“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing
This is a descriptive study ( N = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and dis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Argumentation 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.365-392 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 392 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 365 |
container_title | Argumentation |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila Hample, Dale |
description | This is a descriptive study (
N
= 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2712101812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2712101812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-bdbcc768684248ff1cff08b26e755b75c7f703407bfabccde6ddec93011b141e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcIrE2bB2Hna4lRbaSpXgQCVulpPYIVWaFDtRVU79EPi5fglug8qN02pmZ0a7g9A1gVsCwO4sgRB8DJRiiEMGeH2CeiRkFHOfBaeoBzEFHFD2do4urF0AACec9tDnbvs1yI1SS1U13kNblJn1ZJV5o8LKIz9StjH1xt7vtt_epF57L3VZ2HdvXmXK5EZmrWxU5xsf0WFpmz05rRplVg7VlSy9gcnbosov0ZmWpVVXv7OP5k-Pr8MJnj2Pp8PBDKc0iBucZEmasohHPKAB15qkWgNPaKRYGCYsTJlm4AfAEi2dMlNRlqk09oGQhARE-X100-WuTP3Ruk_Eom6NO8QKygglQDihTkU7VWpqa43SYmWKpTQbQUDsOxZdx8J1LA4di7Uz-Z3JOnGVK_MX_Y_rB4g0hGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712101812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila ; Hample, Dale</creator><creatorcontrib>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila ; Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><description>This is a descriptive study (
N
= 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-427X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>College students ; Communication Studies ; Education ; Gender differences ; Legal History ; Logic ; Original Research ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Law ; Political Communication ; Theories of Law</subject><ispartof>Argumentation, 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.365-392</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-bdbcc768684248ff1cff08b26e755b75c7f703407bfabccde6ddec93011b141e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-bdbcc768684248ff1cff08b26e755b75c7f703407bfabccde6ddec93011b141e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5039-6133</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><title>“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing</title><title>Argumentation</title><addtitle>Argumentation</addtitle><description>This is a descriptive study (
N
= 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Communication Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Legal History</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Law</subject><subject>Political Communication</subject><subject>Theories of Law</subject><issn>0920-427X</issn><issn>1572-8374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcIrE2bB2Hna4lRbaSpXgQCVulpPYIVWaFDtRVU79EPi5fglug8qN02pmZ0a7g9A1gVsCwO4sgRB8DJRiiEMGeH2CeiRkFHOfBaeoBzEFHFD2do4urF0AACec9tDnbvs1yI1SS1U13kNblJn1ZJV5o8LKIz9StjH1xt7vtt_epF57L3VZ2HdvXmXK5EZmrWxU5xsf0WFpmz05rRplVg7VlSy9gcnbosov0ZmWpVVXv7OP5k-Pr8MJnj2Pp8PBDKc0iBucZEmasohHPKAB15qkWgNPaKRYGCYsTJlm4AfAEi2dMlNRlqk09oGQhARE-X100-WuTP3Ruk_Eom6NO8QKygglQDihTkU7VWpqa43SYmWKpTQbQUDsOxZdx8J1LA4di7Uz-Z3JOnGVK_MX_Y_rB4g0hGc</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila</creator><creator>Hample, Dale</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-6133</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing</title><author>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila ; Hample, Dale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-bdbcc768684248ff1cff08b26e755b75c7f703407bfabccde6ddec93011b141e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Communication Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Legal History</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Law</topic><topic>Political Communication</topic><topic>Theories of Law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Argumentation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila</au><au>Hample, Dale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing</atitle><jtitle>Argumentation</jtitle><stitle>Argumentation</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>365-392</pages><issn>0920-427X</issn><eissn>1572-8374</eissn><abstract>This is a descriptive study (
N
= 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-6133</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0920-427X |
ispartof | Argumentation, 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.365-392 |
issn | 0920-427X 1572-8374 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2712101812 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | College students Communication Studies Education Gender differences Legal History Logic Original Research Philosophy Philosophy of Law Political Communication Theories of Law |
title | “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CAgreement%20Builds%20and%20Disagreement%20Destroys:%E2%80%9D%20How%20Polish%20Undergraduates%20and%20Graduates%20Understand%20Interpersonal%20Arguing&rft.jtitle=Argumentation&rft.au=D%C4%99bowska-Koz%C5%82owska,%20Kamila&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=365-392&rft.issn=0920-427X&rft.eissn=1572-8374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2712101812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712101812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |