“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing

This is a descriptive study ( N  = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and dis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Argumentation 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.365-392
Hauptverfasser: Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila, Hample, Dale
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue 3
container_start_page 365
container_title Argumentation
container_volume 36
creator Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila
Hample, Dale
description This is a descriptive study ( N  = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2712101812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2712101812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-bdbcc768684248ff1cff08b26e755b75c7f703407bfabccde6ddec93011b141e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcIrE2bB2Hna4lRbaSpXgQCVulpPYIVWaFDtRVU79EPi5fglug8qN02pmZ0a7g9A1gVsCwO4sgRB8DJRiiEMGeH2CeiRkFHOfBaeoBzEFHFD2do4urF0AACec9tDnbvs1yI1SS1U13kNblJn1ZJV5o8LKIz9StjH1xt7vtt_epF57L3VZ2HdvXmXK5EZmrWxU5xsf0WFpmz05rRplVg7VlSy9gcnbosov0ZmWpVVXv7OP5k-Pr8MJnj2Pp8PBDKc0iBucZEmasohHPKAB15qkWgNPaKRYGCYsTJlm4AfAEi2dMlNRlqk09oGQhARE-X100-WuTP3Ruk_Eom6NO8QKygglQDihTkU7VWpqa43SYmWKpTQbQUDsOxZdx8J1LA4di7Uz-Z3JOnGVK_MX_Y_rB4g0hGc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712101812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila ; Hample, Dale</creator><creatorcontrib>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila ; Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><description>This is a descriptive study ( N  = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0920-427X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>College students ; Communication Studies ; Education ; Gender differences ; Legal History ; Logic ; Original Research ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Law ; Political Communication ; Theories of Law</subject><ispartof>Argumentation, 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.365-392</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-bdbcc768684248ff1cff08b26e755b75c7f703407bfabccde6ddec93011b141e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-bdbcc768684248ff1cff08b26e755b75c7f703407bfabccde6ddec93011b141e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5039-6133</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><title>“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing</title><title>Argumentation</title><addtitle>Argumentation</addtitle><description>This is a descriptive study ( N  = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Communication Studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Legal History</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Law</subject><subject>Political Communication</subject><subject>Theories of Law</subject><issn>0920-427X</issn><issn>1572-8374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcIrE2bB2Hna4lRbaSpXgQCVulpPYIVWaFDtRVU79EPi5fglug8qN02pmZ0a7g9A1gVsCwO4sgRB8DJRiiEMGeH2CeiRkFHOfBaeoBzEFHFD2do4urF0AACec9tDnbvs1yI1SS1U13kNblJn1ZJV5o8LKIz9StjH1xt7vtt_epF57L3VZ2HdvXmXK5EZmrWxU5xsf0WFpmz05rRplVg7VlSy9gcnbosov0ZmWpVVXv7OP5k-Pr8MJnj2Pp8PBDKc0iBucZEmasohHPKAB15qkWgNPaKRYGCYsTJlm4AfAEi2dMlNRlqk09oGQhARE-X100-WuTP3Ruk_Eom6NO8QKygglQDihTkU7VWpqa43SYmWKpTQbQUDsOxZdx8J1LA4di7Uz-Z3JOnGVK_MX_Y_rB4g0hGc</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila</creator><creator>Hample, Dale</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-6133</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing</title><author>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila ; Hample, Dale</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c249t-bdbcc768684248ff1cff08b26e755b75c7f703407bfabccde6ddec93011b141e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Communication Studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Legal History</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Law</topic><topic>Political Communication</topic><topic>Theories of Law</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hample, Dale</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Argumentation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila</au><au>Hample, Dale</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing</atitle><jtitle>Argumentation</jtitle><stitle>Argumentation</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>365-392</pages><issn>0920-427X</issn><eissn>1572-8374</eissn><abstract>This is a descriptive study ( N  = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-6133</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0920-427X
ispartof Argumentation, 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.365-392
issn 0920-427X
1572-8374
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2712101812
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects College students
Communication Studies
Education
Gender differences
Legal History
Logic
Original Research
Philosophy
Philosophy of Law
Political Communication
Theories of Law
title “Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A49%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CAgreement%20Builds%20and%20Disagreement%20Destroys:%E2%80%9D%20How%20Polish%20Undergraduates%20and%20Graduates%20Understand%20Interpersonal%20Arguing&rft.jtitle=Argumentation&rft.au=D%C4%99bowska-Koz%C5%82owska,%20Kamila&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=365-392&rft.issn=0920-427X&rft.eissn=1572-8374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2712101812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712101812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true