Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field
To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental perf...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2022-09, Vol.14 (17), p.10462 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 10462 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana Fabiani, Claudia Pisello, Anna Laura Petrozzi, Alessandro Milone, Daniele Cotana, Franco |
description | To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su141710462 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2711495819</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A746958591</galeid><sourcerecordid>A746958591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-161c474131b4713774b9149dd61d89b0a127a7c7f424df4c6e65e7fd02167c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd9rwjAQx8vYYOJ82j9Q2NMYdbkmbeyjiE5B2Jh72VOJ6aWL1MQlrbj_fhE30LuH-8Hnewd3UXQPZEhpQZ59Bww4EJanV1EvJRwSIBm5Pstvo4H3GxKMUigg70WfU7PXzpotmlY08dh79P5YxFbFwsQLY-xetHqP8VzXX8kbOmXdVhiJ8fSwQ6f_lbXTsmvazmE809hUd9GNEo3HwV_sR6vZ9GMyT5avL4vJeJlIyqFNIAfJOAMKa8aBcs7WBbCiqnKoRsWaCEi54JIrlrJKMZljniFXFUkh55L2o4fT1J2z3x36ttzYzpmwsEw5hEHZCIpADU9ULRostVG2dUIGr3CrpTWodOiPOcsDnxUQBI8XgsC0eGhr0XlfLlbvl-zTiZXOeu9QlbtwFeF-SiDl8TPl2WfoL8YXfuc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711495819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana ; Fabiani, Claudia ; Pisello, Anna Laura ; Petrozzi, Alessandro ; Milone, Daniele ; Cotana, Franco</creator><creatorcontrib>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana ; Fabiani, Claudia ; Pisello, Anna Laura ; Petrozzi, Alessandro ; Milone, Daniele ; Cotana, Franco</creatorcontrib><description>To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su141710462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural industry ; Agricultural innovations ; Agricultural land ; Agricultural production ; Agricultural products ; Agricultural systems ; Agriculture ; Carbon dioxide ; Drainage systems ; Electronic components ; Emissions ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental impact analysis ; Food ; Food availability ; Human influences ; Microclimate ; Natural resources ; Population growth ; Productivity ; R&D ; Research & development ; Sustainability ; Sustainable materials ; Tomatoes ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-09, Vol.14 (17), p.10462</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-161c474131b4713774b9149dd61d89b0a127a7c7f424df4c6e65e7fd02167c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-161c474131b4713774b9149dd61d89b0a127a7c7f424df4c6e65e7fd02167c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8603-9894 ; 0000-0002-4527-6444 ; 0000-0003-1319-2585 ; 0000-0001-5705-5537 ; 0000-0001-9198-8162 ; 0000-0002-7502-8601</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27928,27929</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiani, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisello, Anna Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrozzi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milone, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotana, Franco</creatorcontrib><title>Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits.</description><subject>Agricultural industry</subject><subject>Agricultural innovations</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agricultural products</subject><subject>Agricultural systems</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Drainage systems</subject><subject>Electronic components</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact analysis</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable materials</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd9rwjAQx8vYYOJ82j9Q2NMYdbkmbeyjiE5B2Jh72VOJ6aWL1MQlrbj_fhE30LuH-8Hnewd3UXQPZEhpQZ59Bww4EJanV1EvJRwSIBm5Pstvo4H3GxKMUigg70WfU7PXzpotmlY08dh79P5YxFbFwsQLY-xetHqP8VzXX8kbOmXdVhiJ8fSwQ6f_lbXTsmvazmE809hUd9GNEo3HwV_sR6vZ9GMyT5avL4vJeJlIyqFNIAfJOAMKa8aBcs7WBbCiqnKoRsWaCEi54JIrlrJKMZljniFXFUkh55L2o4fT1J2z3x36ttzYzpmwsEw5hEHZCIpADU9ULRostVG2dUIGr3CrpTWodOiPOcsDnxUQBI8XgsC0eGhr0XlfLlbvl-zTiZXOeu9QlbtwFeF-SiDl8TPl2WfoL8YXfuc</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana</creator><creator>Fabiani, Claudia</creator><creator>Pisello, Anna Laura</creator><creator>Petrozzi, Alessandro</creator><creator>Milone, Daniele</creator><creator>Cotana, Franco</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8603-9894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-6444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-2585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-5537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9198-8162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-8601</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field</title><author>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana ; Fabiani, Claudia ; Pisello, Anna Laura ; Petrozzi, Alessandro ; Milone, Daniele ; Cotana, Franco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-161c474131b4713774b9149dd61d89b0a127a7c7f424df4c6e65e7fd02167c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural industry</topic><topic>Agricultural innovations</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agricultural products</topic><topic>Agricultural systems</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Drainage systems</topic><topic>Electronic components</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact analysis</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable materials</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiani, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisello, Anna Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrozzi, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milone, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cotana, Franco</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frota de Albuquerque Landi, Fabiana</au><au>Fabiani, Claudia</au><au>Pisello, Anna Laura</au><au>Petrozzi, Alessandro</au><au>Milone, Daniele</au><au>Cotana, Franco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>10462</spage><pages>10462-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>To increase food availability, optimizing production systems and reducing burdens related to human activities is essential in a scenario of population growth and limited natural resources. In this context, the life cycle methodology can represent a valuable asset for assessing the environmental performance of agricultural products and services. This study sought to investigate and characterize potential impacts of an experimental tomato field at the University of Perugia and evaluate if the production increment obtained using high-reflective mulching compensated for the emissions caused by this extra component. The first-year crop campaign was the baseline reference to measure the system’s efficiency. A CML baseline method applied demonstrated that the covered field (F1) was associated with more than 23 kg CO2 eq emissions (25% attributed to the mulch) in comparison to about 18 kg CO2 eq of the non-covered sector (F2). In addition, electronic components and drainage systems were linked with most toxicity indicators. However, the F1 field’s higher productivity compensated for the mulch impact, resulting in 9% lower CO2 equivalent emissions per kg yield in the first year and 18% lower each year for 30 years. The results encourage application of this approach in urban contexts with several benefits.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su141710462</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8603-9894</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4527-6444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-2585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5705-5537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9198-8162</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-8601</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-09, Vol.14 (17), p.10462 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2711495819 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural industry Agricultural innovations Agricultural land Agricultural production Agricultural products Agricultural systems Agriculture Carbon dioxide Drainage systems Electronic components Emissions Environmental aspects Environmental assessment Environmental impact analysis Food Food availability Human influences Microclimate Natural resources Population growth Productivity R&D Research & development Sustainability Sustainable materials Tomatoes Toxicity |
title | Environmental Assessment of an Innovative High-Performance Experimental Agriculture Field |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A08%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Environmental%20Assessment%20of%20an%20Innovative%20High-Performance%20Experimental%20Agriculture%20Field&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Frota%20de%20Albuquerque%20Landi,%20Fabiana&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=10462&rft.pages=10462-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su141710462&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA746958591%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711495819&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A746958591&rfr_iscdi=true |