Leafy vegetables marketed as organic and conventional: assessment of essential and non-essential elements’ content
Trace and potentially toxic elements represent one class of food contaminants that has stimulated research. In markets, two main methods of growing vegetables are generally available: conventional and organic. Conventional farming has been the target of some concerns about the use of agrochemicals,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2022-10, Vol.194 (10), p.758, Article 758 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 758 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 194 |
creator | da Silva, Victor Dubas de Mello Gabriel, Gabriele Verônica Botero, Wander Gustavo Fernandes, Andrea Pires do Carmo, Janaina Braga de Oliveira, Luciana Camargo |
description | Trace and potentially toxic elements represent one class of food contaminants that has stimulated research. In markets, two main methods of growing vegetables are generally available: conventional and organic. Conventional farming has been the target of some concerns about the use of agrochemicals, especially the excessive use of pesticides, whereas organic agriculture minimizes the use of agrochemicals. As the main route for potentially toxic elements’ absorption by humans is by food intake, it is important to evaluate if the method of cultivation influences their concentrations. This study evaluated the levels of potentially toxic elements and nutrients on four leafy vegetables: curly lettuce, collard greens, escarole, and rocket, cultivated by conventional and organic farming. We found that Al, Ba, Fe, and Sr levels were higher in conventional samples, whereas K, Pb, and Zn were higher in organic. Amongst the elements analysed, values of Fe, Al, and K were around 0.2, 0.3, and 70 g kg
−1
, respectively, except in collard greens, in which the values were lower. On the other hand, Ba, Sr, and Mn presented higher concentration in collard greens compared to the other vegetables in conventional cultivation (~ 35, 80, and 120 mg kg
−1
, respectively). The principal component analysis result shows that the samples were grouped according to the type of vegetable, regardless of the type of cultivation. Despite this, the evaluation of the cultivation by different types of farming is important in order to choose the healthiest option. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-022-10439-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2712101750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2712101750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2af8ddcda4ff01ff0e3dfd936cdf871e058f9ab125878d5bd9d02ab89748c9a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EoqVwARYoEmvD2E7smB2q-JMqsYG15cTjqiVNSpxW6o5rcD1OgtMW2LGwPJr3zRv7EXLO4IoBqOvAQEpGgXPKIBWapgdkyDIlKNeZPiRDYFJRKaQekJMQ5gCgVaqPyUBIyDMOcki6CVq_SdY4xc4WFYZkYds37NAlNiRNO7X1rExs7ZKyqddYd7OmttVNFAOGsIiNpPFJLHvJVluybmr618EKeyx8fXz2Hl2sT8mRt1XAs_09Iq_3dy_jRzp5fnga305oKVTWUW597lzpbOo9sHhQOO-0kKXzuWIIWe61LRjPcpW7rHDaAbdFHj-Zl9oyMSKXO99l27yvMHRm3qza-P5guGKcAVMZRIrvqLJtQmjRm2U7iylsDAPTB212QZsYtNkGbdI4dLG3XhULdL8jP8lGQOyAEKV6iu3f7n9svwE984yb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2712101750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leafy vegetables marketed as organic and conventional: assessment of essential and non-essential elements’ content</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>da Silva, Victor Dubas ; de Mello Gabriel, Gabriele Verônica ; Botero, Wander Gustavo ; Fernandes, Andrea Pires ; do Carmo, Janaina Braga ; de Oliveira, Luciana Camargo</creator><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Victor Dubas ; de Mello Gabriel, Gabriele Verônica ; Botero, Wander Gustavo ; Fernandes, Andrea Pires ; do Carmo, Janaina Braga ; de Oliveira, Luciana Camargo</creatorcontrib><description>Trace and potentially toxic elements represent one class of food contaminants that has stimulated research. In markets, two main methods of growing vegetables are generally available: conventional and organic. Conventional farming has been the target of some concerns about the use of agrochemicals, especially the excessive use of pesticides, whereas organic agriculture minimizes the use of agrochemicals. As the main route for potentially toxic elements’ absorption by humans is by food intake, it is important to evaluate if the method of cultivation influences their concentrations. This study evaluated the levels of potentially toxic elements and nutrients on four leafy vegetables: curly lettuce, collard greens, escarole, and rocket, cultivated by conventional and organic farming. We found that Al, Ba, Fe, and Sr levels were higher in conventional samples, whereas K, Pb, and Zn were higher in organic. Amongst the elements analysed, values of Fe, Al, and K were around 0.2, 0.3, and 70 g kg
−1
, respectively, except in collard greens, in which the values were lower. On the other hand, Ba, Sr, and Mn presented higher concentration in collard greens compared to the other vegetables in conventional cultivation (~ 35, 80, and 120 mg kg
−1
, respectively). The principal component analysis result shows that the samples were grouped according to the type of vegetable, regardless of the type of cultivation. Despite this, the evaluation of the cultivation by different types of farming is important in order to choose the healthiest option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10439-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36085206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agrochemicals ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Barium ; Contaminants ; Cultivation ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Elements ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental science ; Evaluation ; Farming ; Food ; Food consumption ; Food contamination ; Food intake ; Foods ; Humans ; Iron ; Lactuca ; Manganese ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Nutrients ; Organic farming ; Pesticides ; Plant Leaves ; Principal components analysis ; Strontium ; Trace elements (nutrients) ; Vegetables ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022-10, Vol.194 (10), p.758, Article 758</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2af8ddcda4ff01ff0e3dfd936cdf871e058f9ab125878d5bd9d02ab89748c9a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2af8ddcda4ff01ff0e3dfd936cdf871e058f9ab125878d5bd9d02ab89748c9a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1927-5947 ; 0000-0002-6607-1333 ; 0000-0002-2871-9880 ; 0000-0003-1845-6797 ; 0000-0001-9281-6290 ; 0000-0001-6125-2154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-022-10439-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-022-10439-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36085206$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Victor Dubas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello Gabriel, Gabriele Verônica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botero, Wander Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Andrea Pires</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Carmo, Janaina Braga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Luciana Camargo</creatorcontrib><title>Leafy vegetables marketed as organic and conventional: assessment of essential and non-essential elements’ content</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>Trace and potentially toxic elements represent one class of food contaminants that has stimulated research. In markets, two main methods of growing vegetables are generally available: conventional and organic. Conventional farming has been the target of some concerns about the use of agrochemicals, especially the excessive use of pesticides, whereas organic agriculture minimizes the use of agrochemicals. As the main route for potentially toxic elements’ absorption by humans is by food intake, it is important to evaluate if the method of cultivation influences their concentrations. This study evaluated the levels of potentially toxic elements and nutrients on four leafy vegetables: curly lettuce, collard greens, escarole, and rocket, cultivated by conventional and organic farming. We found that Al, Ba, Fe, and Sr levels were higher in conventional samples, whereas K, Pb, and Zn were higher in organic. Amongst the elements analysed, values of Fe, Al, and K were around 0.2, 0.3, and 70 g kg
−1
, respectively, except in collard greens, in which the values were lower. On the other hand, Ba, Sr, and Mn presented higher concentration in collard greens compared to the other vegetables in conventional cultivation (~ 35, 80, and 120 mg kg
−1
, respectively). The principal component analysis result shows that the samples were grouped according to the type of vegetable, regardless of the type of cultivation. Despite this, the evaluation of the cultivation by different types of farming is important in order to choose the healthiest option.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agrochemicals</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Barium</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Elements</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food contamination</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Lactuca</subject><subject>Manganese</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plant Leaves</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Strontium</subject><subject>Trace elements (nutrients)</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EoqVwARYoEmvD2E7smB2q-JMqsYG15cTjqiVNSpxW6o5rcD1OgtMW2LGwPJr3zRv7EXLO4IoBqOvAQEpGgXPKIBWapgdkyDIlKNeZPiRDYFJRKaQekJMQ5gCgVaqPyUBIyDMOcki6CVq_SdY4xc4WFYZkYds37NAlNiRNO7X1rExs7ZKyqddYd7OmttVNFAOGsIiNpPFJLHvJVluybmr618EKeyx8fXz2Hl2sT8mRt1XAs_09Iq_3dy_jRzp5fnga305oKVTWUW597lzpbOo9sHhQOO-0kKXzuWIIWe61LRjPcpW7rHDaAbdFHj-Zl9oyMSKXO99l27yvMHRm3qza-P5guGKcAVMZRIrvqLJtQmjRm2U7iylsDAPTB212QZsYtNkGbdI4dLG3XhULdL8jP8lGQOyAEKV6iu3f7n9svwE984yb</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>da Silva, Victor Dubas</creator><creator>de Mello Gabriel, Gabriele Verônica</creator><creator>Botero, Wander Gustavo</creator><creator>Fernandes, Andrea Pires</creator><creator>do Carmo, Janaina Braga</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Luciana Camargo</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-5947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6607-1333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2871-9880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1845-6797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-6290</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-2154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Leafy vegetables marketed as organic and conventional: assessment of essential and non-essential elements’ content</title><author>da Silva, Victor Dubas ; de Mello Gabriel, Gabriele Verônica ; Botero, Wander Gustavo ; Fernandes, Andrea Pires ; do Carmo, Janaina Braga ; de Oliveira, Luciana Camargo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-2af8ddcda4ff01ff0e3dfd936cdf871e058f9ab125878d5bd9d02ab89748c9a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agrochemicals</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Barium</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Elements</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food contamination</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Lactuca</topic><topic>Manganese</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plant Leaves</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Strontium</topic><topic>Trace elements (nutrients)</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Victor Dubas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Mello Gabriel, Gabriele Verônica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botero, Wander Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Andrea Pires</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Carmo, Janaina Braga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Luciana Camargo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>da Silva, Victor Dubas</au><au>de Mello Gabriel, Gabriele Verônica</au><au>Botero, Wander Gustavo</au><au>Fernandes, Andrea Pires</au><au>do Carmo, Janaina Braga</au><au>de Oliveira, Luciana Camargo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leafy vegetables marketed as organic and conventional: assessment of essential and non-essential elements’ content</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>194</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>758</spage><pages>758-</pages><artnum>758</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>Trace and potentially toxic elements represent one class of food contaminants that has stimulated research. In markets, two main methods of growing vegetables are generally available: conventional and organic. Conventional farming has been the target of some concerns about the use of agrochemicals, especially the excessive use of pesticides, whereas organic agriculture minimizes the use of agrochemicals. As the main route for potentially toxic elements’ absorption by humans is by food intake, it is important to evaluate if the method of cultivation influences their concentrations. This study evaluated the levels of potentially toxic elements and nutrients on four leafy vegetables: curly lettuce, collard greens, escarole, and rocket, cultivated by conventional and organic farming. We found that Al, Ba, Fe, and Sr levels were higher in conventional samples, whereas K, Pb, and Zn were higher in organic. Amongst the elements analysed, values of Fe, Al, and K were around 0.2, 0.3, and 70 g kg
−1
, respectively, except in collard greens, in which the values were lower. On the other hand, Ba, Sr, and Mn presented higher concentration in collard greens compared to the other vegetables in conventional cultivation (~ 35, 80, and 120 mg kg
−1
, respectively). The principal component analysis result shows that the samples were grouped according to the type of vegetable, regardless of the type of cultivation. Despite this, the evaluation of the cultivation by different types of farming is important in order to choose the healthiest option.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>36085206</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-022-10439-4</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-5947</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6607-1333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2871-9880</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1845-6797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9281-6290</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6125-2154</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022-10, Vol.194 (10), p.758, Article 758 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2712101750 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agriculture Agrochemicals Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Barium Contaminants Cultivation Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Ecotoxicology Elements Environment Environmental Management Environmental Monitoring Environmental science Evaluation Farming Food Food consumption Food contamination Food intake Foods Humans Iron Lactuca Manganese Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Nutrients Organic farming Pesticides Plant Leaves Principal components analysis Strontium Trace elements (nutrients) Vegetables Zinc |
title | Leafy vegetables marketed as organic and conventional: assessment of essential and non-essential elements’ content |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T02%3A45%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leafy%20vegetables%20marketed%20as%20organic%20and%20conventional:%20assessment%20of%20essential%20and%20non-essential%20elements%E2%80%99%20content&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=da%20Silva,%20Victor%20Dubas&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=194&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=758&rft.pages=758-&rft.artnum=758&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-022-10439-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2712101750%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2712101750&rft_id=info:pmid/36085206&rfr_iscdi=true |