Gender Differences in STEM Persistence after Graduation
Much attention is focused on finding ways to encourage females to study STEM in school and college, but what actually happens once women complete a STEM degree? We use the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey to trace out gender differences in STEM persistence over the career. We find a continuous proce...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economica (London) 2022-10, Vol.89 (356), p.862-883 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 883 |
---|---|
container_issue | 356 |
container_start_page | 862 |
container_title | Economica (London) |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Delaney, Judith M. Devereux, Paul J. |
description | Much attention is focused on finding ways to encourage females to study STEM in school and college, but what actually happens once women complete a STEM degree? We use the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey to trace out gender differences in STEM persistence over the career. We find a continuous process whereby women are more likely to exit STEM than men. Among STEM undergraduate degree holders, women are more likely to obtain a non‐STEM master's degree. After entering the labour market, there is a gradual outflow of females during the first 15 years post‐graduation, so that females are about 20 percentage points less likely to work in STEM than men. Conditional on leaving STEM, females are more likely to enter the education and health sectors, while males are more likely to enter the business sector, and this can partly explain the gender pay gap for STEM graduates. Overall, our results suggest that policies that aim to increase the proportion of females studying STEM may have less effect than expected due to the lower attachment of females to STEM after graduation. Such policies may need to be augmented with efforts to tackle the greater propensity of females to exit STEM throughout the career. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ecca.12437 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2713159507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2713159507</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-14373b39fb4981d91a65f90506161909c6f2f4e997ef90f5dd4dc790de2edcf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFKAzEQBuAgCtbqxSdY8CZszWw2SXMsa61CRcF6DmkygZS6W5Mt0rc3dQVvzmVg-PgTfkKugU4gzx1aayZQ1UyekBHUYlpSxvgpGVEKrKR1Jc_JRUobmodXckTkAluHsbgP3mPE1mIqQlu8rebPxSvGFFJ_PBbG91ktonF704euvSRn3mwTXv3uMXl_mK-ax3L5snhqZsvSMsVlCfknbM2UX9dqCk6BEdwryqkAAYoqK3zla1RKYj577lztrFTUYYXOesbG5GbI3cXuc4-p15tuH9v8pK4kMOCKU5nV7aBs7FKK6PUuhg8TDxqoPhajj8Xon2IyLgaMtmtD-qNTUIJKoWgmMJCvsMXDP2F63jSzIfYbGM5tnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2713159507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender Differences in STEM Persistence after Graduation</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Delaney, Judith M. ; Devereux, Paul J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Delaney, Judith M. ; Devereux, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><description>Much attention is focused on finding ways to encourage females to study STEM in school and college, but what actually happens once women complete a STEM degree? We use the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey to trace out gender differences in STEM persistence over the career. We find a continuous process whereby women are more likely to exit STEM than men. Among STEM undergraduate degree holders, women are more likely to obtain a non‐STEM master's degree. After entering the labour market, there is a gradual outflow of females during the first 15 years post‐graduation, so that females are about 20 percentage points less likely to work in STEM than men. Conditional on leaving STEM, females are more likely to enter the education and health sectors, while males are more likely to enter the business sector, and this can partly explain the gender pay gap for STEM graduates. Overall, our results suggest that policies that aim to increase the proportion of females studying STEM may have less effect than expected due to the lower attachment of females to STEM after graduation. Such policies may need to be augmented with efforts to tackle the greater propensity of females to exit STEM throughout the career.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0427</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0335</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>1993-2021 ; Absolventen ; Akademiker ; Careers ; Erwerbsverlauf ; Females ; Gender differences ; Gender inequality ; Gender pay gap ; Geschlechterunterschiede ; Großbritannien ; Health education ; Income inequality ; Karriereplanung ; Labor force ; Labor market ; Masters degrees ; MINT-Fächer ; Women</subject><ispartof>Economica (London), 2022-10, Vol.89 (356), p.862-883</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of London School of Economics and Political Science.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-14373b39fb4981d91a65f90506161909c6f2f4e997ef90f5dd4dc790de2edcf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-14373b39fb4981d91a65f90506161909c6f2f4e997ef90f5dd4dc790de2edcf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fecca.12437$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fecca.12437$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Delaney, Judith M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devereux, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><title>Gender Differences in STEM Persistence after Graduation</title><title>Economica (London)</title><description>Much attention is focused on finding ways to encourage females to study STEM in school and college, but what actually happens once women complete a STEM degree? We use the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey to trace out gender differences in STEM persistence over the career. We find a continuous process whereby women are more likely to exit STEM than men. Among STEM undergraduate degree holders, women are more likely to obtain a non‐STEM master's degree. After entering the labour market, there is a gradual outflow of females during the first 15 years post‐graduation, so that females are about 20 percentage points less likely to work in STEM than men. Conditional on leaving STEM, females are more likely to enter the education and health sectors, while males are more likely to enter the business sector, and this can partly explain the gender pay gap for STEM graduates. Overall, our results suggest that policies that aim to increase the proportion of females studying STEM may have less effect than expected due to the lower attachment of females to STEM after graduation. Such policies may need to be augmented with efforts to tackle the greater propensity of females to exit STEM throughout the career.</description><subject>1993-2021</subject><subject>Absolventen</subject><subject>Akademiker</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Erwerbsverlauf</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Gender inequality</subject><subject>Gender pay gap</subject><subject>Geschlechterunterschiede</subject><subject>Großbritannien</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Karriereplanung</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Masters degrees</subject><subject>MINT-Fächer</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0013-0427</issn><issn>1468-0335</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MFKAzEQBuAgCtbqxSdY8CZszWw2SXMsa61CRcF6DmkygZS6W5Mt0rc3dQVvzmVg-PgTfkKugU4gzx1aayZQ1UyekBHUYlpSxvgpGVEKrKR1Jc_JRUobmodXckTkAluHsbgP3mPE1mIqQlu8rebPxSvGFFJ_PBbG91ktonF704euvSRn3mwTXv3uMXl_mK-ax3L5snhqZsvSMsVlCfknbM2UX9dqCk6BEdwryqkAAYoqK3zla1RKYj577lztrFTUYYXOesbG5GbI3cXuc4-p15tuH9v8pK4kMOCKU5nV7aBs7FKK6PUuhg8TDxqoPhajj8Xon2IyLgaMtmtD-qNTUIJKoWgmMJCvsMXDP2F63jSzIfYbGM5tnQ</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Delaney, Judith M.</creator><creator>Devereux, Paul J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>Gender Differences in STEM Persistence after Graduation</title><author>Delaney, Judith M. ; Devereux, Paul J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3957-14373b39fb4981d91a65f90506161909c6f2f4e997ef90f5dd4dc790de2edcf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>1993-2021</topic><topic>Absolventen</topic><topic>Akademiker</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Erwerbsverlauf</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Gender inequality</topic><topic>Gender pay gap</topic><topic>Geschlechterunterschiede</topic><topic>Großbritannien</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Karriereplanung</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Masters degrees</topic><topic>MINT-Fächer</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Delaney, Judith M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devereux, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economica (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Delaney, Judith M.</au><au>Devereux, Paul J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender Differences in STEM Persistence after Graduation</atitle><jtitle>Economica (London)</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>356</issue><spage>862</spage><epage>883</epage><pages>862-883</pages><issn>0013-0427</issn><eissn>1468-0335</eissn><abstract>Much attention is focused on finding ways to encourage females to study STEM in school and college, but what actually happens once women complete a STEM degree? We use the UK Quarterly Labour Force Survey to trace out gender differences in STEM persistence over the career. We find a continuous process whereby women are more likely to exit STEM than men. Among STEM undergraduate degree holders, women are more likely to obtain a non‐STEM master's degree. After entering the labour market, there is a gradual outflow of females during the first 15 years post‐graduation, so that females are about 20 percentage points less likely to work in STEM than men. Conditional on leaving STEM, females are more likely to enter the education and health sectors, while males are more likely to enter the business sector, and this can partly explain the gender pay gap for STEM graduates. Overall, our results suggest that policies that aim to increase the proportion of females studying STEM may have less effect than expected due to the lower attachment of females to STEM after graduation. Such policies may need to be augmented with efforts to tackle the greater propensity of females to exit STEM throughout the career.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ecca.12437</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-0427 |
ispartof | Economica (London), 2022-10, Vol.89 (356), p.862-883 |
issn | 0013-0427 1468-0335 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2713159507 |
source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | 1993-2021 Absolventen Akademiker Careers Erwerbsverlauf Females Gender differences Gender inequality Gender pay gap Geschlechterunterschiede Großbritannien Health education Income inequality Karriereplanung Labor force Labor market Masters degrees MINT-Fächer Women |
title | Gender Differences in STEM Persistence after Graduation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A15%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20Differences%20in%20STEM%20Persistence%20after%20Graduation&rft.jtitle=Economica%20(London)&rft.au=Delaney,%20Judith%20M.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=356&rft.spage=862&rft.epage=883&rft.pages=862-883&rft.issn=0013-0427&rft.eissn=1468-0335&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ecca.12437&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2713159507%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2713159507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |