb4c4886fc0b1b9b5562072b5cc62dfb7500f8f7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-11257ff2c4ab7951be6504efb4c4886fc0b1b9b5562072b5cc62dfb7500f8f7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4086-823X ; 0000-0003-3277-4505 ; 0000-0001-8116-4733 ; 0000-0002-5580-2989 ; 0000-0001-5526-3623</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pandian, M. Thurai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chouhan, Kuldeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, B. Muthu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dash, Jatindra Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhanjhi, N. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abulfaraj, Anas W.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Efficiency of Large RFID Networks Using a Clustered Method: A Comparative Analysis</title><title>Electronics (Basel)</title><description>Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is primarily used to resolve the problems of taking care of the majority of nodes perceived and tracking tags related to the items. Utilizing contactless radio frequency identification data can be communicated distantly using electromagnetic fields. In this paper, the comparison and analysis made between the Clustered RFID with existing protocols Ad hoc On-demand Multicast Distance Vector Secure Adjacent Position Trust Verification (AOMDV_SAPTV) and Optimal Distance-Based Clustering (ODBC) protocols based on the network attributes of accuracy, vulnerability and success rate, delay and throughput while handling the huge nodes of communication. In the RFID Network, the clustering mechanism was implemented to enhance the performance of the network when scaling nodes. Multicast routing was used to handle the large number of nodes involved in the transmission of particular network communication. While scaling up the network, existing methods may be compromised with their efficiency. However, the Clustered RFID method will give better performance without compromising efficiency. Here, Clustered RFID gives 93% performance, AOMDV_SAPTV can achieve 79%, and ODBC can reach 85% of performance. Clustered RFID gives 14% better performance than AOMDV_SAPTV and 8% better performance than ODBC for handling a huge range of nodes.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electromagnetic fields</subject><subject>Frequency analysis</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Infringement</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Multicasting</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Radio frequency identification</subject><subject>Radio frequency identification (RFID)</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>2079-9292</issn><issn>2079-9292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptUE1Lw0AQDaJgqf0FXhY8p-5HNsl6C7HVQlUQexPCZjNbtybZurut9N-bUg8enDnMMLz3mPei6JrgKWMC30ILKjjbG-UJITkVaX4WjSjORCyooOd_9sto4v0GDyUIyxkeRe-Lbuvs3vRrNNPaKAO9OiCr0VK6NaDX-eIePUP4tu7To5U_4iQq250P4KBBTxA-bHOHClTabiudDGYPqOhle_DGX0UXWrYeJr9zHK3ms7fyMV6-PCzKYhkrlpIQE0J5pjVViawzwUkNKccJ6DpRSZ6nWuGa1KLmPB2M0JorldJG1xnHWOc6U2wc3Zx0BytfO_Ch2tidG57wFc1IyinBlA6o6Qm1li1Uptc2OKmGbqAzyvagzXAvsoSnmHHMBgI7EZSz3jvQ1daZTrpDRXB1jL76J3r2A55seTE</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Pandian, M. Thurai</creator><creator>Chouhan, Kuldeep</creator><creator>Kumar, B. Muthu</creator><creator>Dash, Jatindra Kumar</creator><creator>Jhanjhi, N. Z.</creator><creator>Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman</creator><creator>Abulfaraj, Anas W.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4086-823X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3277-4505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8116-4733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5580-2989</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5526-3623</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Improving Efficiency of Large RFID Networks Using a Clustered Method: A Comparative Analysis</title><author>Pandian, M. Thurai ; Chouhan, Kuldeep ; Kumar, B. Muthu ; Dash, Jatindra Kumar ; Jhanjhi, N. Z. ; Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman ; Abulfaraj, Anas W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-11257ff2c4ab7951be6504efb4c4886fc0b1b9b5562072b5cc62dfb7500f8f7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electromagnetic fields</topic><topic>Frequency analysis</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Infringement</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Multicasting</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Radio frequency identification</topic><topic>Radio frequency identification (RFID)</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pandian, M. Thurai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chouhan, Kuldeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, B. Muthu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dash, Jatindra Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jhanjhi, N. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abulfaraj, Anas W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Electronics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pandian, M. Thurai</au><au>Chouhan, Kuldeep</au><au>Kumar, B. Muthu</au><au>Dash, Jatindra Kumar</au><au>Jhanjhi, N. Z.</au><au>Ibrahim, Ashraf Osman</au><au>Abulfaraj, Anas W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Efficiency of Large RFID Networks Using a Clustered Method: A Comparative Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Electronics (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2968</spage><pages>2968-</pages><issn>2079-9292</issn><eissn>2079-9292</eissn><abstract>Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is primarily used to resolve the problems of taking care of the majority of nodes perceived and tracking tags related to the items. Utilizing contactless radio frequency identification data can be communicated distantly using electromagnetic fields. In this paper, the comparison and analysis made between the Clustered RFID with existing protocols Ad hoc On-demand Multicast Distance Vector Secure Adjacent Position Trust Verification (AOMDV_SAPTV) and Optimal Distance-Based Clustering (ODBC) protocols based on the network attributes of accuracy, vulnerability and success rate, delay and throughput while handling the huge nodes of communication. In the RFID Network, the clustering mechanism was implemented to enhance the performance of the network when scaling nodes. Multicast routing was used to handle the large number of nodes involved in the transmission of particular network communication. While scaling up the network, existing methods may be compromised with their efficiency. However, the Clustered RFID method will give better performance without compromising efficiency. Here, Clustered RFID gives 93% performance, AOMDV_SAPTV can achieve 79%, and ODBC can reach 85% of performance. Clustered RFID gives 14% better performance than AOMDV_SAPTV and 8% better performance than ODBC for handling a huge range of nodes.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/electronics11182968</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4086-823X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3277-4505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8116-4733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5580-2989</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5526-3623</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2079-9292 |
ispartof | Electronics (Basel), 2022-09, Vol.11 (18), p.2968 |
issn | 2079-9292 2079-9292 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2716521022 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Clustering Communication Comparative analysis Efficiency Electromagnetic fields Frequency analysis Fuzzy logic Infringement Internet of Things Licenses Literature reviews Multicasting Nodes Radio frequency identification Radio frequency identification (RFID) Success |
title | Improving Efficiency of Large RFID Networks Using a Clustered Method: A Comparative Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T07%3A05%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Efficiency%20of%20Large%20RFID%20Networks%20Using%20a%20Clustered%20Method:%20A%20Comparative%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Electronics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Pandian,%20M.%20Thurai&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2968&rft.pages=2968-&rft.issn=2079-9292&rft.eissn=2079-9292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/electronics11182968&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA745603503%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2716521022&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A745603503&rfr_iscdi=true |