Sometimes Less Is More: The Effects of Phonetically Variable Input on Auditory Processing Instruction for L2 French
Effects of phonetically variable input (PVI) for processing instruction (PI) training and the number of training items were tested with a picture-selection eye-tracking task. Intermediate second language (L2) learners of French (n = 174) were tested before and after they received either a short (24...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in second language acquisition 2022-09, Vol.44 (4), p.1045-1070 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1070 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1045 |
| container_title | Studies in second language acquisition |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Ito, Kiwako Wong, Wynne |
| description | Effects of phonetically variable input (PVI) for processing instruction (PI) training and the number of training items were tested with a picture-selection eye-tracking task. Intermediate second language (L2) learners of French (n = 174) were tested before and after they received either a short (24 items), medium (48), or long (96) training on the causative structure with either single- or multivoice input. PI improved picture-selection accuracy from about 10% to above 50% regardless of the training size. Eye-tracking data showed a reduction in looks to the incorrect picture only after the short and medium training: it surfaced regardless of voice variability after the short training, whereas multivoice training led to a greater reduction after the medium training. Long training did not yield a reliable reduction of incorrect looks regardless of voice variability. Taken together, PVI does not hinder L2 syntactic learning. Learners may benefit more from a relatively shorter training with PVI. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S027226312100084X |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2711749993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1347842</ericid><sourcerecordid>2711749993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-adacdea67e6a5b27197142c60768511c4d5e2b0dc773f8701c34131b238593b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFLwzAUx4MoOKcfwIMQ8FzNS9Km9TZk00nFwaZ4K2mauI6umUl62Lc3Y-LF0zv8fu__eH-EroHcAQFxvyRUUJoxoEAIyfnnCRoBFySBlKenaHTAyYGfowvvN9HJhGAj5Jd2q0O71R6X2ns89_jVOv2AV2uNp8ZoFTy2Bi_Wto-ekl23xx_StbLuNJ73uyFg2-PJ0LTBuj1eOKtiTtt_ReiDG1RoIzfW4ZLimdO9Wl-iMyM7r69-5xi9z6arx-ekfHuaP07KRFEuQiIbqRotM6EzmdZUQCGAU5URkeUpgOJNqmlNGhUfMbkgoBgHBjVleVqwmrAxuj3m7pz9HrQP1cYOro8nq5gGghdFwaIFR0s5673Tptq5divdvgJSHbqt_nUbd26OO9q16s-fvgDjIueU_QBSrnS0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711749993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sometimes Less Is More: The Effects of Phonetically Variable Input on Auditory Processing Instruction for L2 French</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online (CUP)</source><creator>Ito, Kiwako ; Wong, Wynne</creator><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kiwako ; Wong, Wynne</creatorcontrib><description>Effects of phonetically variable input (PVI) for processing instruction (PI) training and the number of training items were tested with a picture-selection eye-tracking task. Intermediate second language (L2) learners of French (n = 174) were tested before and after they received either a short (24 items), medium (48), or long (96) training on the causative structure with either single- or multivoice input. PI improved picture-selection accuracy from about 10% to above 50% regardless of the training size. Eye-tracking data showed a reduction in looks to the incorrect picture only after the short and medium training: it surfaced regardless of voice variability after the short training, whereas multivoice training led to a greater reduction after the medium training. Long training did not yield a reliable reduction of incorrect looks regardless of voice variability. Taken together, PVI does not hinder L2 syntactic learning. Learners may benefit more from a relatively shorter training with PVI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-2631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-1545</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S027226312100084X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Auditory Perception ; Auditory processing ; Direct Instruction ; Executive Function ; Eye Movements ; French ; French as a second language ; Hypotheses ; Individual Differences ; Language Acquisition ; Language Processing ; Linguistic Input ; Listening Comprehension ; Memory ; Meta Analysis ; Phonemes ; Phonemics ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Romance Languages ; Second Language Instruction ; Second language learning ; Short Term Memory ; Speaking ; Syntax ; Tone Languages ; Training ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Studies in second language acquisition, 2022-09, Vol.44 (4), p.1045-1070</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-adacdea67e6a5b27197142c60768511c4d5e2b0dc773f8701c34131b238593b03</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9778-6940</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1347842$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kiwako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Wynne</creatorcontrib><title>Sometimes Less Is More: The Effects of Phonetically Variable Input on Auditory Processing Instruction for L2 French</title><title>Studies in second language acquisition</title><description>Effects of phonetically variable input (PVI) for processing instruction (PI) training and the number of training items were tested with a picture-selection eye-tracking task. Intermediate second language (L2) learners of French (n = 174) were tested before and after they received either a short (24 items), medium (48), or long (96) training on the causative structure with either single- or multivoice input. PI improved picture-selection accuracy from about 10% to above 50% regardless of the training size. Eye-tracking data showed a reduction in looks to the incorrect picture only after the short and medium training: it surfaced regardless of voice variability after the short training, whereas multivoice training led to a greater reduction after the medium training. Long training did not yield a reliable reduction of incorrect looks regardless of voice variability. Taken together, PVI does not hinder L2 syntactic learning. Learners may benefit more from a relatively shorter training with PVI.</description><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory processing</subject><subject>Direct Instruction</subject><subject>Executive Function</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>French</subject><subject>French as a second language</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Processing</subject><subject>Linguistic Input</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Phonemes</subject><subject>Phonemics</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Romance Languages</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Tone Languages</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0272-2631</issn><issn>1470-1545</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEFLwzAUx4MoOKcfwIMQ8FzNS9Km9TZk00nFwaZ4K2mauI6umUl62Lc3Y-LF0zv8fu__eH-EroHcAQFxvyRUUJoxoEAIyfnnCRoBFySBlKenaHTAyYGfowvvN9HJhGAj5Jd2q0O71R6X2ns89_jVOv2AV2uNp8ZoFTy2Bi_Wto-ekl23xx_StbLuNJ73uyFg2-PJ0LTBuj1eOKtiTtt_ReiDG1RoIzfW4ZLimdO9Wl-iMyM7r69-5xi9z6arx-ekfHuaP07KRFEuQiIbqRotM6EzmdZUQCGAU5URkeUpgOJNqmlNGhUfMbkgoBgHBjVleVqwmrAxuj3m7pz9HrQP1cYOro8nq5gGghdFwaIFR0s5673Tptq5divdvgJSHbqt_nUbd26OO9q16s-fvgDjIueU_QBSrnS0</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Ito, Kiwako</creator><creator>Wong, Wynne</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-6940</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Sometimes Less Is More: The Effects of Phonetically Variable Input on Auditory Processing Instruction for L2 French</title><author>Ito, Kiwako ; Wong, Wynne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-adacdea67e6a5b27197142c60768511c4d5e2b0dc773f8701c34131b238593b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory processing</topic><topic>Direct Instruction</topic><topic>Executive Function</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>French</topic><topic>French as a second language</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Processing</topic><topic>Linguistic Input</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Phonemes</topic><topic>Phonemics</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Romance Languages</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Tone Languages</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ito, Kiwako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Wynne</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Studies in second language acquisition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ito, Kiwako</au><au>Wong, Wynne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1347842</ericid><atitle>Sometimes Less Is More: The Effects of Phonetically Variable Input on Auditory Processing Instruction for L2 French</atitle><jtitle>Studies in second language acquisition</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1045</spage><epage>1070</epage><pages>1045-1070</pages><issn>0272-2631</issn><eissn>1470-1545</eissn><abstract>Effects of phonetically variable input (PVI) for processing instruction (PI) training and the number of training items were tested with a picture-selection eye-tracking task. Intermediate second language (L2) learners of French (n = 174) were tested before and after they received either a short (24 items), medium (48), or long (96) training on the causative structure with either single- or multivoice input. PI improved picture-selection accuracy from about 10% to above 50% regardless of the training size. Eye-tracking data showed a reduction in looks to the incorrect picture only after the short and medium training: it surfaced regardless of voice variability after the short training, whereas multivoice training led to a greater reduction after the medium training. Long training did not yield a reliable reduction of incorrect looks regardless of voice variability. Taken together, PVI does not hinder L2 syntactic learning. Learners may benefit more from a relatively shorter training with PVI.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S027226312100084X</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-6940</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0272-2631 |
| ispartof | Studies in second language acquisition, 2022-09, Vol.44 (4), p.1045-1070 |
| issn | 0272-2631 1470-1545 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2711749993 |
| source | Cambridge Journals Online (CUP) |
| subjects | Auditory Perception Auditory processing Direct Instruction Executive Function Eye Movements French French as a second language Hypotheses Individual Differences Language Acquisition Language Processing Linguistic Input Listening Comprehension Memory Meta Analysis Phonemes Phonemics Phonetics Phonology Romance Languages Second Language Instruction Second language learning Short Term Memory Speaking Syntax Tone Languages Training Word Recognition |
| title | Sometimes Less Is More: The Effects of Phonetically Variable Input on Auditory Processing Instruction for L2 French |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A08%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sometimes%20Less%20Is%20More:%20The%20Effects%20of%20Phonetically%20Variable%20Input%20on%20Auditory%20Processing%20Instruction%20for%20L2%20French&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20second%20language%20acquisition&rft.au=Ito,%20Kiwako&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1070&rft.pages=1045-1070&rft.issn=0272-2631&rft.eissn=1470-1545&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S027226312100084X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2711749993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711749993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1347842&rfr_iscdi=true |