Efficacy of a 365nm Ultraviolet A1 light Emitting Diode (UVA1‐LED) in in vitro Extracorporeal Photopheresis
Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is one of the more effective cell therapies for graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD). ECP is a widely recommended therapeutic approach for the treatment of chronic GvHD, particularly steroid‐refractory GVHD. In recent years, the use of a light emitting diode (LED)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Photochemistry and photobiology 2022-09, Vol.98 (5), p.1229-1235 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1235 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1229 |
container_title | Photochemistry and photobiology |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Maeda, Akira Yamamoto, Riho Mizuno, Shohei Shigeichiro Miki Sakamoto, Yasuhiro Kogata, Shuhei Toyama, Chiyoshi Sato, Kazuki Okamatsu, Chizu Ando, Takanori Iida, Minako Watsuji, Toru Sato, Toshinobu Miyagawa, Shuji Okuyama, Hiroomi Takami, Akiyoshi Kodera, Yoshihisa |
description | Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is one of the more effective cell therapies for graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD). ECP is a widely recommended therapeutic approach for the treatment of chronic GvHD, particularly steroid‐refractory GVHD. In recent years, the use of a light emitting diode (LED) in the clinic has attracted considerable interest. In this study, we examined the issue of whether an ultraviolet A1‐light emitting diode (UVA1‐LED) can be used as a light source in ECP. To compare the efficacy of ECP with conventional UVA lamp and a UVA1‐LED, we established an in vitro ECP model. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by measuring the % apoptosis and the inhibition of T‐cell proliferation. To investigate the effect of ECP on the innate immune reaction, THP‐1 cells with a luciferase reporter gene driven by a NF‐kB response element (THP‐1 luc NF‐kB) were treated with ECP. The LED‐ECP induced apoptosis and inhibition of T‐cell proliferation as efficiently as a conventional ECP. However, LED‐ECP induced less innate immunity in THP‐1. Since LED devices are more compact compared with conventional UVA irradiation devices, the use of a UVA1‐LED in the treatment of ECP may be a better alternative to conventional ECP therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/php.13613 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2715110634</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2715110634</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27151106343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi71OwzAUhS0EEuFn4A2uxAJDii-uEzpW1IiBgYGyVlZwmls5ucZ2K9h4BJ6xT0KQeACOjvQN5ztCXKCc4Jib0IUJqgrVgSiw1liinNWHopBSYXlXaX0sTlLaSInTWY2F6E3bUmObT-AWLKhKDz0sfY52R-xdhjmCp3WXwfSUMw1rWBC_Obhavs5x__X9ZBbXQMNvd5Qjg_kYzw3HwNFZD88dZw6diy5ROhNHrfXJnf_xVFw-mJf7xzJEft-6lFcb3sZhnFa3NWpEWamp-p_1A_DeTZk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715110634</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of a 365nm Ultraviolet A1 light Emitting Diode (UVA1‐LED) in in vitro Extracorporeal Photopheresis</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Maeda, Akira ; Yamamoto, Riho ; Mizuno, Shohei ; Shigeichiro Miki ; Sakamoto, Yasuhiro ; Kogata, Shuhei ; Toyama, Chiyoshi ; Sato, Kazuki ; Okamatsu, Chizu ; Ando, Takanori ; Iida, Minako ; Watsuji, Toru ; Sato, Toshinobu ; Miyagawa, Shuji ; Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Takami, Akiyoshi ; Kodera, Yoshihisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Akira ; Yamamoto, Riho ; Mizuno, Shohei ; Shigeichiro Miki ; Sakamoto, Yasuhiro ; Kogata, Shuhei ; Toyama, Chiyoshi ; Sato, Kazuki ; Okamatsu, Chizu ; Ando, Takanori ; Iida, Minako ; Watsuji, Toru ; Sato, Toshinobu ; Miyagawa, Shuji ; Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Takami, Akiyoshi ; Kodera, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><description>Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is one of the more effective cell therapies for graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD). ECP is a widely recommended therapeutic approach for the treatment of chronic GvHD, particularly steroid‐refractory GVHD. In recent years, the use of a light emitting diode (LED) in the clinic has attracted considerable interest. In this study, we examined the issue of whether an ultraviolet A1‐light emitting diode (UVA1‐LED) can be used as a light source in ECP. To compare the efficacy of ECP with conventional UVA lamp and a UVA1‐LED, we established an in vitro ECP model. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by measuring the % apoptosis and the inhibition of T‐cell proliferation. To investigate the effect of ECP on the innate immune reaction, THP‐1 cells with a luciferase reporter gene driven by a NF‐kB response element (THP‐1 luc NF‐kB) were treated with ECP. The LED‐ECP induced apoptosis and inhibition of T‐cell proliferation as efficiently as a conventional ECP. However, LED‐ECP induced less innate immunity in THP‐1. Since LED devices are more compact compared with conventional UVA irradiation devices, the use of a UVA1‐LED in the treatment of ECP may be a better alternative to conventional ECP therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8655</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-1097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/php.13613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Apheresis ; Apoptosis ; Cell growth ; Cell proliferation ; Effectiveness ; Graft-versus-host reaction ; Innate immunity ; Irradiation ; Light emitting diodes ; Light sources ; Photochemotherapy ; Photodynamic therapy ; Reporter gene</subject><ispartof>Photochemistry and photobiology, 2022-09, Vol.98 (5), p.1229-1235</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2022 American Society for Photobiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Riho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Shohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shigeichiro Miki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogata, Shuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toyama, Chiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamatsu, Chizu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Takanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Minako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watsuji, Toru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Toshinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyagawa, Shuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takami, Akiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodera, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of a 365nm Ultraviolet A1 light Emitting Diode (UVA1‐LED) in in vitro Extracorporeal Photopheresis</title><title>Photochemistry and photobiology</title><description>Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is one of the more effective cell therapies for graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD). ECP is a widely recommended therapeutic approach for the treatment of chronic GvHD, particularly steroid‐refractory GVHD. In recent years, the use of a light emitting diode (LED) in the clinic has attracted considerable interest. In this study, we examined the issue of whether an ultraviolet A1‐light emitting diode (UVA1‐LED) can be used as a light source in ECP. To compare the efficacy of ECP with conventional UVA lamp and a UVA1‐LED, we established an in vitro ECP model. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by measuring the % apoptosis and the inhibition of T‐cell proliferation. To investigate the effect of ECP on the innate immune reaction, THP‐1 cells with a luciferase reporter gene driven by a NF‐kB response element (THP‐1 luc NF‐kB) were treated with ECP. The LED‐ECP induced apoptosis and inhibition of T‐cell proliferation as efficiently as a conventional ECP. However, LED‐ECP induced less innate immunity in THP‐1. Since LED devices are more compact compared with conventional UVA irradiation devices, the use of a UVA1‐LED in the treatment of ECP may be a better alternative to conventional ECP therapy.</description><subject>Apheresis</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Cell growth</subject><subject>Cell proliferation</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Graft-versus-host reaction</subject><subject>Innate immunity</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Light sources</subject><subject>Photochemotherapy</subject><subject>Photodynamic therapy</subject><subject>Reporter gene</subject><issn>0031-8655</issn><issn>1751-1097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNi71OwzAUhS0EEuFn4A2uxAJDii-uEzpW1IiBgYGyVlZwmls5ucZ2K9h4BJ6xT0KQeACOjvQN5ztCXKCc4Jib0IUJqgrVgSiw1liinNWHopBSYXlXaX0sTlLaSInTWY2F6E3bUmObT-AWLKhKDz0sfY52R-xdhjmCp3WXwfSUMw1rWBC_Obhavs5x__X9ZBbXQMNvd5Qjg_kYzw3HwNFZD88dZw6diy5ROhNHrfXJnf_xVFw-mJf7xzJEft-6lFcb3sZhnFa3NWpEWamp-p_1A_DeTZk</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Maeda, Akira</creator><creator>Yamamoto, Riho</creator><creator>Mizuno, Shohei</creator><creator>Shigeichiro Miki</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Yasuhiro</creator><creator>Kogata, Shuhei</creator><creator>Toyama, Chiyoshi</creator><creator>Sato, Kazuki</creator><creator>Okamatsu, Chizu</creator><creator>Ando, Takanori</creator><creator>Iida, Minako</creator><creator>Watsuji, Toru</creator><creator>Sato, Toshinobu</creator><creator>Miyagawa, Shuji</creator><creator>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creator><creator>Takami, Akiyoshi</creator><creator>Kodera, Yoshihisa</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Efficacy of a 365nm Ultraviolet A1 light Emitting Diode (UVA1‐LED) in in vitro Extracorporeal Photopheresis</title><author>Maeda, Akira ; Yamamoto, Riho ; Mizuno, Shohei ; Shigeichiro Miki ; Sakamoto, Yasuhiro ; Kogata, Shuhei ; Toyama, Chiyoshi ; Sato, Kazuki ; Okamatsu, Chizu ; Ando, Takanori ; Iida, Minako ; Watsuji, Toru ; Sato, Toshinobu ; Miyagawa, Shuji ; Okuyama, Hiroomi ; Takami, Akiyoshi ; Kodera, Yoshihisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27151106343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Apheresis</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Cell growth</topic><topic>Cell proliferation</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Graft-versus-host reaction</topic><topic>Innate immunity</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Light sources</topic><topic>Photochemotherapy</topic><topic>Photodynamic therapy</topic><topic>Reporter gene</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamamoto, Riho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Shohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shigeichiro Miki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yasuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogata, Shuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toyama, Chiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamatsu, Chizu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Takanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iida, Minako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watsuji, Toru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Toshinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyagawa, Shuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okuyama, Hiroomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takami, Akiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kodera, Yoshihisa</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Photochemistry and photobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maeda, Akira</au><au>Yamamoto, Riho</au><au>Mizuno, Shohei</au><au>Shigeichiro Miki</au><au>Sakamoto, Yasuhiro</au><au>Kogata, Shuhei</au><au>Toyama, Chiyoshi</au><au>Sato, Kazuki</au><au>Okamatsu, Chizu</au><au>Ando, Takanori</au><au>Iida, Minako</au><au>Watsuji, Toru</au><au>Sato, Toshinobu</au><au>Miyagawa, Shuji</au><au>Okuyama, Hiroomi</au><au>Takami, Akiyoshi</au><au>Kodera, Yoshihisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of a 365nm Ultraviolet A1 light Emitting Diode (UVA1‐LED) in in vitro Extracorporeal Photopheresis</atitle><jtitle>Photochemistry and photobiology</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1229</spage><epage>1235</epage><pages>1229-1235</pages><issn>0031-8655</issn><eissn>1751-1097</eissn><abstract>Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is one of the more effective cell therapies for graft‐versus‐host disease (GvHD). ECP is a widely recommended therapeutic approach for the treatment of chronic GvHD, particularly steroid‐refractory GVHD. In recent years, the use of a light emitting diode (LED) in the clinic has attracted considerable interest. In this study, we examined the issue of whether an ultraviolet A1‐light emitting diode (UVA1‐LED) can be used as a light source in ECP. To compare the efficacy of ECP with conventional UVA lamp and a UVA1‐LED, we established an in vitro ECP model. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by measuring the % apoptosis and the inhibition of T‐cell proliferation. To investigate the effect of ECP on the innate immune reaction, THP‐1 cells with a luciferase reporter gene driven by a NF‐kB response element (THP‐1 luc NF‐kB) were treated with ECP. The LED‐ECP induced apoptosis and inhibition of T‐cell proliferation as efficiently as a conventional ECP. However, LED‐ECP induced less innate immunity in THP‐1. Since LED devices are more compact compared with conventional UVA irradiation devices, the use of a UVA1‐LED in the treatment of ECP may be a better alternative to conventional ECP therapy.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/php.13613</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-8655 |
ispartof | Photochemistry and photobiology, 2022-09, Vol.98 (5), p.1229-1235 |
issn | 0031-8655 1751-1097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2715110634 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Apheresis Apoptosis Cell growth Cell proliferation Effectiveness Graft-versus-host reaction Innate immunity Irradiation Light emitting diodes Light sources Photochemotherapy Photodynamic therapy Reporter gene |
title | Efficacy of a 365nm Ultraviolet A1 light Emitting Diode (UVA1‐LED) in in vitro Extracorporeal Photopheresis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T03%3A37%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20a%20365nm%20Ultraviolet%20A1%20light%20Emitting%20Diode%20(UVA1%E2%80%90LED)%20in%20in%20vitro%20Extracorporeal%20Photopheresis&rft.jtitle=Photochemistry%20and%20photobiology&rft.au=Maeda,%20Akira&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1229&rft.epage=1235&rft.pages=1229-1235&rft.issn=0031-8655&rft.eissn=1751-1097&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/php.13613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2715110634%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715110634&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |