Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis

This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Discourse & communication 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), p.598-618
Hauptverfasser: Pei, Jiamin, Li, Dandi, Cheng, Le
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 618
container_issue 5
container_start_page 598
container_title Discourse & communication
container_volume 16
creator Pei, Jiamin
Li, Dandi
Cheng, Le
description This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both media share a positive transformation of the image-building of hackers in the 21st century. Besides, countries are salient social actors in hacker media discourse and the two media differ in their ways of constructing them. The New York Times tends to have a negative other-representation and categorical otherness of specific countries through such discursive strategies as negative other-representation and group categorization, whereas China Daily is prone to insist on opposing the US hacking allegations in a defensive manner. Regarding major targets, China Daily highlights government websites whereas The New York Times emphasizes government websites, officials’ emails, large technology companies, and election infrastructure. The analysis shows that the two media’s different ways of framing hackers are underpinned by the ideologies behind them and the Chinese and US socio-political landscapes. This study can provide insights into how hacker discourse in media is represented in the 21st century and how national identities are constructed in the media representations of hackers.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17504813221099190
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2713201675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17504813221099190</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2713201675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-5d81acb6bd5732a2ee66717e787f4148ab8b9af4d2a291ff2a4bcd86581f29b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4hzIOk7scKvKUypwKQdO0cYP6jZtgp0K5d_jqggOiNOuducbjYaQc0gvAYS4ApGnXELGGKRlCWV6QEa7W8Ilg8OfHbJjchLCMk1zXmZ8RJonox3SrvW9xwEb2lq6QLUyPlC3odOF2yC9QdcMFDeazheGPptP-tb6FZ27tQnXdEJV67ttSGoMRlPlXe9UdNIuqHbrg4kkNkNw4ZQcWWyCOfueY_J6dzufPiSzl_vH6WSWqAxYn-RaAqq6qHUuMobMmKIQIIyQwnLgEmtZl2i5jr8SrGXIa6VlkUuwrKxFNiYXe9_Otx9bE_pqGYPEEKFiInaUQiHyqIK9Svk2BG9s1Xm3Rj9UkFa7Uqs_pUbmcs8EfDe_rv8DX2wCdoU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2713201675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Pei, Jiamin ; Li, Dandi ; Cheng, Le</creator><creatorcontrib>Pei, Jiamin ; Li, Dandi ; Cheng, Le</creatorcontrib><description>This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both media share a positive transformation of the image-building of hackers in the 21st century. Besides, countries are salient social actors in hacker media discourse and the two media differ in their ways of constructing them. The New York Times tends to have a negative other-representation and categorical otherness of specific countries through such discursive strategies as negative other-representation and group categorization, whereas China Daily is prone to insist on opposing the US hacking allegations in a defensive manner. Regarding major targets, China Daily highlights government websites whereas The New York Times emphasizes government websites, officials’ emails, large technology companies, and election infrastructure. The analysis shows that the two media’s different ways of framing hackers are underpinned by the ideologies behind them and the Chinese and US socio-political landscapes. This study can provide insights into how hacker discourse in media is represented in the 21st century and how national identities are constructed in the media representations of hackers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1750-4813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-4821</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17504813221099190</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>21st century ; Corpus analysis ; Corpus linguistics ; Critical discourse analysis ; Cybercrime ; Discourse analysis ; Discourse strategies ; Hackers ; National identity ; Otherness ; Political discourse ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Discourse &amp; communication, 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), p.598-618</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-5d81acb6bd5732a2ee66717e787f4148ab8b9af4d2a291ff2a4bcd86581f29b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-5d81acb6bd5732a2ee66717e787f4148ab8b9af4d2a291ff2a4bcd86581f29b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17504813221099190$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17504813221099190$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pei, Jiamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Le</creatorcontrib><title>Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis</title><title>Discourse &amp; communication</title><description>This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both media share a positive transformation of the image-building of hackers in the 21st century. Besides, countries are salient social actors in hacker media discourse and the two media differ in their ways of constructing them. The New York Times tends to have a negative other-representation and categorical otherness of specific countries through such discursive strategies as negative other-representation and group categorization, whereas China Daily is prone to insist on opposing the US hacking allegations in a defensive manner. Regarding major targets, China Daily highlights government websites whereas The New York Times emphasizes government websites, officials’ emails, large technology companies, and election infrastructure. The analysis shows that the two media’s different ways of framing hackers are underpinned by the ideologies behind them and the Chinese and US socio-political landscapes. This study can provide insights into how hacker discourse in media is represented in the 21st century and how national identities are constructed in the media representations of hackers.</description><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Corpus analysis</subject><subject>Corpus linguistics</subject><subject>Critical discourse analysis</subject><subject>Cybercrime</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Discourse strategies</subject><subject>Hackers</subject><subject>National identity</subject><subject>Otherness</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1750-4813</issn><issn>1750-4821</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwA7hZ4hzIOk7scKvKUypwKQdO0cYP6jZtgp0K5d_jqggOiNOuducbjYaQc0gvAYS4ApGnXELGGKRlCWV6QEa7W8Ilg8OfHbJjchLCMk1zXmZ8RJonox3SrvW9xwEb2lq6QLUyPlC3odOF2yC9QdcMFDeazheGPptP-tb6FZ27tQnXdEJV67ttSGoMRlPlXe9UdNIuqHbrg4kkNkNw4ZQcWWyCOfueY_J6dzufPiSzl_vH6WSWqAxYn-RaAqq6qHUuMobMmKIQIIyQwnLgEmtZl2i5jr8SrGXIa6VlkUuwrKxFNiYXe9_Otx9bE_pqGYPEEKFiInaUQiHyqIK9Svk2BG9s1Xm3Rj9UkFa7Uqs_pUbmcs8EfDe_rv8DX2wCdoU</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Pei, Jiamin</creator><creator>Li, Dandi</creator><creator>Cheng, Le</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis</title><author>Pei, Jiamin ; Li, Dandi ; Cheng, Le</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-5d81acb6bd5732a2ee66717e787f4148ab8b9af4d2a291ff2a4bcd86581f29b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Corpus analysis</topic><topic>Corpus linguistics</topic><topic>Critical discourse analysis</topic><topic>Cybercrime</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Discourse strategies</topic><topic>Hackers</topic><topic>National identity</topic><topic>Otherness</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pei, Jiamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dandi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Le</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Discourse &amp; communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pei, Jiamin</au><au>Li, Dandi</au><au>Cheng, Le</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis</atitle><jtitle>Discourse &amp; communication</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>598-618</pages><issn>1750-4813</issn><eissn>1750-4821</eissn><abstract>This study draws on a synergy of Corpus Linguistics and Critical Discourse Studies to scrutinize the portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times in the 21st century (2001–2020), primarily revolving around the main social actors and targets in hacking. This study demonstrates that both media share a positive transformation of the image-building of hackers in the 21st century. Besides, countries are salient social actors in hacker media discourse and the two media differ in their ways of constructing them. The New York Times tends to have a negative other-representation and categorical otherness of specific countries through such discursive strategies as negative other-representation and group categorization, whereas China Daily is prone to insist on opposing the US hacking allegations in a defensive manner. Regarding major targets, China Daily highlights government websites whereas The New York Times emphasizes government websites, officials’ emails, large technology companies, and election infrastructure. The analysis shows that the two media’s different ways of framing hackers are underpinned by the ideologies behind them and the Chinese and US socio-political landscapes. This study can provide insights into how hacker discourse in media is represented in the 21st century and how national identities are constructed in the media representations of hackers.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/17504813221099190</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1750-4813
ispartof Discourse & communication, 2022-10, Vol.16 (5), p.598-618
issn 1750-4813
1750-4821
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2713201675
source SAGE Complete
subjects 21st century
Corpus analysis
Corpus linguistics
Critical discourse analysis
Cybercrime
Discourse analysis
Discourse strategies
Hackers
National identity
Otherness
Political discourse
Websites
title Media portrayal of hackers in China Daily and The New York Times: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Media%20portrayal%20of%20hackers%20in%20China%20Daily%20and%20The%20New%20York%20Times:%20A%20corpus-based%20critical%20discourse%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Discourse%20&%20communication&rft.au=Pei,%20Jiamin&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=598-618&rft.issn=1750-4813&rft.eissn=1750-4821&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17504813221099190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2713201675%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2713201675&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17504813221099190&rfr_iscdi=true