Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis
This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Discourse & communication 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), p.598-618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 618 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 598 |
container_title | Discourse & communication |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Pei, Jiamin Li, Dandi Cheng, Le |
description | This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both media share a positive transformation of the image-building of hackers in the 21st century. Besides, countries are salient social actors in hacker media discourse and the two media differ in their ways of constructing them. The New York Times tends to have a negative other-representation and categorical otherness of specific countries through such discursive strategies as negative other-representation and group categorization, whereas China Daily is prone to insist on opposing the US hacking allegations in a defensive manner. Regarding major targets, China Daily highlights government websites whereas The New York Times emphasizes government websites, officials’ emails, large technology companies, and election infrastructure. The analysis shows that the two media’s different ways of framing hackers are underpinned by the ideologies behind them and the Chinese and US socio-political landscapes. This study can provide insights into how hacker discourse in media is represented in the 21st century and how national identities are constructed in the media representations of hackers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/17504813221099190 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2713201675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17504813221099190</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2713201675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-5d81acb6bd5732a2ee66717e787f4148ab8b9af4d2a291ff2a4bcd86581f29b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4hzIOk7scKvKUypwKQdO0cYP6jZtgp0K5d_jqggOiNOuducbjYaQc0gvAYS4ApGnXELGGKRlCWV6QEa7W8Ilg8OfHbJjchLCMk1zXmZ8RJonox3SrvW9xwEb2lq6QLUyPlC3odOF2yC9QdcMFDeazheGPptP-tb6FZ27tQnXdEJV67ttSGoMRlPlXe9UdNIuqHbrg4kkNkNw4ZQcWWyCOfueY_J6dzufPiSzl_vH6WSWqAxYn-RaAqq6qHUuMobMmKIQIIyQwnLgEmtZl2i5jr8SrGXIa6VlkUuwrKxFNiYXe9_Otx9bE_pqGYPEEKFiInaUQiHyqIK9Svk2BG9s1Xm3Rj9UkFa7Uqs_pUbmcs8EfDe_rv8DX2wCdoU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2713201675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Pei, Jiamin ; Li, Dandi ; Cheng, Le</creator><creatorcontrib>Pei, Jiamin ; Li, Dandi ; Cheng, Le</creatorcontrib><description>This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both media share a positive transformation of the image-building of hackers in the 21st century. Besides, countries are salient social actors in hacker media discourse and the two media differ in their ways of constructing them. The New York Times tends to have a negative other-representation and categorical otherness of specific countries through such discursive strategies as negative other-representation and group categorization, whereas China Daily is prone to insist on opposing the US hacking allegations in a defensive manner. Regarding major targets, China Daily highlights government websites whereas The New York Times emphasizes government websites, officials’ emails, large technology companies, and election infrastructure. The analysis shows that the two media’s different ways of framing hackers are underpinned by the ideologies behind them and the Chinese and US socio-political landscapes. This study can provide insights into how hacker discourse in media is represented in the 21st century and how national identities are constructed in the media representations of hackers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1750-4813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-4821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17504813221099190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>21st century ; Corpus analysis ; Corpus linguistics ; Critical discourse analysis ; Cybercrime ; Discourse analysis ; Discourse strategies ; Hackers ; National identity ; Otherness ; Political discourse ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Discourse & communication, 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), p.598-618</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-5d81acb6bd5732a2ee66717e787f4148ab8b9af4d2a291ff2a4bcd86581f29b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-5d81acb6bd5732a2ee66717e787f4148ab8b9af4d2a291ff2a4bcd86581f29b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17504813221099190$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17504813221099190$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pei, Jiamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Le</creatorcontrib><title>Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis</title><title>Discourse & communication</title><description>This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both media share a positive transformation of the image-building of hackers in the 21st century. Besides, countries are salient social actors in hacker media discourse and the two media differ in their ways of constructing them. The New York Times tends to have a negative other-representation and categorical otherness of specific countries through such discursive strategies as negative other-representation and group categorization, whereas China Daily is prone to insist on opposing the US hacking allegations in a defensive manner. Regarding major targets, China Daily highlights government websites whereas The New York Times emphasizes government websites, officials’ emails, large technology companies, and election infrastructure. The analysis shows that the two media’s different ways of framing hackers are underpinned by the ideologies behind them and the Chinese and US socio-political landscapes. This study can provide insights into how hacker discourse in media is represented in the 21st century and how national identities are constructed in the media representations of hackers.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Corpus analysis</subject><subject>Corpus linguistics</subject><subject>Critical discourse analysis</subject><subject>Cybercrime</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Discourse strategies</subject><subject>Hackers</subject><subject>National identity</subject><subject>Otherness</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1750-4813</issn><issn>1750-4821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4hzIOk7scKvKUypwKQdO0cYP6jZtgp0K5d_jqggOiNOuducbjYaQc0gvAYS4ApGnXELGGKRlCWV6QEa7W8Ilg8OfHbJjchLCMk1zXmZ8RJonox3SrvW9xwEb2lq6QLUyPlC3odOF2yC9QdcMFDeazheGPptP-tb6FZ27tQnXdEJV67ttSGoMRlPlXe9UdNIuqHbrg4kkNkNw4ZQcWWyCOfueY_J6dzufPiSzl_vH6WSWqAxYn-RaAqq6qHUuMobMmKIQIIyQwnLgEmtZl2i5jr8SrGXIa6VlkUuwrKxFNiYXe9_Otx9bE_pqGYPEEKFiInaUQiHyqIK9Svk2BG9s1Xm3Rj9UkFa7Uqs_pUbmcs8EfDe_rv8DX2wCdoU</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Pei, Jiamin</creator><creator>Li, Dandi</creator><creator>Cheng, Le</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis</title><author>Pei, Jiamin ; Li, Dandi ; Cheng, Le</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-5d81acb6bd5732a2ee66717e787f4148ab8b9af4d2a291ff2a4bcd86581f29b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Corpus analysis</topic><topic>Corpus linguistics</topic><topic>Critical discourse analysis</topic><topic>Cybercrime</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Discourse strategies</topic><topic>Hackers</topic><topic>National identity</topic><topic>Otherness</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pei, Jiamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Le</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Discourse & communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pei, Jiamin</au><au>Li, Dandi</au><au>Cheng, Le</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis</atitle><jtitle>Discourse & communication</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>598-618</pages><issn>1750-4813</issn><eissn>1750-4821</eissn><abstract>This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both media share a positive transformation of the image-building of hackers in the 21st century. Besides, countries are salient social actors in hacker media discourse and the two media differ in their ways of constructing them. The New York Times tends to have a negative other-representation and categorical otherness of specific countries through such discursive strategies as negative other-representation and group categorization, whereas China Daily is prone to insist on opposing the US hacking allegations in a defensive manner. Regarding major targets, China Daily highlights government websites whereas The New York Times emphasizes government websites, officials’ emails, large technology companies, and election infrastructure. The analysis shows that the two media’s different ways of framing hackers are underpinned by the ideologies behind them and the Chinese and US socio-political landscapes. This study can provide insights into how hacker discourse in media is represented in the 21st century and how national identities are constructed in the media representations of hackers.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/17504813221099190</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1750-4813 |
ispartof | Discourse & communication, 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), p.598-618 |
issn | 1750-4813 1750-4821 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2713201675 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | 21st century Corpus analysis Corpus linguistics Critical discourse analysis Cybercrime Discourse analysis Discourse strategies Hackers National identity Otherness Political discourse Websites |
title | Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Media%20portrayal%20of%20hackers%20in%20China%20Daily%20and%20The%20New%20York%20Times:%20A%20corpus-based%20critical%20discourse%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Discourse%20&%20communication&rft.au=Pei,%20Jiamin&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=598-618&rft.issn=1750-4813&rft.eissn=1750-4821&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17504813221099190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2713201675%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2713201675&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17504813221099190&rfr_iscdi=true |