Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field

To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental perf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2022-09, Vol.14 (17), p.10462
Hauptverfasser: Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana, Fabiani, Claudia, Pisello, Anna Laura, Petrozzi, Alessandro, Milone, Daniele, Cotana, Franco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 17
container_start_page 10462
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 14
creator Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana
Fabiani, Claudia
Pisello, Anna Laura
Petrozzi, Alessandro
Milone, Daniele
Cotana, Franco
description To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su141710462
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2711495819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A746958591</galeid><sourcerecordid>A746958591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-161c474131b4713774b9149dd61d89b0a127a7c7f424df4c6e65e7fd02167c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd9rwjAQx8vYYOJ82j9Q2NMYdbkmbeyjiE5B2Jh72VOJ6aWL1MQlrbj_fhE30LuH-8Hnewd3UXQPZEhpQZ59Bww4EJanV1EvJRwSIBm5Pstvo4H3GxKMUigg70WfU7PXzpotmlY08dh79P5YxFbFwsQLY-xetHqP8VzXX8kbOmXdVhiJ8fSwQ6f_lbXTsmvazmE809hUd9GNEo3HwV_sR6vZ9GMyT5avL4vJeJlIyqFNIAfJOAMKa8aBcs7WBbCiqnKoRsWaCEi54JIrlrJKMZljniFXFUkh55L2o4fT1J2z3x36ttzYzpmwsEw5hEHZCIpADU9ULRostVG2dUIGr3CrpTWodOiPOcsDnxUQBI8XgsC0eGhr0XlfLlbvl-zTiZXOeu9QlbtwFeF-SiDl8TPl2WfoL8YXfuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711495819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana ; Fabiani, Claudia ; Pisello, Anna Laura ; Petrozzi, Alessandro ; Milone, Daniele ; Cotana, Franco</creator><creatorcontrib>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana ; Fabiani, Claudia ; Pisello, Anna Laura ; Petrozzi, Alessandro ; Milone, Daniele ; Cotana, Franco</creatorcontrib><description>To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su141710462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Agricultural innovations ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural products ; Agricultural systems ; Agriculture ; Carbon dioxide ; Drainage systems ; Electronic components ; Emissions ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact analysis ; Food ; Food availability ; Human influences ; Microclimate ; Natural resources ; Population growth ; Productivity ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Sustainability ; Sustainable materials ; Tomatoes ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-09, Vol.14 (17), p.10462</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-161c474131b4713774b9149dd61d89b0a127a7c7f424df4c6e65e7fd02167c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-161c474131b4713774b9149dd61d89b0a127a7c7f424df4c6e65e7fd02167c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8603-9894 ; 0000-0002-4527-6444 ; 0000-0003-1319-2585 ; 0000-0001-5705-5537 ; 0000-0001-9198-8162 ; 0000-0002-7502-8601</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiani, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisello, Anna Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrozzi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milone, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotana, Franco</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural innovations</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural products</subject><subject>Agricultural systems</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Drainage systems</subject><subject>Electronic components</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact analysis</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable materials</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd9rwjAQx8vYYOJ82j9Q2NMYdbkmbeyjiE5B2Jh72VOJ6aWL1MQlrbj_fhE30LuH-8Hnewd3UXQPZEhpQZ59Bww4EJanV1EvJRwSIBm5Pstvo4H3GxKMUigg70WfU7PXzpotmlY08dh79P5YxFbFwsQLY-xetHqP8VzXX8kbOmXdVhiJ8fSwQ6f_lbXTsmvazmE809hUd9GNEo3HwV_sR6vZ9GMyT5avL4vJeJlIyqFNIAfJOAMKa8aBcs7WBbCiqnKoRsWaCEi54JIrlrJKMZljniFXFUkh55L2o4fT1J2z3x36ttzYzpmwsEw5hEHZCIpADU9ULRostVG2dUIGr3CrpTWodOiPOcsDnxUQBI8XgsC0eGhr0XlfLlbvl-zTiZXOeu9QlbtwFeF-SiDl8TPl2WfoL8YXfuc</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana</creator><creator>Fabiani, Claudia</creator><creator>Pisello, Anna Laura</creator><creator>Petrozzi, Alessandro</creator><creator>Milone, Daniele</creator><creator>Cotana, Franco</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8603-9894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-6444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-2585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-5537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9198-8162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-8601</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field</title><author>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana ; Fabiani, Claudia ; Pisello, Anna Laura ; Petrozzi, Alessandro ; Milone, Daniele ; Cotana, Franco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-161c474131b4713774b9149dd61d89b0a127a7c7f424df4c6e65e7fd02167c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural innovations</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural products</topic><topic>Agricultural systems</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Drainage systems</topic><topic>Electronic components</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact analysis</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable materials</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiani, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisello, Anna Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrozzi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milone, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotana, Franco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana</au><au>Fabiani, Claudia</au><au>Pisello, Anna Laura</au><au>Petrozzi, Alessandro</au><au>Milone, Daniele</au><au>Cotana, Franco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>10462</spage><pages>10462-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su141710462</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8603-9894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-6444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-2585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-5537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9198-8162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-8601</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2022-09, Vol.14 (17), p.10462
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2711495819
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural industry
Agricultural innovations
Agricultural land
Agricultural production
Agricultural products
Agricultural systems
Agriculture
Carbon dioxide
Drainage systems
Electronic components
Emissions
Environmental aspects
Environmental assessment
Environmental impact analysis
Food
Food availability
Human influences
Microclimate
Natural resources
Population growth
Productivity
R&D
Research & development
Sustainability
Sustainable materials
Tomatoes
Toxicity
title Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A08%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Assessment%20of%20an%20Innovative%20High-Performance%20Experimental%20Agriculture%20Field&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Frota%20de%20Albuquerque%20Landi,%20Fabiana&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=10462&rft.pages=10462-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su141710462&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA746958591%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711495819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A746958591&rfr_iscdi=true