Evaluation of the Depth and Width of Progressive Failure of Breakout Based on Different Failure Criteria, Using a Finite Element Numerical Model
Shear failure due to compressive stress around a borehole is called breakout. Breakout occurs along the minor principal stresses. Due to the change in the cross section of the borehole due to the collapse of the crushed layers of rock into the borehole, breakout is developed to achieve stability. Ac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011) 2022, Vol.47 (9), p.11825-11839 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11839 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 11825 |
container_title | Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011) |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Bahrehdar, Mohammad Lakirouhani, Ali |
description | Shear failure due to compressive stress around a borehole is called breakout. Breakout occurs along the minor principal stresses. Due to the change in the cross section of the borehole due to the collapse of the crushed layers of rock into the borehole, breakout is developed to achieve stability. Accurate estimation of breakout dimensions is important for two reasons; first, breakout in large volumes can cause borehole instability. Secondly, in recent years, efforts have been made to use breakout dimensions to estimate in situ stresses. Failure breakout area depends on the material properties, in situ stresses and the failure criterion. In this paper, using a simple numerical model based on the finite element method, a comprehensive analysis of the breakout phenomenon and its dimensions for 5 different failure criteria has been performed. The proposed numerical model examines breakout expansion step by step until stability is achieved. According to the obtained results, the failure criterion and intermediate principal stress are effective in the breakout dimensions, as the Drucker-Prager failure criterion suggests the smallest breakout failure area and the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion provides the largest failure area due to not considering the intermediate principal stress, for this reason, Mohr–Coulomb criterion is not suitable for breakout analysis. Comparing the results of numerical analysis with the results of breakout experiments performed on Tablerock sandstone, it was observed that the breakout failure depth, for certain in situ stresses, could be close to the breakout failure depth obtained according to Drucker-Prager and modified Lade criteria. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13369-022-06640-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2714473787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2714473787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3f6fe82e7159352e67e4a3fa602384cafc4f46f7f601771bf4881f86ad1db9803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEhX0B1hZYkvAr9jOkr4AqTwWVLCz3GTcGtKk2Ekl_oJPxm0R7FjN6M65d6SbJGcEXxKM5VUgjIk8xZSmWAiO0_wg6VGSk5RTRQ53O0szIV-Pk34Ibo65YnlGCOslX-ONqTrTuqZGjUXtEtAI1u0SmbpEL66MW5SffLPwEK0bQBPjqs7DVh54MO9N16KBCVCiGDFy1oKHuv3Fht614J25QLPg6gUyaOLqKKFxBast-NCt4r0wFbpvSqhOkyNrqgD9n3mSzCbj5-FtOn28uRteT9OCkbxNmRUWFAVJspxlFIQEbpg1AlOmeGFswS0XVlqBiZRkbrlSxCphSlLOc4XZSXK-z1375qOD0Oq3pvN1fKmpJJxLJpWMFN1ThW9C8GD12ruV8Z-aYL0tX-_L17F8vStf59HE9qYQ4XoB_i_6H9c3ZYaIBA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714473787</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Depth and Width of Progressive Failure of Breakout Based on Different Failure Criteria, Using a Finite Element Numerical Model</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Bahrehdar, Mohammad ; Lakirouhani, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Bahrehdar, Mohammad ; Lakirouhani, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>Shear failure due to compressive stress around a borehole is called breakout. Breakout occurs along the minor principal stresses. Due to the change in the cross section of the borehole due to the collapse of the crushed layers of rock into the borehole, breakout is developed to achieve stability. Accurate estimation of breakout dimensions is important for two reasons; first, breakout in large volumes can cause borehole instability. Secondly, in recent years, efforts have been made to use breakout dimensions to estimate in situ stresses. Failure breakout area depends on the material properties, in situ stresses and the failure criterion. In this paper, using a simple numerical model based on the finite element method, a comprehensive analysis of the breakout phenomenon and its dimensions for 5 different failure criteria has been performed. The proposed numerical model examines breakout expansion step by step until stability is achieved. According to the obtained results, the failure criterion and intermediate principal stress are effective in the breakout dimensions, as the Drucker-Prager failure criterion suggests the smallest breakout failure area and the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion provides the largest failure area due to not considering the intermediate principal stress, for this reason, Mohr–Coulomb criterion is not suitable for breakout analysis. Comparing the results of numerical analysis with the results of breakout experiments performed on Tablerock sandstone, it was observed that the breakout failure depth, for certain in situ stresses, could be close to the breakout failure depth obtained according to Drucker-Prager and modified Lade criteria.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2193-567X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1319-8025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2191-4281</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13369-022-06640-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Boreholes ; Compressive properties ; Criteria ; Engineering ; Failure ; Finite element method ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Material properties ; Mathematical models ; Mohr-Coulomb theory ; multidisciplinary ; Numerical analysis ; Numerical models ; Research Article-Petroleum Engineering ; Sandstone ; Science ; Stability ; Stresses</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011), 2022, Vol.47 (9), p.11825-11839</ispartof><rights>King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2022</rights><rights>King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3f6fe82e7159352e67e4a3fa602384cafc4f46f7f601771bf4881f86ad1db9803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3f6fe82e7159352e67e4a3fa602384cafc4f46f7f601771bf4881f86ad1db9803</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5449-8420</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13369-022-06640-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13369-022-06640-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929,41492,42561,51323</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bahrehdar, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakirouhani, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Depth and Width of Progressive Failure of Breakout Based on Different Failure Criteria, Using a Finite Element Numerical Model</title><title>Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011)</title><addtitle>Arab J Sci Eng</addtitle><description>Shear failure due to compressive stress around a borehole is called breakout. Breakout occurs along the minor principal stresses. Due to the change in the cross section of the borehole due to the collapse of the crushed layers of rock into the borehole, breakout is developed to achieve stability. Accurate estimation of breakout dimensions is important for two reasons; first, breakout in large volumes can cause borehole instability. Secondly, in recent years, efforts have been made to use breakout dimensions to estimate in situ stresses. Failure breakout area depends on the material properties, in situ stresses and the failure criterion. In this paper, using a simple numerical model based on the finite element method, a comprehensive analysis of the breakout phenomenon and its dimensions for 5 different failure criteria has been performed. The proposed numerical model examines breakout expansion step by step until stability is achieved. According to the obtained results, the failure criterion and intermediate principal stress are effective in the breakout dimensions, as the Drucker-Prager failure criterion suggests the smallest breakout failure area and the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion provides the largest failure area due to not considering the intermediate principal stress, for this reason, Mohr–Coulomb criterion is not suitable for breakout analysis. Comparing the results of numerical analysis with the results of breakout experiments performed on Tablerock sandstone, it was observed that the breakout failure depth, for certain in situ stresses, could be close to the breakout failure depth obtained according to Drucker-Prager and modified Lade criteria.</description><subject>Boreholes</subject><subject>Compressive properties</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mohr-Coulomb theory</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Research Article-Petroleum Engineering</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><issn>2193-567X</issn><issn>1319-8025</issn><issn>2191-4281</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEEhX0B1hZYkvAr9jOkr4AqTwWVLCz3GTcGtKk2Ekl_oJPxm0R7FjN6M65d6SbJGcEXxKM5VUgjIk8xZSmWAiO0_wg6VGSk5RTRQ53O0szIV-Pk34Ibo65YnlGCOslX-ONqTrTuqZGjUXtEtAI1u0SmbpEL66MW5SffLPwEK0bQBPjqs7DVh54MO9N16KBCVCiGDFy1oKHuv3Fht614J25QLPg6gUyaOLqKKFxBast-NCt4r0wFbpvSqhOkyNrqgD9n3mSzCbj5-FtOn28uRteT9OCkbxNmRUWFAVJspxlFIQEbpg1AlOmeGFswS0XVlqBiZRkbrlSxCphSlLOc4XZSXK-z1375qOD0Oq3pvN1fKmpJJxLJpWMFN1ThW9C8GD12ruV8Z-aYL0tX-_L17F8vStf59HE9qYQ4XoB_i_6H9c3ZYaIBA</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Bahrehdar, Mohammad</creator><creator>Lakirouhani, Ali</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-8420</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Depth and Width of Progressive Failure of Breakout Based on Different Failure Criteria, Using a Finite Element Numerical Model</title><author>Bahrehdar, Mohammad ; Lakirouhani, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-3f6fe82e7159352e67e4a3fa602384cafc4f46f7f601771bf4881f86ad1db9803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Boreholes</topic><topic>Compressive properties</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mohr-Coulomb theory</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Research Article-Petroleum Engineering</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bahrehdar, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakirouhani, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bahrehdar, Mohammad</au><au>Lakirouhani, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Depth and Width of Progressive Failure of Breakout Based on Different Failure Criteria, Using a Finite Element Numerical Model</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011)</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Sci Eng</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>11825</spage><epage>11839</epage><pages>11825-11839</pages><issn>2193-567X</issn><issn>1319-8025</issn><eissn>2191-4281</eissn><abstract>Shear failure due to compressive stress around a borehole is called breakout. Breakout occurs along the minor principal stresses. Due to the change in the cross section of the borehole due to the collapse of the crushed layers of rock into the borehole, breakout is developed to achieve stability. Accurate estimation of breakout dimensions is important for two reasons; first, breakout in large volumes can cause borehole instability. Secondly, in recent years, efforts have been made to use breakout dimensions to estimate in situ stresses. Failure breakout area depends on the material properties, in situ stresses and the failure criterion. In this paper, using a simple numerical model based on the finite element method, a comprehensive analysis of the breakout phenomenon and its dimensions for 5 different failure criteria has been performed. The proposed numerical model examines breakout expansion step by step until stability is achieved. According to the obtained results, the failure criterion and intermediate principal stress are effective in the breakout dimensions, as the Drucker-Prager failure criterion suggests the smallest breakout failure area and the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion provides the largest failure area due to not considering the intermediate principal stress, for this reason, Mohr–Coulomb criterion is not suitable for breakout analysis. Comparing the results of numerical analysis with the results of breakout experiments performed on Tablerock sandstone, it was observed that the breakout failure depth, for certain in situ stresses, could be close to the breakout failure depth obtained according to Drucker-Prager and modified Lade criteria.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13369-022-06640-9</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5449-8420</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2193-567X |
ispartof | Arabian journal for science and engineering (2011), 2022, Vol.47 (9), p.11825-11839 |
issn | 2193-567X 1319-8025 2191-4281 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2714473787 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Boreholes Compressive properties Criteria Engineering Failure Finite element method Humanities and Social Sciences Material properties Mathematical models Mohr-Coulomb theory multidisciplinary Numerical analysis Numerical models Research Article-Petroleum Engineering Sandstone Science Stability Stresses |
title | Evaluation of the Depth and Width of Progressive Failure of Breakout Based on Different Failure Criteria, Using a Finite Element Numerical Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T03%3A22%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Depth%20and%20Width%20of%20Progressive%20Failure%20of%20Breakout%20Based%20on%20Different%20Failure%20Criteria,%20Using%20a%20Finite%20Element%20Numerical%20Model&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20for%20science%20and%20engineering%20(2011)&rft.au=Bahrehdar,%20Mohammad&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=11825&rft.epage=11839&rft.pages=11825-11839&rft.issn=2193-567X&rft.eissn=2191-4281&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13369-022-06640-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714473787%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714473787&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |