Minding the boundary: social–ecological contexts for fence ecology and management
Fencing is a globally ubiquitous yet largely underestimated human infrastructure. To date, most fencing‐related research and management has focused on its biophysical outcomes. However, fencing is often part of coupled human and natural systems, and inevitably affects social and ecological dynamics...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in ecology and the environment 2022-09, Vol.20 (7), p.405-412 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 412 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 405 |
container_title | Frontiers in ecology and the environment |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Xu, Wenjing Huntsinger, Lynn |
description | Fencing is a globally ubiquitous yet largely underestimated human infrastructure. To date, most fencing‐related research and management has focused on its biophysical outcomes. However, fencing is often part of coupled human and natural systems, and inevitably affects social and ecological dynamics and the links between them. Drawing from three key case studies in the US, China, and South Africa, we delineate five social pathways through which fencing shapes social–ecological dynamics in a landscape. We show that the social functions and physical appearance of fencing conjointly form a positive feedback loop that stimulates the proliferation of fences across entire landscapes, rendering fencing a more impactful feature than expected from its ecological impacts alone. The emerging field of fence ecology and management must embrace the social–ecological complexities of fenced landscapes to minimize unanticipated social consequences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/fee.2500 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2711542373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2711542373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3270-179cb6244bed7135149a4adc894dc3d593b50ccc3cace30a743ca335468af6213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFbBR1jw4iV1_zaNN5FWhYoH9bxsZic1Jd2t2RTtzXfwDX0St0aPnuYH8zHD7yPklLMRZ0xcVIgjoRnbIwOuFcsKyYr9vywKfUiOYlwmUgotB-Txvvau9gvavSAtw8Y7224vaQxQ2-br4xMhNGFRg20oBN_hexdpFVpaoQek_XZLrXd0Zb1d4Ap9d0wOKttEPPmdQ_I8mz5d32bzh5u766t5BlLkLON5AeVYKFWiy7nUXBVWWQeTQjmQThey1AwAJFhAyWyuUpJSq_HEVmPB5ZCc9XfXbXjdYOzMMmxan14akfPUWMhcJuq8p6ANMbZYmXVbr1JLw5nZKTNJmdkpS2jWo291g9t_OTObTn_4b2h5bX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711542373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minding the boundary: social–ecological contexts for fence ecology and management</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Xu, Wenjing ; Huntsinger, Lynn</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Wenjing ; Huntsinger, Lynn</creatorcontrib><description>Fencing is a globally ubiquitous yet largely underestimated human infrastructure. To date, most fencing‐related research and management has focused on its biophysical outcomes. However, fencing is often part of coupled human and natural systems, and inevitably affects social and ecological dynamics and the links between them. Drawing from three key case studies in the US, China, and South Africa, we delineate five social pathways through which fencing shapes social–ecological dynamics in a landscape. We show that the social functions and physical appearance of fencing conjointly form a positive feedback loop that stimulates the proliferation of fences across entire landscapes, rendering fencing a more impactful feature than expected from its ecological impacts alone. The emerging field of fence ecology and management must embrace the social–ecological complexities of fenced landscapes to minimize unanticipated social consequences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/fee.2500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Ecology ; Feedback loops ; Positive feedback</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2022-09, Vol.20 (7), p.405-412</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Sep 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3270-179cb6244bed7135149a4adc894dc3d593b50ccc3cace30a743ca335468af6213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3270-179cb6244bed7135149a4adc894dc3d593b50ccc3cace30a743ca335468af6213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ffee.2500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ffee.2500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Wenjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntsinger, Lynn</creatorcontrib><title>Minding the boundary: social–ecological contexts for fence ecology and management</title><title>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</title><description>Fencing is a globally ubiquitous yet largely underestimated human infrastructure. To date, most fencing‐related research and management has focused on its biophysical outcomes. However, fencing is often part of coupled human and natural systems, and inevitably affects social and ecological dynamics and the links between them. Drawing from three key case studies in the US, China, and South Africa, we delineate five social pathways through which fencing shapes social–ecological dynamics in a landscape. We show that the social functions and physical appearance of fencing conjointly form a positive feedback loop that stimulates the proliferation of fences across entire landscapes, rendering fencing a more impactful feature than expected from its ecological impacts alone. The emerging field of fence ecology and management must embrace the social–ecological complexities of fenced landscapes to minimize unanticipated social consequences.</description><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Feedback loops</subject><subject>Positive feedback</subject><issn>1540-9295</issn><issn>1540-9309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9Kw0AQhxdRsFbBR1jw4iV1_zaNN5FWhYoH9bxsZic1Jd2t2RTtzXfwDX0St0aPnuYH8zHD7yPklLMRZ0xcVIgjoRnbIwOuFcsKyYr9vywKfUiOYlwmUgotB-Txvvau9gvavSAtw8Y7224vaQxQ2-br4xMhNGFRg20oBN_hexdpFVpaoQek_XZLrXd0Zb1d4Ap9d0wOKttEPPmdQ_I8mz5d32bzh5u766t5BlLkLON5AeVYKFWiy7nUXBVWWQeTQjmQThey1AwAJFhAyWyuUpJSq_HEVmPB5ZCc9XfXbXjdYOzMMmxan14akfPUWMhcJuq8p6ANMbZYmXVbr1JLw5nZKTNJmdkpS2jWo291g9t_OTObTn_4b2h5bX4</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Xu, Wenjing</creator><creator>Huntsinger, Lynn</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Minding the boundary: social–ecological contexts for fence ecology and management</title><author>Xu, Wenjing ; Huntsinger, Lynn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3270-179cb6244bed7135149a4adc894dc3d593b50ccc3cace30a743ca335468af6213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Feedback loops</topic><topic>Positive feedback</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Wenjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntsinger, Lynn</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Wenjing</au><au>Huntsinger, Lynn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minding the boundary: social–ecological contexts for fence ecology and management</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>405-412</pages><issn>1540-9295</issn><eissn>1540-9309</eissn><abstract>Fencing is a globally ubiquitous yet largely underestimated human infrastructure. To date, most fencing‐related research and management has focused on its biophysical outcomes. However, fencing is often part of coupled human and natural systems, and inevitably affects social and ecological dynamics and the links between them. Drawing from three key case studies in the US, China, and South Africa, we delineate five social pathways through which fencing shapes social–ecological dynamics in a landscape. We show that the social functions and physical appearance of fencing conjointly form a positive feedback loop that stimulates the proliferation of fences across entire landscapes, rendering fencing a more impactful feature than expected from its ecological impacts alone. The emerging field of fence ecology and management must embrace the social–ecological complexities of fenced landscapes to minimize unanticipated social consequences.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1002/fee.2500</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1540-9295 |
ispartof | Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2022-09, Vol.20 (7), p.405-412 |
issn | 1540-9295 1540-9309 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2711542373 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Ecology Feedback loops Positive feedback |
title | Minding the boundary: social–ecological contexts for fence ecology and management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T02%3A41%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minding%20the%20boundary:%20social%E2%80%93ecological%20contexts%20for%20fence%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20ecology%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Xu,%20Wenjing&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=405-412&rft.issn=1540-9295&rft.eissn=1540-9309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/fee.2500&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2711542373%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711542373&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |