Open Science and Single-Case Design Research
Research indicating many study results do not replicate has raised questions about the credibility of science and prompted concerns about a potential reproducibility crisis. Moreover, most published research is not freely accessible, which limits the potential impact of science. Open science, which...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Remedial and special education 2022-10, Vol.43 (5), p.359-369 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 369 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 359 |
| container_title | Remedial and special education |
| container_volume | 43 |
| creator | Cook, Bryan G. Johnson, Austin H. Maggin, Daniel M. Therrien, William J. Barton, Erin E. Lloyd, John Wills Reichow, Brian Talbott, Elizabeth Travers, Jason C. |
| description | Research indicating many study results do not replicate has raised questions about the credibility of science and prompted concerns about a potential reproducibility crisis. Moreover, most published research is not freely accessible, which limits the potential impact of science. Open science, which aims to make the research process more open and reproducible, has been proposed as one approach to increase the credibility and impact of scientific research. Although relatively little attention has been paid to open science in relation to single-case design, we propose that open-science practices can be applied to enhance the credibility and impact of single-case design research. In this article, we discuss how open-science practices align with other recent developments in single-case design research, describe four prominent open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, registered reports, data and materials sharing, and open access), and discuss potential benefits and limitations of each practice for single-case design. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0741932521996452 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2713201725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1350498</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0741932521996452</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2713201725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-5268493e9ed8820b7fa88f475550bd5a02408915b29537d96b478434ed5cdbb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYDqJgnd69CAWvRvP1NslR6vxiMHB6Lmn6tnbMbibbYf_eloqC4Ok5PJ88hJxzds251jdMK26lAMGtzRSIA5JwkIYqDdkhSQaaDvwxOYlxyRjj2oiEXM032KUL32LnMXVdlS7arlkhzV3E9A5j23TpC0Z0wb-fkqParSKefeOEvN1PX_NHOps_POW3M-ql5FsKIjPKSrRYGSNYqWtnTN0PAWBlBY4JxYzlUAoLUlc2K5U2SiqswFdlaeSEXI65m7D-3GHcFsv1LnR9ZSE0l6LfLqBXsVHlwzrGgHWxCe2HC_uCs2L4pPj7SW-5GC0YWv8jnz5zCUzZoZiOfHQN_pb-m_cFuShmiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2713201725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Open Science and Single-Case Design Research</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cook, Bryan G. ; Johnson, Austin H. ; Maggin, Daniel M. ; Therrien, William J. ; Barton, Erin E. ; Lloyd, John Wills ; Reichow, Brian ; Talbott, Elizabeth ; Travers, Jason C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cook, Bryan G. ; Johnson, Austin H. ; Maggin, Daniel M. ; Therrien, William J. ; Barton, Erin E. ; Lloyd, John Wills ; Reichow, Brian ; Talbott, Elizabeth ; Travers, Jason C.</creatorcontrib><description>Research indicating many study results do not replicate has raised questions about the credibility of science and prompted concerns about a potential reproducibility crisis. Moreover, most published research is not freely accessible, which limits the potential impact of science. Open science, which aims to make the research process more open and reproducible, has been proposed as one approach to increase the credibility and impact of scientific research. Although relatively little attention has been paid to open science in relation to single-case design, we propose that open-science practices can be applied to enhance the credibility and impact of single-case design research. In this article, we discuss how open-science practices align with other recent developments in single-case design research, describe four prominent open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, registered reports, data and materials sharing, and open access), and discuss potential benefits and limitations of each practice for single-case design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0741-9325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0741932521996452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access to Information ; Credibility ; Evidence Based Practice ; Meta Analysis ; Periodicals ; Reproducibility ; Research Methodology ; Research Reports ; Scientific Research</subject><ispartof>Remedial and special education, 2022-10, Vol.43 (5), p.359-369</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-5268493e9ed8820b7fa88f475550bd5a02408915b29537d96b478434ed5cdbb83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-5268493e9ed8820b7fa88f475550bd5a02408915b29537d96b478434ed5cdbb83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9294-0873 ; 0000-0003-1956-3519 ; 0000-0002-5575-5713</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0741932521996452$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0741932521996452$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,30976,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1350498$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cook, Bryan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Austin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therrien, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, John Wills</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichow, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbott, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travers, Jason C.</creatorcontrib><title>Open Science and Single-Case Design Research</title><title>Remedial and special education</title><description>Research indicating many study results do not replicate has raised questions about the credibility of science and prompted concerns about a potential reproducibility crisis. Moreover, most published research is not freely accessible, which limits the potential impact of science. Open science, which aims to make the research process more open and reproducible, has been proposed as one approach to increase the credibility and impact of scientific research. Although relatively little attention has been paid to open science in relation to single-case design, we propose that open-science practices can be applied to enhance the credibility and impact of single-case design research. In this article, we discuss how open-science practices align with other recent developments in single-case design research, describe four prominent open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, registered reports, data and materials sharing, and open access), and discuss potential benefits and limitations of each practice for single-case design.</description><subject>Access to Information</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Evidence Based Practice</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Research Reports</subject><subject>Scientific Research</subject><issn>0741-9325</issn><issn>1538-4756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LwzAYDqJgnd69CAWvRvP1NslR6vxiMHB6Lmn6tnbMbibbYf_eloqC4Ok5PJ88hJxzds251jdMK26lAMGtzRSIA5JwkIYqDdkhSQaaDvwxOYlxyRjj2oiEXM032KUL32LnMXVdlS7arlkhzV3E9A5j23TpC0Z0wb-fkqParSKefeOEvN1PX_NHOps_POW3M-ql5FsKIjPKSrRYGSNYqWtnTN0PAWBlBY4JxYzlUAoLUlc2K5U2SiqswFdlaeSEXI65m7D-3GHcFsv1LnR9ZSE0l6LfLqBXsVHlwzrGgHWxCe2HC_uCs2L4pPj7SW-5GC0YWv8jnz5zCUzZoZiOfHQN_pb-m_cFuShmiA</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Cook, Bryan G.</creator><creator>Johnson, Austin H.</creator><creator>Maggin, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Therrien, William J.</creator><creator>Barton, Erin E.</creator><creator>Lloyd, John Wills</creator><creator>Reichow, Brian</creator><creator>Talbott, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Travers, Jason C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-0873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-3519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5575-5713</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Open Science and Single-Case Design Research</title><author>Cook, Bryan G. ; Johnson, Austin H. ; Maggin, Daniel M. ; Therrien, William J. ; Barton, Erin E. ; Lloyd, John Wills ; Reichow, Brian ; Talbott, Elizabeth ; Travers, Jason C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-5268493e9ed8820b7fa88f475550bd5a02408915b29537d96b478434ed5cdbb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access to Information</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Evidence Based Practice</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Research Reports</topic><topic>Scientific Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cook, Bryan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Austin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggin, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Therrien, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barton, Erin E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, John Wills</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reichow, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talbott, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Travers, Jason C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Remedial and special education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cook, Bryan G.</au><au>Johnson, Austin H.</au><au>Maggin, Daniel M.</au><au>Therrien, William J.</au><au>Barton, Erin E.</au><au>Lloyd, John Wills</au><au>Reichow, Brian</au><au>Talbott, Elizabeth</au><au>Travers, Jason C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1350498</ericid><atitle>Open Science and Single-Case Design Research</atitle><jtitle>Remedial and special education</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>369</epage><pages>359-369</pages><issn>0741-9325</issn><eissn>1538-4756</eissn><abstract>Research indicating many study results do not replicate has raised questions about the credibility of science and prompted concerns about a potential reproducibility crisis. Moreover, most published research is not freely accessible, which limits the potential impact of science. Open science, which aims to make the research process more open and reproducible, has been proposed as one approach to increase the credibility and impact of scientific research. Although relatively little attention has been paid to open science in relation to single-case design, we propose that open-science practices can be applied to enhance the credibility and impact of single-case design research. In this article, we discuss how open-science practices align with other recent developments in single-case design research, describe four prominent open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, registered reports, data and materials sharing, and open access), and discuss potential benefits and limitations of each practice for single-case design.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0741932521996452</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9294-0873</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-3519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5575-5713</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0741-9325 |
| ispartof | Remedial and special education, 2022-10, Vol.43 (5), p.359-369 |
| issn | 0741-9325 1538-4756 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2713201725 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Access to Information Credibility Evidence Based Practice Meta Analysis Periodicals Reproducibility Research Methodology Research Reports Scientific Research |
| title | Open Science and Single-Case Design Research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T14%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Open%20Science%20and%20Single-Case%20Design%20Research&rft.jtitle=Remedial%20and%20special%20education&rft.au=Cook,%20Bryan%20G.&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=369&rft.pages=359-369&rft.issn=0741-9325&rft.eissn=1538-4756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0741932521996452&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2713201725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2713201725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1350498&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0741932521996452&rfr_iscdi=true |